How to change Keyboard Layout (a X11 API solution) - c

I want to change keyboard layout in Linux by programming,
What X11's API function does this?

I found one good solution.
It's a c++ class wrriten by Jay Bromley, that I can add to my app and using it.
source code
It's very easy to use:
#include "XKeyboard.h"
XKeyboard xkb;
std::string cGrpName=xkb.currentGroupName(); //return somethings like "USA"
std::string cGrpSymb=xkb.currentGroupSymbol(); //return somethings like "us"
xkb.setGroupByNum(0);//set keyboard layout to first layout in available ones
you can read source code and found some another useful functions.
for compiling standalone version you need to un-comments "int main" function present in "XKeyboard.cpp" (or write your own main.cpp) and use somethings like this:
g++ *.cpp -o getxkblayout -L/usr/lib -lX11

I'm not sure what the X11 library function is but setxkbmap is the bash command I use to achieve it. Maybe searching along these lines will find what you want (or at a pinch you could just execute the bash command).
Example
setxkbmap dvorak
setxkbmap us
EDIT:
After a strace of setxkbmap didn't turn up anything useful I suggest just calling:
system(“setxkbmap us”);

A pure X11 API solution should look something like this:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <X11/XKBlib.h>
int main() {
Display* _display;
char* displayName = "";
_display = XOpenDisplay(displayName);
XkbDescRec* _kbdDescPtr = XkbAllocKeyboard();
XkbGetNames(_display, XkbSymbolsNameMask, _kbdDescPtr);
Atom symName = _kbdDescPtr -> names -> symbols;
char* layoutString = XGetAtomName(_display, symName);
XCloseDisplay(_display);
printf("%s\n", layoutString);
}
Compile with -lX11 flag
This will print something like pc+us+inet(evdev) for English (USA) qwerty layout, pc+ru+us:2+inet(evdev) for Russian йцукен layout, pc+us(dvorak)+us:2+inet(evdev) for English dvorak layout.

Yesterday I was trying to make auto layuout switcher to EN for Google's xsecurelock. I tryed to find some existing solutions for X11 api, but...
So I decided to write my own with some help from S. Razi.
Here is the code: (run with gcc -lX11)
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <X11/XKBlib.h>
int main(){
Display* _display;
char* displayName = "";
_display = XOpenDisplay(displayName);
int _deviceId = XkbUseCoreKbd;
int i = 0;
int _groupCount = 0;
XkbDescRec* kbdDescPtr = XkbAllocKeyboard();
if (kbdDescPtr == NULL) {
printf("%s\n", "Failed to get keyboard description.");
return False;
}
kbdDescPtr->dpy = _display;
if (_deviceId != XkbUseCoreKbd) {
kbdDescPtr->device_spec = _deviceId;
}
XkbGetControls(_display, XkbAllControlsMask, kbdDescPtr);
XkbGetNames(_display, XkbSymbolsNameMask, kbdDescPtr);
XkbGetNames(_display, XkbGroupNamesMask, kbdDescPtr);
/* count groups */
Atom* groupSource = kbdDescPtr->names->groups;
if (kbdDescPtr->ctrls != NULL) {
_groupCount = kbdDescPtr->ctrls->num_groups;
} else {
_groupCount = 0;
while (_groupCount < XkbNumKbdGroups &&
groupSource[_groupCount] != 0) {
_groupCount++;
}
}
/* get group names */
Atom* tmpGroupSource = kbdDescPtr->names->groups;
Atom curGroupAtom;
char* groupName;
for (i = 0; i < _groupCount; i++) {
if ((curGroupAtom = tmpGroupSource[i]) != None) {
char* groupNameC = XGetAtomName(_display, curGroupAtom);
if (groupNameC == NULL) {
continue;
} else {
groupName = groupNameC;
char *temp = "English";
if (strncmp(temp, groupName, 7) == 0){
printf ("%s\n", groupName);
printf ("%d\n", i);
XkbLockGroup(_display, _deviceId, i);
XFree(groupNameC);
XCloseDisplay(_display);
}
return 0;
}
}
}
}
Here you can change char* temp = "English" to name of the group of your layout (exmp: "Russian"), and this simple code will switch your current layout :)

Related

Excel Add-in: Assignment in for loop causes segmentation fault but line-by-line assignments work. Why?

