public class ExtentReportDemo {
#BeforeTest
public void config()
{
String path = System.getProperty("user.dir")+\\reports\index.html; //user.dir - it means project path in the system
ExtentSparkReporter reporter = new ExtentSparkReporter(path);
reporter.config().setReportName("Web Automation results");
reporter.config().setDocumentTitle("Test results");
ExtentReports extent =new ExtentReports();
extent.attachReporter(reporter);
}
Above code already has "ExtentSparkReporter" class in 4th line but what's the purpose of creating another class called "ExtentReports" here in last two lines?
ExtentReports extent =new ExtentReports();
extent.attachReporter(reporter);
Related
Problem
Could not initialize class ...
...javax.xml.transform.FactoryFinder (in our case).
In the article, where we found the solution, it was the class SessionFactory.
Class Under Test
We wanted to write a test for a utils class with static members.
We got the error when trying to create a Mock of a class, which contained a new statement as an initialization of a static field.
public class ClassUnderTest{
private static JavaType javaType = new JavaType();
// ...
}
Test Class
#RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
#PrepareForTest(ClassUnderTest.class)
public class TestForClassUnderTest {
#Test
public void testCase() {
PowerMockito.mockStatic(ClassUnderTest.class);
Solution
The solution was adding another class level annotation to the test class:
#SuppressStaticInitializationFor("com.example.package.util.ClassUnderTest")
Note, that you have to give the package path and no .class at the end. Unlike #PrepareFor.
Thanks to this article: http://www.gitshah.com/2010/06/how-to-suppress-static-initializers.html
Test Class with Solution
//...
import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PrepareForTest;
import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.SuppressStaticInitializationFor;
#RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
#PrepareForTest(ClassUnderTest.class)
#SuppressStaticInitializationFor("com.example.package.util.ClassUnderTest") // <-- this is it :)
public class TestForClassUnderTest {
#Test
public void testCase() {
PowerMockito.mockStatic(ClassUnderTest.class);
//...
}
}
How do I archive the results (report) of the tests in Selenium 2 (Webdriver) so as to be able to return to them? Each performance suite overwrites the previous report, as it can be prevented? I use a simple html report.
//FOR EXAMPLE YOU WANT TO TEST THIS CLASS AND WANT TO CREATE NEW OUTPUT FOLDER FOR EACH EXECUTION
public class TestClass {
#Test
public void testME(){
System.out.println("Success");
}
}
//Then create new class which will be the start point of your execution, and run it from here
public class MainClass {
//This code will be your start point of execution
#Test
public void testCode(){
Random randomNo = new Random();
TestListenerAdapter listener = new TestListenerAdapter();
TestNG testng = new TestNG();
//Here you are changing Output directory and archive it for further
//use, OUTPUT FOLDER WILL BE ADDED BY APPPENDING RANDOM NUMBER ON IT
testng.setOutputDirectory("test-output"+randomNo.nextInt());
//ADD ALL TEST CLASSES WHERE YOUR TESTNG CODE IS PRESENT WITH #Test
testng.setTestClasses(new Class[]{TestClass.class});
testng.addListener(listener);
testng.run();
}
}
I get the exception:
1) More than one export was found that matches the constraint:
ContractName CompositionTest.C
RequiredTypeIdentity CompositionTest.C
When running the program
namespace CompositionTest
{
// [Export] // Also doesn't work
[Export(typeof(C))]
public class C
{
//[ImportAttribute(AllowRecomposition = true)] // also doesn't work
[Import(AllowRecomposition = true)]
public C PropertyC { get; set; }
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
// Declare a composition container.
CompositionContainer compositionContainer = new CompositionContainer();
compositionContainer.ComposeParts( new C() );
compositionContainer.ComposeParts( new C() ); // exception here!
}
}
}
What am I doing wrong?
The first time you call ComposeParts, a new C object is added as an export to the container. Then second time you call ComposeParts, another C object is added as an export. This creates a problem with the import because there are two possible parts for import and MEF cannot make a decision. Hence the cardinality exception.
One solution would be to change the import to:
[ImportMany(AllowRecomposition = true)]
public IEnumerable<C> PropertyC { get; set; }
Another solution is to actually use a catalog when creating the container. This is the common way to use MEF. Pretty much all the examples you can find follow this approach:
//Create a catalog. In this case, a catalog based on an already loaded assembly.
var catalog = new AssemblyCatalog(typeof(C).Assembly);
//Create a container using the catalog. Only the parts from that catalog will be used.
var compositionContainer = new CompositionContainer(catalog);
For more on catalogs you should read this article.
