I want to print a calendar month thats enclausured in a box made of - and |.
I wrote up a code and if you set the starting date as 2 it kinda works if not it doesnt. What am i doing wrong??
for(cons=1;cons<inicio;cons++)
printf("| ");
for(cons=2;cons<inicio;cons++)
printf(" ");
for(cons=1;cons<=dias_mes(mes,ano);cons++){
printf("%3d", cons);
if((inicio+cons-1)%7 == 0)
printf(" |\n|");
}
This is the code i have for printing the calendar and if i set the starting day to 2 i get this result:
------------------------
| Fevereiro - 2022 |
------------------------
| D S T Q Q S S |
------------------------
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
| 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 |
| 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 |
| 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 |
| 28
Else i just get this:
------------------------
| Fevereiro - 2022 |
------------------------
| D S T Q Q S S |
------------------------
| | | 1 2 3 4 |
| 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 |
| 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 |
| 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 |
| 26 27 28
this time i set it to 4.
Related
I currently have deviations for a number of models as shown in the data below:
year model_2015 model_2016 model_2017
2016 15 . .
2017 20 10 .
2018 30 20 30
Variable Model_2015, performed in 2015, has deviations for 2016, 2017, 2018; variable Model_2016 for 2017 as well as 2018, and so on.
I would like to create a variable that sums the first observation of each.
So for this example:
first = 15 + 10 + 30 = 55
I'm assuming that I have to make a loop, but I am stumped on how to go about it.
EDIT:
Ideally, I would also like a solution adding the second, third, and so on non-missing observations.
The following works for me:
generate first = model_2015[1] + model_2016[2] + model_2017[3]
However, here is a more general approach:
clear
input year model_2015 model_2016 model_2017
2016 15 . .
2017 20 10 .
2018 30 20 30
end
generate id = 1
tempfile myfile
save `myfile'
collapse (firstnm) model*, by(id)
egen first = rowtotal(model*)
keep id first
merge 1:m id using `myfile'
drop id _merge
order year model* first
list, abbreviate(15)
+-----------------------------------------------------+
| year model_2015 model_2016 model_2017 first |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
1. | 2016 15 . . 55 |
2. | 2017 20 10 . 55 |
3. | 2018 30 20 30 55 |
+-----------------------------------------------------+
EDIT:
Below, is an even more general solution:
clear
input year model_2015 model_2016 model_2017
2016 15 . .
2017 20 10 .
2018 30 20 30
2019 40 10 10
end
local i = 0
foreach v of varlist model* {
local ++i
local vals
forvalues j = 1 / `=_N' {
if !missing(`v'[`j']) local vals `vals' `=`v'[`j']'
}
local ind_`i' `: word 1 of `vals'' // CHANGE THIS NUMBER
local ind_all `ind_all' `ind_`i''
}
generate first = `= subinstr("`ind_all'", " ", "+", `= wordcount("`ind_all'") - 1')'
Results:
list, abbreviate(15)
+-----------------------------------------------------+
| year model_2015 model_2016 model_2017 first |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
1. | 2016 15 . . 55 |
2. | 2017 20 10 . 55 |
3. | 2018 30 20 30 55 |
4. | 2019 40 10 10 55 |
+-----------------------------------------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------+
| year model_2015 model_2016 model_2017 second |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
1. | 2016 15 . . 50 |
2. | 2017 20 10 . 50 |
3. | 2018 30 20 30 50 |
4. | 2019 40 10 10 50 |
+-----------------------------------------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------+
| year model_2015 model_2016 model_2017 third |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
1. | 2016 15 . . 40 |
2. | 2017 20 10 . 40 |
3. | 2018 30 20 30 40 |
4. | 2019 40 10 10 40 |
+-----------------------------------------------------+
Note that in this case I used a slightly modified example for better illustration.
The code below might be the loop(s) that you are seeking for:
forvalues i = 1 / `=_N' {
generate S_`i' = 0
forvalues j = `i' / `=_N' {
capture replace S_`i' = S_`i' + model_`=2015+`j'-`i''[`j']
}
}
How to print numbers from 1 to 10 using a loop in Brainfuck? Is it even possible?