I just tested a toy Excel add-in project, cross building the XLL with mingw32 tool chains.
Here is my code:
//testXLL.c
#include "windows.h"
#include "xlcall.h"
#define MEMORYSIZE 65535000
char vMemBlock[MEMORYSIZE];
int vOffsetMemBlock =0;
LPSTR GetTempMemory(int cBytes){
LPSTR lpMemory;
if(vOffsetMemBlock + cBytes > MEMORYSIZE)
return 0;
else{
lpMemory = (LPSTR) &vMemBlock + vOffsetMemBlock;
vOffsetMemBlock += cBytes;
if(vOffsetMemBlock & 1) vOffsetMemBlock++;
return lpMemory;
}
}
LPXLOPER TempStr(LPSTR lpstr){
LPXLOPER lpx;
int chars;
lpx = (LPXLOPER)GetTempMemory(sizeof(XLOPER));
if(!lpx) return 0;
chars = lstrlen(lpstr);
if(chars>255) chars=255;
lpx->val.str=(char*)GetTempMemory((sizeof(char)*chars+1));
if(!lpx->val.str) return 0;
strncpy(lpx->val.str, lpstr,chars);
lpx->val.str[0]=(BYTE) chars;
//lpx->val.str[chars]='\0';
lpx->xltype = xltypeStr;
return lpx;
}
#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C" {
#endif
__declspec(dllexport) double __stdcall myadd2(double a1,double a2){
return a1+a2;
}
static char functionTable[11][255] =
{" myadd2", // procedure
" BBB", // type_text
" add", // function_text
" add1,add2", // argument_text
" 1", // macro_type
" category", // category
" ", // shortcut_text
" some help topic", // help_topic
" Adds toy", // function_help
" 1st.", // argument_help1
" 2nd" // argument_help2
};
__declspec(dllexport) int __stdcall xlAutoOpen(){
LPXLOPER pxDLL;
Excel4(xlGetName,pxDLL,0);
XLOPER xlRegArgs[11];
for(int i = 0; i < 11; i++){
xlRegArgs[i] = *TempStr(functionTable[i]);
}
Excel4(xlfRegister, 0, 12,
pxDLL,
&xlRegArgs[0], &xlRegArgs[1], &xlRegArgs[2],
&xlRegArgs[3], &xlRegArgs[4], &xlRegArgs[5],
&xlRegArgs[6], &xlRegArgs[7], &xlRegArgs[8],
&xlRegArgs[9], &xlRegArgs[10]);
return 1;
}
__declspec(dllexport) LPXLOPER __stdcall xlAddInManagerInfo(LPXLOPER xlAction) {
static XLOPER xlReturn, xlLongName, xlTemp;
xlTemp.xltype = xltypeInt;
xlTemp.val.w = xltypeInt;
Excel4(xlCoerce, &xlReturn, 2, xlAction, &xlTemp);
if(1 == xlReturn.val.w) {
xlLongName = *TempStr(" xll-name");
} else {
xlLongName.xltype = xltypeErr;
xlLongName.val.err = xlerrValue;
}
return &xlLongName;
}
#ifdef __cplusplus
}
#endif
I built this testXLL.c file in Ubuntu:
>i686-w64-mingw32-gcc -shared -Wl,--kill-at testXLL.c -o win.xll -L. -lxlcall32
This generates the "win.xll" successfully but, when loading this win.xll, Excel crashes.
In Windows 10, I tried to use gdb to debug it, but I can't catch break point in the xll file – it got disabled automatically when loading. But I can see in the gdb output, it is a segmentation fault when Excel crashes.
XLOPER xlRegArgs[11];
for(int i = 0; i < 11; i++){
xlRegArgs[i] = *TempStr(functionTable[i]);
}
