Packaged shell extension killing application - wpf

I have a WPF application. To give it an identity to consume UWP APIs, I've added sparse package support. This installs / uninstalls / updates (we're not using MSIX) with my WPF application fine, and my app is running with an identity. It shows in task manager with a Package Name listed on my process.
Now I'm attempting to add context menu support following Microsoft's docs.
I've created a shell extension which will show when opening the context menu for any file and folder, which is pretty much a copy of their sample with different GetIcon(), GetTitle() and Invoke() implementations for IExplorerCommand.
I'm specifying this in the AppxManifest.xml (values anonymised):
<desktop4:Extension Category="windows.fileExplorerContextMenus">
<desktop4:FileExplorerContextMenus>
<desktop5:ItemType Type="*">
<desktop5:Verb Id="MyFileCommand" Clsid="file-guid"/>
</desktop5:ItemType>
<desktop5:ItemType Type="Directory">
<desktop5:Verb Id="MyFolderCommand" Clsid="folder-guid"/>
</desktop5:ItemType>
</desktop4:FileExplorerContextMenus>
</desktop4:Extension>
<com:Extension Category="windows.comServer">
<com:ComServer>
<com:SurrogateServer DisplayName="SSVerbHandler">
<com:Class Id="file-guid" Path="my-shell-extension.dll" ThreadingModel="STA"/>
</com:SurrogateServer>
<com:SurrogateServer DisplayName="SSVerbHandler">
<com:Class Id="folder-guid" Path="my-shell-extension.dll" ThreadingModel="STA"/>
</com:SurrogateServer>
</com:ComServer>
</com:Extension>
This works, my context menu entry is listed and performs the action as expected. But here's the issue: each time the context menu is opened for the first time, it kills the already running instance of my WPF application. By first time, I mean restarting explorer.exe and right clicking on a file or folder.
My gut feeling is this is related to UWP side of things. This is because originally it would always kill my application when right clicking to open a context menu. But with a little trial and error I solved this by configuring multi-instance support in my AppxManifest.xml:
<Package
...
xmlns:desktop4="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/manifest/desktop/windows10/4"
xmlns:iot2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/manifest/iot/windows10/2"
IgnorableNamespaces="uap mp desktop4 iot2">
...
<Applications>
<Application Id="App"
...
desktop4:SupportsMultipleInstances="true"
iot2:SupportsMultipleInstances="true">
...
</Application>
</Applications>
...
</Package>
I'm hoping someone can suggest any troubleshooting ideas as I'm now struggling.
I've sprinkled some ol' trusty MessageBox functions within the shell extension in DllMain, DllCanUnloadNow and DllGetClassObject. But for that first load attempt, no message boxes are shown, no context menu item listed and my application is still killed.
I've poked around in the event viewer hoping to see any errors or warnings listed recently, plus in Applications and Service Logs\Microsoft\Windows\Appx* and Applications and Service Logs\Microsoft\Windows\AppModel-Runtime. Nothing has jumped out at me.
According to this SO anwser, if there's an error with the shell extension itself, it may not show. That does fit, but I'm sceptical as it always works on subsequent attempts, and the previously solved UWP killing issue.
In the scenario where my application stops, using these powershell commands I get:
$process = Start-Process .\MyApp.exe -PassThru -Wait
$process.ExitCode
1
I do have crash logging in my app, but nothing gets logged. This is the only place Environment.Exit(1) is called within the WPF application.
I did try the silent monitoring detection in GFlags on the WPF application, but couldn't seem to trigger it. Only when I manually closed the application. (Ignore Self Exits unchecked for testing). I'm not sure if that's because the exit code is 1.
When the error occurs with process monitor running, I can see lots of ThreadExit before a final ProcessExit with the exit code 1. That would imply it's exiting cleanly with my application itself returning 1?
It's also worth mentioning I've lived in managed / .NET land for the last decade or so, I don't have much experience with C++ (or unmanaged languages in general) or UWP, and the first time I've attempted to write a shell extension.

Related

Diagnosing why a custom shell on Windows 10 IoT gives black screen

I am configuring Windows 10 Enterprise (IoT) to run a custom shell, but running into the "Black screen with nothing other than a cursor" phenomena.
My application - a .Net4 Winforms app - is installed and runs fine from the desktop.
I can launch it as a custom shell via a batch file as per the comments here: How to run an application as shell replacement on Windows 10 Enterprise
But setting my app as a custom shell, I just get the black screen.
I note the comments in the above link about applications being signed, but I have tried two mini test applications (also .net winforms), one signed, one not, and both run fine as custom shells. (My application has several dependencies, not all of which are signed, so to sign it would mean going through the ILMerge mill or similar which I would rather avoid if I can.)
I don't expect people to be able to tell me why my app doesn't run (although that would be nice!) but I am looking for ways of diagnosing this. Looking in event logs, etc, is yielding no information whatsoever. My app keeps its own event log, which is not showing any evidence of the app starting.
Thanks in advance
Problem solved:
If a shell application requires elevated permissions, UAC must be turned off. Turning off notifications via the control panel is NOT sufficient, as UAC is still running in the background - it just doesn't notify you! To completely turn off UAC, edit registry entry:
HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System and set the DWORD value EnableLUA to 0
Evidence of UAC behaviour can be found in the windows event log at:
Applications And Services Logs -> Microsoft -> Windows ->UAC