I am looking for a solution to this issue.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Cell 0 to '1'
>++++++++++ cell 1 to '\n'
>+++++++++ cell 2 to 9 as counter
[ Print numbers 1 to 9
<< Data pointer to cell 0
.+ Print and increment cell 0
>. Data pointer to cell 1 and print the newline
>- Data pointer to cell 2 and decrement counter
] Loop till counter is 0
+++++++++ Set cell 2 to 9
[ Set cell 0 to '1'
<<- Data pointer to cell 0 and decrement
>>- Data pointer to cell 2 and decrement counter
] Loop till counter is 0
<<. Data pointer to cell 0 and print '1'
-. Decrement cell 0 and print '0'
>. Data pointer to cell 1 and print newline
Readable version:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++>
++++++++++>
+++++++++[<<.+>.>-]
+++++++++[<<->>-]
<<.-.>.
Output:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Live demo:
Brainf**k print 1 to 10
Brainf**k Visualizer
TL;DR
-[>+<-----]>---<++++++++++<++++++++++[>>.+<.<-]>>---------.-.
Try it online!
END TL;DR
In order to program in BrainF**k, pretend like every program (even simple ones) will need to start out with a layout.
The pseudo-code for this would be something like:
Generate the character '0'
Move left and generate '\n'
Move left and generate the counter (10 numbers in this case)
Loop: Get back to the character '0', print it, increment it to '1', go to the newline, print it, go to the counter, and decrement it. End it when the counter is 0
Generate '1' and print it
Generate '0' and print it
However, the last two steps could be simplified to just:
Go back to the digit '9'
Decrement it until '1' and print
Decrement it until '0' and print
This saves a lot of time and bytes characters.
To generate the character '0', you generate the integer 48 (because that's it's ASCII value). To do this you can go to Esolangs' BF Constants. Looking up the number 48, we find -[>+<-----]>---
Our program so far is -[>+<-----]>--- to generate 0
Next, move left and generate \n (newline). We can use <++++++++++. Notice how it is completely plus signs. This is because there is not much room to reduce the character count at the number 10.
Our program so far is -[>+<-----]>---<++++++++++
Then, move left and generate the counter. We want the counter to be 10 to print numbers from 0 to 9. <++++++++++.
Our program so far is -[>+<-----]>---<++++++++++<++++++++++
After that, start the loop [. Go to the '0' >>, print it ., increment it +, go to the newline and print <., Go to the counter and decrement it, and end the loop when it is zero <-]. [>>.+<.<-]
Our program so far is -[>+<-----]>---<++++++++++<++++++++++[>>.+<.<-]
Finally, go to the '9' >>, decrement it until it is 1 and print ---------., and decrement it until it is 0 and print -.. ---------.-.
The program is finished.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Let address 0 be the digit we want to print, starting with '0'
>++++++++++ Let address 1 be our newline character
>+++++++++ Let address 2 be our counter, starting at 9
[
- Decrement the counter
<<+. Increment the digit we want to print and print it
>. Print the newline
> Make sure we're at the counter again before we loop back
]
<< Move back to address 0
--------. Make address 0 '1'
-. Make address 0 '0'
Live demo
This is possible. Here's the code: ++++++++++>++++++++++[>+++++<-]>-.<<.>>+.<<.>>+.<<.>>+.<<.>>+.<<.>>+.<<.>>+.<<.>>+.<<.>>+.<<.>>--------.-. It could be shorter, however, it still accomplishes the same task. Brainf*** can theoretically perform any computation, as it is Turing complete. This is just one of those computations.
I suggest the following:
+++++++++>>++++++++[-<++++++>][-]>++++[-<++++++++>]<<<[->+.>.<<]>[-]+++++++[-<+++++++>]<.-.
It outputs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10.
We have this (each line is after the next cell-affecting instruction, which are + - .):
| C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | Output |
+----+----+----+----+-----------------------+
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
...
