I have a chat app I made using React for the frontend, DRF for the backend and I also have a node.js server within the React app for socket.io The issue is that the chat doesn't work basically (it works fine locally). When a message is sent it's not emitted and only shows up when I refresh since it's then pulled from the DB instead. I have gone through many threads on here for this issue but can't figure out what I'm doing wrong.
My server:
const server = require("http").createServer();
const io = require("socket.io")(server, {
cors: {
origin: "*",
},
});
const PORT = process.env.PORT || 5000;
const NEW_CHAT_MESSAGE_EVENT = "newChatMessage";
io.on("connection", (socket) => {
console.log('Client connected')
// Join a conversation.
const {roomId} = socket.handshake.query;
socket.join(roomId);
// Listen for new messages
socket.on(NEW_CHAT_MESSAGE_EVENT, (data) => {
io.in(roomId).emit(NEW_CHAT_MESSAGE_EVENT, data);
});
// Leave the room if the user closes the socket
socket.on("disconnect", () => {
socket.leave(roomId);
});
});
server.listen(PORT, (error) => {
if (error) throw error;
console.log(`Listening on port ${PORT}`);
});
Hook I made for the frontend:
const NEW_CHAT_MESSAGE_EVENT = "newChatMessage"; // Name of the event
const SOCKET_SERVER_URL = `https://<my-react-frontend>.herokuapp.com`;
export const useChat = () => {
const socketRef = useRef();
const {messages, setMessages, activeConvo, headerConvo, reloadSideBar, setReloadSideBar} = useActiveConvo()
const roomId = activeConvo
useEffect(() => {
console.log('useChat useEffect ran')
// Creates a WebSocket connection
socketRef.current = socketIOClient(SOCKET_SERVER_URL, {
query: {roomId},
});
// Listens for incoming messages
socketRef.current.on(NEW_CHAT_MESSAGE_EVENT, (message) => {
const incomingMessage = {
message: message.body,
created_by: localStorage.getItem('currentUserID'),
};
console.log('messages set in useChat useFfect')
setMessages((messages) => [...messages, incomingMessage]);
});
// Destroys the socket reference
// when the connection is closed
return () => {
socketRef.current.disconnect();
};
}, [roomId]);
// Sends a message to the server that
// forwards it to all users in the same room
const sendMessage = (messageBody) => {
socketRef.current.emit(NEW_CHAT_MESSAGE_EVENT, {
body: messageBody,
senderId: socketRef.current.id,
});
const fetchContents = {
message: messageBody,
created_by: localStorage.getItem('currentUserID'),
convo_id: activeConvo ? activeConvo : headerConvo
}
fetch(`https://<my-drf-backend>.herokuapp.com/api/save-message/`, authRequestOptions(('POST'), fetchContents))
.then(response => response.json())
.then(setReloadSideBar(reloadSideBar + 1))
.catch(error => console.log(error))
};
return {messages, sendMessage};
};
The issue in most of the threads appeared to be either still using the localhost url on the frontend or not using process.env.PORT in the server but it's still busted after fixing that. I also saw someone mention in another thread that the folder structure was the issue so I tried having the server file in the root of the react app and having it in it's own folder under "src", no dice.
In case anyone faces this same issue, I solved it by putting the server in a separate app on heroku
I have built an axios private instance with interceptors to manage auth request.
The system has a custom axios instance:
const BASE_URL = 'http://localhost:8000';
export const axiosPrivate = axios.create({
baseURL: BASE_URL,
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
},
withCredentials: true,
});
A custom useRefreshToken hook returns accessToken using the refresh token:
const useRefreshToken = () => {
const { setAuth } = useAuth();
const refresh = async () => {
const response = await refreshTokens();
// console.log('response', response);
const { user, roles, accessToken } = response.data;
setAuth({ user, roles, accessToken });
// return accessToken for use in axiosClient
return accessToken;
};
return refresh;
};
export default useRefreshToken;
Axios interceptors are attached to this axios instance in useAxiosPrivate.js file to attached accessToken to request and refresh the accessToken using a refresh token if expired.
