I generated a PageBuilder different UI-Models (TextBlocks, Images) for creating a XAMLLayout.
For this I placed all my Elements on a Canvas and save the complete Canvas to a Xaml-File (With the XamlWriter.Save-Method).
Now I need to generate Charts and serialize them.
With the OxyPlot-Library i used this code for generating the code via runtime.
OxyPlot.Wpf.PlotView pv = new OxyPlot.Wpf.PlotView();
OxyPlot.PlotModel pm = new OxyPlot.PlotModel();
pv.Height = 300;
pv.Width = 500;
pv.Background = Brushes.Red;
pm.Title = "Test";
pm.Series.Add(new OxyPlot.Series.FunctionSeries(Math.Cos, 0, 10, 0.1, "cos(x)"));
pv.Model = pm;
canvas.Children.Add(pv);
For the serialisation I just call my Canvas and serialize the whole objects like this this:
XamlWriter.Save(canvas);
Durring this process I got an exception:
System.InvalidOperationException: "The generic type" System.Collections.Generic.List`1 [OxyPlot.OxyColor] "can not be serialized."
At this point, Generic type only has very limited support in xaml.
XamlWriter cannot serialize a property of a generic list type. You can try the following workaround to fix the issue.
public class OxyPlot
{
public OxyColors OxyColor { get; set; }
}
public class OxyColors : List<OxyColor>
{
}
public class OxyColor
{
}
Related
I would like to cut the extra text and display three dots(...) and when user clicks on the cell, everthing has to be displayed. how to calculate the width of the property grid cell and cut the text. Any help will be grateful.
Pictures are attached for explanation
Instead of this
I would like to achieve this
and it should vary according to the cell size
The property grid does not allow that and you cannot customize it to do so using any official way.
However, here is some sample code that seems to work. It uses a TypeConverter to reduce the value from the grid's size.
Use at your own risk as it relies on PropertyGrid's internal methods and may have an impact on performance, since it requires a refresh on the whole grid on each resize.
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
// note this may have an impact on performance
propertyGrid1.SizeChanged += (sender, e) => propertyGrid1.Refresh();
var t = new Test();
t.MyStringProperty = "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog";
propertyGrid1.SelectedObject = t;
}
}
public class AutoSizeConverter : TypeConverter
{
public override object ConvertTo(ITypeDescriptorContext context, CultureInfo culture, object value, Type destinationType)
{
if (value == null)
return null;
// small trick to get PropertyGrid control (view) from context
var view = (Control)context.GetService(typeof(IWindowsFormsEditorService));
// bigger trick (hack) to get value column width & font
int width = (int)view.GetType().GetMethod("GetValueWidth").Invoke(view, null);
var font = (Font)view.GetType().GetMethod("GetBoldFont").Invoke(view, null); // or GetBaseFont
// note: the loop is not super elegant and may probably be improved in terms of performance using some of the other TextRenderer overloads
string s = value.ToString();
string ellipsis = s;
do
{
var size = TextRenderer.MeasureText(ellipsis, font);
if (size.Width < width)
return ellipsis;
s = s.Substring(0, s.Length - 1);
ellipsis = s + "...";
}
while (true);
}
}
public class Test
{
// we use a custom type converter
[TypeConverter(typeof(AutoSizeConverter))]
public string MyStringProperty { get; set; }
}
Here is the result (supports resize):
I have just started using gmap.net and I was looking for the functionality of adding labels under the markers. I see there's tooltips but I would like to have a constant label under my marker with a one word description.
I searched for docs or other answers but I cannot find anything which leads me to believe that it is not implemented. If someone can verify this I would appreciate it.
You need to create your own custom marker.
