I am setting up webhooks for Teams call records mentioned in https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/api/callrecords-callrecord-get?view=graph-rest-1.0&tabs=http .
My doubt is related to statement "Subscribe to change notifications to the /communications/callRecords endpoint.".
Can we use same notification url for multiple accounts with different tenant id ?
or Can we use same notification url for completely different organizations ?
There is no technical constraint preventing us from using the same webhook endpoint.
The webhook just needs to read the tenantId field to route notifications appropriately. Note that each tenant does need its own subscription, but they can all have the same notificationUrl.
Related
I am looking for a way to bundle the individual log entries inside the Privileged Identity Management audit logs by the workflow they belong to.
Every action (like request -> approval -> completion) is a separate entry in the audit logs, and simply grouping by requester and role is not helpful e.g. in case the same person requests something multiple times.
There is a CorrelationId field in every audit log but that is not the same for all steps from the workflow.
I found this in the docs, but that is not helpful for automatic processing:
Typically, the log event immediately above the approval event is an event for "Add member to role completed" where the Initiated by (actor) is the requester. In most cases, you won't need to find the requester in the approval request from an auditing perspective.
Is there another way that I am overlooking?
You could do that by using the Request Id from the Target(s). All actions (request->approval->completion) use the same Request Id.
[]
I'd like to get the behavior change notification, but I have no idea to do so.
https://community.snowflake.com/s/article/Behavior-Change-Policy
This page says, snowflake sends email notification of behavior changes to a mailing list of users who are authorized to submit support cases.
In order to get the autlirized to submit support cases, I did this way:https://community.snowflake.com/s/article/How-To-Submit-a-Support-Case-in-Snowflake-Lodge
I expect I can check the pending behavior change like this page:
https://community.snowflake.com/s/article/How-to-Use-the-Notification-Center, but the checkbox doesn't apper.
How can I get the notificaiton? and, what point in my process is wrong?
You must be a Community Enabled Customer e.g. you can submit a support ticket via the community page.
Alternatively, you must have Organization enabled and be the Orgadmin of your company, then you can opt-in to receive the notification described here:
https://docs.snowflake.com/en/user-guide/ui-snowsight-admin.html
The Notification Contacts page of Snowsight lets you set email addresses to receive security, privacy, and product notifications.
Emails are sent in accordance with the Snowflake Policy Notice.
Note
Only users with the ORGADMIN role can view contact information. Other users will not see Admin » Contacts. The role need not be currently active but only granted.
I am using Azure API Management.
I have create an API, a product and a subscription
The API is generic. it does a lookup of sales order history and requires a customer id to show that customers orders onyl. The relation between customer and subscription is intended as 1:1.
However I dont want subscribers to see other subscribers data. I thought, I could set a fixed parameter (e.g. customer id) to each subscription to be passed to the API on any call.
Or how can limit API to be only show subscriber specific data? Somehow the API has to differentiate between subscriber. Any idea?
When calling an API using a subscription key, the context.Subscription and context.User (not for standalone subscriptions) are set for use in policies.
Since you have a 1:1 relation between customer and subscription, you could set a header in the request to the backend with the user's email using the below policy statement in the inbound policy section
<set-header name="x-customer-email" exists-action="override">
<value>#(context.User.Email)</value>
</set-header>
We are trying to develop a SCIM enabled Provisioning system for provisioning data from an Enterprise Cloud Subscriber(ECS) to Salesforce(Cloud Service Provider-CSP). We are following SCIM 1.1 standard.
What are we able to do:
We are able to perform CRUD operations on User object using Salesforce auto-generated userId field
Exact Problem:
We are not able to update/delete User object using externalId provided by ECS.
Tried something as below... But it is not working, Unknown_Exception is thrown...
XXX/my.salesforce.com/services/scim/v1/Users/701984?fields=externalId
Please note that it is not possible to store Salesforce userId in ECS's database due to some compliance reasons. So we have to completely depend upon externalId only.
Possible Workaround:
Step1: Read the userId based on externalId from Salesforce
Step2: Update the User object using the salesforce UserId obtained in Step1.
But this two step process would definitely degrade the performance.
Is there any way to update/delete the User by externalId
Could you please guide us on this..
Thanks so much....
I realize this is old thread but wanted to note that you CAN update Users from REST using an external ID. The endpoint in above question is incorrect. Following is how it should be set, send as a PATCH request:
[instance]/services/data/v37.0/sobjects/user/[external_id__c]/[external id value]
Instance = your instance i.e. https://test.salesforce.com/
external_id__c = API name of your custom external Id field on User
external id value = whatever the value of the user's external Id
NOTES:
Salesforce responds with an HTTP 204 status code with No Content in the body, this isn't usual for patch requests, but it is 'success' response
The external id on user has to be a custom field, make sure it is set
as UNIQUE
Ensure the profile/permission set of the user that is making the call
has the Manage Users permission & has access to the external id field
It is pretty common pattern for other applications, too, to search first and then perform on update on the returned object. Your workaround seems fine to me. What performance problem are you concerned about? Are you concerned about Salesforce not being able to process more requests or are you concerned about the higher response time in your application because you need to make multiple requests? Have you actually measured how much an extra call costs?
I'm trying to build a web app using AngularJS and Firebase that sends an email to two users that match on certain parameters. The users submit their information first and if there is a match with another person in the database, I want to send an email to both those people. For example, if two people, A and B both have the age of 25, I would like to send A and B an email with certain information. Is this possible using Firebase?
If you are NOT running a server
Yes
You could achieve it by using a service like Zapier.
You could create a zap linking FireBase and an e-mail service like Mandrill.
A Zap combines triggers and actions — whenever the trigger event occurs, Zapier automatically completes the action for you!
When there is a match, update a special key in your FireBase database.
As Zapier is listening to updates of that particular key, it will react by sending your e-mails via Mandrill.
March 2017 UPDATE
New tools have now been added to Firebase to trigger database event handlers:
database events triggers: https://firebase.google.com/docs/functions/database-events
cloud functions for FireBase: https://firebase.google.com/docs/functions/functions-and-firebase
using cloud functions to send e-mails through sendGrid:
https://cloud.google.com/functions/docs/tutorials/sendgrid
If you are running a server
Your server can easily check the values in FireBase and send e-mails accordingly. That would then be a
Yes, of course :)