const useAxiosPrivate = () => {
const { auth } = useAuth();
const refresh = useRefreshToken();
useEffect(() => {
const requestIntercept = axiosPrivate.interceptors.request.use(
(config) => {
// attach the access token to the request if missing
if (!config.headers['Authorization']) {
config.headers['Authorization'] = `Bearer ${auth?.accessToken}`;
}
return config;
},
(error) => Promise.reject(error)
);
const responseIntercept = axiosPrivate.interceptors.response.use(
(response) => response,
async (error) => {
const prevRequest = error?.config;
// sent = custom property, after 1st request - sent = true, so no looping requests
if (error?.response?.status === 403 && !prevRequest?.sent) {
prevRequest.sent = true;
const newAccessToken = await refresh();
prevRequest.headers['Authorization'] = `Bearer ${newAccessToken}`;
return axiosPrivate(prevRequest);
}
return Promise.reject(error);
}
);
// remove the interceptor when the component unmounts
return () => {
axiosPrivate.interceptors.response.eject(responseIntercept);
axiosPrivate.interceptors.request.eject(requestIntercept);
};
}, [auth, refresh]);
return axiosPrivate;
};
export default useAxiosPrivate;
Now, this private axios instance is called in functional component - PanelLayout which is used to wrap around the pages and provide layout.
Here, I've tried to use AbortControllers in axios to terminate the request after the component is mounted.
function PanelLayout({ children, title }) {
const [user, setUser] = useState(null);
const axiosPrivate = useAxiosPrivate();
const router = useRouter();
useEffect(() => {
let isMounted = true;
const controller = new AbortController();
const signal = controller.signal;
const getUserProfile = async () => {
try {
const response = await axiosPrivate.get('/api/identity/profile', {
signal,
});
console.log(response.data);
isMounted && setUser(response.data.user);
} catch (error) {
console.log(error);
router.push({
pathname: '/seller/auth/login',
query: { from: router.pathname },
});
}
};
getUserProfile();
return () => {
isMounted = false;
controller.abort();
};
}, []);
console.log('page rendered');
return (
<div className='flex items-start'>
<Sidebar className='h-screen w-[10rem]' />
<section className='min-h-screen flex flex-col'>
<PanelHeader title={title} classname='left-[10rem] h-[3.5rem]' />
<main className='mt-[3.5rem] flex-1'>{children}</main>
</section>
</div>
);
}
export default PanelLayout;
However, the above code is throwing the following error:
CanceledError {message: 'canceled', name: 'CanceledError', code: 'ERR_CANCELED'}
code: "ERR_CANCELED"
message: "canceled"
name: "CanceledError"
[[Prototype]]: AxiosError
constructor: ƒ CanceledError(message)
__CANCEL__: true
[[Prototype]]: Error
Please suggest how to avoid the above error and get axios to work properly.
I also encountered the same issue and I thought that there was some flaw in my logic which caused the component to be mounted twice. After doing some digging I found that react apparently added this feature with with the new version 18 in StrictMode where useEffect was being run twice. Here's a link to the article clearly explaining this new behaviour.
One way you could solve this problem is by removing StrictMode from your application (Temporary Solution)
Another way is by using useRef hook to store some piece of state which is updated when your application is mounted the second time.
// CODE BEFORE USE EFFECT
const effectRun = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
let isMounted = true;
const controller = new AbortController();
const signal = controller.signal;
const getUserProfile = async () => {
try {
const response = await axiosPrivate.get('/api/identity/profile', {
signal,
});
console.log(response.data);
isMounted && setUser(response.data.user);
} catch (error) {
console.log(error);
router.push({
pathname: '/seller/auth/login',
query: { from: router.pathname },
});
}
};
// Check if useEffect has run the first time
if (effectRun.current) {
getUserProfile();
}
return () => {
isMounted = false;
controller.abort();
effectRun.current = true; // update the value of effectRun to true
};
}, []);
// CODE AFTER USE EFFECT
Found the solution from this YouTube video.
I, too, encountered this issue. What made it worse is that axios doesn't provide an HTTP status code when the request has been canceled, although you do get error.code === "ERR_CANCELED". I solved it by handling the abort within the axios interceptor:
axiosInstance.interceptors.response.use(
(response) => response,
(error) => {
if (error.code === "ERR_CANCELED") {
// aborted in useEffect cleanup
return Promise.resolve({status: 499})
}
return Promise.reject((error.response && error.response.data) || 'Error')
}
);
As you can see, I ensure that the error response in the case of an abort supplies a status code of 499.
