I have this document :
[
{
"_id": "626c5fd2aa0fc0e4eef45c94",
"productos": [
{
"_id": "626d50b621180e291a330333",
"nombre": "ciruelas",
"descripcion": "marca lala",
"codigo": 33,
"foto": "https://cdn3.iconfinder.com/data/icons/fruits-52/150/icon_fruit_morango-256.png",
"precio": 15,
"stock": 30,
"timestamp": "2022-04-30T15:06:45.128Z",
"__v": 0
}
],
"timestamp": "2022-04-29T21:59:35.301Z",
"__v": 0
},
{
"_id": "626d508b21180e291a33032c",
"productos": [],
"timestamp": "2022-04-30T15:06:45.139Z",
"__v": 0
}
]
I would like to delete "ciruela" with "_id": "626d50b621180e291a330333" inside "productos".
How could i do that?
You could use $pull to remove the object with specified _id from the array productos
db.collection.update({
"_id": "626c5fd2aa0fc0e4eef45c94"
},
{
"$pull": {
"productos": {
"_id": "626d50b621180e291a330333"
}
}
})
Here is the link to the code for your reference https://mongoplayground.net/p/tsOJypb5Y6q
Solved!
I had to look for my "product" first.
async eraseMyProductFromCart (idProduct, idCart) {
try{
const productSelected = await Product.findOne({_id:idProduct})
await Cart.findByIdAndUpdate(idCart, {$pull: {"products": productSelected}})
return Cart.find()
}
catch(error){
console.log(error.message)
}
}
And then, pull that product when I do findByIdAndUpdate.
I donĀ“t know if that is the correct solution, but it worked for me.
Related
Can someone help me with a solution to update an array object inside the MongoDB document, I've tried a couple of methods but still it's to updating, here is my document that I want to update the array in the document.
{
"title": "Products",
"description": "test",
"image": "bdd8510d75f6e83ad308d5f306afccef_image.jpg",
"_created_at": "2021-06-07T20:51:08.316Z",
"ratingCount": 0,
"ratingTotal": 0,
"placeListSave": [
{
"objectId": "g70brr45pfi",
"name": "Kale",
"email": "null",
"strBrandLogo": "84de8865e3223d1ca61386355895aa04_image.jpg",
"storeNumber": "56",
"phone": "0815342119",
"createdAt": "2021-06-10T10:19:53.384Z",
"image": "ad1fb7602c2188223fd891a52373cb9d_image.jpg"
},
{
"objectId": "0qokn33p773",
"name": "Apple",
"email": null,
"strBrandLogo": null,
"storeNumber": "01",
"phone": "011 393 8600",
"createdAt": "2021-06-11T03:11:17.342Z",
"image": "8cfcbf2bcb5e3b4ea8ade44d3825bb52_image.jpg"
}
]
}
So I only want to update the apple object and change the data, I've tried the following code but doesn't seem to work.
`
var db = client.db("test");
try {
db.collection("ShoppingCentres").updateOne({
"title": req.body.product,
"placeListSave.objectId": req.body.id,
}, {
$set: {
"placeListSave.$.email": req.body.email,
"placeListSave.$.storeNumber": req.body.storeNumber,
"placeListSave.$.phone": req.body.phone,
"placeListSave.name": req.body.name,
},
});
res.json("client");
} catch (e) {
console.log("verify", e);
}
});`
arrayFilters seems suitable here:
db.collection.update({
"title": "Products",
"placeListSave.objectId": "0qokn33p773",
},
{
$set: {
"placeListSave.$[x].email": "test#some.email",
"placeListSave.$[x].storeNumber": "test",
"placeListSave.$[x].phone": "test",
"placeListSave.$[x].name": "test"
}
},
{
arrayFilters: [
{
"x.objectId": "0qokn33p773"
}
]
})
explained:
Add array filter called "x" with the objectId for the element that you need to update and use this filter in the $set stage to update the necessary elements.
Hint: To speed up the update you will need to add index on title field or compound index on title+placeListSave.objectId
playground
I am trying to convert array of strings to array of ObjectId using map function, map will return me array of ObjectIds that I am using in $match to check if _id matches with any of objectids present in array using $in operator.
