How to style Material UI Dialog with Tailwind? - reactjs

Material UI Dialog is a portaled component. The way I understood it and saw it in action is that it renders its markup outside the React's root element.
It renders itself before the </body> tag.
Now I have encountered a problem because of this.
When user chooses the dark mode, I set a dark class on top-level element, one beneath the root element.
And on all components I can use dark variant to apply styles, like dark:bg-zinc-700.
But when I apply it the <Dialog /> component, it won't affect its style, though I can see that the class exists in the output.
<Dialog
PaperProps={{
className="dark:bg-zinc-700"
}}
How should I solve this problem? I know I can use sx to apply style. But that means I need to lose consistency and I also don't know how to translate Tailwind to sx. Thus I prefer to keep using Tailwind.

I solve this problem with this Link
MuiDialog: {
defaultProps: {
container: rootElement,
},
},
Check this

#HosseinFallah Looking back at your post I think this won't work because tailwind and material ui handle dark modes differently. However, you can target Material UI css without using sx. You can use the Dialog API classes in your css and apply tailwind colors on them like this in your global css:
.MuiDialog-paperScrollBody {
background-color: theme(colors.dark) !important;
}
Where dark is the custom dark color you've set in your tailwind.config.js

To add to the answer you can also set this for your whole app by wrapping it with the Mui's StyledEngineProvider. This way tailwind will be prioritized when injecting styling.
In your index.tsx
import { StyledEngineProvider } from '#mui/material';
const container: any = document.getElementById('root');
const root = createRoot(container);
root.render(
<Provider store={store}>
<React.StrictMode>
<StyledEngineProvider injectFirst>
<App />
</StyledEngineProvider>
</React.StrictMode>
</Provider>
);
Then this will be possible without needing to specify !important
<Dialog
PaperProps={{
className="dark:bg-zinc-700"
}}

Did you set the "important" property in the Tailwind config (tailwind.config.js) by chance?
If you set it to something like "#root" then it will only match the elements inside the #root element which is bypassed when MUI uses React Portals.
You could change it to something like "#tw" and then set your body's ID to "tw" so it will always match since Portals are always children of the body element.

if you completely interoperate to tailwindcss, see: https://mui.com/material-ui/guides/interoperability/#tailwind-css
i think this mistake occure in tailwindcss.config.js.
by adding another id to wrap dialog container and asign it to "important" property will solve this problem

You can increase the specificity of the TailwindCSS by using !important selector.
You can find more here https://tailwindcss.com/docs/functions-and-directives

Related

Remove padding from Kendo react dropdownButton

I have a DropDownButton
<DropDownButton text="i" items={items} />
that has padding around it
How would one remove that padding for just this one button not all of them on the site ?
See for more context
https://codesandbox.io/s/unruffled-snow-cx50hi
You can also pass buttonClass prop to that particular DropDownButton, I have also shown it here.
https://codesandbox.io/s/crazy-forest-1lvs7f?file=/app/main.tsx
Please check the props that are being passed to DropDownButton for a better understanding.
Add below css in a new file called style.css
button {
padding: 0 !important;
}
and import it in main.tsx as
import ./style.css

Material UI - Overriding styles using Root & using ClassName

I'm new to material UI. While learning, I came to know out that styles of a material UI can be overridden with the rule name of the classes.
If I have an element - MenuItem where I just need to change the default styling of the text (such as fontFamily, fontWeight, fontSize)
According to the documentation available here https://material-ui.com/api/menu-item/ I used makeStyles hook and have overridden some properties of the root element of Menu-Item
Sample code
const useStyles = makeStyles((theme) => ({
menuItem: {
fontFamily: "Raleway",
}
}));
JSX code: <MenuItem onClick={handleClose} component={Link} to="/services" classes={{root: classes.menuItem}}>Services</MenuItem>
In one more tutorial, I found another way of overriding - with className like
const useStyles = makeStyles((theme) => ({
menuItem: {
fontFamily: "Raleway",
}
}));
JSX code: <MenuItem onClick={handleClose} component={Link} to="/services" className={classes.menuItem}>Services</MenuItem>
My question lies in this part className={classes.menuItem} and classes={{root: classes.menuItem}}
On using root -> I see the css properties getting added to the root element but on using className={classes.menuItem} I see a new class is added to the DOM. But Is there any difference with respect to the behaviour of the app between these 2 methods or is it just another way of doing it?
Thanks
From what I can tell having worked with Material UI, the difference is with what you're trying to do.
className={classes.menuItem} and classes={{root: classes.menuItem}} will both get you the results that you're expecting, as you've already discovered.
The distinctions are important when you start building custom themes, because Material UI allows you to apply classes to the components as a whole, meaning potentially comprised of other components, or pass along styles to the root elements if you need a higher specificity.
For example, consider the Stepper component.
classes={{root: classes.menuItem}} will override the root in the component, applying your styles.
className={classes.menuItem} will add an additional class to the component, leaving the underlying styles intact.

Is there any way to change where Material-UI adds style tag html elements?

