I'm struggling to write a Mongo UpdateMany statement that can reference and update an object within an array.
Here I create 3 documents. Each document has an array called innerArray always containing a single object, with a single date field.
use test;
db.innerArrayExample.insertOne({ _id: 1, "innerArray": [ { "originalDateTime" : ISODate("2022-01-01T01:01:01Z") } ]});
db.innerArrayExample.insertOne({ _id: 2, "innerArray": [ { "originalDateTime" : ISODate("2022-01-02T01:01:01Z") } ]});
db.innerArrayExample.insertOne({ _id: 3, "innerArray": [ { "originalDateTime" : ISODate("2022-01-03T01:01:01Z") } ]});
I want to add a new date field, based on the original date field, to end up with this:
{ _id: 1, "innerArray": [ { "originalDateTime" : ISODate("2022-01-01T01:01:01Z"), "copiedDateTime" : ISODate("2022-01-01T12:01:01Z") } ]}
{ _id: 2, "innerArray": [ { "originalDateTime" : ISODate("2022-01-02T01:01:01Z"), "copiedDateTime" : ISODate("2022-01-02T12:01:01Z") } ]}
{ _id: 3, "innerArray": [ { "originalDateTime" : ISODate("2022-01-03T01:01:01Z"), "copiedDateTime" : ISODate("2022-01-03T12:01:01Z") } ]}
In pseudo code I am saying take the originalDateTime, run it through a function and add a related copiedDateTime value.
For my specific use-case, the function I want to run strips the timezone from originalDateTime, then overwrites it with a new one, equivalent to the Java ZonedDateTime function withZoneSameLocal. Aka 9pm UTC becomes 9pm Brussels (therefore effectively 7pm UTC). The technical justification and methodology were answered in another Stack Overflow question here.
The part of the query I'm struggling with, is the part that updates/selects data from an element inside an array. In my simplistic example, for example I have crafted this query, but unfortunately it doesn't work:
This function puts copiedDateTime in the correct place... but doesn't evaluate the commands to manipulate the date:
db.innerArrayExample.updateMany({ "innerArray.0.originalDateTime" : { $exists : true }}, { $set: { "innerArray.0.copiedDateTime" : { $dateFromString: { dateString: { $dateToString: { "date" : "$innerArray.0.originalDateTime", format: "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%L" }}, format: "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%L", timezone: "Europe/Paris" }}});
// output
{
_id: 1,
innerArray: [
{
originalDateTime: ISODate("2022-01-01T01:01:01.000Z"),
copiedDateTime: {
'$dateFromString': {
dateString: { '$dateToString': [Object] },
format: '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%L',
timezone: 'Europe/Paris'
}
}
}
]
}
This simplified query, also has the same issue:
b.innerArrayExample.updateMany({ "innerArray.0.originalDateTime" : { $exists : true }}, { $set: { "innerArray.0.copiedDateTime" : "$innerArray.0.originalDateTime" }});
//output
{
_id: 1,
innerArray: [
{
originalDateTime: ISODate("2022-01-01T01:01:01.000Z"),
copiedDateTime: '$innerArray.0.originalDateTime'
}
]
}
As you can see this issue looks to be separate from the other stack overflow question. Instead of being able changing timezones, it's about getting things inside arrays to update.
I plan to take this query, create 70,000 variations of it with different location/timezone combinations and run it against a database with millions of records, so I would prefer something that uses updateMany instead of using Javascript to iterate over each row in the database... unless that's the only viable solution.
I have tried putting $set in square brackets. This changes the way it interprets everything, evaluating the right side, but causing other problems:
test> db.innerArrayExample.updateMany({ "_id" : 1 }, [{ $set: { "innerArray.0.copiedDateTime" : "$innerArray.0.originalDateTime" }}]);
//output
{
_id: 1,
innerArray: [
{
'0': { copiedDateTime: [] },
originalDateTime: ISODate("2022-01-01T01:01:01.000Z")
}
]
}
Above it seems to interpret .0. as a literal rather than an array element. (For my needs I know the array only has 1 item at all times). I'm at a loss finding an example that meets my needs.