What's weird is that, if I substitute the above for loop with the following line-by-line assignments in the xlAutoOpen function, the compiled XLL file works fine in Excel:
XLOPER xlRegArgs[11];
xlRegArgs[0] = *TempStr(functionTable[0]);
xlRegArgs[1] = *TempStr(functionTable[1]);
xlRegArgs[2] = *TempStr(functionTable[2]);
xlRegArgs[3] = *TempStr(functionTable[3]);
xlRegArgs[4] = *TempStr(functionTable[4]);
xlRegArgs[5] = *TempStr(functionTable[5]);
xlRegArgs[6] = *TempStr(functionTable[6]);
xlRegArgs[7] = *TempStr(functionTable[7]);
xlRegArgs[8] = *TempStr(functionTable[8]);
xlRegArgs[9] = *TempStr(functionTable[9]);
xlRegArgs[10] = *TempStr(functionTable[10]);
Please enlighten me. What's the difference between these two assignment approaches?
Although I don't (yet) have a full explanation for this behaviour, I'm posting this as a possible 'workaround', which I have used in a very similar case I encountered in one of my projects.
The issue appears to be some form of 'stack corruption' caused by the use of the function-local variable (i) used as the loop index; converting this to a global/static variable will likely fix the issue. The following code snippet is a suggested fix (I have changed the name of the index variable to avoid possible name clashes elsewhere in the code):
///...
static int regloop; // Used as the loop index, below...
__declspec(dllexport) int __stdcall xlAutoOpen(){
LPXLOPER pxDLL;
Excel4(xlGetName,pxDLL,0);
XLOPER xlRegArgs[11];
for(regloop = 0; regloop < 11; regloop++){
xlRegArgs[regloop] = *TempStr(functionTable[regloop]);
}
Here's the section of code from my aforementioned project (but note this is C++/MFC) that exhibits the same sort of behaviour – but only in x86 builds (x64 builds work without issue):
static int plin; // NOTA BENE:- We use this in the two functions below, as the use of
// a local 'plin' loop index is prone to induce stack corruption (?),
// especially in MSVC 2017 (MFC 14) builds for x86.
void BasicApp::OnUpdatePICmd(uint32_t nID, void *pUI)
{
//! for (int plin = 0; plin < Plugin_Number; ++plin) { // Can cause problems - vide supra
for (plin = 0; plin < Plugin_Number; ++plin) {
BOOL mEbl = FALSE; int mChk = -1;
if ((Plugin_UDCfnc[plin] != nullptr) && Plugin_UDCfnc[plin](nID, &mEbl, &mChk)) {
CommandEnable(pUI, mEbl ? true : false);
if (mChk >= 0) CmdUISetCheck(pUI, mChk);
return;
}
}
CommandEnable(pUI, false);
return;
}
(The Plugin_UDCfnc is a static array member of the BasicApp class.)
I have, in the years since the above code was written, had occasional 'fleeting insights' into why this is happening but, as of now, I can't offer a more robust fix. I shall revisit the issue and update this post if I should stumble upon a resolution. In the meantime, others are welcome to take this as a 'clue' and post their own explanations/solutions.

