Why is the context provider state not shared between micro-frontends? - reactjs

I am trying to split a monolithic React application into micro-frontends using Webpack Module Federation
The application relies on Context objects that are provided by the Host application. The context works as expected inside of the Host application, but not in the Remote application.
My code looks like this:
Host Application
Context and Context provider:
// TestContext.js
import React from 'libs/react';
export const TestContext = React.createContext("Not Initialized :(");
// LocalSample.js
import React from 'libs/react';
import { TestContext } from './TestContext';
export default function () {
const context = React.useContext(TestContext);
return <div>Local: {context}</div>
}
// App.js
import React, { Suspense } from 'libs/react';
import { TestContext } from './TestContext';
import RemoteSample from 'remote1/RemoteSample';
import LocalSample from './LocalSample';
export default function () {
return (
<TestContext.Provider value="Initialized :)">
<LocalSample />
<Suspense fallback={'loading...'}>
<RemoteSample />
</Suspense>
</TestContext.Provider>
);
};
Remote Application
// RemoteSample.js
import React from 'libs/react';
import { TestContext } from 'host/TestContext';
export default function () {
const context = React.useContext(TestContext);
return <div>Remote: {context}</div>
}
Sample code is also available at https://github.com/christianheld/module-federation-context-repro
The output of the application is:
Local: Initialized :)
Remote: Not Initialized :(
How can I share the context value from Host to the Remote application?

The trick is to put your contexts in into the shared object in the Module Federation configuration.
In my application this looks like:
shared: {
"./src/MyContext": {}
}
I found the workaround in the following video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LNcpralkjM&t=540
Please watch the video for the explanation.

Related

Using React.Context with Nextjs13 server-side components

Next13 was released a week ago, and I am trying to migrate a next12 app to a next13.
I want to use server-side components as much as possible, but I can't seem to use
import { createContext } from 'react';
in any server component.
I am getting this error:
Server Error
Error:
You're importing a component that needs createContext. It only works in a Client Component but none of its parents are marked with "use client", so they're Server Components by default.
,----
1 | import { createContext } from 'react';
: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
`----
Maybe one of these should be marked as a client entry with "use client":
Is there an alternative here or do I have to resort to prop drilling to get server-side rendering?
It seems like I can use createServerContext
import { createServerContext } from 'react';
If you're using Typescript and React 18, you'll also need to add "types": ["react/next"] to your tsconfig.json compiler options, since this is a not-yet-stable function.
This is a new feature from React's SSR to recognize whether a component is client-side or server-side. In your case, createContext is only available on the client side.
If you only use this component for client-side, you can define 'use client'; on top of the component.
'use client';
import { createContext } from 'react';
You can check this Next.js document and this React RFC for the details
According to Next.js 13 beta documentation, you cannot use context in Server Components:
In Next.js 13, context is fully supported within Client Components, but it cannot be created or consumed directly within Server Components. This is because Server Components have no React state (since they're not interactive), and context is primarily used for rerendering interactive components deep in the tree after some React state has been updated
However, there are alternative ways to handle data in the new approach, depending on your case. F.e. if you fetched the data from the server in a parent component and then passed it down the tree through Context, you can now fetch the data directly in all the components that depend on this data. React 18 will dedupe (de-duplicate) the fetches, so there are no unnecessary requests.
There are more alternatives in the documentation.
I've made a tiny package to handle context in server components, works with latest next.js, it's called server-only-context:
https://www.npmjs.com/package/server-only-context
Usage:
import serverContext from 'server-only-context';
export const [getLocale, setLocale] = serverContext('en')
export const [getUserId, setUserId] = serverContext('')
import { setLocale, setUserId } from '#/context'
export default function UserPage({ params: { locale, userId } }) {
setLocale(locale)
setUserId(userId)
return <MyComponent/>
}
import { getLocale, getUserId } from '#/context'
export default function MyComponent() {
const locale = getLocale()
const userId = getUserId()
return (
<div>
Hello {userId}! Locale is {locale}.
</div>
)
}
This is the code for it, it's really simple:
import 'server-only'
import { cache } from 'react'
export default <T>(defaultValue: T): [() => T, (v: T) => void] => {
const getRef = cache(() => ({ current: defaultValue }))
const getValue = (): T => getRef().current
const setValue = (value: T) => {
getRef().current = value
}
return [getValue, setValue]
}