I faced the same problem in similar project, lets start by understanding first the root cause of that problem.
in react 18 the try to make us convenient to the idea of mounting and unmounting components twice for future features that the are preparing, the the useEffect hook now is mounted first time then unmounted the mounted finally.
so they need from us adapt our projects to the idea of mount and unmount of components twice
so you have two ways, adapting these changes and try to adapt your code to accept mounting twice, or making some turn around code to overcome mounting twice, and I would prefer the first one.
here in your code after first mount you aborted your API request in clean up function, so when the component dismount and remount again it face an error when try to run previously aborted request, so it throw exception, that's what happens
1st solution (adapting to react changing):
return () => {
isMounted = false
isMounted && controller.abort()
}
so in above code we will abort controller once only when isMounted is true, and thats will solve your problem
2nd solution (turn around to react changing):
by using useRef hook and asign it to a variable and update its boolean value after excuting the whole code only one time.
const runOnce = useRef(true)
useEffect(()=>{
if(runOnce.current){
//requesting from API
return()=>{
runOnce.current = false
}
}
},[])
3rd solution (turn around to react changing):
remove React.StrictMode from index.js file
When fetching data I'm getting: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component. The app still works, but react is suggesting I might be causing a memory leak.
This is a no-op, but it indicates a memory leak in your application. To fix, cancel all subscriptions and asynchronous tasks in a useEffect cleanup function."
Why do I keep getting this warning?
I tried researching these solutions:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/AbortSignal
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/AbortController
but this still was giving me the warning.
const ArtistProfile = props => {
const [artistData, setArtistData] = useState(null)
const token = props.spotifyAPI.user_token
const fetchData = () => {
const id = window.location.pathname.split("/").pop()
console.log(id)
props.spotifyAPI.getArtistProfile(id, ["album"], "US", 10)
.then(data => {setArtistData(data)})
}
useEffect(() => {
fetchData()
return () => { props.spotifyAPI.cancelRequest() }
}, [])
return (
<ArtistProfileContainer>
<AlbumContainer>
{artistData ? artistData.artistAlbums.items.map(album => {
return (
<AlbumTag
image={album.images[0].url}
name={album.name}
artists={album.artists}
key={album.id}
/>
)
})
: null}
</AlbumContainer>
</ArtistProfileContainer>
)
}
Edit:
In my api file I added an AbortController() and used a signal so I can cancel a request.
export function spotifyAPI() {
const controller = new AbortController()
const signal = controller.signal
// code ...
this.getArtist = (id) => {
return (
fetch(
`https://api.spotify.com/v1/artists/${id}`, {
headers: {"Authorization": "Bearer " + this.user_token}
}, {signal})
.then(response => {
return checkServerStat(response.status, response.json())
})
)
}
// code ...
// this is my cancel method
this.cancelRequest = () => controller.abort()
}
My spotify.getArtistProfile() looks like this
this.getArtistProfile = (id,includeGroups,market,limit,offset) => {
return Promise.all([
this.getArtist(id),
this.getArtistAlbums(id,includeGroups,market,limit,offset),
this.getArtistTopTracks(id,market)
])
.then(response => {
return ({
artist: response[0],
artistAlbums: response[1],
artistTopTracks: response[2]
})
})
}
but because my signal is used for individual api calls that are resolved in a Promise.all I can't abort() that promise so I will always be setting the state.
For me, clean the state in the unmount of the component helped.
const [state, setState] = useState({});
useEffect(() => {
myFunction();
return () => {
setState({}); // This worked for me
};
}, []);
const myFunction = () => {
setState({
name: 'Jhon',
surname: 'Doe',
})
}
Sharing the AbortController between the fetch() requests is the right approach.
When any of the Promises are aborted, Promise.all() will reject with AbortError:
function Component(props) {
const [fetched, setFetched] = React.useState(false);
React.useEffect(() => {
const ac = new AbortController();
Promise.all([
fetch('http://placekitten.com/1000/1000', {signal: ac.signal}),
fetch('http://placekitten.com/2000/2000', {signal: ac.signal})
]).then(() => setFetched(true))
.catch(ex => console.error(ex));
return () => ac.abort(); // Abort both fetches on unmount
}, []);
return fetched;
}
const main = document.querySelector('main');
ReactDOM.render(React.createElement(Component), main);
setTimeout(() => ReactDOM.unmountComponentAtNode(main), 1); // Unmount after 1ms
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.8.3/umd/react.development.js"></script>
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.8.3/umd/react-dom.development.js"></script>
<main></main>
For example, you have some component that does some asynchronous actions, then writes the result to state and displays the state content on a page:
export default function MyComponent() {
const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false);
const [someData, setSomeData] = useState({});
// ...