I have also tried experimenting with the arrayFilters, documented on my mongo updateMany documentation but I cannot fathom how it works with objects:
test> db.innerArrayExample.updateMany(
... { },
... { $set: { "innerArray.$[element].copiedDateTime" : "$innerArray.$[element].originalDateTime" } },
... { arrayFilters: [ { "originalDateTime": { $exists: true } } ] }
... );
MongoServerError: No array filter found for identifier 'element' in path 'innerArray.$[element].copiedDateTime'
test> db.innerArrayExample.updateMany(
... { },
... { $set: { "innerArray.$[0].copiedDateTime" : "$innerArray.$[element].originalDateTime" } },
... { arrayFilters: [ { "0.originalDateTime": { $exists: true } } ] }
... );
MongoServerError: Error parsing array filter :: caused by :: The top-level field name must be an alphanumeric string beginning with a lowercase letter, found '0'
If someone can help me understand the subtleties of the Mongo syntax and help me back on to the right path I'd be very grateful.
You want to be using pipelined updates, the issue you're having with the syntax you're using is that it does not allow the usage of aggregation operators and document field values.
Here is a quick example on how to do it:
db.collection.updateMany({},
[
{
"$set": {
"innerArray": {
$map: {
input: "$innerArray",
in: {
$mergeObjects: [
"$$this",
{
copiedDateTime: "$$this.originalDateTime"
}
]
}
}
}
}
}
])
Mongo Playground
Related
My question is a combination of:
This question: Removing the array element in mongoDB based on the position of element
And this question: mongodb set object where key value dynamically changes
I know you can define the field (array) dynamically like this:
{ [arrayName]: { <condition> } }
But, I then want to remove a certain element in a dynamically defined array by specifying the position (which is also defined dynamically). In other words, the function that processes this query is coming in which two parameters: the array's name and the index of the element to remove.
The options given by the selected answer were the following:
Option 1, does not work (in general), adapted to my case this looks like:
{ $pull : { [arrayName] : { $gt: index-1, $lt: index+1 } } }
Option 2, I cannot use dynamically defined values in field selectors with quotation marks (as far as I am aware):
{ $pull : "[arrayName].[index]" }
or
{ $pull : "[arrayName].$": index }
Option 3, is different method but can't use it for the same reason:
{ $unset: { "[arrayName].[index]": 1 } } // Won't work
{ $pull: { [arrayName]: null } } // Would probably work
The only workarounds I can think of right now involve significantly changing the design which would be a shame. Any help is appreciated!
PS: I'm using mongoose as a driver on the latest version as of today (v6.3.5) and MongoDB version 5.0.8
On Mongo version 4.2+ You can use pipelined updates to achieve this, you can get it done in multiple ways, here is what I consider the easiest two ways:
using $slice and $concatArrays to remove a certain element:
db.collection.update({},
[
{
$set: {
[arrayName]: {
$concatArrays: [
{
$slice: [
`$${arrayName}`,
index,
]
},
{
$slice: [
`$${arrayName}`,
index + 1,
{
$size: `$${arrayName}`
}
]
}
]
}
}
}
])
Mongo Playground
using $filter and $zip to filter out based on index:
db.collection.updateOne(
{},
[
{
"$set": {
[arrayName]: {
$map: {
input: {
$filter: {
input: {
$zip: {
inputs: [
{
$range: [
0,
{
$size: `$${arrayName}`
}
]
},
`$${arrayName}`
]
}
},
cond: {
$ne: [
{
"$arrayElemAt": [
"$$this",
0
]
},
index
]
}
}
},
in: {
$arrayElemAt: [
"$$this",
1
]
}
}
}
}
}
])
Alternatively you can just prepare
MongoDB: 4.4.9, Mongosh: 1.0.4
I have a MongoDB collection full of documents with monthly production data as separate fields (monthlyProd1, monthlyProd2, etc.). Each field is one month's production data, and the values are an object data type.
Document example:
_id: ObjectId("314e0e088f183fb7e699d635")
name: "documentName"
monthlyProd1: Object
monthlyProd2: Object
monthlyProd3: Object
...
I want to take all the months and put them into a single new field (monthlyProd) -- a single array of objects.