Based on the source of GMapMarker and the derived GMarkerGoogle I came up with this simplified example:
public class GmapMarkerWithLabel : GMapMarker, ISerializable
{
private Font font;
private GMarkerGoogle innerMarker;
public string Caption;
public GmapMarkerWithLabel(PointLatLng p, string caption, GMarkerGoogleType type)
: base(p)
{
font = new Font("Arial", 14);
innerMarker = new GMarkerGoogle(p, type);
Caption = caption;
}
public override void OnRender(Graphics g)
{
if (innerMarker != null)
{
innerMarker.OnRender(g);
}
g.DrawString(Caption, font, Brushes.Black, new PointF(0.0f, innerMarker.Size.Height));
}
public override void Dispose()
{
if(innerMarker != null)
{
innerMarker.Dispose();
innerMarker = null;
}
base.Dispose();
}
#region ISerializable Members
void ISerializable.GetObjectData(SerializationInfo info, StreamingContext context)
{
base.GetObjectData(info, context);
}
protected GmapMarkerWithLabel(SerializationInfo info, StreamingContext context)
: base(info, context)
{
}
#endregion
}
Usage (assuming a GMap instance named gm):
GMapOverlay markerOverlay = new GMapOverlay("markers");
gm.Overlays.Add(markerOverlay);
var labelMarker = new GmapMarkerWithLabel(new PointLatLng(53.3, 9), "caption text", GMarkerGoogleType.blue);
markerOverlay.Markers.Add(labelMarker)
I'll answer here because this is the first question that pops up when looking to display a text marker for the WPF GMAP.NET library. Displaying a text marker with the WPF version of the library is actually much easier than in WinForms, or at least than the accepted answer.
The GMapMarker in WPF has a Shape property of type UIElement, which means you can provide a System.Windows.Controls.TextBlock object to display a text marker :
Markers.Add(new GMapMarker(new PointLatLng(latitude, longitude))
{
Shape = new System.Windows.Controls.TextBlock(new System.Windows.Documents.Run("Label"))
});
Since the marker displays the top left portion of the shape at the given position, you can play with the GMapMarker.Offset property to adjust the text position according to its dimensions. For instance, if you want the text to be horizontally centered on the marker's position :
var textBlock = new TextBlock(new Run("Label"));
textBlock.Measure(new Size(double.PositiveInfinity, double.PositiveInfinity));
textBlock.Arrange(new Rect(textBlock.DesiredSize));
Markers.Add(new GMapMarker(new PointLatLng(request.Latitude, request.Longitude))
{
Offset = new Point(-textBlock.ActualWidth / 2, 0),
Shape = textBlock
});
The solution to get the TextBlock's dimensions was quickly taken from this question, so if you need a more accurate way of getting the block's dimensions to play with the offset I suggest you start from there.
(I didn't find a way to do this, from source code it appears it is not supported, but I might have overlooked it)
I would like to do something akin to:
(new Fixture())
.CreateAnonymous<Circle>(
new CircleSpecification { MinRadius = 1, MaxRadius = 5 }
);
So this is a variation on a similar seed-idiom present in AutoFixture already, but seed idiom is very hard coded (or so I think).
Quiestion: Is it possible to customize a fixture to accept an argument for a specimen?
The best idea I have so far is to build a special Specification class that includes the result object, so that you can do:
public class CircleSpecification {
public double MinRadius { get; set; }
public double MaxRadius { get; set; }
public Circle Circle { get; set; }
}
so that I can register CircleSpecificationSpecimenBuilder that can be used:
Circle circle = Fixture.CreateAnonymous<CircleSpecification>(
new CircleSpecification { MinRadius = 0.0, MaxRadius = 5.0 }).Circle;
notice that to use CreateAnonymous with seed overload seed argument type has to match method return type.
If you want to assign a value while creating an anonymous instance of Circle you can use the Build method:
var fixture = new Fixture();
var c = fixture
.Build<Circle>()
.With(x => x.Radius, 3)
.CreateAnonymous();
However, if there's nothing special about the Radius property, why not simply assign it a value afterwards?
var fixture = new Fixture();
var c = fixture.CreateAnonymous<Circle>();
c.Radius = 3;
The latter option is much more declarative, and will enable you to use AutoFixture's xUnit.net integration to write a much terser test that removes all the accidental complexity:
[Theory, AutoData]
public void Test3(Circle c)
{
c.Radius = 3;
// Act and assert here
}
I have built custom WPF Control which unique function is displaying text. I tried using TextBlock from System.Windows.Controls namespace but it's not working for me (I have ~10000 strings with different position and too much memory loss). So I tried making my own control by inheriting FrameworkElement, overriding OnRender method which now contain single line:
drawingContext.DrawText(...);
But...
I get a little confusing result.
After comparing performance for 10000 objects, I realized that the time needed for creating and adding to Canvas is still ~10 sec, and memory usage for my application raises from ~32MB to ~60MB !!!