React Native: platform specific import

Got this weird situation. Building for react native and using a native package from Intercom. Importing it works fine when android or ios. But for the web (or node jest) it throws an error.
So have to do some face-pattern "hacking" like this
utilities/Intercom/index.ios.ts
export { default } from '#intercom/intercom-react-native'
utilities/Intercom/index.web.ts
export default function Intercom() {}
some file that uses Intercom
// #ts-ignore
import Intercom from '~/utilities/Intercom' // Cannot find module '~/utilities/Intercom' or its corresponding type declarations.ts(2307)
...
Intercom.logout() // no TS support
Not only does TS complain, but I also loses all types 😭
Is there any other way to do platform specific import and keep the native types?
The error in jest (node) is Cannot read property 'UNREAD_CHANGE_NOTIFICATION' of undefined which is also described in their docs. Problem is that I can't mock it out when using react-native-web that comes with expo.
I think this is what you're looking for https://stackoverflow.com/a/43531355/1868008
In your utilities directory, create a file named Intercom.d.ts and there place the following
import DefaultIos from "./Intercom/index.ios";
import * as ios from "./Intercom/index.ios";
import DefaultWeb from "./Intercom/index.web";
import * as web from "./Intercom/index.web";
declare var _test: typeof ios;
declare var _test: typeof web;
declare var _testDefault: typeof DefaultIos;
declare var _testDefault: typeof DefaultWeb;
export * from "./Intercom/index.ios";
export default DefaultIos;
Not sure what all those are. Maybe something used in typescript internals.
And for the tests, it seems you'll need to mock every method you use in the code you're testing, e.g., in this App component; I'm using the logEvent method, so I return it in the mock object of the library
import React from "react";
import renderer from "react-test-renderer";
import App from "./App";
jest.mock("#intercom/intercom-react-native", () => ({ logEvent: jest.fn() }));
describe("<App />", () => {
it("has 1 child", () => {
const tree = renderer.create(<App />).toJSON();
expect(tree.children.length).toBe(1);
});
});
App.tsx
...
import Intercom from "./utilities/Intercom";
export default function App() {
Intercom.logEvent("test", {});
...
}
For the web implementation, you could import the type to ensure compliance with the library interface
import type { IntercomType } from "#intercom/intercom-react-native";
const webImplementation: IntercomType = {
// here implement all methods
};
export default webImplementation;
https://github.com/diedu89/expo-isomorphic-import-ts

How to use dynamic import with a named export in Next.js?

I have this react component. It works just fine for me.
import { Widget } from 'rasa-webchat';
function CustomWidget(){
return (
<Widget
initPayload={"payload"}
socketPath={"/socket.io/"}
customData={{"language": "en"}}
/>
)
}
export default CustomWidget;
But when I try to use it on my next.js website it fails to work.
It gives me a window is not defined error.
I think I resolved this particular error by using the dynamic importer:
import dynamic from "next/dynamic";
const webchat = dynamic(
() => {
return import('rasa-webchat');
},
{ ssr: false }
);
But now I can't figure out how to actually use the widget component from the package.
Am I allowed to import { Widget } from 'rasa-webchat' or is this just not compatible with next.js for some reason? If it's possible, how do I do it?
The syntax for named exports is slightly different. You can use the widget with a dynamic import as follows:
import dynamic from 'next/dynamic';
const Widget = dynamic(
() => import('rasa-webchat').then((mod) => mod.Widget),
{ ssr: false }
);
function CustomWidget(){
return (
<Widget
initPayload={"payload"}
socketPath={"/socket.io/"}
customData={{"language": "en"}}
/>
)
}
export default CustomWidget;
For further details check Next.js dynamic import documentation.
Nextjs is a frame work that allows you to build Static and Server Side rendered apps. So, it uses Nodesj under hood and window is not defined in nodejs. Only way to accessing window in react ssr frameworks is useEffect hook. Your dynamic import solution is right , becuase you are getting file on client side. I hope it makes sense.
Have a great day