I can't seem to access the fields with the different methods I've tried. For example, this gets close to doing what I want:
db.monthlyProdData.updateMany({},
{ $push: { "monthlyProd": { $each: [ "$monthlyProd1", "$monthlyProd2", "$monthlyProd3" ] } } }
)
...but instead of taking the value / object data from each field, like I had hoped, it just outputs a string into the monthlyProd array ("$monthlyProd1", "$monthlyProd2", ...):
Actual output:
monthlyProd: Array
0: "$monthlyProd1"
1: "$monthlyProd2"
2: "$monthlyProd3"
...
Desired output:
monthlyProd: Array
0: Object
1: Object
2: Object
...
I want the data, not a string! Lol. Thank you for your help!
Note: some months/fields may be an empty string ("") because there was no production. I want to make sure to not add empty strings into the array -- only months with production / fields that have an object data type. That being said, I can try figuring that out on my own, if I can just get access to these fields' data!
Try this one:
db.collection.updateMany({}, [
// convert to k-v Array
{ $set: { monthlyProd: { $objectToArray: "$$ROOT" } } },
{
$set: {
monthlyProd: {
// removed not needed objects
$filter: {
input: "$monthlyProd",
cond: { $not: { $in: [ "$$this.k", [ "name", "_id" ] ] } }
// or cond: { $in: [ "$$this.k", [ "monthlyProd1", "monthlyProd2", "monthlyProd3" ] ] }
}
}
}
},
// output array value
{ $project: { monthlyProd: "$monthlyProd.v" } }
])
Mongo playground
Thank you to #Wernfried for the original solution to this question. I have modified the solution to incorporate my "Note" about ignoring any empty monthlyProd# values (aka months that didn't have any production), so that they are not added into the final monthlyProd array.
To do this, I added an $and operator to the cond: within $filter, and added the following as the second expression for the $and operator (I used "" and {} to take care of the empty field values if they are of either string or object data type):
{ $not: { $in: [ "$$this.v", [ "", {} ] ] } }
Final solution:
db.monthlyProdData2.updateMany({}, [
// convert to k-v Array
{ $set: { monthlyProd: { $objectToArray: "$$ROOT" } } },
{
$set: {
monthlyProd: {
// removed not needed objects
$filter: {
input: "$monthlyProd",
cond: { $and: [
{ $not: { $in: [ "$$this.k", [ "name", "_id" ] ] } },
{ $not: { $in: [ "$$this.v", [ "", {} ] ] } }
]}
}
}
}
},
// output array value
{ $project: { monthlyProd: "$monthlyProd.v", name: 1 } }
])
Thanks again #Wernfried and Stackoverflow community!
Suppose I have a collection in mongoDB like given below -
{
name : "Abhishek",
Roll_no : null,
hobby : stackoverflow
},
{
name : null,
Roll_no : 1,
hobby : null
}
Now I want to delete the fields in my Documents where the field values are null. I know that I can do it using the $unset in following way -
db.collection.updateMany({name: null}, { $unset : { name : 1 }});
And we could do it in the same way for hobby and name field.
But I was wondering if I can do the same deletion operation using just one query? I was wondering if maybe I could use $or or something else to achieve the same effect but in a single command.
Any ideas?
On MongoDB version >= 3.2 :
You can take advantage of .bulkWrite() :
let bulkArr = [
{
updateMany: {
filter: { name: null },
update: { $unset: { name: 1 } }
}
},
{
updateMany: {
filter: { Roll_no: null },
update: { $unset: { Roll_no: 1 } }
}
},
{
updateMany: {
filter: { hobby: null },
update: { $unset: { hobby: 1 } }
}
},
];
/** All filter conditions will be executed on all docs
* but respective update operation will only be executed if respective filter matches (kind of individual ops) */
db.collection.bulkWrite(bulkArr);
Ref : bulkwrite
On MongoDB version >= 4.2 :
Since you wanted to delete multiple fields(where field names can't be listed down or unknown) having null value, try below query :
db.collection.update(
{}, // Try to use a filter if possible
[
/**
* using project as first stage in aggregation-pipeline
* Iterate on keys/fields of document & remove fields where their value is 'null'
*/
{
$project: {
doc: {
$arrayToObject: { $filter: { input: { $objectToArray: "$$ROOT" }, cond: { $ne: ["$$this.v", null] } } }
}
}
},
/** Replace 'doc' object as root of document */
{
$replaceRoot: { newRoot: "$doc" }
}
],
{ multi: true }
);
Test : mongoplayground
Ref : update-with-an-aggregation-pipeline , aggregation-pipeline
Note :
I believe this would be one time operation & in future you can use Joi npm package or mongoose schema validators to restrict writing null's as field values. If you can list down your field names as if not too many plus dataset size is way too high then try to use aggregation with $$REMOVE as suggested by '#thammada'.