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
... (first loop)
| 9 | 48 | 0 | 0 | |
| 9 | 48 | 0 | 1 | |
| 9 | 48 | 0 | 2 | |
| 9 | 48 | 0 | 3 | |
| 9 | 48 | 0 | 4 | |
| 9 | 48 | 0 | 3 | | (enter second loop)
| 9 | 48 | 1 | 3 | |
| 9 | 48 | 2 | 3 | |
...
| 9 | 48 | 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 48 | 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 48 | 9 | 2 | |
...
| 9 | 48 | 16 | 2 | |
| 9 | 48 | 16 | 1 | |
| 9 | 48 | 17 | 1 | |
...
| 9 | 48 | 24 | 1 | |
| 9 | 48 | 24 | 0 | |
| 9 | 48 | 25 | 0 | |
...
| 0 | 48 | 32 | 0 | | (exit second loop)
| 8 | 48 | 32 | 0 | | (enter third loop)
| 8 | 49 | 32 | 0 | |
| 8 | 49 | 32 | 0 | 1 |
| 8 | 49 | 32 | 0 | 1_ | (underscores are spaces)
| 7 | 49 | 32 | 0 | 1_ |
| 7 | 50 | 32 | 0 | 1_ |
| 7 | 50 | 32 | 0 | 1_2 |
| 7 | 50 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_ |
| 6 | 50 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_ |
| 6 | 51 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_ |
| 6 | 51 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3 |
| 6 | 51 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_ |
| 5 | 51 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_ |
| 5 | 52 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_ |
| 5 | 52 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4 |
| 5 | 52 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_ |
| 4 | 52 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_ |
| 4 | 53 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_ |
| 4 | 53 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_5 |
| 4 | 53 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_5_ |
| 3 | 53 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_5_ |
| 3 | 54 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_5_ |
| 3 | 54 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_5_6 |
| 3 | 54 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_5_6_ |
| 2 | 54 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_5_6_ |
| 2 | 55 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_5_6_ |
| 2 | 55 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_5_6_7 |
| 2 | 55 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_5_6_7_ |
| 1 | 55 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_5_6_7_ |
| 1 | 56 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_5_6_7_ |
| 1 | 56 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_5_6_7_8 |
| 1 | 56 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_5_6_7_8_ |
| 0 | 56 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_5_6_7_8_ |
| 0 | 57 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_5_6_7_8_ |
| 0 | 57 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_5_6_7_8_9 |
| 0 | 57 | 32 | 0 | 1_2_3_4_5_6_7_8_9_ | (exit third loop)
+----+----+----+----+-----------------------+
Then cell C2 is set to 0 and used to set cell C1 to 49 (charater 1).
It prints C1, then removes one and prints it again, giving an output of:
1_2_3_4_5_6_7_8_9_10 (underscores are spaces)
It's for me the simplest program to print the integers from 1 to 10.
If you want each number to be on its own line, replace the >>>++++[-<++++++++>]<<< by ++++++++++.
Issue [SOLVED]: instead of printing 10 at the end, it prints :...
I want to sum the 7 preceding values of a row as a measure like so:
| Wk_number | Value A | Measure | Array |
-------------------------------------------
| 01 | 1 | N/A# | N/A# |
| 02 | 1 | 1 | {01} |
| 03 | 10 | 2 | {01-02} |
| 04 | 3 | 12 | {01-03} |
| 05 | 5 | 15 | {01-04} |
| 06 | 10 | 20 | {01-05} |
| 07 | 1 | 30 | {01-06} |
| 08 | 4 | 31 | {01-07} |
| 09 | -10 | 34 | {02-08} |
| 10 | 3 | 26 | {03-09} |
| 11 | 2 | 18 | {04-10} |
etc...
I added the array column just to clarify the example how of the sum is comprised, notice that from wk09 it's not simply a running total.
How to do this using DAX statements?
Two ways to do this: you can either create a calculated column, or a measure.
For the column:
=CALCULATE(SUM([Value A]),FILTER(Table,Table[Wk_number]<EARLIER(Table[Wk_number]) && Table[Wk_number] >= (EARLIER(Table[Wk_number])-7)))
For the measure, it's a very similar formula but instead of using EARLIER(), we use MAX():
=CALCULATE(SUM([Value A]),FILTER(ALL(Table3),Table3[Wk_number]<MAX(Table3[Wk_number]) && Table3[Wk_number] >= (MAX(Table3[Wk_number])-7)))
Below is a screenshot of the results. A few of the numbers in your example table seem to be off based on the math:
Just skip to the answer at the answer section, the question part has speculations and mistakes. The answer is based on experiment and it is accurate.
For a long time I have used a single png packed 256px ico file for my Visual Studio projects, and it worked well, cause scaling works fine on those icons and they take almost no space, and I did not care that much before.
