In the AzureAD Portal, in "Enterprise applications -> -> Provisioning -> Edit Provisioning -> Settings", I can choose a "scope" between "Sync only assigned users and groups" and "Sync all users and groups".
How can I do that with the Graph API? I couldn't find it anywhere.
Thanks!
I found out by chance how to choose between "Sync only assigned users and groups" and "Sync all users and groups" with GraphAPI.
It's actually part of the ServicePrincipal's synchronization secrets, under the SyncAll key:
GET https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/servicePrincipals/<ID>/synchronization/secrets
{
"#odata.context": "https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/$metadata#servicePrincipals('<ID>')/synchronization/secrets",
"value": [
{
"key": "BaseAddress",
"value": "https://my.server.com/scim"
},
{
"key": "SecretToken",
"value": "*"
},
{
"key": "SyncNotificationSettings",
"value": "{\"Enabled\":false,\"DeleteThresholdEnabled\":false,\"HumanResourcesLookaheadQueryEnabled\":false}"
},
{
"key": "SyncAll",
"value": "false"
}
]
}
I found it in https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articles/active-directory/app-provisioning/skip-out-of-scope-deletions.md
Related
When I run this initial query:
https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/users/delta?$select=id,displayName,manager,jobTitle&$filter=id+eq+'87fa2ed7-5e58-4ff5-85ca-42a973e103e7'
I get the following response (as expected):
{
"#odata.context": "https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/$metadata#users(id,displayName,jobTitle,manager)",
"#odata.nextLink": "https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/users/delta?$skiptoken=<removed>",
"value": [
{
"displayName": "Jane Doe",
"jobTitle": "Super Administrator",
"id": "87fa2ed7-5e58-4ff5-85ca-42a973e103e7",
"manager#delta": [
{
"#odata.type": "#microsoft.graph.user",
"id": "1ab00b74-6f7e-45ca-8629-22d64632501d"
}
]
}
]
}
I follow the #odata.nextLink URL, which returns:
{
"#odata.context": "https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/$metadata#users",
"#odata.deltaLink": "https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/users/delta?$deltatoken=<removed>",
"value": []
}
I don't really understand why it doesn't just give me the deltaLink in the first call, but that isn't the issue. At this point, I make a change to the user's job title in Azure AD (outside of Graph API) and then follow the #odata.deltaLink, which returns:
{
"#odata.context": "https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/$metadata#users",
"#odata.deltaLink": "https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/users/delta?$deltatoken=<removed>",
"value": [
{
"displayName": "Jane Doe",
"jobTitle": "Administrator",
"id": "87fa2ed7-5e58-4ff5-85ca-42a973e103e7"
}
]
}
No manager!!
The only attribute changed was the job title; Manager is unchanged. This behavior is the same in both the v1.0 and beta endpoints. Also, I am not using the "prefer:return=minimal" header (or any additional headers for that matter).
Can anyone provide some insight into this?
Created Google Smart Home Action.
Implemented device with:
a. deviceType = action.devices.types.SETTOP
b. deviceTrait = action.devices.traits.Channel
Device is successfully discovered and added to Google Home App's Homegraph.
User sends command: "Ok Google, change to ESPN"
Receives the following json in fulfillment URL:
{
"requestId": "[RequestId GUID]",
"inputs": [{
"intent": "action.devices.EXECUTE",
"payload": {
"commands": [{
"devices": [{
"id": "[SettopBox device Id]"
}],
"execution": [{
"command": "action.devices.commands.selectChannel",
"params": {
"channelCode": "espn",
"channelName": "ESPN",
"channelNumber": "206"
}
}]
}]
}
}]
}
Questions:
How does Google Smart Home determine the "channelNumber" value for "ESPN"? The user's command was "Ok Google, change to "ESPN". This does not contain any information about the channel number.
If a provider was set automatically, is there a setting in Google Home or Google Assistant to change this provider?
The number of a channel for the Channel trait is provided in the SYNC request along with any relevant labels.
{
"availableChannels": [
{
"key": "ktvu2",
"names": [
"Fox",
"KTVU"
],
"number": "2"
},
{
"key": "abc1",
"names": [
"ABC",
"ABC East"
],
"number": "4-11"
}
]
}
As shown in the snippet, the channel number comes from the service. This may be up to the developer of the integration how these numbers may be determined, whether from a cable provider or over-the-air. The field is optional, so a service without channel numbers may still work by saying its name.
In Azure Active Directory I created an app, in the manifest file I've update the appRoles with the following value:
"appRoles": [
{
"allowedMemberTypes": [
"User"
],
"displayName": "Client manager",
"id": "bf77e391-0bbf-4e33-854b-a384a5ac0630",
"isEnabled": true,
"description": "Client manager can manage all client actions.",
"value": "ClientManager"
}]
I updated my user so that my assigned role is no longer Default Access but is Client manager
With Graph api I'm trying to retrieve this assigned role.