As of now, aggregation-pipeline in .updateMany() is not supported by many clients even few mongo shell versions - back then my ticket to them got resolved by using .update(), if it doesn't work then try to use update + { multi : true }.
With MongoDB v4.2, you can do Updates with Aggregation Pipeline, along with the $$REMOVE system variable
db.collection.updateMany({
$or: [{
name: null
}, {
Roll_no: null
}, {
hobby: null
}]
}, [{
$set: {
name: { $ifNull: ["$name", "$$REMOVE"] }
Roll_no: { $ifNull: ["$Roll_no", "$$REMOVE"] },
hobby: { $ifNull: ["$hobby", "$$REMOVE"] }
}
}]
folks. I'm working in Node.js with a MongoDB collection that has a field that is an array of objects, like so:
{_id: 'someIdNumber',
text: 'some text',
replies: [{_id: 'someReplyId', replyText: 'some reply text', password: 'somePassword'}, {...}]
I'm trying to update the replyText field of the replies array using the $[<identifier>] array update operator as shown in the MongoDB documentation: https://docs.mongodb.com/manual/reference/operator/update/positional-filtered/ What I'm trying to do is as follows:
db.collection('collectionName').updateOne(
{ _id: ObjectID('whateverId') },
{ $set: { "replies.$[elem].replyText": "new text" } },
{
arrayFilters: [{ "elem._id": ObjectID(req.body.reply_id)}, {"elem.password": 'whateverPassword}]
},
(err, data) => {console.log('hooray, it worked')}
This throws an error, MongoError: Found multiple array filters with the same top-level field name elem. If I get rid of one of my arrayFilters, this fixes the error, but obviously at the expense of my filtering conditions.
The MongoDB documentation's example of this process, (I've shortened the collection students2 to a single document,) is as follows:
{
"_id" : 1,
"grades" : [
{ "grade" : 80, "mean" : 75, "std" : 6 },
{ "grade" : 85, "mean" : 100, "std" : 4 },
{ "grade" : 85, "mean" : 100, "std" : 6 }
]
}
db.students2.update(
{ },
{ $inc: { "grades.$[elem].std" : -1 } },
{ arrayFilters: [ { "elem.grade": { $gte: 80 }, "elem.std": { $gt: 5 } } ], multi: true }
)
The syntax is a tiny bit different because the documentation is using the Mongo shell method, not Node.js, but otherwise, it looks to me like I'm doing what the documentation says to do. I'm using updateOne and not update because I only want to update one document, and I'm not using multi for the same reason.
Any insight on how I could get this to work with both arrayFilters intact would be much appreciated.
Thanks for your time!
Got it! Unfortunately I cannot upvote the question/comment hence adding here for others to benefit. Thanks #LuosRestil and #typesafe for getting me to the fix. I had the same syntax error where I tried to add multiple expressions for the same field in the array for the arrayFilters. It should be once expression per field.
WRONG:
arrayFilters: [
{ "elemA.<fieldName1>": "value1" },
{ "elemA.<fieldName2>": "value2" },
{ "elemA.<fieldName3>": "value3" }
];
CORRECT:
arrayFilters: [
{
"elemA.<fieldName1>": "value1",
"elemA.<fieldName2>": "value2",
"elemA.<fieldName3>": "value3"
}
];
I am working on an express js application where I need to update a nested array.
