Here is the situation:
There's a SQL Server database with a Microsoft Access front end. There is a table in the SQL Server database with a column called PackID which is defined as VARCHAR(6) NOT NULL (it has to be NOT NULL because it's part of a composite primary key for this table). Empty strings are legitimate in the PackID column. In fact, they occur quite often. When the user enters data in the UI for this table, and tabs through the PackID field, an error message appears: "Cannot insert the value NULL into column 'PackID'; column does not allow nulls. INSERT fails."
Things that have been tried that do not work:
adding a default constraint on this column in the SQL Server database with a value of '' - apparently the default is only used if the column is omitted from the INSERT statement
setting the Default Value of the PackID field in Access to "" - it behaves as though "" is a NULL
calling the following VBA code when user moves off row in UI (Lost Focus event)
If IsNull(PackID.Value) Then
PackID.Value = ""
End If
Does anyone know how to force an empty string in Access so it's interpreted as an empty string for SQL Server and not a NULL?
Setting the Default Value in the text box Properties for PackID in Access to this
=" "
worked. The space between the double quotes is very important. Leaving the space out causes the insert to fail. In SQL Server LEN(PackID) returns 0. For instance:
SELECT LEN(''), LEN(' ');
both return 0. It appears as though SQL Server treats both of these as empty strings.
An alternative solution to this problem (no Default Value in text box Properties for PackID).
Private Sub Form_BeforeUpdate(Cancel As Integer)
If IsNull(PackID.Value) Or PackID.Value = "" Then
PackID.Value = " "
End If
End Sub
This still uses the concept of passing SQL Server " " (read this as quote space quote) as the field's value. On the UI side, this is an alternative to setting a default value for the field.
I have a grails application that is intended to insert arabic characters from interface to sql server database. First I did it with field type varchar but it appears ???????. Then I found that the field type should be nvarchar but with, application simply fails to insert any row by giving the following error,
java.sql.SQLException: Cannot insert the value NULL into column 'id', table 'smsCampaigner.dbo.message'; column does not allow nulls. INSERT fails.
I know that this is constraints error that id cannot be null but this was not the case before changing the field type. Now I want to know whether we can specify fro config.groovy which encoding should be used in database ? any other type of help will be appreciated.
here you go..
when you create the domain class use String type for that column and that's it. you could insert any character it will accept.
for example TestDomain.groovy
class TestDomain {
String column1
}
In mysql you can set up the collation of the database/table/column to use utf8_unicode_ci and if I am not wrong that is valid to save arabic chars. Not sure how to do it with SQL Server but it should be something similar.
Change the collation of the database and tables and columns to Arabic_CI_AS
In Sql Server management studio (SSMS), Execute :
ALTER DATABASE DB06 COLLATE Arabic_CI_AS
where DB06 is the name of the database.
right-click on table, then click design, then select the desired column, in its properties, choose the collation to Arabic_CI_AS
by the way, the error :
Cannot insert the value NULL into column
is not related to Arabic, this is because you are trying to insert NULL in the column that does not allow NULL.
Just wondering
I colleague said to me don't use columnName='' instead use Len(columnName)==0
This happened when I was querying something and I wanted all columns in my table where the value was null or empty.
Is there any benefit in using len i/o testing for empty string? I cannot see any.
thanks
If you want the rows where the value is empty string or null you should do like this.
where Col = '' or Col is null
Using len(Col) will not give you the the rows with null values.
I have a SQL Server table with a few columns of type varchar which are nullable. When an aspx page posts data if the textbox is empty, the database table column is updated to an empty string.
To maintain the null value rather han have it replaced by an empty string, I can either have the logic to change the empty string to System.DBnull in the middle tier c# code or do so in the stored procedure.
