Is there any options to check Apex class version in PMD Rules? - salesforce

I am new to writing custom pmd rules. I need to check the apex class version. Is there any way to check that?

Related

Can/Is the latest version of IdentityServer4 supports dynamic client add?

I assume I can build an additional API that registers users/apps/containers.
But is there a simpler way to accept multiple clients dynamically ?
That is for example, if my IDP is in the UK, and i would like to allow a predefined containers to "add themselves" to the client list of my IDP.
I achieved a simple "User -> Client -> IDP" authentication but would like to automate the process.
Thank you fellow coders.
In short, yes - but you'd have to create the mechanism to do so yourself.
If using a database to back your client storage (rather than using the default static/config file based in-memory store) then you're free to implement that any way you like.
In our solution we have an API that allows for this as well as a more limited self-serve UI capability.
There is an OpenID Connect spec for this that may provide some inspiration: https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-registration-1_0.html
You can implement you own client store using IClientStore interface.
Something like
internal class MyCustomClientStore : IClientStore
{
public Task<Client> FindClientByIdAsync(string clientId)
{
throw new System.NotImplementedException();
}
}
You can store client data anywhere you want, interface is pretty simple.
This implementation can be registered using DI with
services
.AddIdentityServer()...
.AddClientStore<MyCustomClientStore>()

#EnableJpaRepositories annotation disables data.sql initialization script

My Spring Boot (v2.3.4) based application uses my custom library containing core entities and business logic. To use entities and repositories from this library I had to use #EnableJpaRepositories and #EntityScan annotations with proper packages provided.
I also wanted to initialize database with some required data (let's say the configuration) during application startup. I found that Spring Boot allows to use data.sql or data-${platform}.sql files to achieve that.
Long story short when using #EnableJpaRepositories annotation the data.sql script is not executed.
I did some digging in the code and found that when #EnableJpaRepositories annotation is not used then entityManagerFactory bean is of org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean type. This bean uses org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.orm.jpa.DataSourceInitializedPublisher bean post processor, which fires org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.jdbc.DataSourceSchemaCreatedEvent event indicating the schema has been created. Class, which listens for this event is org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.jdbc.DataSourceInitializerInvoker. This listener invokes initSchema() method from org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.jdbc.DataSourceInitializer class. This method is responsible for whole initialization using data.sql script.
It looks like setting #EnableJpaRepositories annotation creates instance of different class for entityManagerFactory bean, which does not support this simple initialization.
My basic question is then how to make it all work with #EnableJpaRepositories annotation. I can always use Hibernate's import.sql file (which works fine) but I'm also trying to understand what exactly is going on under the hood I how can I control it.
UPDATE 1 28.09.2021
I did further investigation and #EnableJpaRepositories annotation does not change the instance type of entityManagerFactory but it causes silent exception (?) when creating org.springframework.scheduling.annotation.ProxyAsyncConfiguration bean (during creation of org.springframework.context.annotation.internalAsyncAnnotationProcessor bean). It looks like everything is related to #EnableAsync annotation, which I'm also using but didn't know it might be related. But it is - removing it makes the initialization work even with #EnableJpaRepositories.
UPDATE 2 28.09.2021
I've found full explanation for my issue. There are 4 conditions, which must be met to reproduce the issue:
#EnableJpaRepositories annotation in application configuration
#EnableAsync annotation in application configuration
Configuration implements AsyncConfigurer interface
Autowired any JpaRepository repository or any other bean which injects repository
Enabling asynchronous execution and implementing AsyncConfigurer makes the whole configuration to be instantiated before regular beans. Because Spring has to inject repository, it needs to instantiate entityManagerFactory bean too. Spring prints thenINFO level logs like below:
Bean 'entityManagerFactoryBuilder' of type [org.springframework.boot.orm.jpa.EntityManagerFactoryBuilder] is not eligible for getting processed by all BeanPostProcessors (for example: not eligible for auto-proxying)
One of not eligible BeanPostProcessors is DataSourceInitializedPublisher responsible for firing DataSourceSchemaCreatedEvent event. Without that event, data-${platform}.sql script won't be processed at all.
I'm not sure what is the role of #EnableJpaRepositories in that process but without it the problem does not occur.
Example
Minimal code to reproduce the issue (data.sql located in src/main/resources):
#Entity
public FileStore {
...
}
public interface FileStoreRepository extends extends JpaRepository<FileStore, Long> {
}
#Configuration
#EnableAsync
#EnableJpaRepositories
public class Configuration implements AsyncConfigurer {
#Autowired
private FileStoreRepository fileStoreRepository;
...
}
Solutions
There are two solutions I'm aware of:
Move AsyncConfigurer along with its overrided methods and #EnableAsync annotation to separate configuration class
Use #Lazy annotation on autowired bean like below:
#Lazy
#Autowired
private FileStoreRepository fileStoreRepository;
Similar problem was pointed by #Allen D. Ball and can be checked there.
This behavior had changed.
Take a look at the
how-to guide.
Add:
spring.jpa.defer-datasource-initialization: true

