How is model Meta class different from model form Meta class? - django-models

I wanted to understand the metaclasses we use in the model. I found about it in docs. I remember adding metaclass in model forms as well. It seems like model metaclass and model form metaclass is different. How are they different and what are the meta options in the model form.

In Epistemology, meta is a (ancient) Greek word means about. It is thus a class that says something about the model, or the ModelForm. The name is basically the only thing they have in common.
The Meta class of a model will specify the verbose name, etc. of a model, constraints and indexes defined in the corresponding database table, etc. The Django documentation has a section that lists all the Meta options for a model.
The Meta of a ModelForm on the other hand will explain to the ModelForm how it should construct a form for the given model. Normally it the Meta one defines the model for which the ModelForm is constructed together with the fields or exclude that specify what fields to include/exclude respectively. Furthermore the Overriding default fields section of the documentation lists all other Meta options, where a user can (slightly) alter the way how the fields are defined in the ModelForm. The source code [GitHub] also lists all the options for the Meta of ModelForm:
class ModelFormOptions:
def __init__(self, options=None):
self.model = getattr(options, 'model', None)
self.fields = getattr(options, 'fields', None)
self.exclude = getattr(options, 'exclude', None)
self.widgets = getattr(options, 'widgets', None)
self.localized_fields = getattr(options, 'localized_fields', None)
self.labels = getattr(options, 'labels', None)
self.help_texts = getattr(options, 'help_texts', None)
self.error_messages = getattr(options, 'error_messages', None)
self.field_classes = getattr(options, 'field_classes', None)

Related

Allowing Edit to editable=False Fields in Django Admin

DRF will use the editable=False on a field to default the Serializer to read-only. This is a very helpful / safe default that I take advantage of (ie I won't forget to set the Serializer to read-only). That being said once I have set editable=False is there any way to then force the Django admin to allow editing one of those fields?
Presumably the admin is a super user and I do want him to be able to change the fields value but fore safety I want the default Serializer logic to be read only.
UPDATE
I don't actually need to be able to edit the field as much as "set-it" when I create the object.
You are going about this the wrong way.
Your models should be the most pure implementation of the things you are modelling. If something about a model is fixed (for example a creation date) it shouldn't be editable in the model, if its mutable, then leave as editable in the model.
Otherwise, in the future you (or someone else) might be stuck wondering why a field which is set to editable=False is some how being changed. Especially as the documentation states:
If False, the field will not be displayed in the admin or any other ModelForm. They are also skipped during model validation.
If you have one view in which it shouldn't be editable (such as in the API), then override it there.
If you have multiple serilaizers for a model, instead make an abstract serializer with a read_only_fields set and then subclass that. For example:
class AbstractFooSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Foo
read_only_fields = ('bar',)
class MainFooSerializer(AbstractFooSerializer):
pass
class DifferentFooSerializer(AbstractFooSerializer):
pass
If you really, really want to use editable=False, but allow the item to be edited in the Admin site only on creation you have an up hill battle.
Probably the best approach would be to reimplement the AdminForm you are using for the Admin
So instead of:
class FooAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
Use:
class FooAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
form = MySpecialForm
Then declare the form:
class MySpecialForm(forms.Model):
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
self.is_new = False
if kwargs.get('instance',None) is None:
# There is no instance, thus its a new item
self.is_new = True
self.fields['one_time_field'] = forms.CharField() # Or what have you.
super(MySpecialForm, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
def save(self, commit=True):
instance = super(MySpecialForm, self).save(commit)
if self.is_new:
instance.your_one_time_only_field = self.one_time_field
instance.save()
return instance
Note: you will need to manually add a field and save each readonly field that you want to do this for. This may or may not be 100% functional.
For those who want to allow editing of a non-editabled field only during creation (no instance.pk, yet):
# models.py
class Entity(Model):
name = CharField(max_length=200, unique=True, null=False, blank=False, editable=False)
# admin.py
#register(Entity)
class EntityAdmin(ModelAdmin):
def get_readonly_fields(self, request, obj=None):
if obj: # This is the case when obj is already created i.e. it's an edit
return ['id', 'name']
else:
return []
# this override prevents that the new_name field shows up in the change form if it's not a creation
def get_form(self, request, obj=None, **kwargs):
orig_self_form = self.form
if not obj:
self.form = CreateEntityForm
result = super().get_form(request, obj=obj, **kwargs)
self.form = orig_self_form
return result
# forms.py
class CreateEntityForm(ModelForm):
new_name = CharField(max_length=200, min_length=2, label='Name', required=True)
def clean_new_name(self):
code = self.cleaned_data['new_name']
# validate uniqueness - if you need
exists = Entity.objects.filter(name=code).first()
if exists:
raise ValidationError('Entity with this name already exists: {}', exists)
return name
def save(self, commit=True):
if self.instance.pk:
raise NotImplementedError('Editing of existing Entity is not allowed!')
self.instance.name = self.cleaned_data['new_name'].upper()
return super().save(commit)
class Meta:
model = Entity
fields = ['new_name']
exclude = ['id', 'name']