Material-UI adds generated style tags to the <header /> which is of course a standard place for styles, however I need my style tags to be added in a different html element.
I'm looking for a way to transition a legacy CodeIgniter PHP application to React. I have a plan but the issue is that this legacy application is using bootstrap which is messing with my React components.
The plan is to reset all styles in a div and render React components in it. something like:
<div class="clearcss">
<div>
<style type="text/css"></style> // material ui style tags
<div id="react-component"></div>
</div>
</div>
Unfortunately because Material ui adds all of its styles to the header Material ui styles are also reset, but if I could change where material ui places style tags then I think I could make it work.
Actually, in JSS documentation I found examples that show how to specify insertion points outside <head />.
Together with Ryan's comment pointing to material ui documentation I was able to achieve what I wanted.
JSS supports two ways of specifying a custom insertion point for styles:
By adding an html comment (e.g. <!-- custom-jss-insertion-point -->). This is only supported for insertion points in the <head>.
By specifying an element (e.g. insertionPoint: document.getElementById("custom-jss-insertion-point")). This approach supports insertion points in the document body.
Here's a working example of what is needed for the second approach:
index.html -- add an element that styles will be inserted after
...
<body>
<noscript>
You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.
</noscript>
<div id="custom-jss-insertion-point"></div>
<div id="root"></div>
</body>
...
App.js -- Tell JSS about the custom insertion point
import React from "react";
import { create } from "jss";
import { StylesProvider, jssPreset } from "#material-ui/core/styles";
import Button from "#material-ui/core/Button";
const jss = create({
...jssPreset(),
// Define a custom insertion point that JSS will look for when injecting the styles into the DOM.
insertionPoint: document.getElementById("custom-jss-insertion-point")
});
export default function App() {
return (
<StylesProvider jss={jss}>
<div className="App">
<Button variant="contained" color="primary">
Hello
</Button>
</div>
</StylesProvider>
);
}
This results in the styles being added as shown in the image below:
If you render the insertion point element using React, you need to ensure that the element exists before you try to call document.getElementById("custom-jss-insertion-point") while configuring JSS. If it is possible to do so, I would recommend rendering the insertion point element outside of React (as in the example) to avoid order-of-operations complications.

Check If Prop Exists in Styled Components

I am just getting started with styled components and want to create variations for things like buttons, navbars, etc.
For instance, I'd like to create a dark version of a navbar (wherein the background color would become dark and the text color light).
What I'd like to do is simply add a prop of dark on a component as follows:
<Navbar dark>...</Navbar>
I'd like to do this as opposed to something like this:
<Navbar type="dark">...</Navbar>
However, I'm not sure how to do this. That is, how do I style an element just by checking if the prop name exists (without passing the prop any values)?
Any ideas? Thanks in advance.
styled-components supports passing props to styled components, and those props can be accessed in the CSS tagged template literal (the CSS inside of the backticks) of the styled component receiving those props.
For example, say that the <Navbar /> in your example is a styled <nav> element, then we can define <Navbar /> in a way that takes into account a dark prop:
const Navbar = styled.nav`
background: ${props => props.dark ? 'black' : 'white'}
`
In the example above, we check for the existance of the dark prop. If it was passed, then we give the component a black background color. Otherwise (the default), we give the component a white background color:
<Navbar dark /> // produces component with black background
<Navbar /> // produces the default white background

How can I access to change styles of inner items of a component in react and material ui?

How can I access to inner css classes of children of a component and add or change styles to/of them? like I want to change and customize material ui stepper steps circle font size and color and so on.
How can I write css classes like bellow:
.stepper circle {
font-size:18px;
}
or
.stepper .text {
font-size:18px;
}
thanks.
Thanks to #spakmad's answer, but that's not exactly what I meant, maybe my question was not clear enough. I meant how to write above mentioned CSSs in material ui object style classes format(classes injected with withStyle HOC).
I found my solution:
stepper:{
'& circle':{
fontSize: '18px'
}
}
and
stepper: {
'& .text': {
fontSize: '18px'
}
}
The very straightforward way to do it without having to worry about classes is by using the material-ui style prop. Like so,
<Stepper style={{ fontSize: '18px' }} />
This applies a style to the root element, which I assume to be a div or container of sorts, although it probably varies by the component.
More specifically, and what you probably want to do is use material-ui classes prop. That is, since you know exactly what classes you want to override, you can do so as follows,
<Stepper classes={{ text: { fontSize: '18px' }}} />
I use text here as a classname because in the question, .text appears to reference and already existing class. Since you're trying to increase the size of the font in this svg that comes with the Stepper. You'll need to get the class name applied to the svg and override it. In this case, one of its classnames is MuiSvgIcon-root-184 so you would expect to be able to do,
<Stepper classes={{ MuiSvgIcon-root-184: { fontSize: '18px' }}} />
This classname however is generated by material-ui dynamically based on the layout resulting from props and could be different across all renders.
TLDR
So, trusty className component and writing some css and component JSX as follows.
<Stepper className={'customStepper'} />
.customStepper svg: {
font-size: '18px !important',
}
You need to include !important to make sure this style is respected. Material UI by default puts its styles last in the document so they're normally overwriting anything else, but the !important spec should override the override.

Resources