Working with a functional component which has the following two useEffects:
//update the state when props changed
useEffect(() => {
const newState = mapPropsToState(props);
if (!_.isEqual(newState, state)) {
setState(newState);
}
}, [props]);
//make an API call
useEffect(() => {
preferencesChanged();
}, [state]);
State is derived from props, so the purpose of the first useEffect is to respond to a change in props and update the state.
The purpose of the second useEffect is to make an API call when state has changed. However, this API call can result in the props of this component changing (since preferencesChanged() updates the state of a parent component).
What I really want is for the setState in the first useEffect to be done "quietly" and not to trigger the 2nd useEffect.
Is this possible? Or am I thinking about this design in completely the wrong way?
State is derived from props.
You can just do your logic inside of component (in render phase), instead of calling it in an effect:
//...
const newState = mapPropsToState(props);
// ...
and you can use useMemo if that is an expensive calculation:
const newState = useMemo(() => mapPropsToState(props), [props])
And to answer your question,
What I really want is for the setState in the first useEffect to be done "quietly" and not to trigger the 2nd useEffect.
You can store the relevant info (dependencies of 2nd useEffect) in a seperate state varable, and then use that.
Refs:
You might not need an effect (React docs)
Summing up some of nuances of useEffect
Related
I am doing a project where i have a toast function which implements toast there i call the function of fetching data from api and updating my state so that whenever i click the update feed button fetching data from api function called, updation of state and toast of success appears. Now the question is i have a component of categories post displays seperate category post inside of all post component which has the function to display toast, how could i pass the updated state,fetching data from api function from child component that is category post component to parent component that is all post component to implement toast for category component.
If I understand your question correctly -- at a high level, you're trying to figure out how to update a state variable of a parent component from within a child component. Easiest way would be with the useState hook, and then by passing the setState function to the child component.
const ParentComponent = () => {
const [state, setState] = useState([])
useEffect(() => {
// logic that will be executed every time the state variable changes
}, [state])
return <ChildComponent setState={setState} />
}
const ChildComponent = ({setState}) => {
const handleClick = () => {
setState((currentState) => currentState.concat(1))
}
return <Button onClick={handleClick} />
}
Edit: To answer your question from the comment -- a few things to point out here:
You can pass a value to useState which will be the starting value of the variable. In our example, it's an empty array
setState has access to the current state, so you can push a value to an array with this syntax: setState((previousState) => previousState.concat(val))
useEffect is a hook which is invoked whenever there's a change in the value of the dependency (or dependencies) passed in the second argument. So by including state in its dependency array, we can execute whatever logic we want every time the value of the state variable changes
I would also recommend looking into useMemo. It similarly allows you to have aspects of your component logic that are re-executed only when values of certain variables change. For example:
const ParentComponent = () => {
const [state, setState] = useState([])
useEffect(() => {
// logic that will be executed every time the state variable changes
}, [state])
const renderCards = useMemo(() => {
return state.map(val => <SomeOtherComponent val={val}/>)
}, [state])
return (
<div>
{renderCards}
<ChildComponent setState={setState} />
</div>
)
}
By wrapping the function inside renderCards in the useMemo hook, the evaluated result is "memoized". And so it won't be executed on every render, unless the variable in the dependency array changes.
Passing down setState to a child component in order to trigger a re-render in the parent component is straightforward when it's an immediate child. If the child component is nested deeper, or there are multiple components that need to react to a change in a variable (e.g. light/dark mode) -- that's when you want to look into a state management tool like Redux or Context.
There are two ways I can think of to achieve what you are trying to do here, i.e. get the child component's state in a parent component.
You can make use of refs. You should be familiar with React hooks to use this approach. The documentation is really good.
You can also make use of a global state using either Redux or Context.
I want to trigger An API to do some actions when the value in the react state be empty, Is there a way in react state hook to achieve that?
If you are using a functional component you can use the "useEffect" hook with a proper dependency.
Class base components you might choose (if I understand your situation properly) something like the "componentWillUnmount()" method.
You could have a useEffect hook with the state as a dependency, in-which you can check if the state is empty and act accordingly.
Example:
const [state, setState] = useState([]);
useEffect(() => {
if (state.length !== 0) {
return;
}
// Can make your API call here (preferably call a function that does it)
// and then set the state.
setState(...);
}, [state]);
useEffect is a hook that accepts a callback as the first argument, and a dependency array as the second.