But now I have an icon that needs to "retain hard edges", it is "pixel art".
If I build with a 256px version downscales terribly or if I build with 16px upscales slightly less terribly but not good enough. So my questions are:
What are the sizes I have to generate to merge into the ico (I don't care about pre win7 icons)?
If I got that list, do I have to generate 1.25x, 1.5x and 2.0x versions for high dpi settings?
Finally, some apps like firefox has a large icon on start menu inside the medium square block, my apps have a smaller one in the center like Visual Studio does, how can I put a large icon in the start menu medium sized square?
I did found it: Unfortunately VS says: VisualElements is not supported in a Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) project. Is there a way around this?
I looked around and collected possible sizes #1x(96DPI):
16, 20, 24, 30, 32, 40, 48, 50, 64, 128, 150, 256, 512, 768
Mostly I collected these from Which icon sizes should my Windows application's icon include?.
Not that bad, but if I add 1.25x, 1.5x, 2.0x then we get:
16, 20, 24, 25, 30, 32, 36, 38, 40, 45, 48, 50, 60, 62, 64, 72, 75, 80, 96, 100, 128, 150, 160, 188, 192, 225, 256, 300, 320, 384, 512, 640, 768, 960, 1024, 1152, 1536 In my case it makes a 500k ico file and as it seems the 1024 is the max resolution you can put into an ico file, my icon is pixelated so compresses really well with png and still ~500k.
I also made an ico has all of the above resolutions in rgba, and every one has its size on it, so you can see which windows loads on which dpi setting. you can download it from here and use it in a vs project to test.
As I understand everything under 256px can't be png compressed, is this right?
And do I need all these sizes to retain a pixel perfect icon? Are only 32bit(RGBA) pngs okay? I hope I don't need to include other depths.
After i wrote an ico writer from the spec I realized that pngs can have 0 for resolution cause 1 byte is available for x or y(but i have never seen an ico that is non square, maybe curs can be non square), in this case probably the first one in the file with zeros for resolution going to be used...This is not sure but I think its not far from the truth. See images. Rescaling issues are still confusing me, if I'll have some time tomorrow I'll test it. A pixel perfect icon seems to be imposible to do: having one image to rescale to anything above 256px.
The answers:
Are PNGs are acceptable under 256px inside ICO file?
Microsoft states that the sizes under 256px should be a BMP without the first 14 bytes.
But at least in the case of windows 10, the answer is YES.
Can you add larger than 1024px image into the ICO?
YES. As long as it is a PNG it can be as big as you want.
Note the "one icon over 255px" limitation:
You can only add one image larger than 255px ( you can add more but windows will only read the first image block in the ICO head where the resolution is 0,0). The format specifies 1 byte for each dimension. See table #2.
What sizes to include for all DPI setting?
Windows 10 uses the following icon sizes (see table below):
16, 20, 24, 28, 30, 31, 32, 40, 42, 47, 48, 56, 60, 63, 84 and one larger than 255px.
Note that Windows RT apps do not use ICO files, they use PNGs or Fonts, this is from Firefox's source:
<Application xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance'>
<VisualElements
ShowNameOnSquare150x150Logo='on'
Square150x150Logo='browser\VisualElements\VisualElements_150.png'
Square70x70Logo='browser\VisualElements\VisualElements_70.png'
ForegroundText='light'
BackgroundColor='#0996f8'/>
</Application>
So how Firefox has a large icon on start menu in the medium tile?
Well its include this above file in the exe directory before the shortcut added to start menu, this article explains it how. My app has an example.
If you make icons for Windows 10 you are better off with my tool and photoshop (or something like that) than anything else, I tried editors and they suck.
win10iconTools by me
You can create ICO files (as MS recommendation or not) or create icons with resolution printed on them, the latter is what I used to make the table.
Supports multiple resize modes including nearest neighbor.
If you want to you can use it on other windows versions, it works with .net2, test another windows, send me the results and I extend the table for the good of mankind.
As for pixel art in icons it is not possible to be perfect :(, unless we can change the scaling algorithm in windows 10.
So a wide range 84-256 gets the scaled to "0" (see above), so there is no real point adding something bigger that 256 as I see it now you should create a 256px image for "0".