1) Schema :
//Creating a mongoose schema
var userSchema = mongoose.Schema({
_id: {type: String, required:true},
name: String,
sensors: [{
sensor_name: {type: String, required:true},
measurements: [{time: String}]
}] });
2)
Here is the code snippet and explanation is below:
router.route('/sensors_update/:_id/:sensor_name/')
.post(function (req, res) {
User.findOneAndUpdate({_id:req.body._id}, {$push: {"sensors" :
{"sensor_name" : req.body.sensor_name , "measurements.0.time": req.body.time } } },
{new:true},function(err, newSensor) {
if (err)
res.send(err);
res.send(newSensor)
}); });
I am able to successfully update a value to the measurements array using the findOneAndUpdate with push technique but I'm failing when I try to add multiple measurements to the sensors array.
Here is current json I get if I get when I post a second measurement to the sensors array :
{
"_id": "Manasa",
"name": "Manasa Sub",
"__v": 0,
"sensors": [
{
"sensor_name": "ras",
"_id": "57da0a4bf3884d1fb2234c74",
"measurements": [
{
"time": "8:00"
}
]
},
{
"sensor_name": "ras",
"_id": "57da0a68f3884d1fb2234c75",
"measurements": [
{
"time": "9:00"
}
]
}]}
But the right format I want is posting multiple measurements with the sensors array like this :
Right JSON format would be :
{
"_id" : "Manasa",
"name" : "Manasa Sub",
"sensors" : [
{
"sensor_name" : "ras",
"_id" : ObjectId("57da0a4bf3884d1fb2234c74"),
"measurements" : [
{
"time" : "8:00"
}
],
"measurements" : [
{
"time" : "9:00"
}
]
}],
"__v" : 0 }
Please suggest some ideas regarding this. Thanks in advance.
You might want to rethink your data model. As it is currently, you cannot accomplish what you want. The sensors field refers to an array. In the ideal document format that you have provided, you have a single object inside that array. Then inside that object, you have two fields with the exact same key. In a JSON object, or mongo document in this context, you can't have duplicate keys within the same object.
It's not clear exactly what you're looking for here, but perhaps it would be best to go for something like this:
{
"_id" : "Manasa",
"name" : "Manasa Sub",
"sensors" : [
{
"sensor_name" : "ras",
"_id" : ObjectId("57da0a4bf3884d1fb2234c74"),
"measurements" : [
{
"time" : "8:00"
},
{
"time" : "9:00"
}
]
},
{
// next sensor in the sensors array with similar format
"_id": "",
"name": "",
"measurements": []
}],
}
If this is what you want, then you can try this:
User.findOneAndUpdate(
{ _id:req.body._id "sensors.sensor_name": req.body.sensor_name },
{ $push: { "sensors.0.measurements": { "time": req.body.time } } }
);
And as a side note, if you're only ever going to store a single string in each object in the measurements array, you might want to just store the actual values instead of the whole object { time: "value" }. You might find the data easier to handle this way.
Instead of hardcoding the index of the array it is possible to use identifier and positional operator $.
Example:
User.findOneAndUpdate(
{ _id: "Manasa" },
{ $push: { "sensors.$[outer].measurements": { "time": req.body.time } } }
{ "arrayFilters:" [{"outer._id": ObjectId("57da0a4bf3884d1fb2234c74")}]
);
You may notice than instead of getting a first element of the array I specified which element of the sensors array I would like to update by providing its ObjectId.
Note that arrayFilters are passed as the third argument to the update query as an option.
You could now make "outer._id" dynamic by passing the ObjectId of the sensor like so: {"outer._id": req.body.sensorId}
In general, with the use of identifier, you can get to even deeper nested array elements by following the same procedure and adding more filters.
If there was a third level nesting you could then do something like:
User.findOneAndUpdate(
{ _id: "Manasa" },
{ $push: { "sensors.$[outer].measurements.$[inner].example": { "time": req.body.time } } }
{ "arrayFilters:" [{"outer._id": ObjectId("57da0a4bf3884d1fb2234c74"), {"inner._id": ObjectId("57da0a4bf3884d1fb2234c74"}}]
);
You can find more details here in the answer written by Neil Lunn.
refer ::: positional-all
--- conditions :: { other_conditions, 'array1.array2.field_to_be_checked': 'value' }
--- updateData ::: { $push : { 'array1.$[].array2.$[].array3' : 'value_to_be_pushed' } }