Simple PUT not modifying the model

The route is shown below and I can confirm the request is hitting the route, however, the model parameter is the currently saved model, when I'd expect it to be the model with updated properties.
#Page.method(request_fields=('id',),
path='page/{id}', http_method='PUT', name='page.udpate')
def PageUpdate(self, model):
if not model.from_datastore:
raise endpoints.NotFoundException('MyModel not found.')
model.put()
return model
The request_fields field specifies what comes in the request, so you'll want to include a lot more. The _message_fields_schema property (discussed in simple_get example) is best to use.
class Page(EndpointsModel):
_message_fields_schema = ('id', ... other properties)
and then just let the default be used:
#Page.method(path='page/{id}', http_method='PUT', name='page.update')
def PageUpdate(self, page):
if not page.from_datastore:
raise endpoints.NotFoundException('Page not found.')
page.put()
return page
NOTE: I also changed the spelling of 'page.udpate' and the text in the error message.

How to use hyperlinks to represent relationships instead of primary keys in Django REST framework

I want to get my object index as a "resource_uri" instead id
I take the usual way I make a model , views , serializers :
class User(BaseModel):
user = models.ForeignKey(settings.AUTH_USER_MODEL)
models.CharField()
class UserSerailizers(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = User
fields = ('id','user','formatted_address')
classclass UserList(generics.ListCreateAPIView):
queryset = Image.objects.all()
serializer_class = UserSerializer
when i call < my_domain/user/ > I get this response
{
id:1,
name:'toto'
}
but I want to have an answer to this form:
{
'url': my_domain/user/1/
'name': 'toto'
}
Any thoughts?
If you want a hyperlink instead of a primary key in your model representations, you have to use either HyperlinkedModelSerializer or more generic Serializer along with HyperlinkedIdentityField and/or HyperlinkedRelatedField. The former is probably what you are looking for.
The HyperlinkedModelSerializer class is similar to the ModelSerializer class except that it uses hyperlinks to represent relationships, rather than primary keys.
See Django REST framework documentation for more details.
As already commented, you need to use the HyperlinkedModelSerializer as you've shown.
The lookup_field attribute should be inside the Meta class.
And the latest and this is a guess: You just have a ListView for your User model. In order to show the detail for the user, you need also the retrieve method. I would recommend you using the ModelViewset so it automatically implements all methods.

Django: Single model for multiple tables

I have a main table
Slideshow
then a site specific table that captures a few extra details for that site.
Site1_Slideshow
In a web app (specific to a site) i want a single model i.e. Slideshow that combines the 2 tables above.
Currently i have the code below, but i dont think this is correct. I cant do things like
s = Slideshow.objects.get(slideshowId=1) as Slideshows only has the properties featurecategory and slideshow. So how can i have an model called Slideshow that is composed of these 2 tables but looks like it was a single db table.
class SlideshowAbstract(models.Model):
slideshowid = models.IntegerField(primary_key=True, db_column=u'SlideshowId') # Field name made lowercase.
headline = models.TextField(db_column=u'Headline') # Field name made lowercase.
class Meta:
db_table = u'Slideshow'
class Slideshow(models.Model):
slideshow = models.OneToOneField(SlideshowAbstract, primary_key=True,db_column=u'SlideshowId')
def __unicode__(self):
return self.slideshow.headline
class Meta:
db_table = u'Site1_Slideshow'
Think i found the solution.
On the Site1_Slideshow you need to add a column for django to use, that i presume is always the same as primary key value.
Its name is SlideshowAbstract_ptr_id
Once that is added you can change the Slideshow model to be
class Slideshow(SlideshowAbstract):
featureCategory = models.ForeignKey(Featurecategory,db_column=u'FeatureCategoryId')
def __unicode__(self):
return self.headline
class Meta:
db_table = u'Site1_Slideshow'
So doable but not the nicest if you are not doing "model first" and already have the schema. Would be good to be able to override the name of the _ptr_id column.
I did try adding the following to Slideshow too see if i could map this ptr col to the primary key
slideshowabstract_ptr_id = models.IntegerField(primary_key=True, db_column=u'SlideshowId')
but no cigar.
I havent tested inserts either but ...objects.all() works