So no benefits at all.
Can anyone explain why this happens, and what is the other way to create simple (simple = allocate less memory, take less time to create) visual with two functions:
display text
set position (using thickness or TranslateTransform)
Thanks.
Check out AvalonEdit
Also not sure how you are storing the strings, but have you used StringBuilder before?
Here is my code (a little bit modified):
public class SimpleTextBlock : FrameworkElement
{
#region Static
private const double _fontSize = 12;
private static Point _emptyPoint;
private static Typeface _typeface;
private static LinearGradientBrush _textBrush;
public readonly static DependencyProperty TextWidthProperty;
static SimpleTextBlock()
{
_emptyPoint = new Point();
_typeface = new Typeface(new FontFamily("Sergoe UI"), FontStyles.Normal, FontWeights.Normal, FontStretches.Normal);
GradientStopCollection GSC = new GradientStopCollection(2);
GSC.Add(new GradientStop(Color.FromArgb(160, 255, 255, 255), 0.0));
GSC.Add(new GradientStop(Color.FromArgb(160, 180, 200, 255), 0.7));
_textBrush = new LinearGradientBrush(GSC, 90);
_textBrush.Freeze();
SimpleTextBlock.TextWidthProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(
"TextWidth",
typeof(double),
typeof(SimpleTextBlock),
new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(0.0d, FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions.AffectsRender));
}
#endregion
FormattedText _formattedText;
public SimpleTextBlock(string text)
{
_formattedText = new FormattedText(text, System.Globalization.CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, FlowDirection.LeftToRight, _typeface, _fontSize, _textBrush);
}
public SimpleTextBlock(string text, FlowDirection FlowDirection)
{
_formattedText = new FormattedText(text, System.Globalization.CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, FlowDirection, _typeface, _fontSize, _textBrush);
}
protected override void OnRender(DrawingContext drawingContext)
{
_formattedText.MaxTextWidth = (double)GetValue(TextWidthProperty);
drawingContext.DrawText(_formattedText, _emptyPoint);
}
public double TextWidth
{
get { return (double)base.GetValue(TextWidthProperty); }
set { base.SetValue(TextWidthProperty, value); }
}
public double ActualTextWidth
{
get { return _formattedText.Width; }
}
public double ActualTextHeight
{
get { return _formattedText.Height; }
}
}
Since it sounds like we determined you should stylize a control like listbox, here are some examples of different things you can do:
Use Images as Items
Stylized and Binding
Honestly it all depends on what you want it to look like. WPF is great in how much control it gives you on how something looks.
Crazy example using a listbox to make the planet's orbits
I'm trying to drag data from the Winforms portion of my application on a WPF controls that's contained inside an "ElementHost". And it crashes when I try doing so.
Trying the same thing but from Winforms to Winforms works fine. (See example code below)
I need help on making this work... have any clues what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks!
Example:
In the sample code below, I'm just trying to drag a custom MyContainerClass object created when initating the drag on the label control on a 1) System.Windows.Forms.TextBox (Winforms) and 2) System.Windows.TextBox (WPF, added to an ElementHost).
Case 1) works fine but case 2) is crashing when trying to retrieve the drop data using GetData(). GetDataPresent("WindowsFormsApplication1.MyContainerClass") returns "true" so In theory, I should be able to retrive my drop data of that type like in Winforms.