Database configuration is
db={
"students": [
{
"_id": ObjectId("5c1a79f7c98da061141475b7"),
"firstName": "Ibrahim",
"kelasID": ObjectId("5c429f9906f2a805bc6cd494"),
"lastName": "Ali",
"schoolID": ObjectId("5c1a735fc98da061141475a1"),
"year": 2018,
"__v": 0,
"addedOn": ISODate("2018-12-25T04:27:47.909Z"),
"checkIn": false,
"checkInStatus": 1,
"contactNo1": "012225656",
"father": "Ali",
"fatherID": "8852245",
"idType": 0,
"lastModified": ISODate("2018-12-25T04:27:47.909Z"),
"mother": "",
"motherID": ""
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("5c3bfea37774fb0b55000cb5"),
"idType": 0,
"checkIn": false,
"checkInStatus": 1,
"year": 2019,
"schoolID": ObjectId("5c1a735fc98da061141475a1"),
"kelasID": ObjectId("5c1a7534c98da061141475a3"),
"firstName": "Umar",
"lastName": "Bin Al-Khattab",
"contactNo1": "601222",
"status": 1,
"addedOn": ISODate("2019-01-14T03:14:43.597Z"),
"lastModified": ISODate("2019-01-14T03:14:43.597Z"),
"__v": 0
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("5c1a7c69c98da061141475bb"),
"idType": 0,
"checkIn": false,
"checkInStatus": 1,
"year": 2018,
"schoolID": ObjectId("5c1a735fc98da061141475a1"),
"kelasID": ObjectId("5c1a7540c98da061141475a5"),
"firstName": "Abdul Rahman",
"lastName": "Affan",
"father": "Affan",
"fatherID": "54321",
"contactNo1": "602288",
"status": 1,
"addedOn": ISODate("2018-12-25T04:30:16.130Z"),
"lastModified": ISODate("2018-12-25T04:30:16.130Z"),
"__v": 0
}
]
}
and the query is
db.students.aggregate([
{
"$match": {
"_id": {
$in: {
"stud": {
"$map": {
"input": [
"5c1a79f7c98da061141475b7",
"5c3bfea37774fb0b55000cb5",
"5c1a7c69c98da061141475bb",
"5c3bfea37774fb0b55000cb4",
"5c1a7d32c98da061141475be",
"5c3bfea37774fb0b55000cb7"
],
"in": {
"$toObjectId": "$$this"
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
])
You can also check this out here- https://mongoplayground.net/p/8tQFHxtrttW
The above doesn't work but if I change the query like below it works.
db.students.aggregate([
{
"$match": {
"_id": {
$in: [
ObjectId("5c1a79f7c98da061141475b7"),
ObjectId("5c3bfea37774fb0b55000cb5")
]
}
}
}
])
Link to above query- https://mongoplayground.net/p/cjq77KIAcPE
Error i'm getting - query failed: (BadValue) $in needs an array
Can anybody help with the reason to the error , as according to docs map does return an array , so what am I doing wrong?
Not sure why it doesn't work it might have to do with $in operator and $in aggregation. When you use an array that is defined by a variable you can use $in operator but when you are using aggregation result ( in this case $map ) you have to use $in aggregation. But to use $in aggregation you need to work with $expr for $match.
You can try the below code which works fine
db.students.aggregate([
{
$addFields: {
studentIds: {
$map: {
input: [
"5c1a79f7c98da061141475b7",
"5c3bfea37774fb0b55000cb5",
"5c1a7c69c98da061141475bb",
"5c3bfea37774fb0b55000cb4",
"5c1a7d32c98da061141475be",
"5c3bfea37774fb0b55000cb7",
],
in: {
$toObjectId: "$$this",
},
},
},
},
},
{
$match: {
$expr: {
$in: ["$_id", "$studentIds"],
},
},
},
]);
or if you want to combine the two of the stages you can do it like this
db.students.aggregate([
{
$match: {
$expr: {
$in: [
"$_id",
{
$map: {
input: [
"5c1a79f7c98da061141475b7",
"5c3bfea37774fb0b55000cb5",
"5c1a7c69c98da061141475bb",
"5c3bfea37774fb0b55000cb4",
"5c1a7d32c98da061141475be",
"5c3bfea37774fb0b55000cb7",
],
in: {
$toObjectId: "$$this",
},
},
},
],
},
},
},
]);
I am trying to get an average number of an key in a nested array inside a document, but not sure how to accomplish this.