Are there other better ways to handle this situation?
you can use a trigger or do it in the proc, you can use the NULLIF function
Example
DECLARE #d VARCHAR(20)
SELECT #d = ''
SELECT NULLIF(#d,'')
I would probably put it near the code that makes a decision based on the distinction between an empty string and a null string. If there is no difference between their meaning or the resulting behavior of the application, I would suggest making the field non-nullable and sticking with an empty string.
I have to write a component that re-creates SQL Server tables (structure and data) in an Oracle database. This component also has to take new data entered into the Oracle database and copy it back into SQL Server.
Translating the data types from SQL Server to Oracle is not a problem. However, a critical difference between Oracle and SQL Server is causing a major headache. SQL Server considers a blank string ("") to be different from a NULL value, so a char column can be defined as NOT NULL and yet still include blank strings in the data.
Oracle considers a blank string to be the same as a NULL value, so if a char column is defined as NOT NULL, you cannot insert a blank string. This is causing my component to break whenever a NOT NULL char column contains a blank string in the original SQL Server data.
So far my solution has been to not use NOT NULL in any of my mirror Oracle table definitions, but I need a more robust solution. This has to be a code solution, so the answer can't be "use so-and-so's SQL2Oracle product".
How would you solve this problem?
Edit: here is the only solution I've come up with so far, and it may help to illustrate the problem. Because Oracle doesn't allow "" in a NOT NULL column, my component could intercept any such value coming from SQL Server and replace it with "#" (just for example).
When I add a new record to my Oracle table, my code has to write "#" if I really want to insert a "", and when my code copies the new row back to SQL Server, it has to intercept the "#" and instead write "".
I'm hoping there's a more elegant way.
Edit 2: Is it possible that there's a simpler solution, like some setting in Oracle that gets it to treat blank strings the same as all the other major database? And would this setting also be available in Oracle Lite?
I don't see an easy solution for this.
Maybe you can store your values as one or more blanks -> ' ', which aren't NULLS in Oracle, or keep track of this special case through extra fields/tables, and an adapter layer.
My typical solution would be to add a constraint in SQL Server forcing all string values in the affected columns to have a length greater than 0:
CREATE TABLE Example (StringColumn VARCHAR(10) NOT NULL)
ALTER TABLE Example
ADD CONSTRAINT CK_Example_StringColumn CHECK (LEN(StringColumn) > 0)
However, as you have stated, you have no control over the SQL Database. As such you really have four choices (as I see it):
Treat empty string values as invalid, skip those records, alert an operator and log the records in some manner that makes it easy to manually correct / re-enter.
Convert empty string values to spaces.
Convert empty string values to a code (i.e. "LEGACY" or "EMPTY").
Rollback transfers that encounter empty string values in these columns, then put pressure on the SQL Server database owner to correct their data.
Number four would be my preference, but isn't always possible. The action you take will really depend on what the oracle users need. Ultimately, if nothing can be done about the SQL database, I would explain the issue to the oracle business system owners, explain the options and consequences and make them make the decision :)
NOTE: I believe in this case SQL Server actually exhibits the "correct" behaviour.
Do you have to permit empty strings in the SQL Server system? If you can add a constraint to the SQL Server system that disallows empty strings, that is probably the easiest solution.
Its nasty and could have unexpected side effects.. but you could just insert "chr(0)" rather than ''.
drop table x
drop table x succeeded.
create table x ( id number, my_varchar varchar2(10))
create table succeeded.
insert into x values (1, chr(0))
1 rows inserted
insert into x values (2, null)
1 rows inserted
select id,length(my_varchar) from x
ID LENGTH(MY_VARCHAR)
---------------------- ----------------------
1 1
2
2 rows selected
select * from x where my_varchar is not null
ID MY_VARCHAR
---------------------- ----------
1
NOT NULL is a database constraint used to stop putting invalid data into your database. This is not serving any purpose in your Oracle database and so I would not have it.
I think you should just continue to allow NULLS in any Oracle column that mirrors a SqlServer column that is known to contain empty strings.