Django, autogenerate one-to-many tables, and database structure

I am using django for a website where I have a database with users, people, locations, items and so on. Know i find that I need some extra information that requires one-to-many relations like Aliases for most of these tables.
Should I (1) create a common alias table for all of these by using the content type framework (will probably end up with billions of rows), or should I (2) create a alias table for each of these. If the latter one, how do I auto-create one-to-many table like this by just adding a single line like this
"alias = Ailias()"
in each model. I`m sure I saw an app doing something like that way a while ago, I think is was a reversion app of some kind. Even if the second method is not suited i would love tho understand how to do it. I do not know what to search after to find an explanation of this.
I plan to add Haystack with Solr to this, so method 2 might add much extra work there. But I do not have much experience with it jet, so I might be wrong.
PS: ended up wih method one.
Manage to do what I wanted in method 2, easily generate one-to-many fields. Not sure if this is the easiest way, or the best way. If someone has a better way of doing it, I would love to learn it. I am a long way from a django expert, so I might have meddled with some unnecessary complex stuff to do what I wanted.
This example creates an easy way of adding a one-to-many alias relationship.
Alias Managers
class AliasManagerDescriptor(object):
def __init__(self, model,fkName):
self.model = model
self.fkName = fkName
def __get__(self, instance, owner):
if instance is None:
return AliasManager(self.model,self.fkName)
return AliasManager(self.model, self.fkName, instance)
class AliasManager(models.Manager):
def __init__(self, model,fkName, instance=None):
super(AliasManager, self).__init__()
self.model = model
self.instance = instance
#Name of FK linking this model to linked model
self.fkName=fkName
def get_query_set(self):
"""
Get query set, or only get instances from this model that is linked
to the chosen instance from the linked model if one is chosen
"""
if self.instance is None:
return super(AliasManager, self).get_query_set()
if isinstance(self.instance._meta.pk, models.OneToOneField):
#TODO: Checkif this part works, not checked
filter = {self.instance._meta.pk.name+"_id":self.instance.pk}
else:
filter = {self.fkName: self.instance.pk}
return super(AliasManager, self).get_query_set().filter(**filter)
def create(self,**kwargs):
"""
Create alias instances. If FK is not given then it is automatically set
to the chosen instance from the linked model
"""
if self.fkName not in kwargs:
kwargs[self.fkName]=self.instance
print kwargs
super(AliasManager, self).create(**kwargs)
Alias Models
class Alias(object):
def contribute_to_class(self, cls, name):
self.manager_name = name
aliasModel = self.create_alias_model(cls)
descriptor = AliasManagerDescriptor(aliasModel,cls._meta.object_name.lower())
setattr(cls, self.manager_name, descriptor)
def create_alias_model(self, model):
"""
Creates a alias model to associate with the model provided.
"""
attrs = {
#'id': models.AutoField(primary_key=True),
"name": models.CharField(max_length=255),
#Not sure which to use of the two next methods
model._meta.object_name.lower(): models.ForeignKey(model),
#model._meta.object_name.lower(): AliasObjectDescriptor(model),
'__unicode__': lambda self: u'%s' % self.name,
'__module__': model.__module__
}
attrs.update(Meta=type('Meta', (), self.get_meta_options(model)))
name = '%s_alias' % model._meta.object_name
return type(name, (models.Model,), attrs)
def get_meta_options(self, model):
"""
Returns a dictionary of fields that will be added to
the Meta inner class.
"""
return {
}
"""class AliasObjectDescriptor(object):
def __init__(self, model):
self.model = model
def __get__(self, instance, owner):
values = (getattr(instance, f.attname) for f in self.model._meta.fields)
return self.model(*values)"""
Person Model - Only need to add "alias = Alias()" to a model to add a one-to-many alias field.
class Person(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=30,blank=True,null=True)
age = models.IntegerField(blank=True,null=True)
alias = Alias()
Now you I can do something like this:
per = Person(name="Per",age=99)
per.save()
per.alias.create(name="Mr.P")
per_alias = per.alias.all().values_list("name",flat=True)

Resources