useEffect( () => {
(async () => {
setLoading(true);
someResponse = await doVeryLongRequest(); // it takes some time
// When request is finished:
setSomeData(someResponse.data); // (1) write data to state
setLoading(false); // (2) write some value to state
})();
}, []);
return (
<div className={loading ? "loading" : ""}>
{someData}
<Link to="SOME_LOCAL_LINK">Go away from here!</Link>
</div>
);
}
Let's say that user clicks some link when doVeryLongRequest() still executes. MyComponent is unmounted but the request is still alive and when it gets a response it tries to set state in lines (1) and (2) and tries to change the appropriate nodes in HTML. We'll get an error from subject.
We can fix it by checking whether compponent is still mounted or not. Let's create a componentMounted ref (line (3) below) and set it true. When component is unmounted we'll set it to false (line (4) below). And let's check the componentMounted variable every time we try to set state (line (5) below).
The code with fixes:
export default function MyComponent() {
const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false);
const [someData, setSomeData] = useState({});
const componentMounted = useRef(true); // (3) component is mounted
// ...
useEffect( () => {
(async () => {
setLoading(true);
someResponse = await doVeryLongRequest(); // it takes some time
// When request is finished:
if (componentMounted.current){ // (5) is component still mounted?
setSomeData(someResponse.data); // (1) write data to state
setLoading(false); // (2) write some value to state
}
return () => { // This code runs when component is unmounted
componentMounted.current = false; // (4) set it to false when we leave the page
}
})();
}, []);
return (
<div className={loading ? "loading" : ""}>
{someData}
<Link to="SOME_LOCAL_LINK">Go away from here!</Link>
</div>
);
}
Why do I keep getting this warning?
The intention of this warning is to help you prevent memory leaks in your application. If the component updates it's state after it has been unmounted from the DOM, this is an indication that there could be a memory leak, but it is an indication with a lot of false positives.
How do I know if I have a memory leak?
You have a memory leak if an object that lives longer than your component holds a reference to it, either directly or indirectly. This usually happens when you subscribe to events or changes of some kind without unsubscribing when your component unmounts from the DOM.
It typically looks like this:
useEffect(() => {
function handleChange() {
setState(store.getState())
}
// "store" lives longer than the component,
// and will hold a reference to the handleChange function.
// Preventing the component to be garbage collected after
// unmount.
store.subscribe(handleChange)
// Uncomment the line below to avoid memory leak in your component
// return () => store.unsubscribe(handleChange)
}, [])
Where store is an object that lives further up the React tree (possibly in a context provider), or in global/module scope. Another example is subscribing to events:
useEffect(() => {
function handleScroll() {
setState(window.scrollY)
}
// document is an object in global scope, and will hold a reference
// to the handleScroll function, preventing garbage collection
document.addEventListener('scroll', handleScroll)
// Uncomment the line below to avoid memory leak in your component
// return () => document.removeEventListener(handleScroll)
}, [])
Another example worth remembering is the web API setInterval, which can also cause memory leak if you forget to call clearInterval when unmounting.
But that is not what I am doing, why should I care about this warning?
React's strategy to warn whenever state updates happen after your component has unmounted creates a lot of false positives. The most common I've seen is by setting state after an asynchronous network request:
async function handleSubmit() {
setPending(true)
await post('/someapi') // component might unmount while we're waiting
setPending(false)
}
You could technically argue that this also is a memory leak, since the component isn't released immediately after it is no longer needed. If your "post" takes a long time to complete, then it will take a long time to for the memory to be released. However, this is not something you should worry about, because it will be garbage collected eventually. In these cases, you could simply ignore the warning.
But it is so annoying to see the warning, how do I remove it?
There are a lot of blogs and answers on stackoverflow suggesting to keep track of the mounted state of your component and wrap your state updates in an if-statement:
let isMountedRef = useRef(false)
useEffect(() => {
isMountedRef.current = true
return () => {
isMountedRef.current = false
}
}, [])
async function handleSubmit() {
setPending(true)
await post('/someapi')
if (!isMountedRef.current) {
setPending(false)
}
}
This is not an recommended approach! Not only does it make the code less readable and adds runtime overhead, but it might also might not work well with future features of React. It also does nothing at all about the "memory leak", the component will still live just as long as without that extra code.
