I have successfully linked my account with Amazon. After the account linking process is done how can i get the Echo ID to store it my database.
how do i get the accessToken
Is there any way where i can get these data?
Related
I am trying to get "/groups" endpoint of Microsoft Graph API in my tenants via Azure Data Factory. I have given "Delegated permission" for my service principal. To my knowledge, when there is no user to act on behalf of, we should use "Application permission".
However, organization requirement does not allow me to use Application permission.
Therefore, when I try to execute my pipeline, I get "insufficient privileges to complete the operation."
Can this be the reason because ADF does not allow to use delegated permissions as there is no user to act on behalf of?
I tried to reproduce the same in my environment to get groups endpoint using graph api from ADF
And got same error:
Insufficient privileges to complete the operation
Make sure you have Microsoft graph permissions to query groups and users.
The user here do not has Data Factory contributor role .
Or make sure you ADF has proper access to the resources .So give it contributor role
And if your are using storage account to store the rest response, make sure user , app or group has Storage blob data contributor role.
Reference:
Copy and transform data from and to a REST endpoint - Azure Data Factory & Azure Synapse | Microsoft Learn
We have an application which parses the Audit Logs emitted by Azure AD. More specifically we are parsing the 'Update application' log to detect when a new Role has been added to an Application (see example below).
We would like to find out more information about the "DirectAccessGrantTypes" and "ImpersonationAccessGrantTypes" fields. If someone can point us to documentation for this that would be great.
[{"EntitlementEncodingVersion":2,"EntitlementId":"654a4f1f-1b7f-4354-a6d6-fcf7346af0ec","IsDisabled":true,"Origin":0,"Name":"Data Manager","Description":"Manager for test app","Definition":null,"ClaimValue":"DataManager","ResourceScopeType":0,"IsPrivate":false,"UserConsentDisplayName":null,"UserConsentDescription":null,"DirectAccessGrantTypes":[20],"ImpersonationAccessGrantTypes":[],"EntitlementCategory":0,"DependentMicrosoftGraphPermissions":[]},{"EntitlementEncodingVersion":2,"EntitlementId":"3d03256d-cf0c-4553-b8af-98d7ebbee1f2","IsDisabled":false,"Origin":0,"Name":"Application Manager","Description":"Admin for test app","Definition":null,"ClaimValue":"ApplicationManager","ResourceScopeType":0,"IsPrivate":false,"UserConsentDisplayName":null,"UserConsentDescription":null,"DirectAccessGrantTypes":[20],"ImpersonationAccessGrantTypes":[],"EntitlementCategory":0,"DependentMicrosoftGraphPermissions":[]},{"EntitlementEncodingVersion":2,"EntitlementId":"88d0d3e3-b661-4760-aea3-f4548db1ff96","IsDisabled":false,"Origin":0,"Name":"Read","Description":"Allow users to add a admin consent","Definition":null,"ClaimValue":"Read","ResourceScopeType":0,"IsPrivate":false,"UserConsentDisplayName":null,"UserConsentDescription":null,"DirectAccessGrantTypes":[],"ImpersonationAccessGrantTypes":[{"Impersonator":29,"Impersonated":20}],"EntitlementCategory":0,"DependentMicrosoftGraphPermissions":[]}]
From article > View reports & logs in entitlement management - Azure AD | Microsoft Docs
When Azure AD receives a new request, it writes an audit record, in
which the Category is EntitlementManagement and the Activity is
typically User requests access package assignment. In the case of a
direct assignment created in the Azure portal, the Activity field of
the audit record is Administrator directly assigns user to access package, and the user performing the assignment is identified by the
ActorUserPrincipalName.
Application Impersonation is basically an administrator-managed, not user-managed permission.
Impersonate access grants logs gives information ex:count., of users given consent by the admin to access the application to impersonate user.
ImpersonationAccessGrantTypes gives count or info of access grants by admin on behalf of user whereas DirectAccessGrantTypes gives info about the users who directly access the application ,as they are already assigned by admin.