WPF application shows managed has exited with code -1073740771 (0xc000041d) in InitializeComponent call

When I launch my WPF application and when it goes to InitializeComponent function call of one user control, it silently quits and only leaves one message in the output window saying Managed (v4.0.30319)' has exited with code -1073740771 (0xc000041d). When I say "silently", I mean there is no exception is caught even if I wrap this InitializeComponent call with a try-catch block (that's how I normally find where the problem is)
Here is what I did: in this application project we need to use a reference Microsoft.Office.Interop.Owc.dll, with version number 10.0.4504.0. Since it is an interop library, when I added this reference in VS2012, it automatically sets the property Embedded Interop Types as true, which I assume means it will not keep an individual dll in the output folder but instead embed this library into the main output (at least this is how it seems in our other references, for example, Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook.dll). However, when I launch the project, it throws an XamlParseException saying:
"Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.Office.Interop.Owc, Version=10.0.4504.0,
Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies. The system
cannot find the file specified.":"Microsoft.Office.Interop.Owc, Version=10.0.4504.0,
Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35""
It seems that the reference was not embedded(or the version is not currect. But I verified that the reference version is indeed 10.0.4504.0)
Next I copied this dll directly to the output folder bin\Debug\, to make sure that it can find this library. This time the exception is not thrown, but the whole application just silently quits as I described in the beginning. I tried to google the code -1073740771 (0xc000041d) but there is no article about it. I tried to set the Embedded Interop Types to true/false but the problem is the same.
UPDATE:
I'd like to add more description here. As mentioned above, the problematic library is OWC(Office Web Component)10. I followed this link to make OWC work with VB.NET desktop application: HOW TO: Handle Events for the Office Web Components in Visual Studio .NET. But this official article is so old so I had to make a lot of changes to compile the wrapper dll(mainly because of namespace mismatch). Then when I add the reference to the actual interop library Microsoft.Office.Interop.Owc, if I follow the default setting and let the Embedded Interop Types as True, at runtime it will complain (throw a XamlParseException) that the assembly cannot be loaded (see description above). What the hell? I thought make it as "embedded" would guarantee this library will be found. Then I copy this dll to the output folder, then I have this silently quit problem. But it might be worth mentioning that this time the output window shows the Microsoft.Office.Interop.Owc.dll is indeed loaded. Actually it is the last message before the managed has exited message. So it must still relate to this library.
All of this only happens with OWC10. There is actually a similar way to do that in OWC11(the latest, but unfortunately still pretty old version since it came with Office2003): HOW TO: Handle Events for the Office 2003 Web Components in Visual Studio .NET. But it actually works and the control is displayed on my application. It is because of some other reason that I wanted to try OWC10 instead of OWC11
When I launch my WPF application and when it goes to InitializeComponent function call of one user >control, it silently quits and only leaves one message in the output window saying Managed
(v4.0.30319)' has exited with code -1073740771 (0xc000041d). When I say "silently", I mean there is >no exception is caught even if I wrap this InitializeComponent call with a try-catch block (that's >how I normally find where the problem is)
Next I copied this dll directly to the output folder bin\Debug\, to make sure that it can find this >library. This time the exception is not thrown, but the whole application just silently quits as I >described in the beginning. I tried to google the code -1073740771 (0xc000041d) but there is no >article about it. I tried to set the Embedded Interop Types to true/false but the problem is the >same.
I had exactly the same thing happening to me today, "has exited with code -1073740771 (0xc000041d)." (This happened in both a VB and C# .NET WinForms application for me). I tried debugging and saw I never even got into the Form_Load code block.
I "solved" this in the end by running visual studio as an administrator (and then just opening & building and running the project via the menu).
This is a win8 security issue and it isn't well explained anywhere.
(I got distracted and just opened up a specific project straight out of my task bar/solution file which caused this to happen to me).
You've probably found this out by yourself by now, hope you didn't lose any hair over it :)
Just pointing this out for other people who might have this error occuring somewhere.
Also had this issue, the 'silent' exit with code -1073740771 (0xc000041d) on x64 platforms, on x86 platforms everything was OK.
Part of my application is unmanaged C++, another part is C#. It turned out that my C++ code was not completely ready for the x64 platform. The following change fixed the issue in my case:
// before
g_OrigWndProc = reinterpret_cast<WNDPROC>(::SetWindowLongPtr(hWnd, GWLP_WNDPROC,
reinterpret_cast<LONG>(WindowProc)));
// fixed version
g_OrigWndProc = reinterpret_cast<WNDPROC>(::SetWindowLongPtr(hWnd, GWLP_WNDPROC,
reinterpret_cast<LONG_PTR>(WindowProc)));
So, the generic recommendation is to verify that your code is completely ready for the x64 platform.

