seems like this would be a common question, but searching yielded nothing...the DataGridViewColumn has a DisplayIndex property indicating it's index as displayed on screen (vs the Index property which related - I think - to the order it was added to the grid). Is there a similar concept for rows? I want to iterate through the rows as they are displayed on screen, which may change if a column is sorted.
edit: this is the WinForms DataGridView
Unlike the columns, the index for the row is the actual display position of the row.
Related
I’m trying to select multiple rows in my nested datagrid and put the rows into a list or at least get all the first column values of the selected rows, but I can’t find anywhere on the web that details how to do that. Is it even possible?
Can someone show me a quick example?
YourDataGrid.SelectedItems;
This will get you all the rows you have selected in code behind, To multi select use Ctrl key while selecting and don't forget to allow Extended selection mode(I guess its the default), put this SelectionMode="Extended" in your xaml.
And you can access rows like this
DataRowView row = (DataRowView)YourDataGrid.SelectedItems[0];
And you can access Cells like this
row["ColumnName"];
I was wondering what the best way was to create an empty datagrid.
For example after you have hit new in excel, You have a grid with empty rows and columns.
I am using c# with WPF and .net 4.0.
Thank you.
As the comments have suggested, a datagrid is not a spreadsheet, but a method to display / edit existing data. That said if you want something similar, feel free to populate a collection with default / 'empty' objects and bind that to your grid. It just means that after working with the data, you will have to define a method to capture only the edited rows. This still means that the column-bound properties of your class need to be known ahead of time.
A DataGrid is used to display a collection. If you want to create an individual row DataGrid is not really the right tool. You could but a single empty row in the DataGrid using a collection of only on row. There is a lot of guidance on Master Detail on MSDN. If you don't know how many columns at design time you could used a DataGrid to turn the row vertical with column 1 as name and column as value so now you have one record but with a collection of fields.
I need to write an excel-like grid that can have a lot of cells (400x400). All columns have the same width and all rows the same height. Each cell can contain text or be empty and each cell can have a column and/or row span. I suppose this will never work with the Grid panel and I suppose I will need UI virtualization in both column and row direction.
So my first try was to create a virtualizing grid by deriving from VirtualizingPanel and implement IScrollInfo. This could have "easily" be the solution except that I ran into a problem:
To provide IScrollInfo with the relevant information about scroll size and position and to be able to detemine wich items need to be created (realized) next using the ItemsContainerGenerator, I need to know the column index, row indeox and columnspan for each child item (cell). The only way I can think of to do this is using attach properties. The problem is: I can only read the values of attached properties if the ItemContainer that has them is already realized. So I am in a catch 22 here. To know what to realize I need to realize all items. To provide the data for IScrollInfo I need to realize all items.
So it seems that I am at a dead end with this approach.
Do you have any idea how I could implement a control like this or know how I could reslove the above problem?
It strikes me that you may not need to instanciate the UI elements themselves- you can very easily have a collection of DependencyObject-derived viewmodels, each of which has the WidthProperty and HeightProperty set (and possibly bound to the equivalent Width and Height properties of the visible cell UI element, once those are created).
Storing 160,000 (400x400) class instances shouldn't be a problem, especially if you are able to index into the set using row and column.
Does anyone knows how to get a DevExpress WPF Grid Rows count?
The number of rows displayed can change as users change the grouping, filterting. Therefore, you should use the GridControl.VisibleRowCount property instead of the data source row count.
I am not sure there is a way except by actually walking the visual tree (using VisualTreeHelper). How about something like (mygGidControl1.DataSource as ICollection).Count ?
I have a list of string array as input. The array dimension are static for all the list but I can't know the array size until the list is retrieved.
I need to bind the list in a datagrid in Silverlight.
I tried to create columns at runtime, binding each column to a particular array position but cannot find a way.
Have you any idea how to do it?
I could eventually "convert" my list of array in anything else that could be binded in a datagrid?
The idea is to have a sort of 2d Matrix showed inside the datagrid in Silverlight (I think that the problem is similar).
List
column_1 column_2 column_3 .. column_m
string[1,1] string[1,2] string[1,3] .. string[1,m]
string[2,1] string[2,2] string[2,3] .. string[2,m]
string[3,1] string[3,2] string[3,3] .. string[3,m]
....
string[n,1] string[n,2] string[n,3] .. string[n,m]
n is list lenght, m is list column max number.
Any idea is appreciated
I've found two solution to the problem that use the schema in the Denis's answer:
the first one is to use reflection to generate a class at runtime for the binding as suggested in this article (thanks to Vladimir Bodurov). I've tested this solution and I'll try to use it on my project. The only problem right now is that for large collection, the performance are poor. But I hope that someone will fix it in next relese (Silverlight 3 seems to not have fixed this problem, yet)
the second solution will be using some dynamic language for generate data. I don't know if this could be faster or not (probably not) but eventually could help. I will try in the future and use ironpython or ruby to generate classes that will be binded in datagrid.
If anyone have tryed using the second solution or any performance related information about creating classes at runtime, it will be appreciated.
Giorgio
Unfortunately that's not gonna be easy.
Do you have any valid constraints, like the maximum number of columns that is allowed or anything like that?
If you do (let's say you have N column maximum), you might be able to do something by
Having a class that exposes N
properties (named Col1...ColN for
example) that map the content
of the array for one line at column
X
Generating a list of that class,
one instance for each line
Generating the correct number of
column on the fly, binding each
column to property ColX
Binding your DataGrid to that list
That's kind of ugly, but it would work.
If you do not have to rely on the DataGrid, there is a possibility using a UniformGrid. A UniformGrid is a panel that layouts its children in a regular grid (every item has the same width, every item has the same height). You can indicate the number of columns at runtime, and the panel will fit children one after the other up to the number of columns and then continue on another line.
You could bind an ItemsControl to your array, indicating it should use a UniformGrid as its layout panel and indicating a suitable ItemTemplate to render each string.
The second option is much easier, but you will not have the capabilities of the DataGrid like sorting, moving columns, row selection, edition events per row etc.