The recommended way to deal with this is to either cancel the asynchronous function (with for instance the AbortController API), or to ignore it.
In fact, React dev team recognises the fact that avoiding false positives is too difficult, and has removed the warning in v18 of React.
You can try this set a state like this and check if your component mounted or not. This way you are sure that if your component is unmounted you are not trying to fetch something.
const [didMount, setDidMount] = useState(false);
useEffect(() => {
setDidMount(true);
return () => setDidMount(false);
}, [])
if(!didMount) {
return null;
}
return (
<ArtistProfileContainer>
<AlbumContainer>
{artistData ? artistData.artistAlbums.items.map(album => {
return (
<AlbumTag
image={album.images[0].url}
name={album.name}
artists={album.artists}
key={album.id}
/>
)
})
: null}
</AlbumContainer>
</ArtistProfileContainer>
)
Hope this will help you.
I had a similar issue with a scroll to top and #CalosVallejo answer solved it :) Thank you so much!!
const ScrollToTop = () => {
const [showScroll, setShowScroll] = useState();
//------------------ solution
useEffect(() => {
checkScrollTop();
return () => {
setShowScroll({}); // This worked for me
};
}, []);
//----------------- solution
const checkScrollTop = () => {
setShowScroll(true);
};
const scrollTop = () => {
window.scrollTo({ top: 0, behavior: "smooth" });
};
window.addEventListener("scroll", checkScrollTop);
return (
<React.Fragment>
<div className="back-to-top">
<h1
className="scrollTop"
onClick={scrollTop}
style={{ display: showScroll }}
>
{" "}
Back to top <span>⟶ </span>
</h1>
</div>
</React.Fragment>
);
};
I have getting same warning, This solution Worked for me ->
useEffect(() => {
const unsubscribe = fetchData(); //subscribe
return unsubscribe; //unsubscribe
}, []);
if you have more then one fetch function then
const getData = () => {
fetch1();
fetch2();
fetch3();
}
useEffect(() => {
const unsubscribe = getData(); //subscribe
return unsubscribe; //unsubscribe
}, []);
This error occurs when u perform state update on current component after navigating to other component:
for example
axios
.post(API.BASE_URI + API.LOGIN, { email: username, password: password })
.then((res) => {
if (res.status === 200) {
dispatch(login(res.data.data)); // line#5 logging user in
setSigningIn(false); // line#6 updating some state
} else {
setSigningIn(false);
ToastAndroid.show(
"Email or Password is not correct!",
ToastAndroid.LONG
);
}
})
In above case on line#5 I'm dispatching login action which in return navigates user to the dashboard and hence login screen now gets unmounted.
Now when React Native reaches as line#6 and see there is state being updated, it yells out loud that how do I do this, the login component is there no more.
Solution:
axios
.post(API.BASE_URI + API.LOGIN, { email: username, password: password })
.then((res) => {
if (res.status === 200) {
setSigningIn(false); // line#6 updating some state -- moved this line up
dispatch(login(res.data.data)); // line#5 logging user in
} else {
setSigningIn(false);
ToastAndroid.show(
"Email or Password is not correct!",
ToastAndroid.LONG
);
}
})
Just move react state update above, move line 6 up the line 5.
Now state is being updated before navigating the user away. WIN WIN
there are many answers but I thought I could demonstrate more simply how the abort works (at least how it fixed the issue for me):
useEffect(() => {
// get abortion variables
let abortController = new AbortController();
let aborted = abortController.signal.aborted; // true || false
async function fetchResults() {
let response = await fetch(`[WEBSITE LINK]`);
let data = await response.json();
aborted = abortController.signal.aborted; // before 'if' statement check again if aborted
if (aborted === false) {
// All your 'set states' inside this kind of 'if' statement
setState(data);
}
}
fetchResults();
return () => {
abortController.abort();
};
}, [])
Other Methods:
https://medium.com/wesionary-team/how-to-fix-memory-leak-issue-in-react-js-using-hook-a5ecbf9becf8
If the user navigates away, or something else causes the component to get destroyed before the async call comes back and tries to setState on it, it will cause the error. It's generally harmless if it is, indeed, a late-finish async call. There's a couple of ways to silence the error.
