Using const keyword in c - c

I have been looking at a source code, and i came across this code
static char const *const delimit_method_string[] =
{
"none", "prepend", "separate", NULL
};
I thought I knew the meaning of const keyword in the C language but after seeing this syntax I am confused as I can't decode the meaning of the syntax, so I wanted to know the meaning of using const like this I searched internet I saw some questions like this in stackoverflow that are,
Meaning of two const in C/C++ signature
Double const declaration
But still I don't understand what's the meaning of the syntax in that code snippet, may be that because I am not good enough with fundamentals of C but I really like to improve it.
So I wrote some code to know how that syntax works, this is what I tried:
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
char a = 'A';
char b = 'B';
char const * const ptr = &a;
ptr = &b;
printf("a is %c\n", *ptr);
printf("a is %c", a);
return 0;
}
I got this output, that somewhat I expected.
$ gcc test.c
test.c: In function 'main':
test.c:9:13: error: assignment of read-only variable 'ptr'
9 | ptr = &b;
|
^
I changed the code and tested again,
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
char a = 'A';
char b = 'B';
char const const *ptr = &a;
ptr = &b;
printf("a is %c\n", *ptr);
printf("a is %c", a);
return 0;
}
this time the output is not what I expected,
$ ./a.exe
a is B
a is A
I really appreciate if someone can explain what is the correct way of using const in C and also how the syntax in first code snippet works.

This declaration
static char const *const delimit_method_string[] =
{
"none", "prepend", "separate", NULL
};
declares an array with the name delimit_method_string of pointers to string literals.
In C opposite to C++ string literals have types of non-constant character arrays. Nevertheless you may not change a string literal. Any attempt to change a string literal results in undefined behavior. So it is better to declare pointers to string literals the following way as for example
const char *s = "Hello";
So you could declare the above array like
static char const * delimit_method_string[] =
{
"none", "prepend", "separate", NULL
};
But the programmer who declared this array also wanted to declare at as a constant array. That is he wanted that its elements can not be changed.
For the declaration above you can write for example
delimit_method_string[0] = "all";
To prevent such a changing elements of the array must be constant. To do this you need to write
static char const * const delimit_method_string[] =
{
"none", "prepend", "separate", NULL
};
Now the elements of the array that have the pointer type const char * are constant due to the second qualifier const.
Tom make it more clear consider the following declarations.
char *p;
This declaration declares a non-constant pointer to a non-constant object of the type char.
const char *p;
This declaration declares a non-constant pointer to a constant object of the type char.
const char * const p;
This declaration declares a constant pointer to a constant object of the type char.
The last declaration may be rewritten like
const char ( * const p );
As for this your declaraion
char const const *ptr = &a;
then on of the two qualifiers const is redundant because the both refer to the type specifier char.

char const const *ptr = &a;
This double const does not have any special meaning as both are on the same side of the *. Additional const qualifiers are ignored by the compiler. You can write char const const const const const*ptr = &a; It is the same as char const *ptr = &a; which means:
pointer to constant character
If we change it to
char const * const ptr = &a;
It will mean:
constant pointer to constant char
Your snippet will stop to compile: https://godbolt.org/z/sM9qnv8fq
examples:
const int *ptr; - pointer to constant integer
int * const ptr; - constant pointer to integer
const int * const ptr; - constant pointer to constant integer
Your first example static char const *const delimit_method_string[] declares:
static array of constant pointers to constant character
BTW I personally prefer to have the first const before the type ie:
static const volatile char *const delimit_method_string[]
const char *p

Related

Why is const used in function declarations [duplicate]