creating multiple recursive directories in c

I am completing cs50x (the edX (free) version of the Harvard cs50) course and am trying to be a bit tricky/lazy/test myself.
I am trying to use a C program to create all the directories I will need for my psets.
I have looked online and found that <sys/stat.h> includes the mkdir() function and therefore tried creating some nested loops to create all the necessary folders by doing something similar to mkdir {pset1,pset1/{standard,hacker},pset2,pset2{standard... to give me a directory structure like this:
pset1/Standard
pset1/Hacker
pset2/Standard
etc...
I came up with this:
#include <cs50.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
int main(int argc, string argv[])
{
for(int i = 1; i <=8; i++)
{
string dir = argv[1];
sprintf(dir,"%s%i", argv[1], i);
mkdir(dir, 0777);
for(int j = 0; j<2; j++)
{
string subDir[] = {"Standard","Hacker"};
sprintf(dir,"%s%i/%s", argv[1], i, subDir[j]);
mkdir(dir, 0777);
}
}
}
However, the program only creates pset1 and completes, there are no subfolders, no pset2 etc.
Yes, you're being lazy since you seem to have very little knowledge of C, yet try to program in it. :)
C is not Python, there is no string interpolation/formatting operator. You have to call a function, specificially snprintf(). Read that manual page.
Also, you can't create a bunch of nested directories with a single call to mkdir(). Read the manual page.
To create nested directories, you're either going to have to build each's absolute path (i.e. each successive time you call mkdir() the path will be longer than the previous time), or actually enter each directory as you create it, and go from there.
To create a full path you can call mkdir() recursivly like this:
#include <limits.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
int mkdirr(const char * path, const mode_t mode, const int fail_on_exist)
{
int result = 0;
char * dir = NULL;
do
{
if (NULL == path)
{
errno = EINVAL;
result = -1;
break;
}
if ((dir = strrchr(path, '/')))
{
*dir = '\0';
result = mkdirr(path, mode, fail_on_exist);
*dir = '/';
if (result)
{
break;
}
}
if (strlen(path))
{
if ((result = mkdir(path, mode)))
{
char s[PATH_MAX];
sprintf(s, "mkdir() failed for '%s'", path);
perror(s);
if ((EEXIST == result) && (0 == fail_on_exist))
{
result = 0;
}
else
{
break;
}
}
}
} while (0);
return result;
}
And then call mkdirr() like this;
int main(void)
{
char p[] = "test/1/2/3";
if (-1 == mkdirr(p, 0777, 0))
{
perror("mkdirr() failed()");
}
return 0;
}

Expanding on a *, using glob

I'm trying to expand *, so I've done some research and it seems that glob is the function to use. Just like linux when you type ls *.c, it will return you all the files that contains .c
I've got myself to start so I know that I need to malloc glob_t first, so here it is:
glob_t *globbuf = (glob_t*)malloc(sizeof(glob_t));
After this, I'm not sure how to work this out... going through internet has shown me some examples, but I don't get quite how it works. This is what I figured out:
if(glob("*.c",GLOB_DOOFFS,NULL,globbuf)) {
// what am i supposed to write in here?}
globbuf->gl_pathv[0] = "ls";
Here's a simple, straight-forward example that Works As Expected:
#include <glob.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int foo(char const * epath, int eerrno) { return 0; }
int main()
{
glob_t globbuf = {0};
glob("*.c", GLOB_DOOFFS, foo, &globbuf);
for (size_t i = 0; i != globbuf.gl_pathc; ++i)
{
printf("Found: %s\n", globbuf.gl_pathv[i]);
}
globfree(&globbuf);
}