If there is a logical difference in the SqlServer database between NULL and empty string, then you would need something extra to model this difference in Oracle.
I'd go with an additional column on the oracle side. Have your column allow nulls and have a second column that identifies whether the SQL-Server side should get a null-value or empty-string for the row.
For those that think a Null and an empty string should be considered the same. A null has a different meaning from an empty string. It captures the difference between 'undefined' and 'known to be blank'. As an example a record may have been automatically created, but never validated by user input, and thus receive a 'null' in the expectation that when a user validates it, it will be set to be empty. Practically we may not want to trigger logic on a null but may want to on an empty string. This is analogous to the case for a 3 state checkbox of Yes/No/Undefined.
Both SQL and Oracle have not got it entirely correct. A blank should not satisfy a 'not null' constraint, and there is a need for an empty string to be treated differently than a null is treated.
If you are migrating data you might have to substitute a space for an empty string. Not very elegant, but workable. This is a nasty "feature" of Oracle.
I've written an explanation on how Oracle handles null values on my blog a while ago. Check it here: http://www.psinke.nl/blog/hello-world/ and let me know if you have any more questions.
If you have data from a source with empty values and you must convert to an Oracle database where columns are NOT NULL, there are 2 things you can do:
remove the not null constraint from the Oracle column
Check for each individual column if it's acceptable to place a ' ' or 0 or dummy date in the column in order to be able to save your data.
Well, main point I'd consider is absence of tasks when some field can be null, the same field can be empty string and business logic requires to distinguish these values. So I'd make this logic:
check MSSQL if column has NOT NULL constraint
check MSSQL if column has CHECK(column <> '') or similar constraint
If both are true, make Oracle column NOT NULL. If any one is true, make Oracle column NULL. If none is true, raise INVALID DESIGN exception (or maybe ignore it, if it's acceptable by this application).
When sending data from MSSQL to Oracle, just do nothing special, all data would be transferred right. When retrieving data to MSSQL, any not-null data should be sent as is. For null strings you should decide whether it should be inserted as null or as empty string. To do this you should check table design again (or remember previous result) and see if it has NOT NULL constraint. If has - use empty string, if has not - use NULL. Simple and clever.
Sometimes, if you work with unknown and unpredictable application, you cannot check for existence of {not empty string} constraint because of various forms of it. If so, you can either use simplified logic (make Oracle columns always nullable) or check whether you can insert empty string into MSSQL table without error.
Although, for the most part, I agree with most of the other responses (not going to get into an argument about any I disagree with - not the place for that :) )
I do notice that OP mentioned the following:
"Oracle considers a blank string to be the same as a NULL value, so if a char column is defined as NOT NULL, you cannot insert a blank string."
Specifically calling out CHAR, and not VARCHAR2.
Hence, talking about an "empty string" of length 0 (ie '' ) is moot.
If he's declared the CHAR as, for example, CHAR(5), then just add a space to the empty string coming in, Oracle's going to pad it anyway. You'll end up with a 5 space string.
Now, if OP meant VARCHAR2, well yeah, that's a whole other beast, and yeah, the difference between empty string and NULL becomes relevant.
SQL> drop table junk;
Table dropped.
SQL>
SQL> create table junk ( c1 char(5) not null );
Table created.
SQL>
SQL> insert into junk values ( 'hi' );
1 row created.
SQL>
SQL> insert into junk values ( ' ' );
1 row created.
SQL>
SQL> insert into junk values ( '' );
insert into junk values ( '' )
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into ("GREGS"."JUNK"."C1")
SQL>
SQL> insert into junk values ( rpad('', 5, ' ') );
insert into junk values ( rpad('', 5, ' ') )
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into ("GREGS"."JUNK"."C1")
SQL>
SQL> declare
2 lv_in varchar2(5) := '';
3 begin
4 insert into junk values ( rpad(lv_in||' ', 5) );
5 end;
6 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>