What's the difference between:
char * const
and
const char *
The difference is that const char * is a pointer to a const char, while char * const is a constant pointer to a char.
The first, the value being pointed to can't be changed but the pointer can be. The second, the value being pointed at can change but the pointer can't (similar to a reference).
There is also a
const char * const
which is a constant pointer to a constant char (so nothing about it can be changed).
Note:
The following two forms are equivalent:
const char *
and
char const *
The exact reason for this is described in the C++ standard, but it's important to note and avoid the confusion. I know several coding standards that prefer:
char const
over
const char
(with or without pointer) so that the placement of the const element is the same as with a pointer const.
To avoid confusion, always append the const qualifier.
int * mutable_pointer_to_mutable_int;
int const * mutable_pointer_to_constant_int;
int *const constant_pointer_to_mutable_int;
int const *const constant_pointer_to_constant_int;
const always modifies the thing that comes before it (to the left of it), EXCEPT when it's the first thing in a type declaration, where it modifies the thing that comes after it (to the right of it).
So these two are the same:
int const *i1;
const int *i2;
they define pointers to a const int. You can change where i1 and i2 points, but you can't change the value they point at.
This:
int *const i3 = (int*) 0x12345678;
defines a const pointer to an integer and initializes it to point at memory location 12345678. You can change the int value at address 12345678, but you can't change the address that i3 points to.
const char* is a pointer to a constant character
char* const is a constant pointer to a character
const char* const is a constant pointer to a constant character
const * char is invalid C code and is meaningless. Perhaps you meant to ask the difference between a const char * and a char const *, or possibly the difference between a const char * and a char * const?
See also:
What are const pointers (as opposed to pointers to const objects)?
Const in C
Difference between const declarations in C++
C++ const question
Why can I change the values of a const char* variable?
Rule of thumb: read the definition from right to left!
const int *foo;
Means "foo points (*) to an int that cannot change (const)".
To the programmer this means "I will not change the value of what foo points to".
*foo = 123; or foo[0] = 123; would be invalid.
foo = &bar; is allowed.
int *const foo;
Means "foo cannot change (const) and points (*) to an int".
To the programmer this means "I will not change the memory address that foo refers to".
*foo = 123; or foo[0] = 123; is allowed.
foo = &bar; would be invalid.
const int *const foo;
Means "foo cannot change (const) and points (*) to an int that cannot change (const)".
To the programmer this means "I will not change the value of what foo points to, nor will I change the address that foo refers to".
*foo = 123; or foo[0] = 123; would be invalid.
foo = &bar; would be invalid.
const char* x Here X is basically a character pointer which is pointing to a constant value
char* const x is refer to character pointer which is constant, but the location it is pointing can be change.
const char* const x is combination to 1 and 2, means it is a constant character pointer which is pointing to constant value.
const *char x will cause a compiler error. it can not be declared.
char const * x is equal to point 1.
the rule of thumb is if const is with var name then the pointer will be constant but the pointing location can be changed , else pointer will point to a constant location and pointer can point to another location but the pointing location content can not be change.
Another thumb rule is to check where const is:
before * => value stored is constant
after * => pointer itself is constant
First one is a syntax error. Maybe you meant the difference between
const char * mychar
and
char * const mychar
In that case, the first one is a pointer to data that can't change, and the second one is a pointer that will always point to the same address.
Lots of answer provide specific techniques, rule of thumbs etc to understand this particular instance of variable declaration. But there is a generic technique of understand any declaration:
Clockwise/Spiral Rule
A)
const char *a;
As per the clockwise/spiral rule a is pointer to character that is constant. Which means character is constant but the pointer can change. i.e. a = "other string"; is fine but a[2] = 'c'; will fail to compile
B)
char * const a;
As per the rule, a is const pointer to a character. i.e. You can do a[2] = 'c'; but you cannot do a = "other string";
Here is a detailed explanation with code
/*const char * p;