Find Verbs in a String

I am trying (and having trouble) to write a program (In C) that accepts a string in the command line (eg. $ test.out "This is a string") and looks through the string to find verbs (and nouns, but if I figure out verbs, I can do nouns on my own).
A list of aplphabetically sorted verbs is given in the file lexicon.h, and is what I am supposed to use as my dictionary.
I know how to accept the string from the command line and use that input to create an array of strings, each string itself being a separate word, and I already have a working program that can do that, and that I hope to use part of for this one.
I am supposed to create a function called binary_search(...stuffgoeshere...) and use that to search through the lexicon file and find the verb.
I would like some suggestions or guidance on how to create a function (binary_search) that can check to see if an already separated word matches any on the list in lexicon.h. I do not want someone to just write an answer, I would like to know why you are suggesting what you do. Hopefully I can learn something fun out of this!
I know it's messy, but this is what I have so far.
Also note that lexicon's verb array has 637 values (as seen when I make int size = 637)
This program does not compile anymore, as I have not yet figured out how to make the binary_search function work yet. I am trying to modify a binary search function used in an example for class, however, that one sorted numbers in a text file, not strings of characters.
If there is anything else I should include, let me know. Thank you for your help!
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include "lexicon.h"
int binary_search(char word[], char verbs[][], int size);
int
main(int argc, char*argv[])
{
char word[80];
char str[80],
args[80][80];
int counter = 0,
a = 0,
i = 0,
index = 0,
t = 0;
while(str[a] != '\0')
{
if(str[a] == ' ')
{
args[index][i] = '\0';
i = 0;
a++;
index ++;
counter ++;
}
args[index][i++] = str[a++];
}
args[index][i] = '\0';
counter = counter + 1;
printf("\nThe verbs were: ");
int verbposition= -1;
int size = 637;
while(t<counter)
{
strcpy(word, args[t]);
verbposition = binary_search(word, verbs, size);
if(verbposition > -1)
printf("%s", args[t]);
t++;
}
return 0;
}
int
binary_search(char word[], char &verbs[][], int size)
{
int bottom = 0,
top = size - 1,
found = 0,
middle;
while(bottom <= top && !found)
{
middle = (bottom + top) / 2;
if(strcmp(word, verbs[middle]))
{
found = 1;
return = middle;
}
if(strcmp(word, verbs[middle]) > 0)
{
top = middle - 1;
}
else
bottom = middle + 1;
}
return -1;
}
You are on the right track. I would highly suggest you to use print statements as you will have a clear idea of where you are going wrong.

User entered string run a particular function in c

Guys so I'm working on the web service assignment and I have the server dishing out random stuff and reading the uri but now i want to have the server run a different function depending on what it reads in the uri. I understand that we can do this with function pointers but i'm not exactly sure how to read char* and assign it to a function pointer and have it invoke that function.
Example of what I'm trying to do: http://pastebin.com/FadCVH0h
I could use a switch statement i believe but wondering if there's a better way.
For such a thing, you will need a table that maps char * strings to function pointers. The program segfaults when you assign a function pointer to string because technically, a function pointer is not a string.
Note: the following program is for demonstration purpose only. No bounds checking is involved, and it contains hard-coded values and magic numbers
Now:
void print1()
{
printf("here");
}
void print2()
{
printf("Hello world");
}
struct Table {
char ptr[100];
void (*funcptr)(void)
}table[100] = {
{"here", print1},
{"hw", helloWorld}
};
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int i = 0;
for(i = 0; i < 2; i++){
if(!strcmp(argv[1],table[i].ptr) { table[i].funcptr(); return 0;}
}
return 0;
}
I'm gonna give you a quite simple example, that I think, is useful to understand how good can be functions pointers in C. (If for example you would like to make a shell)
For example if you had a struct like this:
typedef struct s_function_pointer
{
char* cmp_string;
int (*function)(char* line);
} t_function_pointer;
Then, you could set up a t_function_pointer array which you'll browse:
int ls_function(char* line)
{
// do whatever you want with your ls function to parse line
return 0;
}
int echo_function(char* line)
{
// do whatever you want with your echo function to parse line
return 0;
}
void treat_input(t_function_pointer* functions, char* line)
{
int counter;
int builtin_size;
builtin_size = 0;
counter = 0;
while (functions[counter].cmp_string != NULL)
{
builtin_size = strlen(functions[counter].cmp_string);
if (strncmp(functions[counter].cmp_string, line, builtin_size) == 0)
{
if (functions[counter].function(line + builtin_size) < 0)
printf("An error has occured\n");
}
counter = counter + 1;
}
}
int main(void)
{
t_function_pointer functions[] = {{"ls", &ls_function},
{"echo", &echo_function},
{NULL, NULL}};
// Of course i'm not gonna do the input treatment part, but just guess it was here, and you'd call treat_input with each line you receive.
treat_input(functions, "ls -laR");
treat_input(functions, "echo helloworld");
return 0;
}
Hope this helps !

Resources