(See table why)
If Windows gets all icons 16 to 255 + the 1 larger than 255 (0 in the table) chooses these sizes:
(so no markdown tables here?, its kind of wide, the tables are in the app readme also)
| | Windows 10 |
| | 96DPI | 120DPI | 144DPI | 168DPI |
| icon |disp.|load|disp.|load|disp.|load|disp.|load|
|-------------------------------------------|-----|----|-----|----|-----|----|-----|----|
| alt-tab | 24 | 32 | 30 | 32 | 36 | 32 | 42 | 32 |
| desktop large | 96 | 0 | 120 | 0 | 144 | 0 | 168 | 0 |
| desktop medium | 48 | 48 | 60 | 60 | 72 | 72 | 84 | 84 |
| desktop small | 32 | 32 | 40 | 40 | 48 | 48 | 56 | 56 |
| explorer content, inc0 | 32 | 32 | 40 | 40 | 48 | 48 | 56 | 56 |
| explorer extra large | 256 | 0 | 256 | 0 | 256 | 0 | 256 | 0 |
| explorer large | 96 | 0 | 120 | 0 | 144 | 0 | 168 | 0 |
| explorer medium | 48 | 48 | 60 | 60 | 72 | 72 | 84 | 84 |
| explorer small:inc4,list:inc3,details:inc2| 16 | 16 | 20 | 20 | 24 | 24 | 28 | 28 |
| explorer tiles, inc1 | 48 | 48 | 60 | 60 | 72 | 72 | 84 | 84 |
| startmenu medium | 32 | 32 | 40 | 40 | 48 | 48 | 56 | 63 |
| startmenu programs | 24 | 24 | 30 | 30 | 36 | 36 | 42 | 42 |
| startmenu search | 32 | 60 | 40 | 60 | 48 | 60 | 56 | 0 |
| startmenu tile small | 24 | 24 | 30 | 31 | 36 | 39 | 42 | 47 |
| taskbar normal | 24 | 32 | 30 | 40 | 36 | 48 | 42 | 56 |
| taskbar small | 16 | 16 | 20 | 20 | 24 | 24 | 28 | 28 |
| window icon | 16 | 16 | 20 | 16 | 24 | 16 | 28 | 16 |
| desktop inc0 | 16 | 16 | 20 | 20 | 24 | 24 | 28 | 28 |
| desktop inc1 | 18 | 32 | 23 | 40 | 27 | 48 | 32 | 56 |
| desktop inc2 | 20 | 30 | 25 | 40 | 30 | 48 | 35 | 56 |
| desktop inc3 | 22 | 32 | 28 | 40 | 33 | 48 | 39 | 56 |
| desktop inc4 | 24 | 32 | 30 | 40 | 36 | 48 | 42 | 56 |
| desktop inc5 | 27 | 32 | 34 | 40 | 41 | 48 | 47 | 56 |
| desktop inc6 | 30 | 32 | 38 | 40 | 45 | 48 | 53 | 56 |
| desktop inc7 | 33 | 48 | 41 | 60 | 50 | 72 | 58 | 84 |
| desktop inc8 | 37 | 48 | 46 | 60 | 56 | 72 | 65 | 84 |
| desktop inc9 | 41 | 48 | 51 | 60 | 62 | 72 | 72 | 84 |
| desktop inc10 | 46 | 48 | 58 | 60 | 69 | 72 | 82 | 84 |
| desktop inc11 | 51 | 0 | 64 | 0 | 77 | 0 | 89 | 0 |
| desktop inc12 | 57 | 0 | 71 | 0 | 86 | 0 | 100 | 0 |
| desktop inc13 | 63 | 0 | 79 | 0 | 95 | 0 | 110 | 0 |
| desktop inc14 | 70 | 0 | 88 | 0 | 105 | 0 | 123 | 0 |
| desktop inc15 | 78 | 0 | 98 | 0 | 117 | 0 | 137 | 0 |
| desktop inc16 | 87 | 0 | 109 | 0 | 131 | 0 | 152 | 0 |
| desktop inc17 | 97 | 0 | 121 | 0 | 146 | 0 | 170 | 0 |
| desktop inc18 | 108 | 0 | 135 | 0 | 162 | 0 | 189 | 0 |
| desktop inc19 | 120 | 0 | 150 | 0 | 180 | 0 | 210 | 0 |
| desktop inc20 | 133 | 0 | 166 | 0 | 200 | 0 | 233 | 0 |
| desktop inc21 | 148 | 0 | 185 | 0 | 222 | 0 | 256 | 0 |
| desktop inc22 | 164 | 0 | 205 | 0 | 246 | 0 | 256 | 0 |
| desktop inc23 | 182 | 0 | 228 | 0 | 256 | 0 | 256 | 0 |
| desktop inc24 | 202 | 0 | 253 | 0 | 256 | 0 | 256 | 0 |
| desktop inc25 | 224 | 0 | 256 | 0 | 256 | 0 | 256 | 0 |
| desktop inc26 | 249 | 0 | 256 | 0 | 256 | 0 | 256 | 0 |
| explorer inc5 | 18 | 32 | 23 | | | | | |