I tried this uri but for some reason it will not return my role(s).
https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/me/appRoleAssignments?$filter=resourceId eq 04dcaab1-7219-4689-8510-4672e957ac11$select=appRoleId
But the response is:
{
"error": {
"code": "BadRequest",
"message": "Invalid filter clause",
"innerError": {
"request-id": "ce3cb456-956b-41c5-84a2-cdcdfe1ac3c5",
"date": "2018-11-05T20:54:08"
}
}
}
I could create a workaround requesting all my roles, for all my applications but this is something I would like to avoid. This would end up with the following uri:
https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/me/appRoleAssignments?$select=resourceId,appRoleId
and results in this json, where I need to filter out my applicationid.
{
"#odata.context": "https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/$metadata#appRoleAssignments(resourceId,appRoleId)",
"value": [
{
"appRoleId": "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000",
"resourceId": "667cc3aa-00b9-4526-bde5-b81312ed5afb"
},
{
"appRoleId": "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000",
"resourceId": "64b92ac1-4a56-478c-8774-5c584fb200e5"
},
{
"appRoleId": "bf77e391-0bbf-4e33-854b-a384a5ac0630",
"resourceId": "04dcaab1-7219-4689-8510-4672e957ac11"
}
]
}
I tried several solutions proposed on StackOverflow already but for some reason, all the eq filters don't work. I'm testing my query with the Graph explorer. My desired result should be something like this:
{
"#odata.context": "https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/$metadata#appRoleAssignments(appRoleId)",
"value": [
{
"appRoleId": "bf77e391-0bbf-4e33-854b-a384a5ac0630"
}
]
}
It seems not support to filter resourceId with https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/me/appRoleAssignments.
As mentioned in the doc:
Not all parameters are supported across all Microsoft Graph APIs, and support might differ significantly between the v1.0 and beta endpoints.
Also, if we filter the id with GET https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/me/appRoleAssignments?$filter=id eq 'xxxxxxx', it will work fine. So I think the format of the query should be correct, the only possibility is it is not supported as mentioned in the doc.
I'm trying SCIM 2.0 provisioning with Azure AD
As premise, I have SCIM a server for my product and I'm implementing PATCH endpoints for use with Okta and Microsoft Azure AD.
I'm done testing with Okta, so I'm trying with Azure AD now.
I read this post active-directory-scim-provisioning and the SCIM 2.0 Specification Section 3.5.2.
I set up an enterprise application on our Azure AD with the following mapping
Then, Azure AD sends the following JSON POST request to create users assigned to the application to my server:
POST:
{
"active": true,
"displayName": "$DISPLAY_NAME",
"emails": [
{
"primary": true,
"type": "work",
"value": "$EMAIL"
}
],
"externalId": "$EXTERNAL_ID",
"meta": {
"resourceType": "User"
},
"name": {
"formatted": "$FORMATTED"
},
"schemas": [
"urn:ietf:params:scim:schemas:core:2.0:User",
"urn:ietf:params:scim:schemas:extension:enterprise:2.0:User"
],
"userName": "$USER_NAME"
}
I can process the POST request correctly, but I am unable to consume the PATCH request from Azure AD.
PATCH:
{
"Operations": [
{
"op": "Replace",
"path": "name.givenName",
"value": [
{
"$ref": null,
"value": "$VALUE"
}
]
},
{
"op": "Replace",
"path": "name.familyName",
"value": [
{
"$ref": null,
"value": "$VALUE"
}
]
}
],
"schemas": [
"urn:ietf:params:scim:api:messages:2.0:PatchOp"
]
}
Is it correct (according to the specification) that the value attribute is of type Array, even if the target is a single-valued attribute? Is the use of the $ref attribute correct in this case?
Or did I misunderstand the specification?
They have fixed it Dec 18 2018 :)
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/manage-apps/application-provisioning-config-problem-scim-compatibility
They made a mistake on the value implementation for non-complex objects. You can read more about it here https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/lync/en-US/e2200b69-4333-41ea-9f51-717d316c7751/automatic-user-provisioning-scim-restful-patch-payload-issue?forum=WindowsAzureAD
I am trying to create schema extensions. I do have
"scp": "Directory.AccessAsUser.All" in token. Don't know for what reason it is failing.
https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/docs/api-reference/beta/api/schemaextension_post_schemaextensions
POST https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/schemaExtensions
Content-type: application/json
{
"id":"courses",
"description": "Graph Learn training courses extensions",
"targetTypes": [
"Group"
],
"properties": [
{
"name": "courseId",
"type": "Integer"
},
{
"name": "courseName",
"type": "String"
},
{
"name": "courseType",
"type": "String"
}
]
}
error :
{
"error": {
"code": "Service_InternalServerError",
"message": "Encountered an internal server error.",
"innerError": {
"request-id": "1909aef3-b66d-48de-8204-0a41df0a27a8",
"date": "2017-07-17T13:07:20"
}
}
}
Unfortunately it looks like Microsoft Graph schema extensions is not supported in B2C tenant (please confirm if you are NOT using a B2C tenant - in which case this might be a different problem).
In the meantime (until we fix this issue), you'll need to use Azure AD Graph to register and use directory extensions.
Hope this helps,