The callback will execute upon re-render whenever any of the dependencies in the array change.
Note: this is relevant only for functional components, for class-based component we have the componentDidUpdate lifecycle hook.
I want updated playerNames, so that I cant send it to reducer, but after setting state I am not getting the updated state, both in if and else condition
const [playerNames, setPlayersName] = React.useState([]);
let updatePlayers = playerNames.map(item=>item.id == event.target.value.id
? {...item}
:item
setPlayersName(updatePlayers)
}else{
setPlayersName(prev=>[...prev,event.target.value])
}
dispatch(selectPlayers(playerNames))
On the other hand, you can dispatch the data without setting the state. Just use event.target.value or a simple let variable = ..., and dispatch that instead. We use states to re-render components, there is no need to set the state if you are going to dispatch it.
You can't really call the dispatch right after calling the selectPlayers hook.
Why
In class based component, The setState has a callback function that can be executed right after the state update. But in terms of hook we do not have that. But we can achieve that with some tricks.
In your case I would something like this.
Solution
At first I would define an useEffect and give the playerNames as a dependency So whenever the state gets changed it will call dispatch
useEffect(() => {
dispatch(selectPlayers(playerNames))
}, [playerNames])
Why this useEffect
It will give your more power to conditionally call the dispatch and execute it. We can also do it in many other ways like bellow.
dispatch(selectPlayers(updatePlayers))
Doc link - https://reactjs.org/docs/state-and-lifecycle.html#state-updates-may-be-asynchronous
I am implementing a component in functional components where there are several other child components in it passing data to each other. I need to pass data from parent to child component and call some function there to use it.
In class componenets we use componentdidupdate but could not understand how to do in functional component.
One idea is to use useEffect hook but could not do with it.
Im going to take a stab here, because we dont have context or code to go with.
useEffect accepts a dependency array to which it will react when a value or object reference changes
const ChildComponent = (props) => {
const {
valuePassedFromParent
} = props;
const actionFunction = (value) => {
//perform some tasks with value passed from parent when it changes
}
//this is similar to componentDidUpdate, but it reacts to changes in valuePassedFromParent though props since its in the useEffect dependency array
useEffect(() => {
//do something with valuePassedFromParent
actionFunction(valuePassedFromParent);
},[valuePassedFromParent]);
return (
<div>
</div>
)
}
You cas use useEffect to reproduce the behavior of componentdidupdate like this :
const [myState,setMyState] = useState();
useEffect(() => {
...
},[myState]);
The function use effect will run every time myState will be updated, like componentdiduptate would have do.
In your case, the state is given by the parent component if I understand well, so just replace the myState in the array dependency by the state given through the prop of your child component.
I have a redux action that fetches all data and stores it into a global Redux store.
I want to store that state in a local state using Hooks so that the actual state doesn't get changed when I change it locally.
What I am doing right now is,
const [filteredTable, setFilteredTable] = useState([])
useEffect(() => {
props.fetchDatabase();
props.fetchOptions();
setFilteredTable(props.filtered_table_data);
}, [])
In useEffect, the props.fetchDatabase() gets the props.filtered_table_data and I can see that when I console.log it out.
However, when I use Hooks to store it into a local state and check if it's in there,
console.log(filteredTable, 'filteredTable')
just gives me [].
What am I doing wrong?
I believe the props.fetchDatabase() call is asynchronous, so by the time you are attempting to setFilteredTable the props.filtered_table_data has not updated yet.
You can try something like this:
useEffect(() => {
props.fetchDatabase();
props.fetchOptions();
}, [])
useEffect(() => {
setFilteredTable(props.filtered_table_data);
}, [props.filtered_table_data]);
Note that this effect will run every time filtered_table_data changes, so you may need to wrap around the code in the callback with some sort of condition if you want to restrict setting the local state.
useEffect's callback with [] as hook's second argument is only being called once when component just mounted. Inside it fetchDatabase, and fetchOptions callbacks are called, and right after that (when data isn't yet fetched) you call setFilteredTable, that's why there are empty array occurs in filteredTable.
Not sure if this answers your question, but React-Redux provides some hooks for accessing the redux store.
The one that might be of interest to you is the useSelector() hook.
Here's an example usage:
import { useSelector } from 'react-redux';
const App = () => {
const tableData = useSelector(state => state.tableData);
...
}