By the way I have never seen such an example of MEF usage before. My answer is mainly based on observations I made while debugging it.
I am trying to do this in a specflow step definition file, so that I can create an object of view model and make method calls to it.
But I get an error saying "Interface cannot be resolved: Microsoft.Practices.Prism.Regions.IRegionManager (resolution path: TestClass)". What is that I am doing wrong?
public class TestClass
{
private IRegionManager _RegionManager;
[ImportingConstructor]
public TestClass(IRegionManger regionManager)
{
this._RegionManager = regionManager;
// stuff here
}
}
Are you expecting your test class to be instantiated by SpecFlow or via Prism? As both have dependency injection functionality.
So I wouldn't expect your test definition file to have any importing constructors or similar MEF attributes. Instead I would expect your test class to written more like
[Binding]
public class TestClass
{
[Given("I setup Prism")]
public void GivenISetupPrism()
{
// Call into prism
}
}
See the documentation on http://specflow.org for more details.
first post here, hoping someone could perhaps shed some light on an issue I've been trying to juggle...
As a part of a school project we're attempting to build a interface to display points on a map and paths on a map.
For our first sprint I managed to work out storing/retrieving items using Objectify - it went great!
Now we're trying to extend the functionality for our next spring. Having problems now trying to store an object of type MapPath (note MapPath and MapData, our two data types, both extend class Data). Brief code snippets as follows :
#Entity
public class Data extends JavaScriptObject
{
#Id
Long id;
private String name;
private String dataSet;
...getters and setters
}
#Subclass
public class MapData extends Data implements Serializable{
{
private String name;
private String address;
private String dataSet;
#Embedded
private Coordinate location;
....constructors, getters/setters
}
#Subclass
public class PathData extends Data implements Serializable{
private String name;
private String address;
private String dataSet;
#Embedded
private Coordinate[] path;
...etc
}
Now hopefully I haven't lost you yet. I have a DataService class that basically handles all transactions. I have the following unit test :
#Test
public void storeOnePath(){
PathData pd = new PathData();
pd.setName("hi");
DataService.storeSingleton(pd);
Data d = DataService.getSingleton("hi");
assertEquals(pd,d);
}
The implementation of getSingleton is as follows :
public static void storeSingleton(Data d){
Objectify obj = ObjectifyService.begin();
obj.put(d);
}
JUnit complains:
java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
at com.teamrawket.tests.DataTest.storeOnePath(DataTest.java:59)
...<taken out>
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Attempting to create multiple associations on class com.teamrawket.server.MapData for name
at com.googlecode.objectify.impl.Transmog$Visitor.addRootSetter(Transmog.java:298)
at com.googlecode.objectify.impl.Transmog$Visitor.visitField(Transmog.java:231)
at com.googlecode.objectify.impl.Transmog$Visitor.visitClass(Transmog.java:134)
at com.googlecode.objectify.impl.Transmog.<init>(Transmog.java:319)
at com.googlecode.objectify.impl.ConcreteEntityMetadata.<init>(ConcreteEntityMetadata.java:75)
at com.googlecode.objectify.impl.Registrar.registerPolymorphicHierarchy(Registrar.java:128)
at com.googlecode.objectify.impl.Registrar.register(Registrar.java:62)
at com.googlecode.objectify.ObjectifyFactory.register(ObjectifyFactory.java:209)
at com.googlecode.objectify.ObjectifyService.register(ObjectifyService.java:38)
at com.teamrawket.server.DataService.<clinit>(DataService.java:20)
... 27 more
What exactly does "attempting to create multiple associations on class ... for name" imply?
Sorry for the long post and any formatting issues that may arise.
You have repeated field names in your subclasses. You should not declare 'name' and 'dataSet' in both superclasses and subclasses; remove these fields from MapData and PathData and you should be fine.
com.teamrawket.server.MapData refers to the fullPath name for your MapData file. The name at the end refers to the field String name in your MapData class. This whole exception tries to tell you that it already contains a reference for that specific fullPath.
I would say there is another object with the same fullPath already registered. It would be helpful to know where line 59 is exactly as that is where the error occured.