Reference:
Multiple Client applications authorisation to WebApi (microsoft.com)
We have a C# web app for new customer intake, at the end of which the user enters a password value we apply to their new Active Directory user object when we invoke the userPrincipal .NET method to create their user object. Our code also creates an account in our Azure AD tenant, with the correct values (ImmutableID) set for Azure AD Connect to import and join both accounts on its next pass (30 minutes AADC cycle wait time not acceptable for our requirements). We sync our password hashes from on-premise AD to Azure AD, and we have password complexity enabled in AD, and we enabled and added our own vocabulary to the Banned Words (substrings) facility in Azure AD. We are considering installing the MS "Password Protection" service on our DC's that will also apply Azure Banned Words checking when passwords are updated on-premise.
To keep this question short, we really would like to pre-validate the user entered passwords against all the password policies, including the banned words list (assume we install that service on all our on-prem DCs), but we can't find a method or service in .NET that will pre-validate that a proposed password passes all the active password policies. Our users tend to use Azure Self Service Password Reset, on-premise password changes later on are rare. But in the C# programming, it appears you have to actually request an Add of a new AD username to get .NET to evaluate the password value and signal status back, from the userPrincipal method in .NET
Anyone got any tricky ideas how to get a password pre-validated against AD password policies without the context of adding an actual new user, but assuming that the sAMAccountName that will be submitted does NOT yet exist in Active Directory? We thought about creating a temporary AD user with hash or base64 of a GUID for a unique temporary usernames, get any password evaluation feedback back from .NET, then delete the temporary user object, but that's a lot of overhead just to check a password, would trigger replications and generate beaucoup EventViewer and AD-AuditPlus log events, much junk network traffic. Thank you.
I believe one of our developers inadvertently deleted the two default service accounts that came with the Google Cloud Project
I am now unable to start or spin up any new servers as I receive this:
The user does not have access to service account
'215988481317-compute#developer.gserviceaccount.com'
Is there a way to restore this service account with the correct permissions?
OR is the entire project screwed because this account doesn't exist anymore and creating a new account doesn't have this same syntax?
It appears that the service account's project permission may have been deleted rather than the account itself. Try adding the service account email address as member with the "Editor" role using the Permissions page.
I spent a long time yesterday to configure for my CouchDB instance in order to create a little app and letting CouchDB manage authentication and authorizations for me.
So I ended up with something like that :
On top of everything I've got a server admin, who basically is god on my CouchBD instance.
Then I created a database named "mydatabase" (for example) and added the role "mydatabase_dba" as admin and also the role "mydatabase_user" as reader.
I also created a database named "_users" which contains all the database admins and users with their roles and also a design document named "_auth" which manages authorizations.
Only the server admin is admin of this database, and I added users with role "mydatabase_dba" as readers. Then, for those of you who knows about it, I modified the "validate_doc_update" field o the "_auth" document so that users with role "mydatabase_dba" can only deals with users with role "mydatabase_user".
So, to summarize at this point :
server admin is still god
users with role "mydatabase_user" can connect to "mydatabase" but they are just readers
users with role "mydatabase_dba" are admins of "mydatabase"
users with role "mydatabase_dba" can connect to database "_users" where they are readers
users with role "mydatabase_dba" can only manage users of role "mydatabase_user" in "_users"
Hope this is clear :D
What I can do now is create an application that will not manage users itself, but let users connect to CouchDB directly (transparently).
The problem come when it deals with users creation/update/deletion.
Because only users with role "mydatabase_dba" can access to the "_users" database and work on users with roles "mydatabase_user", I need at some point to connect to CouchDB as this db admin.
I have two solutions :
Create a user interface into my app that will let the admin connect and do what he has to do
or
Make some more code and let the app do it automatically, this is the solution I prefer, but the problem is : I have to store the admin credentials...
Sorry for the long introduction but I had to describe the landscape first :)
I created a post yesterday about how I could secure the connection between my app and the CouchDB instance : here
The solution I was given is to use HTTP over SSL (/TLS) to secure the communication. I'm okay with that, but now I have another concern, maybe I'm paranoid, but because my app will need to connect as "mydatabase_dba", I have to store its credential somewhere.
But how to store them securely ? As said in my previous post, even if I store the hashed password instead of the plain text password, if an attacker access my app source code, he'll have my admin credentials...
An application should never have an administrative rights. It should only be given the bare minim rights it needs to function. If the application needs some administrative rights, make sure it has as few as possible. Other than that, most of the time these credentials are stored in plain text in some file that only your application can access.
Never commit this text file into your source code manager (Subversion, Git, etc.)! Placing the file into a running system must be a step in the installation procedure.