Hi everyone ( sorry for my english )
I wnat to contol yandex robot request rate to my sait and found some examples and write it in confs but it doesn`t work
following in this URL https://yandex.com/support/search/robots/request-rate.html it`s not work too
if I enabled robot request my sait going down that`s why I must disable robot request
Related
Stack: Nextjs, expressjs, socket.io, WebRTC
I'm trying to build a video chat, at the moment everything works fine only if the second user joins and agrees to use the camera and has one at all.
Otherwise, the connection is established, a chat is available between two users, but user 2 does not receive the video stream of user 1.
I put this code on github for more clarity and a better understanding of what is happening.
Very big cosmic thanks for help!
You are calling createOffer without the "legacy" offerToReceive* constraints. Without these, if the user creating the offer does not have a camera they will only negotiate audio and not attempt to negotiate video.
See https://webrtc.github.io/samples/src/content/peerconnection/pc1/ for a sample using those options.
I found that there are some wording "wakewordAgentEnabled" found in alexa voice service javaclient sample but when I run the program and android companion app, it shows a "Listen" button, it works properly, but how to call the wakeword "Hey Alexa" instead of using the "Listen" button?
Actually, I would like to use the logic of wakeword in Android app, so no need to click a button.
Is the sample support wakeword?
Is it needed to work with the Kitt-AI snowboy together?
From what I understand (I work in the Alexa org at Amazon) the reason the Echo can respond to wake words ('Alexa' 'Amazon' and 'Echo') is actually hardware in the device that opens up the connection. In order to obtain this on another device such as an Android phone you would actually need to constantly be listening, converting speech to text, and validating text for the wake word which would be very resource intensive and a large power drain. To reduce that drain it is just a button to open the connection.
I am working on gwt application with google app engine as a server. I have put the logs and appstat filter, so that i could know that what is the latency time.
Suppose if i open a link it is showing that 118ms for appstats (real=118ms) and 90ms for coming back through my login filter, so it is totally 208ms but in the firebug net panel it is showing 705ms for onload for the first request,
Any body have any idea, please let me know.
Thanks
MSNaidu
It would be a really difficult to figure our whether firebug is recording incorrectly or if there is genuine lag. You should try cross confirming by using Chrome SpeedTracer and Chrome's Dev Tools Network, Timeline and Audits features.
Good day all, sorry if the question has confused you.
My client has required us to build an IM apps like talkbox.
Thet especially want the voice msg feature in talkbox. i.e. The sender can hold a button to record a short msg. Then receiver can listen to the short msg when click the text msg.
What protocol should be used?XMPP/SID?
And any other area I should drill into for building an IM app as I am new to this area? Thanks.
I am writing a Google Wave Robot that allows users to "manage a wave". I plan to have a configuration page on my website. When the configuration is changed, ideally all waves where this user added by this user should change immediately (or at least next time someone views the wave). What is the best way of doing this?
Apparently, "a robot cannot contact Wave directly; it can only respond to wave-related events and cron events". If I decide to go the cron route, how quickly can I update the Wave?
Please check out the new Robot API v2 - it enables robots to actively push information into Wave.
as far as I know, cron does not work at the moment (2009-11-28) either. You could add a gadget, that changes its internal state - for example 1 sec after wave loaded using a timer - and listen for DOCUMENT_CHANGED or BLIP_SUBMITTED (less volume) events. But unless your bot comes with a gadget anyway, this is of course not very pretty.
=HC