| explorer inc6 | 20 | 32 | 25 | | | | | |
| explorer inc7 | 22 | 32 | 28 | | | | | |
| explorer inc8 | 23 | 32 | 29 | | | | | |
| explorer inc9 | 25 | 32 | 31 | | | | | |
| explorer inc10 | 27 | 32 | 34 | | | | | |
| explorer inc11 | 29 | 32 | 36 | | | | | |
| explorer inc12 | 31 | 32 | 39 | | | | | |
| explorer inc13 | 33 | 48 | 41 | | | | | |
| explorer inc14 | 35 | 48 | 44 | | | | | |
| explorer inc15 | 38 | 48 | 48 | | | | | |
| explorer inc16 | 41 | 48 | 51 | | | | | |
| explorer inc17 | 44 | 48 | 55 | | | | | |
| explorer inc18 | 47 | 48 | 59 | | | | | |
| explorer inc19 | 50 | 0 | 63 | | | | | |
| explorer inc20 | 54 | 0 | 68 | | | | | |
| explorer inc44 | 239 | 0 | 256 | 0 | | | | |
| explorer inc45 | 256 | 0 | 256 | 0 | | | | |
There are 27 zoom increments on desktop
and 45 zoom increments on explorer (including the defaults from the menu on the "bottom level")
Icon format specification:
|**block** |**offset** |**offset** |**length** |**description** |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-------------------------------|
|main header| 0 | | 2 |Reserved=0 |
| | 2 | | 2 |Image type: 1(.ICO) 2(.CUR) |
| | 4 | | 2 |Number of images in container |
|image head1| 6 | 0 | 1 |Pixel width |
| | 7 | 1 | 1 |Pixel height |
| | 8 | 2 | 1 |Color palette size or 0 |
| | 9 | 3 | 1 |Reserved=0 |
| | A | 4 | 2 |Color planes=0 or 1 |
| | C | 6 | 2 |Bits per Pixel |
| | E | 8 | 4 |Image raw size |
| | 12 | C | 4 |Offset of imageblock from BOF |
|image head2| 16 | 0 | 1 |Pixel width |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |... |
|imageblock1| ... | ... | ... |all image data goes here: |
| | ... | ... | ... | pngs included in whole |
| | ... | ... | ... | bmps missing first 14 bytes |
The icons you see in Windows 10 are packed into a icon font named Segoe MDL2 Assets & all built-in UWP apps like Groove Music are using this font for icons. Also some apps in the Windows store using it.
I have a table in Access database as below;
Name | Range | X | Y | Z
------------------------------
A | 100-200 | 1 | 2 | 3
A | 200-300 | 4 | 5 | 6
B | 100-200 | 10 | 11 | 12
B | 200-300 | 13 | 14 | 15
C | 200-300 | 16 | 17 | 18
C | 300-400 | 19 | 20 | 21
I have trying write a query that convert this into the following format.
Name | X_100_200 | Y_100_200 | Z_100_200 | X_200_300 | Y_200_300 | Z_200_300 | X_300_400 | Y_300_400 | Z_300_400
A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | | |
B | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | | |
C | | | | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21
After trying for a while the best method I could come-up with is to write bunch of short queries that selects the data for each Range and then put them together again using a Union query. The problem is that for this example I have shown 3 columns (X, Y and Z), but I actually have much more. Access is starting to strain with the amount of SQL I have come up with.
Is there a better way to achieve this?
The answer was simple. Just use Access Pivotview. Finding it hard to export the results to Excel though.