If you're implementing a hook like useAsync you can declare your useStates with let instead of const, and, in the destructor returned by useEffect, set the setState function(s) to a no-op function.
export function useAsync<T, F extends IUseAsyncGettor<T>>(gettor: F, ...rest: Parameters<F>): IUseAsync<T> {
let [parameters, setParameters] = useState(rest);
if (parameters !== rest && parameters.some((_, i) => parameters[i] !== rest[i]))
setParameters(rest);
const refresh: () => void = useCallback(() => {
const promise: Promise<T | void> = gettor
.apply(null, parameters)
.then(value => setTuple([value, { isLoading: false, promise, refresh, error: undefined }]))
.catch(error => setTuple([undefined, { isLoading: false, promise, refresh, error }]));
setTuple([undefined, { isLoading: true, promise, refresh, error: undefined }]);
return promise;
}, [gettor, parameters]);
useEffect(() => {
refresh();
// and for when async finishes after user navs away //////////
return () => { setTuple = setParameters = (() => undefined) }
}, [refresh]);
let [tuple, setTuple] = useState<IUseAsync<T>>([undefined, { isLoading: true, refresh, promise: Promise.resolve() }]);
return tuple;
}
That won't work well in a component, though. There, you can wrap useState in a function which tracks mounted/unmounted, and wraps the returned setState function with the if-check.
export const MyComponent = () => {
const [numPendingPromises, setNumPendingPromises] = useUnlessUnmounted(useState(0));
// ..etc.
// imported from elsewhere ////
export function useUnlessUnmounted<T>(useStateTuple: [val: T, setVal: Dispatch<SetStateAction<T>>]): [T, Dispatch<SetStateAction<T>>] {
const [val, setVal] = useStateTuple;
const [isMounted, setIsMounted] = useState(true);
useEffect(() => () => setIsMounted(false), []);
return [val, newVal => (isMounted ? setVal(newVal) : () => void 0)];
}
You could then create a useStateAsync hook to streamline a bit.
export function useStateAsync<T>(initialState: T | (() => T)): [T, Dispatch<SetStateAction<T>>] {
return useUnlessUnmounted(useState(initialState));
}
Try to add the dependencies in useEffect:
useEffect(() => {
fetchData()
return () => { props.spotifyAPI.cancelRequest() }
}, [fetchData, props.spotifyAPI])
Usually this problem occurs when you showing the component conditionally, for example:
showModal && <Modal onClose={toggleModal}/>
You can try to do some little tricks in the Modal onClose function, like
setTimeout(onClose, 0)
This works for me :')
const [state, setState] = useState({});
useEffect( async ()=>{
let data= await props.data; // data from API too
setState(users);
},[props.data]);
I had this problem in React Native iOS and fixed it by moving my setState call into a catch. See below:
Bad code (caused the error):
const signupHandler = async (email, password) => {
setLoading(true)
try {
const token = await createUser(email, password)
authContext.authenticate(token)
} catch (error) {
Alert.alert('Error', 'Could not create user.')
}
setLoading(false) // this line was OUTSIDE the catch call and triggered an error!
}
Good code (no error):
const signupHandler = async (email, password) => {
setLoading(true)
try {
const token = await createUser(email, password)
authContext.authenticate(token)
} catch (error) {
Alert.alert('Error', 'Could not create user.')
setLoading(false) // moving this line INTO the catch call resolved the error!
}
}
Similar problem with my app, I use a useEffect to fetch some data, and then update a state with that:
useEffect(() => {
const fetchUser = async() => {
const {
data: {
queryUser
},
} = await authFetch.get(`/auth/getUser?userId=${createdBy}`);
setBlogUser(queryUser);
};
fetchUser();
return () => {
setBlogUser(null);
};
}, [_id]);
This improves upon Carlos Vallejo's answer.
useEffect(() => {
let abortController = new AbortController();
// your async action is here
return () => {
abortController.abort();
}
}, []);
in the above code, I've used AbortController to unsubscribe the effect. When the a sync action is completed, then I abort the controller and unsubscribe the effect.
it work for me ....
The easy way
let fetchingFunction= async()=>{
// fetching
}
React.useEffect(() => {
fetchingFunction();
return () => {
fetchingFunction= null
}
}, [])
options={{
filterType: "checkbox"
,
textLabels: {
body: {
noMatch: isLoading ?
:
'Sorry, there is no matching data to display',
},
},
}}