ProviderFunction not exporting my new functions

My Problem :
I expect my FirebaseProvider function to provide an object containing all functions, through the app. The problem is that all functions are well provided through my files, except my last new function : fetchTest.
Explainations :
If I click the TestPage.js button I get Uncaught TypeError: fetchTest is not a function.
I saw many posts on stackoverflow about this type of error, but none did help me. -> I think the original problem is the index.js is not called. The console.log("firebaseprovider") (in index.js) does not appear in console, yet the other files of the project in web-app/src/views/ have the same imports and exports than TestPage.
Since App.js code worked fine on all the other files, I don't know how console.log("firebaseprovider") is never displayed in the navigator console. (edit: no matter which page I go, this console.log never appears)
<FirebaseProvider> seems to not provide TestPage.js.
Do you have an idea ?
What I've tried :
placing a console.log in TestPage.js : it shows every function written in index.js but not fetchTest. It seems to not be properly exported through api object.
in TestPage.js trying console.log("api.fetchTest") : console displays undefined.
add a second testing function in index.js, whithout parameters, which just does console.log("test")
compare imports/exports and api declarations with other files in web-app/src/views/
create a handleSubmit() function in TestPage.js to not put the functions directly in return
delete node_modules and then yarn install
yarn workspace web-app build and then relaunch yarn workspace web-app start
(This is a Yarn Workspaces project containing a common/ and a web-app/ folders)
common/src/index.js:
import React, { createContext } from 'react';
import {FirebaseConfig} from 'config';
const FirebaseContext = createContext(null);
const FirebaseProvider = ({ children }) => {
console.log("firebaseprovider"); // is not displayed in the console
let firebase = { app: null, database: null, auth: null, storage:null }
if (!app.apps.length) { // I tried to comment out this line (and the '}') -> no difference
app.initializeApp(FirebaseConfig); // no difference when commented out
firebase = {
app: app,
database: app.database(),
auth: app.auth(),
storage: app.storage(),
// [ ... ] other lines of similar code
api : { // here are functions to import
fetchUser: () => (dispatch) => fetchUser()(dispatch)(firebase),
addProfile: (details) => (dispatch) => addProfile(userDetails)(dispatch)(firebase),
// [ ... ] other functions, properly exported and working in other files
// My function :
fetchTest: (testData) => (dispatch) => fetchTest(testData)(dispatch)(firebase),
}
}
}
return (
<FirebaseContext.Provider value={firebase}>
{children}
</FirebaseContext.Provider>
)
}
export { FirebaseContext, FirebaseProvider, store }
web-app/src/views/TestPage.js:
import React, { useContext } from "react";
import { useDispatch } from "react-redux";
import { FirebaseContext } from "common";
const TestPage.js = () => {
const { api } = useContext(FirebaseContext);
console.log(api); // Displays all functions in api object, but not fetchTest
const { fetchTest } = api;
const dispatch = useDispatch();
const testData = { validation: "pending" };
return <button onClick={ () => {
dispatch(fetchTest(testData)); // Tried with/without dispatch
alert("done");
}}>Test button</button>
}
export default TestPage;
web-app/src/App.js:
import React from 'react';
import { Router, Route, Switch } from 'react-router-dom';
// ... import all pages
import { Provider } from 'react-redux';
import TestPage from './views/CreateSiteNeed'; // written same way for the other pages
import { store, FirebaseProvider } from 'common';
function App() {
return (
<Provider store={store}>
<FirebaseProvider>
<AuthLoading>
<Router history={hist}>
<Switch>
<ProtectedRoute exact component={MyProfile} path="/profile" />
<!-- [ ... ] more <ProtectedRoute /> lines, form imported Pages line 3. -->
<ProtectedRoute exact component={TestPage} path="/testpage" />
</Switch>
</Router>
</AuthLoading>
</FirebaseProvider>
</Provider>
);
}
export default App;
I hope some people will find this post helpful, thanks
Here was the problem :
Firstly :
I'm using Redux, so fetchTest() has its testActions.js and testReducer.js files, which are functionnal. But I did forget to update my store.js :
// [ ... ] import all reducers
import { testReducer as testData } from '../reducers/testReducer'; // was'nt imported
const reducers = combineReducers({
auth,
usersdata,
// [ ... ] other imported reducers
testData // My test reducer
}
// The rest is a classic store.js code
Secondly :
As I'm using Yarn Workspaces, I had to compile the code in common/dist/index.js to make it accessible through the whole entire code (even for local testing).
Here is the command to compile the code (-> to include all redux edits made above) and make it accessible to web-app workspace :
yarn workspace common build && yarn workspace web-app add common#1.0.0 --force
Explanations on the second part of the command (yarn workspace web-app add common#1.0.0 --force) :
The web-app/package.json file contains { "dependencies": { ... "common":"1.0.0" ... }}

Reactjs import dynamically js file with default export function

I have a reactjs app
In MyApp component I use an import at top like this:
import { ProvideAuth } from "util/auth.js";
Internally this file util/auth.js I have this code (I import another js file at top like this):
import analytics from "./analytics";
export function ProvideAuth({ children }) {
.....
}
How can I make this import analytics from "./analytics" dynamically depending on a cookie value?.
I made this code, but it doesn't work:
function loadLazyModule() {
console.log("loadLazyModule");
const _module = React.lazy(() =>
import("./analytics.js")
);
return _module;
}
// Provider hook that creates auth object and handles state
export function ProvideAuth({ children }) {
if (statisticsCookie == 'Y') {
console.log("statisticsCookie", statisticsCookie);
loadLazyModule();
}
.....
}
Finally my analytics.js has this code:
// Initialize analytics and plugins
// Documentation: https://getanalytics.io
const analytics = Analytics({
debug: process.env.NODE_ENV !== "production",
plugins: [
googleAnalyticsPlugin({
trackingId: process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_GA_TRACKING_ID,
}),
],
});
....
export default analytics;
I need to this file import only if my cookie is enabled (has value 'Y'):
import analytics from "./analytics";
Help me please!
Thanks!
you can do it like this.
you can also use, .than().catch() function after that.
async function load() {
let say = await import('./say.js');
say.hi(); // Hello!
say.bye(); // Bye!
say.default(); // Module loaded (export default)!
}
or via import module
let modulePath = prompt("Which module to load?");
import(modulePath)
.then(obj => <module object>)
.catch(err => <loading error,e.g. if no such module>)
it's described here
https://javascript.info/modules-dynamic-imports

Resources