ITfoxtec SAML 2.0: Dynamic configuration

I would like to know if it's possible to configure the library during runtime (Saml2Configuration). We want to have the ability to set the configuration options and get them from DB.
Thank you
Yes no problem. You can populate the Saml2Configuration at runtime on load or in the controller just before setting the Saml2Configuration object in the constructor.
Here an example from FoxIDs https://github.com/ITfoxtec/FoxIDs/blob/master/src/FoxIDs/Logic/Saml/SamlAuthnDownLogic.cs#L70

Unable to generate cloud endpoint class

Dear fellow programmers,
I am very new to programming and i am following the tutorial on using app engine backend tutorial. However i face some problem along the way.
I have Setup App Engine Backend Application Project, created a CheckIn entity class.
After which, i follow the instruction to create a new class with the name CheckInEndPoint.java
I copy the code from the snippet over to the Class.
When i try to Generate Cloud Endpoint Class, i faced an error message.
Error Generating API
This is not a JDO/JPA entity class.
Kindly seek your advice on how to troubleshoot it.
https://cloud.google.com/developers/articles/how-to-build-mobile-app-with-app-engine-backend-tutorial#ecdp
The instructions as provided by Google are confusing. What the instructions intended to say is after creating CheckIn.java, right-click on the CheckIn.java file and select Google->Generate Cloud Endpoint Class. This will then automatically create the CheckInEndpoint.java file.
Read through the entire "Entity Design Class Pattern" paragraph as given in the link you provided. You'll recognise that their instructions are ambiguous and is actually meant to be carried out from point 6.
Try adding this annotation to your CheckIn class:
import javax.jdo.annotations.PersistenceCapable;
#PersistenceCapable
public class CheckIn ...
This way it will find it as a JDO entity class and it will generate your CheckInEndPoint class.
I had the same error, I have first renamed the class CheckInEndPoint I've created manually to avoid any kind of conflicts. After that I have right clicked on
CheckIn class -> Google ->Generate Cloud Endpoint Class.
If you get some dependencies errors, please try check whether all the classes like ApiKeysAndIds.java, UserAccount.java are in the package.

Guice and JSF 2

I'm trying to use Guice to inject properties of a JSF managed bean. This is all running on Google App Engine (which may or may not be important)
I've followed the instructions here:
http://code.google.com/docreader/#p=google-guice&s=google-guice&t=GoogleAppEngine
One problem is in the first step. I can't subclass the Servlet module and setup my servlet mappings there because Faces is handled by the javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet which subclasses Servlet, not HttpServlet. So, I tried leaving my servlet configuration in the web.xml file and simply instantiating a new ServletModel() along with my business module when creating the injector in the context listener described in the second step.
Having done all that, along with the web.xml configuration, my managed bean isn't getting any properties injected. The method is as follows
#ManagedBean
#ViewScoped
public class ViewTables implements Serializable
{
private DataService<Table> service;
#Inject
public void setService( DataService<Table> service )
{
this.service = service;
}
public List<Table> getTables()
{
return service.getAll();
}
}
So, I'm wondering if there is a trick to get Guice injecting into a JSF managed bean? I obviously can't use the constructor injection because JSF needs a no-arg constructor to create the bean.
Check the following JSF-Guice integration framework/advice:
http://code.google.com/p/jsf-sugar/
http://notdennisbyrne.blogspot.com/2007/09/integrating-guice-and-jsf.html
http://cagataycivici.wordpress.com/2007/03/26/integrating_guice_and_jsf/
http://snippets.dzone.com/posts/show/7171
You can also create an HTTP servlet that then simple delegates the request on to a FacesServlet (like a wrapper). This should give you the same effect using Guice Servlet.
How about this approach, works well for us:
http://uudashr.blogspot.com/2008/12/guicing-jsf-with-guice.html
being the developer of jsf sugar I really would like to know the problem you had using it. We are already using it in production here so there shouldn't be any "show stoppers", maybe something is just not well documented? Just drop me a mail: murbanek(at)gmx_net (replace the _ with a .) .
check out http://code.google.com/p/guice2jsf/, and website starchu.blogspot.com, it has excellent library that provides Guice and JSF 2.0 integration
As information in this post are getting out of date but the question is still relevant, I'd like to share my findings about this topic. I wrote a little tutorial including a runnable sample project on how to setup a fully guice powered web stack. You can find it here: https://github.com/skuzzle/guice-jsf

Resources