Here is how my document looks like:
{
"_id": {
"$oid": "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"
},
"data": {
"type": "PlayerRoundData",
"playerId": "XXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"groupId": "XXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"holeScores": [
{
"type": "RoundHoleData",
"points": 2
},
{
"type": "RoundHoleData",
"points": 13
},
{
"type": "RoundHoleData",
"points": 3
},
{
"type": "RoundHoleData",
"points": 1
},
{
"type": "RoundHoleData",
"points": 21
}
]
}
}
Now, the tricky part of this is that I only want the average of points for holeScores[0] of all documents with this playerid and this groupid.
Actually, the best solution would be collecting all documents with playerid and groupid and create a new array with the average of holeScores[0], holeScores[1], holeScores[2]... But if I only can get one array key at the time, that would be OK to :-)
Here is what I am thinking but not quit sure how to put it together:
var allScores = dbCollection('scores').aggregate(
{$match: {"data.groupId": groupId, "playerId": playerId}},
{$group: {
_id: playerId,
rounds: { $sum: 1 }
result: { $sum: "$data.scoreTotals.points" }
}}
);
Really hoping for help with this issue and thanks in advance :-)
You can use $unwind with includeArrayIndex to get index and then use $group to group by that index
dbCollection('scores').aggregate(
{
$match: { "data.playerId": "XXXXXXXXXXXXX", "data.groupId": "XXXXXXXXXXXXXX" }
},
{
$unwind: {
path: "$data.holeScores",
includeArrayIndex: "index"
}
},
{
$group: {
_id: "$index",
playerId: { $first: "data.playerId" },
avg: { $avg: "$data.holeScores.points" }
}
}
)
You can try below aggregation
db.collection.aggregate(
{ "$match": { "data.groupId": groupId, "data.playerId": playerId }},
{ "$group": {
"_id": null,
"result": {
"$sum": {
"$arrayElemAt": [
"$data.holeScores.points",
0
]
}
}
}}
)
Given my Profile data looks like below, I want to find the profile for combination of userName and productId
and only return the profile with the respective contract for this product.
{
"firstName": "John",
"lastName": "Doe",
"userName": "john.doe#gmail.com",
"language": "NL",
"timeZone": "Europe/Amsterdam",
"contracts": [
{
"contractId": "DEMO1-CONTRACT",
"productId": "ticket-api",
"startDate": ISODate('2016-06-29T09:06:42.391Z'),
"roles": [
{
"name": "Manager",
"permissions": [
{
"activity": "ticket",
"permission": "createTicket"
},
{
"activity": "ticket",
"permission": "updateTicket"
},
{
"activity": "ticket",
"permission": "closeTicket"
}
]
}
]
},
{
"contractId": "DEMO2-CONTRACT",
"productId": "comment-api",
"startDate": ISODate('2016-06-29T10:27:45.899Z'),
"roles": [
{
"name": "Manager",
"permissions": [
{
"activity": "comment",
"permission": "createComment"
},
{
"activity": "comment",
"permission": "updateComment"
},
{
"activity": "comment",
"permission": "deleteComment"
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
I managed to find the solution how to do this from the command line. But I don't seem to find a way how to accomplish this with Morphia (latest version).
db.Profile.aggregate([
{ $match: {"userName": "john.doe#gmail.com"}},
{ $project: {
contracts: {$filter: {
input: '$contracts',
as: 'contract',
cond: {$eq: ['$$contract.productId', "ticket-api"]}
}}
}}
])
This is what I have so far. Any help is most appreciated
Query<Profile> matchQuery = getDatastore().createQuery(Profile.class).field(Profile._userName).equal(userName);
getDatastore()
.createAggregation(Profile.class)
.match(matchQuery)
.project(Projection.expression(??))
