I am kinda new there, I started to learn about manifest files lately,
and
I found out there are 1.0, 1.0.1, 1.1.0 versions, but my question is - what are really the differences between them all? thank you for answering, I really appreciate it.
I found there are two functions. I found out there is a function called "version", which I can't really understand what is the best type of version that it would be best to use.
Related
I found a pdf containing all the information I need, unfortunately it is (currently) for version 1.2019.6 http://plantuml.com/guide
I'm currently using 1.2019.3, and can't upgrade because the changes to preprocessing break my project, where can I find a similar helpful PDF but for version 1.2019.3(or older versions in general)?
You'll find something interesting here:
http://pdf.plantuml.net/1.2019.3/PlantUML_Language_Reference_Guide_en.pdf
:-)
And we are interested by the issue you have with the new preprocessor. Maybe we can fix them ? So tell us more about it... Thanks
I fear I've missed it, but I can't seem to find a spot in the docs that specifically lays out what version(s) of Django are tested to work. I did notice the requirements.txt file. Should that be my guide then? Thanks!
The definitive source of information about supported Django versions is setup.py in the Wagtail codebase. The release notes section of the documentation will tell you when a new version is supported, or an old version is dropped, but there's currently no place in the documentation that will tell you the supported Django versions for a given Wagtail release. (There probably should be!)
The requirements.txt in the project template won't tell you the full range of supported versions - usually it points to the latest compatible major Django release, as that's the one you're encouraged to use on new projects.
Yes! As of this writing you can find them here: http://docs.wagtail.io/en/v2.0.1/releases/upgrading.html
I had the same question today and thanks to #gasman who lead me to the right place where I should be digging.
Thank you for reading this post.
As a newcomer to the programming community, I have what I believe to be a fairly easy question.
How do you implement a file upload (particularly images) using the MEAN stack (yeoman angular-fullstack generator in particular)? An explanation using the yeoman angular-fullstack boilerplate would be appreciated.
In particular, could you please make a step-by-step explanation. This is not recorded anywhere on the internet, so your help will be recognized and appreciated! :-)
While there are numerous explanations out there, those explanations always answer a particular user's question (as do many other questions/answers) and are not applicable to general use cases. Those explanations typically require one to be able to parse through numerous lines of irrelevant code, in order to absorb the information that's relevant. As such, a "noob" is not able to utilize the part of the code that is applicable to him/her. That is why I'm asking for an explanation using the boilerplate of a generator, so that myself and others may use this information -- now and in the future.
Using search engines and research, I have come across the predominate answer that ng-file-upload and multer can accomplish this task. However, there is no rudimentary explanation of how this used implemented within a MEAN stack together (particularly, angular-fullstack -- the predominate MEAN stack implementation at this time).
Today, any general non-static website requires a file-upload implementation, and it seems extremely odd that there is very little documentation on this issue. I've read numerous O'Reilly books on MongoDB, but this issue is not addressed. Images and Videos are essential to commercial-grade websites, and these topics should be documented in a way that is digestible for newcomers to MEAN programming.
Thank you for your time, and I appreciate any and all helpful answers and comments.
you can use my code which is MEAN project for image upload
https://github.com/RohitShedage/image-upload
I'm sure I should upgrade my project from 2.1 to 2.8+
But how hard would it be? Anyone have some experience like this?
Are there any "dos and don'ts" I should know (apart those from the man)?
But how hard would it be? Anyone have some experience like this?
How hard it is depends on the quality of your code and how close you stayed to the principles of the framework. If you used it well and followed its conventions and didn't change core classes or made any other big stupid thing it should be just a matter of following the migration guides.
Are there any "dos and don'ts" I should know (apart those from the man)?
No, just follow the migration guides. Every version has one that describes the changes. Here is the one for 2.8, I'm sure you'll be able to find the others.
http://book.cakephp.org/2.0/en/appendices/2-8-migration-guide.html
I can't find Rhino Mocks executables for Silverlight.
I've googled a lot. It should be here http://ayende.com/blog/3843/rhino-mocks-3-5-silverlight. But link does't work anymore.
I think the latest repository is here on GitHub.
The link is broken for quite a while now (at least half year, might be more). Myself, I have never seen actual RhinoMocks executables for Silverlight (been looking for them too!). Since you got the same problem, perhaps it will be a good idea to try out one of the new mocking frameworks which both support Silverlight and are constantly gaining on popularity:
FakeItEasy
Moq
If you have some RhinoMocks background, using either of them will be easy and intuitive.