Detecting Exceptions During Beta Testing

(see update below)
While running within the VisualStudio 2010 environment, I can easily tell if my Winform application causes an exception. I just have to go to Debug | Exceptions and make sure that both columns of checkboxes are checked. I then run the application and if any exceptions then I get dropped straight into the offending piece of code.
How do I determine exceptions during testing, when I give test build to a tester. I do not want the tester to run within Visual Studio, just as a regular user. I still want to know if there are exceptions and the pertinent details.
Obviosualy, I should be able to control the process, so that when the code gets released normal execution happens.
Yes, I know about and use try/catch blocks, but I am talking about a method similar to Visual Studio exception catcher and reporter, just possibly compiled into the product and used for deployment to beta testers.
Maybe Visual Studio has such a feature, in which case where and how to set up, or possibly a third party component.
[Update:
I added two sub-questions, which you can find at Unhandled Exception next line or exit.
The solution mentioned below sounds great and with a tweak probably works, just not at the moment.
Inside the Visual Studio both 2010 and now 2012 works great. The exception handler gets called, okay after VS breaks at the line and I say to continue. I decided to test outside the VS2012 IDE, good thing for that. The OS traps the bug, shows the standard an "An Unhandled Exception Occurred" dialog giving the details along with a continue and quit buttons. Selecting continue, just continues the application with no trapping into my uber exception handler. Selecting quite, whites-out the application and displays the standard close window dialog. The quit button also does not call my uber handler.
The purpose is so that my exception handler gets called. I do not need an uber exception handler if I am working inside the VS2012 IDE. The purpose of the handler is for end users and beta testers, namely anyone other than myself and who will not have my development station.
So unless I am missing something, the question is still open.
There are code samples in the other question, enough to copy and paste and create a test application in a couple minutes time.
]
Thanks in advance,
Sarah
I don't know of any automagical ways to reports error in Visual Studio but here is what I do.
Hook into the UnhandledException event for the application.
Use a logging framework like nLog or Log4Net to log the exception and other data you get from that event. Or just write to a text file.
Upload that data either from within your application or have the beta-tester send it to you.
Okay, the Google Uberlord took pitty upon me and I found this wonderful article solving the problem. Praise to the almighty Google.
Here is the link:
http://www.switchonthecode.com/tutorials/csharp-tutorial-dealing-with-unhandled-exceptions
Basically, JRadness had the right idea, just slightly in error. He should have used
Application.ThreadException +=
new System.Threading.ThreadExceptionEventHandler(Application_ThreadException);
rather than
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.UnhandledException +=
new UnhandledExceptionEventHandler(CurrentDomain_UnhandledException);
The author on Switch on the Code talked of three methods, the first of which is what JRadness proposed and does not work for Windows forms.
The autor even solved my other question of Continue and Abort. The OS got bypassed.
Yeah!!

WPF app won't run in kiosk mode

I have a WPF application that is designed for a touchscreen kiosk. Users will not have access to a keyboard or mouse. The application runs fine when started normally from the program icon in windows. However, when it is set up to run automatically at startup (by replacing the Windows shell using a registry key), the application does not function properly.
The application reads an XML file that lists available videos, then displays buttons to show the videos. When run in "kiosk mode," it does not seem to have access to the files in its media directory (the XML file and presumably the videos as well). I suspect that because the application is running in place of the windows explorer, it is missing resources it needs for file access that are normally loaded by windows explorer.
I have not been able to find any info on this - there is plenty of info on how to get an app to run at startup, but not much on how to make sure it will actually function in that environment. The PC is running Windows 7 Professional.
Is my assumption about the problem correct, or is it likely something else (e.g. permissions - we checked the permissions, but maybe they operate differently when you replace the windows shell?) If it is because needed resources are not loaded, does anyone have pointers on how to make sure my app loads them?
Perhaps you have file access occurring via a file dialog? This might explain a bit further. What is the minimum functionality needed to create Shell Replacement for Windows?
because you have stopped windows default running explorer.exe , your program can not get access to default xml directory therefore you should specify the complete path for example like below:
stream = File.Open(#"C:\x86\Debug\xml.xml", FileMode.OpenOrCreate);