Here is the stack trace of the crash:
"Error HRESULT E_FAIL has been returned from a call to a COM component" with the following stack trace:
at System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ThrowExceptionForHRInternal(Int32 errorCode, IntPtr errorInfo)
at System.Windows.Forms.DataObject.GetDataIntoOleStructs(FORMATETC& formatetc, STGMEDIUM& medium)
at System.Windows.Forms.DataObject.System.Runtime.InteropServices.ComTypes.IDataObject.GetDataHere(FORMATETC& formatetc, STGMEDIUM& medium)
at System.Windows.Forms.DataObject.System.Runtime.InteropServices.ComTypes.IDataObject.GetData(FORMATETC& formatetc, STGMEDIUM& medium)
at System.Windows.DataObject.OleConverter.GetDataInner(FORMATETC& formatetc, STGMEDIUM& medium)
at System.Windows.DataObject.OleConverter.GetDataFromOleHGLOBAL(String format, DVASPECT aspect, Int32 index)
at System.Windows.DataObject.OleConverter.GetDataFromBoundOleDataObject(String format, DVASPECT aspect, Int32 index)
at System.Windows.DataObject.OleConverter.GetData(String format, Boolean autoConvert, DVASPECT aspect, Int32 index)
at System.Windows.DataObject.OleConverter.GetData(String format, Boolean autoConvert)
at System.Windows.DataObject.GetData(String format, Boolean autoConvert)
at System.Windows.DataObject.GetData(String format)
at WindowsFormsApplication1.Form1.textBox_PreviewDragEnter(Object sender, DragEventArgs e) in WindowsFormsApplication1\WindowsFormsApplication1\Form1.cs:line 48
Here is some code:
// -- Add an ElementHost to your form --
// -- Add a label to your form --
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
System.Windows.Controls.TextBox textBox = new System.Windows.Controls.TextBox();
textBox.Text = "WPF TextBox";
textBox.AllowDrop = true;
elementHost2.Child = textBox;
textBox.PreviewDragEnter += new System.Windows.DragEventHandler(textBox_PreviewDragEnter);
System.Windows.Forms.TextBox wfTextBox = new System.Windows.Forms.TextBox();
wfTextBox.Text = "Winforms TextBox";
wfTextBox.AllowDrop = true;
wfTextBox.DragEnter += new DragEventHandler(wfTextBox_DragEnter);
Controls.Add(wfTextBox);
}
void wfTextBox_DragEnter(object sender, DragEventArgs e)
{
bool dataPresent = e.Data.GetDataPresent("WindowsFormsApplication1.MyContainerClass");
// NO CRASH here!
object data = e.Data.GetData("WindowsFormsApplication1.MyContainerClass");
}
void textBox_PreviewDragEnter(object sender, System.Windows.DragEventArgs e)
{
bool dataPresent = e.Data.GetDataPresent("WindowsFormsApplication1.MyContainerClass");
// Crash appens here!!
// {"Error HRESULT E_FAIL has been returned from a call to a COM component."}
object data = e.Data.GetData("WindowsFormsApplication1.MyContainerClass");
}
private void label1_MouseDown(object sender, MouseEventArgs e)
{
label1.DoDragDrop(new MyContainerClass(label1.Text), DragDropEffects.Copy);
}
}
public class MyContainerClass
{
public object Data { get; set; }
public MyContainerClass(object data)
{
Data = data;
}
}
#Pedery & jmayor: Thanks for the suggestions guys! (see my findings below)
After quite a few experimentation, trials and errors, and a bit of "Reflector'ing", I managed to figure out exactly why I was receiving the cryptic error message "Error HRESULT E_FAIL has been returned from a call to a COM component".
It was due to the fact that when dragging data WPF <-> Winforms in a same app, that data has to be Serializable!
I've checked how difficult it would be to transform all of our classes to "Serializable" and I would have a been a real pain for a couple of reasons... one, we would need to practically make all of classes serializable and two, some of these classes have references to Controls! And Controls aren't serializable. So a major refactoring would have been needed.
So... since we wanted to pass any object of any class to drag from/to WPF inside the same application, I decided to create a wrapper class, with the Serializable attribute and implementing ISerializable. I would have 1 contructor with 1 parameter of type "object" which would be the actual drag data. That wrapper, when serializing/de-serializing, would serialize not the object itself... but rather the IntPtr to the object (which we can do since we only want that functionnality inside our 1 instance only application.) See code sample below:
[Serializable]
public class DataContainer : ISerializable
{
public object Data { get; set; }
public DataContainer(object data)
{
Data = data;
}
// Deserialization constructor
protected DataContainer(SerializationInfo info, StreamingContext context)
{
IntPtr address = (IntPtr)info.GetValue("dataAddress", typeof(IntPtr));
GCHandle handle = GCHandle.FromIntPtr(address);
Data = handle.Target;
handle.Free();
}
#region ISerializable Members
public void GetObjectData(SerializationInfo info, StreamingContext context)
{
GCHandle handle = GCHandle.Alloc(Data);
IntPtr address = GCHandle.ToIntPtr(handle);
info.AddValue("dataAddress", address);
}
#endregion
}
To keep the IDataObject functionnality, I created the following DataObject wrapper:
public class DataObject : IDataObject
{
System.Collections.Hashtable _Data = new System.Collections.Hashtable();
public DataObject() { }
public DataObject(object data)
{
SetData(data);
}
public DataObject(string format, object data)
{
SetData(format, data);
}
#region IDataObject Members
public object GetData(Type format)
{
return _Data[format.FullName];
}
public bool GetDataPresent(Type format)
{
return _Data.ContainsKey(format.FullName);
}
public string[] GetFormats()
{
string[] strArray = new string[_Data.Keys.Count];
_Data.Keys.CopyTo(strArray, 0);
return strArray;
}
public string[] GetFormats(bool autoConvert)
{
return GetFormats();
}
private void SetData(object data, string format)
{
object obj = new DataContainer(data);
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(format))
{
// Create a dummy DataObject object to retrieve all possible formats.