Note... meanwhile I found another solution which does not use an aggregation pipeline.
public Optional<Profile> findByUserNameAndContractQuery(String userName, String productId) {
DBObject contractQuery = BasicDBObjectBuilder.start(Contract._productId, productId).get();
Query<Profile> query =
getDatastore()
.createQuery(Profile.class)
.field(Profile._userName).equal(userName)
.filter(Profile._contracts + " elem", contractQuery)
.retrievedFields(true, Profile._contracts + ".$");
return Optional.ofNullable(query.get());
}
I finally found the best way (under assumption I only want to return max. 1 element from array) to filter embedded array.
db.Profile.aggregate([
{ $match: {"userName": "john.doe#gmail.com"}},
{ $unwind: "$contracts"},
{ $match: {"contracts.productId": "comment-api"}}
])
To match according to your first design you could try the projection settings with morphia aggregation pipeline.
Query<Profile> matchQuery = getDatastore().createQuery(Profile.class).field(Profile._userName).equal(userName);
getDatastore()
.createAggregation(Profile.class)
.match(matchQuery)
.project(Projection.expression("$filter", new BasicDBObject()
.append("input", "$contracts")
.append("as", "contract")
.append("cond", new BasicDBObject()
.append("$eq", Arrays.asList('$$contract.productId', "ticket-api")));
Also see the example written by the morphia crew around line 88 at https://github.com/mongodb/morphia/blob/master/morphia/src/test/java/org/mongodb/morphia/aggregation/AggregationTest.java.
I am trying to get an object out of a JSON array that is stored in elasticsearch. The layout is like this:
[
object{}
object{}
object{}
]
What I need for when I do a search and it hits on one of these objects, to get the specific object it matches to. Currently, using the java API I am searching with:
QueryBuilder qb = QueryBuilders.boolQuery()
.should(QueryBuilders.matchQuery("text", "pottery").boost(5)
.minimumShouldMatch("1"));
SearchResponse response = client.prepareSearch("stuff")
.setTypes("things")
.setSearchType(SearchType.DFS_QUERY_THEN_FETCH)
.setQuery(qb)
.setPostFilter(filter)//.setHighlighterQuery(qb)
.addField("places.numbers")
.addField("name")
.addField("city")
.setFrom(0).setSize(60).setExplain(true)
.execute()
.actionGet();
But this will just return the whole object that I hit or when I tell it to return the field "places.numbers" it will only return the first object in the "palces" array, not the one that was matched in the query.
Thank you for any help!
There are a couple of ways to handle this. I would probably do it with a nested type and inner hits, given what you've shown in your question, but it could also probably be done with the parent/child relationship.
Here is an example with nested docs. I set up a simple index like this:
PUT /test_index
{
"mappings": {
"parent_doc": {
"properties": {
"parent_name": {
"type": "string"
},
"nested_docs": {
"type": "nested",
"properties": {
"nested_name": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
Then added a couple of simple documents:
POST /test_index/parent_doc/_bulk
{"index":{"_id":1}}
{"parent_name":"p1","nested_docs":[{"nested_name":"n1"},{"nested_name":"n2"}]}
{"index":{"_id":2}}
{"parent_name":"p2","nested_docs":[{"nested_name":"n3"},{"nested_name":"n4"}]}
And now I can search like this, using "inner_hits":
POST /test_index/_search
{
"query": {
"nested": {
"path": "nested_docs",
"query": {
"match": {
"nested_docs.nested_name": "n3"
}
},
"inner_hits" : {}
}
}
}
which returns:
{
"took": 4,
"timed_out": false,
"_shards": {
"total": 1,
"successful": 1,
"failed": 0
},
"hits": {
"total": 1,
"max_score": 2.098612,
"hits": [
{
"_index": "test_index",
"_type": "parent_doc",
"_id": "2",
"_score": 2.098612,
"_source": {
"parent_name": "p2",
"nested_docs": [
{
"nested_name": "n3"
},
{
"nested_name": "n4"
}
]
},
"inner_hits": {
"nested_docs": {
"hits": {
"total": 1,
"max_score": 2.098612,
"hits": [
{
"_index": "test_index",
"_type": "parent_doc",
"_id": "2",
"_nested": {
"field": "nested_docs",
"offset": 0
},
"_score": 2.098612,
"_source": {
"nested_name": "n3"
}
}
]
}
}
}
}
]
}
}
Here's the code I used to test it:
http://sense.qbox.io/gist/ef7debf436fec2a10097ba2106d5ff30ff8d7c77