For a customer, i wrote an middleware to let him access the serial port, or serial port over network using an ethernet adapter, and read data using a webservice.
He recently asked to add too support for reading data from a barcode scanner, stuff that i've implemented reading events directly from the device (/dev/input/eventX or /dev/input/by-id/xyz).
The barcode scanner is attached directly to the server and data are being readed through a webservice exposed by my webserver.
All works fine, except that barcodes are recived by the linux console!
How can i "block" (stop) the system from sending stuff to the console?
NOTE: no X11/Xorg or nothing else, the server is a console only machine! Barcodes are readed by javascript (jsonp) executed on an android tablet
Check /etc/inittab to see if a getty is running on that serial port. If it is, comment out the line by inserting a # as the first character.
It depends on your Linux distro. On Redhat/Centos, you can turn off or filter console messages by editing /etc/syslog.conf and /etc/sysconfig/syslog.
Presumably the barcodes are getting to the console either because you are running the server process from a startup script and it is outputting to stdout/stderr, or they are some kind of system log or kernel messages.
Assuming they are standard output, find where the server is run in your startup scripts, and redirect the output to file or /dev/null, e.g.:
noisy-server-cmd >/dev/null 2>&1 &
Related
I'm having an issue connecting a serial device to an embedded device I'm writing code for.
The device I am writing has two serial ports, an incoming from my laptop, and an outgoing to an external device.
When I connect both terminals to my laptop and view the data, I get exactly the data I am expecting.
When I connect my laptop to the external device directly, I am getting exactly what I expect, and a response.
When I connect the laptop and the external device to the embedded device I am working on, the laptop sends data to it, it receives it, it passes it on to the external device. This works as expected.
However, the external device doesn't send back the response.
If I send data to the external device from the embedded device, each new message I send allows it to send the original reply.
I know the first message got through correctly because the external device whirrs to live, and I know when it is sending the response by running and logic analyser on the tx/rx comms and viewing the traffic.
I considered that the embedded device is holding the rx line and preventing its transmission, but I don't see how that possible in the code. Also if that is the case it shouldn't work when I plug both lines into my laptop.
I also considered the DTR was not set high, but checked this and it appears to be set high.
Does anyone know a reason which would prevent a device from responding?
Note: When I say Serial Ports I am referring to the UART when referring to the embedded device. All device use a DB9 connector running RS232.
Edit: Operating System on laptop is Windows 10. Embedded device is a Atmega324p.
Edit 2: Did some more testing. It appears that it sometimes work and sometimes doesn't.
I have added an image which show a almost perfect signal of the response.
The blue section is a gap in the signal that shouldn't be there.
Ended up finding a solution.
The RTS line was held via the embedded device at 1.2v, while the Pc was holding it at 5.2v.
Pulling the RTS line up to 5v fixed the issue.
I'm trying to use AT commands to setup a BGS2-W modem on a custom board to connect to a site over TLS, but the modem is not reacting to my commands and no certificates are being set.
I'm using the command
AT^SBNW
to send the commands as documented in Transport Layer Security for Client
TCP/IP Services doc (https://ptelectronics.ru/wp-content/uploads/organizatsiya_bezopasnogo_ssl-soedineniya.pdf#page=8).
Unfortunately, the document provides no examples, and I haven't been able to find any samples showing the usage of this command online.
The document linked has a java commandline tool attached that will send a cert from a PC, however I am unable to use this tool (I don't have the connection to the modem).
If anyone has any idea's on how to use this command I could very much use the help.
Note: I'm trying to set the certificates from within code running on a PIC18 - this isn't a final incarnation, I just need the certificates loaded so I can connect to our secure server.
Well, guess this one isn't going to find an answer anytime soon :)
So, its fairly easy to capture the output from the javatool - I'm using Com0Com to emulate 2 connected ports, then using termite to manually input on one port while telling the java app to connect to the other.
The first query from the java app expects an "OK" response, I find it easiest to send the response before starting the java app (I guess it gets cached in the recv buffer of the emulated port).
The javatool then sends "AT^SBNW=is_cert,1\r", and you can type in the reply in termite "SECURE CMD READY: SEND COMMAND ..."
After this a large binary dump comes through. You can decode the dump using the structure described in Application Note 62 (https://ptelectronics.ru/wp-content/uploads/organizatsiya_bezopasnogo_ssl-soedineniya.pdf). That should get all the data required to generate the same binary within code.
I have an embedded system that is programed in C. I need to do the equivalent to the DOS command Telnet. The idea is to test if the remote host is up and running.
I would like to have some orientation here like:
Open source project that I can use as a guide line (C language)
Some documentation on what the Telnet command does (so I can
implement my own)
Thanks
Update: Thank you for your valuable comments
My system connects to a host via GPRS/Ethernet/dial up/Wifi (one of them). As a developer I check if the host is ok by using my windows laptop (with a Dial up modem, GPRS modem or whatever is needed) and running Telnet like this:
telnet 192.168.0.1 8000
(non real values)
If the host is ok I got the clean screen, otherwise I got an error. That's what I need to do in code, to be able to determine if the host is up and running by using a sort of DOS telnet client command in C.
This is done once, just to check communications, after this test is cleared the real info should be sent.
I have a windows application on my PC which connects to a device over telnet. It sends a series of commands to the device, and the device responds to it.
Is there any way I can listen to what that program is writing to the device?
I tried using win32 socket programming to create a client that connects to the application. But, I get an error saying connection refused. When I analyze the traffic between the application and device on wireshark, I can see that the application uses different ports each time it reads from or writes to the telnet port(23) of the device.
Is there any way I can read the commands sent by the program to the device?
If you want to capture program's output to the device
programmatically, the right way is not to connect to the program (you
can't tap into an existing connection), but instead provide a server
that will stand for target device from the program's point of view.
It's going to work if the program can be configured to connect to the
device at different address and port. Write a "proxy" that listens on
some fixed port, and for any accepted connection, opens a client
connection to the real device. Then it should forward data in both
directions between the accepted connection from the program and the
client connection to the device. During this, you can also parse data
or do whatever you want with them, e.g. forward them to yet another
connection to another real device.
How are you supposed to programatically detect when the remote modem on your call hangs up? I am writing a C program which interfaces with a SoftModem device /dev/ttySL0 in Ubuntu linux. I am able to configure the modem using Hayes AT commands and communicate with the remote modem. However, I haven't been able to determine how I'm supposed to detect that the other end has hung up the line.
I have the modem configured so that when the other end hangs up, the device prints NO CARRIER and switches to command mode. However, I can't use the NO CARRIER string because I can't guarantee that the modem won't receive that string while in data mode.
How do you "listen" for remote hang up?
This is a hardware signal on modems, the Carrier Detect (CD) line. You'll need to monitor it to know that the connection was lost. Basics in linux are described in this how-to, you obtain the signal state with ioctl() using the TIOCM_CAR command.
Testing for NO CARRIER as text will not suffice. This text frequently occurs on sites in the net, even on Q&A sites.
Coming from the modem, it should be enclosed in line breaks.
Besides, after you detect that text, you can try to switch to command mode with +++. If that works, your connection persists and you can reattach it and continue using it. If it doesn't (because you are already there and +++ is an invalid command), the connection has gone.