// Ex.: For a System.String type, GetFormats returns 3 formats:
// "System.String", "UnicodeText" and "Text"
System.Windows.Forms.DataObject dataObject = new System.Windows.Forms.DataObject(data);
foreach (string fmt in dataObject.GetFormats())
{
_Data[fmt] = obj;
}
}
else
{
_Data[format] = obj;
}
}
public void SetData(object data)
{
SetData(data, null);
}
#endregion
}
And we are using the above classes like this:
myControl.DoDragDrop(new MyNamespace.DataObject(myNonSerializableObject));
// in the drop event for example
e.Data.GetData(typeof(myNonSerializableClass));
I know I know... it's not very pretty... but it's doing what we wanted. We also created a dragdrop helper class which masks the DataObject creation and has templated GetData functions to retrieve the data without any cast... a bit like:
myNonSerializableClass newObj = DragDropHelper.GetData<myNonSerializableClass>(e.Data);
So thanks again for the replies! You guys gave me good ideas where to look at for possible solutions!
-Oli
I had a "similar" issue some time ago so I can at least tell you what I found out.
It seems .Net is resorting to OLE remoting when drag/drop operations are performed in but the simplest of cases. For some reason GetDataPresent will in these cases be successful and GetData will fail. This is furthermore mystified by the fact that there are several versions of the IDataObject in the .Net framework.
Windows Forms defaults to System.Windows.Forms.IDataObject. However, in your case you could try to give System.Runtime.InteropServices.ComTypes.IDataObject a shot instead. You can also check out my discussion here.
Hope this helps.
Seems wonderfull at first sight. I tried it but got some errors on implementations.
I began to correct some errors when I decided to look for something a little bit more simplier, that do not have pointers (humm I don't like that, particularly with carbage collection, but I have no idea if it could have real impact) and that do not use Interop.
I come up with that. It works for me and I hope it will work for anybody else. It is only intended to be used for local drag drop (inside the same app).
How to use to drag:
DragDrop.DoDragDrop(listBoxOfAvailableScopes, new DragDropLocal(GetSelectedSimulResultScopes()),
DragDropEffects.Copy);
How to use to drop (get):
DragDropLocal dragDropLocal = (DragDropLocal)e.Data.GetData(typeof(DragDropLocal));
SimulResultScopes simulResultScopes = (SimulResultScopes)dragDropLocal.GetObject();
Code:
namespace Util
{
[Serializable]
public class DragDropLocal
{
private static readonly Dictionary<Guid, object> _dictOfDragDropLocalKeyToDragDropSource = new Dictionary<Guid, object>();
private Guid _guid = Guid.NewGuid();
public DragDropLocal(object objToDrag)
{
_dictOfDragDropLocalKeyToDragDropSource.Add(_guid, objToDrag);
}
public object GetObject()
{
object obj;
_dictOfDragDropLocalKeyToDragDropSource.TryGetValue(_guid, out obj);
return obj;
}
~DragDropLocal()
{
_dictOfDragDropLocalKeyToDragDropSource.Remove(_guid);
}
}
}
Maybe the events are in the opposite way. The PreviewDragEnter should be related with the WPFTextBox. Also watch out the DragEventArgs class. There is one in System.Windows.Form ( Windows Form version) and the one under System.Windows( for WPF version).