How do I launch a WPF app from command.com. I'm getting a FontCache error

I know this is not ideal, but my constraint is that I have a legacy application written in Clipper.
I want to launch a new, WinForms/WPF application from inside the application (to ease transition). This legacy application written in Clipper launches using:
SwpRunCmd("C:\MyApp\MyBat.bat",0)
The batch file contains something like this command:
C:\PROGRA~1\INTERN~1\iexplore "http://QASVR/MyApp/AppWin/MyCompany.MyApp.AppWin.application#MyCompany.MyApp.AppWin.application"
It is launching a WinForms/WPF app that is we deploy via ClickOnce. Everything has been going well until we introduced WPF into the application. We were able to easily launch from the legacy application.
Since we have introduced WPF, however, we have the following behavior. If we launch via the Clipper application first, we get an exception when launching the application. The error text is:
The type initializer for 'System.Windows.FrameworkElement' threw an exception.
at System.Windows.FrameworkElement..ctor()
at System.Windows.Controls.Panel..ctor()
at System.Windows.Controls.DockPanel..ctor()
at System.Windows.Forms.Integration.AvalonAdapter..ctor(ElementHost hostControl)
at System.Windows.Forms.Integration.ElementHost..ctor()
at MyCompany.MyApp.AppWin.Main.InitializeComponent()
at MyCompany.MyApp.AppWin.Main..ctor(String[] args)
at MyCompany.MyApp.AppWin.Program.Main(String[] args)
The type initializer for 'System.Windows.Documents.TextElement' threw an exception.
at System.Windows.FrameworkElement..cctor()
The type initializer for 'System.Windows.Media.FontFamily' threw an exception.
at System.Windows.Media.FontFamily..ctor(String familyName)
at System.Windows.SystemFonts.get_MessageFontFamily()
at System.Windows.Documents.TextElement..cctor()
The type initializer for 'MS.Internal.FontCache.Util' threw an exception.
at MS.Internal.FontCache.Util.get_WindowsFontsUriObject()
at System.Windows.Media.FontFamily.PreCreateDefaultFamilyCollection()
at System.Windows.Media.FontFamily..cctor()
Invalid URI: The format of the URI could not be determined.
at System.Uri.CreateThis(String uri, Boolean dontEscape, UriKind uriKind)
at System.Uri..ctor(String uriString, UriKind uriKind)
at MS.Internal.FontCache.Util..cctor()
If we launch the application via the URL (in IE) or via the icon on the desktop first, we do not get the exception and application launches as expected.
The neat thing is that whatever we launch with first determines whether the app will launch at all. So, if we launch with legacy first, it breaks right away and we can't get the app to run even if we launch with the otherwise successful URL or icon. To get it to work, we have to logout and log back in and start it from the URL or icon.
If we first use the URL or the icon, we have no problem launching from the legacy application from that point forward (until we logout and come back in).
One other piece of information is that we are able to simulate the problem in the following fashion. If we enter a command prompt using "cmd.exe" and execute a statement to launch from a URL, we are successful. If, however, we enter a command prompt using "command.com" and we execute that same statement, we experience the breaking behavior.
We assume it is because the legacy application in Clipper uses the equivalent of command.com to create the shell to spawn the other app. We have tried a bunch of hacks like having command.com run cmd.exe or psexec and then executing, but nothing seems to work.
We have some ideas for workarounds (like making the app launch on startup so we force the successful launch from a URL, making all subsequent launches successful), but they all are sub-optimal even though we have a great deal of control over our workstations.
To reduce the chance that this is related to permissions, we have given the launching account administrative rights (as well as non-administrative rights in case that made a difference).
Any ideas would be greatly-appreciate. Like I said, we have some work arounds, but I would love to avoid them.
Thanks!
It sounds like the Presentation Font Cache service has trouble starting when the app is launched in this way.
If you have control over the client environment, you could try setting the Windows Presentation Font Cache startup to automatic instead of manual.
This is a shot in the dark made with incomplete information:
command.com and cmd.exe are quite different. AFAIK, command.com exists for legacy compatibility, so applications you run from it will run differently. I can't test anything to complete my post because I believe that command.com runs in 16-bit mode and 64bit versions of Windows (on which I'm running) don't support that mode anymore so no more command.com for me.
That being said, there should be no difference when trying to run 32-bit applications (including managed applications).
I'm not aware of what are the limitations of your environment, but some things you may try are:
Rename you .bat into .cmd to make sure it starts with cmd.exe rather than command.com
Make your .bat start the program using the start console command
Have a non-WPF program to invoke your WPF one with a more sane environment
The problem is that the windir environmental variable is not set when using command.com.
So, in your case, adding the line set windir=C:\Windows to the beginning of the bat file will solve the problem (assuming that you have your Windows instalation in C:\Windows.
An additional issue might be that the host application is running command.com in compatibility mode. The best is to list all the environmental variables after running cmd.exe (using the set command) and comparing it to the output of the set command that you set in your bat file

Resources