I need to find a plugin or make it (with your help) that would change the sound of the discord call by the "id" of the group.
I know about the existence of plugins that allow you to change the sound of Group calls and Calls. but I couldn't find those that would change calls to specific groups.
Related
I'm new to Alexa Conversations - still learning. My challenge: In the Alexa Conversation Dialog, I'm trying to enable a skill to ask to play music in a certain room. For example, a user might ask to play Prince in the Kitchen or they might ask to play Let's Go Crazy in the Bedroom or they might ask to play Dua Lipa Radio in the Bathroom. In each case, I need to prompt the user to ask them if the request is an Artist, a Song, a Playlist or a Station. Currently I'm prompting the user and saving their answer in a custom variable called MusicType.
How do I now take the answer and convert that to a different API Parameter? In this case I'd want to take MusicType and set it to PlayListName in the API. I don't see how to take the values out of variables and then associate them to something else. help?
I tried using the Inform Args section but that will only continue to save the variable - it seems it needs conditional logic here?
With the Alexa Conversations Description Language you can add conditional logic as already suggested by yourself, which then uses further expressions to handle the variable content and/or invoke the API in different ways.
But be aware that the feature is currently in Beta (might change without notice) and is not supported in the UI, so it needs to be done with CLI access from your side.
I want to get multiple information from a certain node using slots.
One thing is, I want to give options for some of the questions I prompt.
Example: the user will make a reservation. I'm capturing date and time with the slot, and also where does he want the table. For the table part, I would like to provide him with two options "inside" or "outside".
Is that possible using slots?
This feature is coming soon. At this point, you need to export the entire workspace json and manually edit it there, we don't have GUI support just yet.
I was wondering if anyone had any information on how to change a priority on a rule in HP Fortify?
For example in C, the category "Uninitialized Variables" has the fortify priority order of LOW. I need to change to HIGH for auditing purposes. Is there any way to change a rule or do I need to create a new rule?
If I need to create a new rule, how would I make a rule that matches "Uninitialized Variables" and make it global for other users to use?
There's not really way for you to modify the existing rule pack. But that's okay. There's something much easier that I can suggest that does not involve trying to create or modify custom rules (which can get a very messy if you're not careful).
The easiest thing you can do is create a custom Folder Filter.
Open up your FPR in Audit Workbench. Select the correct Filter Set that you normally use.
Your chosen Filter Set will be home to
our new Visibility Filter. For example purposes I will use the Security Auditor View. Then select the Filters tab and click Create New Filter.
Use the values shown below, but feel free to adjust if needed, and then click Save:
At this point, you should be able to see the Uninitialized Variable findings in the High tab.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
This change to the organization of your Fortify Findings right now, only is in effect for this one FPR. If you wish to have this filter rule exist in scan for other projects, then you will need to modify the default fortify filters be creating something called a custom Fortify Issue Template. Check your fortify documentation to get more information on this.
If you try to upload this to SSC (Software Security Center) where you might want to perform some reporting, then the default Issue Template that lives on SSC will be used to sort and organize your scan's issues, when generating reports. If you wish for your new custom Fortify Issue Template to be used for reporting and organization withing the web UI, then you will need to override the default Issue Template on the SSC server with your new custom Issue Template. Again, see your documentation for more information on this.
Finally, there is a way to potentially create a custom Fortify Control Flow rule (which will need to be used, together in combination, with a suppression rule) that will make it possible to essentially reassign the priority metadata for your particular issue, but this is quite difficult.
We are looking for a function or code to quickly identify if Lambda code is running on an Alexa Dot/Echo or a Show/Spot. More than the device ID, we want the device type. Based on the device capability, display or no display, the code will provide different types of content. We are hoping not to include a "device registration" feature. We are building a health-related Skill, which will also be for seniors, so we want to include visual interactions if a display is present, in the simplest possible fashion. Suggestions?
You should be able to examine the request and determine if a display is present, such as context.System.device.supportedInterfaces, I think it is. Under there you can look for Display, so you are not looking so much for a particular model, rather for specific functionality, such as a display.
I tried from gmail.com UI, but i didn't found any way to create nested folders under system labels.
Then i tried using APIs and it's not possible from there also.
But i am not able to find any documentation where this behaviour is specified. Am i missing something or doing something wrong.
I am using gmail apis to create labels. https://developers.google.com/gmail/api/v1/reference/users/labels/create
The problem is we have a customer who has nested labels under inbox. I think may be its old gmail feature and does not exists anymore. Can someone clear my understanding. Thanks in advance
It appears that USER labels cannot currently be nested under SYSTEM labels with the Gmail API. I'm not sure if they could have been at a point in the past using the Gmail API or another deprecated API. Finding information to indicate it was possible in the past may be difficult as the older "offical" APIs such as the Email Migration v2 API (and its predecessor) appear to have had there documentation taken down.
Maybe #Rubén is onto something here. Though I would assume that Google's servers in their current configuration would return some sort of error while attempting this from any client. It is probably deprecated functionality that has since been removed that made this possible. Maybe when using the old obsolete Email Migration v2 API this was possible. I unfortunately cannot recall/prove if it allowed said functionality.
I cannot find a link with information directly from Google. However, I have found the following:
ScottG_TC said: "You are creating a new Label, did you check off Nest Under and then the drop down will show you all of the user created lables. Those are the only ones you can nest under."
https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/gmail/DqWSicdPTSs
ScottG_TC said: "You can not nest labels in Inbox."
https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/inbox/78TdouDE0s4
Gmail API
Having used the .NET wrapper/version of the API I have noticed that I cannot create a nested label under the 'Inbox' SYSTEM label programmatically. Attempting to do so produces the same result as using the GUI. It creates a flat USER defined label named 'Inbox/Foo'. This appears to be the standard result of attempting to create a nested USER label under a SYSTEM label. That is, a flat USER defined label will be created independent of the intended SYSTEM label.
Gmail
Example using the Gmail UI itself.
And after creation.
As I'm sure you've already noticed in the UI using the "Nest label under:" has no option to specify any of the SYSTEM labels.
Creation of a USER defined label using the name of a SYSTEM label is also invalid.
"Duplicate Question"
Regarding this
I don't believe this is a duplicate question, the Gmail API has the concept of USER and SYSTEM labels. The provided duplicate question/answer only goes over the idea of creating a nested label under a USER defined label. It does not state whether or not a nested label can be created under a SYSTEM label such as 'Inbox'
Difference between USER and SYSTEM labels:
https://developers.google.com/gmail/api/guides/labels
The difference can also be observed by going to https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#settings/labels SYSTEM labels have there own section.
I was able to accomplish this by linking my gmail account to windows 10 "mail" program. Then used the windows mail UI to create my nested folders under my inbox then when I go back to gmail using chrome ::boom:: nested under my inbox.