char * const p;
const char * const p;*/ // these are the three conditions,
// const char *p;const char * const p; pointer value cannot be changed
// char * const p; pointer address cannot be changed
// const char * const p; both cannot be changed.
#include<stdio.h>
/*int main()
{
const char * p; // value cannot be changed
char z;
//*p = 'c'; // this will not work
p = &z;
printf(" %c\n",*p);
return 0;
}*/
/*int main()
{
char * const p; // address cannot be changed
char z;
*p = 'c';
//p = &z; // this will not work
printf(" %c\n",*p);
return 0;
}*/
/*int main()
{
const char * const p; // both address and value cannot be changed
char z;
*p = 'c'; // this will not work
p = &z; // this will not work
printf(" %c\n",*p);
return 0;
}*/
char * const and const char *?
Pointing to a constant value
const char * p; // value cannot be changed
Constant pointer to a value
char * const p; // address cannot be changed
Constant pointer to a constant value
const char * const p; // both cannot be changed.
I presume you mean const char * and char * const .
The first, const char *, is a pointer to a constant character. The pointer itself is mutable.
The second, char * const is a constant pointer to a character. The pointer cannot change, the character it points to can.
And then there is const char * const where the pointer and character cannot change.
// Some more complex constant variable/pointer declaration.
// Observing cases when we get error and warning would help
// understanding it better.
int main(void)
{
char ca1[10]= "aaaa"; // char array 1
char ca2[10]= "bbbb"; // char array 2
char *pca1= ca1;
char *pca2= ca2;
char const *ccs= pca1;
char * const csc= pca2;
ccs[1]='m'; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only location ‘*(ccs + 1u)’
ccs= csc; // Good
csc[1]='n'; // Good
csc= ccs; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only variable ‘csc’
char const **ccss= &ccs; // Good
char const **ccss1= &csc; // Bad - warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
char * const *cscs= &csc; // Good
char * const *cscs1= &ccs; // Bad - warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
char ** const cssc= &pca1; // Good
char ** const cssc1= &ccs; // Bad - warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
char ** const cssc2= &csc; // Bad - warning: initialization discards ‘const’
// qualifier from pointer target type
*ccss[1]= 'x'; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only location ‘**(ccss + 8u)’
*ccss= ccs; // Good
*ccss= csc; // Good
ccss= ccss1; // Good
ccss= cscs; // Bad - warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type
*cscs[1]= 'y'; // Good
*cscs= ccs; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only location ‘*cscs’
*cscs= csc; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only location ‘*cscs’
cscs= cscs1; // Good
cscs= cssc; // Good
*cssc[1]= 'z'; // Good
*cssc= ccs; // Bad - warning: assignment discards ‘const’
// qualifier from pointer target type
*cssc= csc; // Good
*cssc= pca2; // Good
cssc= ccss; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only variable ‘cssc’
cssc= cscs; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only variable ‘cssc’
cssc= cssc1; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only variable ‘cssc’
}
Constant pointer: A constant pointer can point only to a single variable of the respective data type during the entire program.we can change the value of the variable pointed by the pointer. Initialization should be done during the time of declaration itself.
Syntax:
datatype *const var;
char *const comes under this case.
/*program to illustrate the behaviour of constant pointer */
#include<stdio.h>
int main(){
int a=10;
int *const ptr=&a;
*ptr=100;/* we can change the value of object but we cannot point it to another variable.suppose another variable int b=20; and ptr=&b; gives you error*/
printf("%d",*ptr);
return 0;
}
Pointer to a const value: In this a pointer can point any number of variables of the respective type but we cannot change the value of the object pointed by the pointer at that specific time.
Syntax:
const datatype *varor datatype const *var
const char* comes under this case.
/* program to illustrate the behavior of pointer to a constant*/
#include<stdio.h>
int main(){
int a=10,b=20;
int const *ptr=&a;
printf("%d\n",*ptr);
/* *ptr=100 is not possible i.e we cannot change the value of the object pointed by the pointer*/
ptr=&b;
printf("%d",*ptr);
/*we can point it to another object*/
return 0;
}
The const modifier is applied to the term immediately to its left. The only exception to this is when there is nothing to its left, then it applies to what is immediately on its right.
These are all equivalent ways of saying "constant pointer to a constant char":
const char * const
const char const *
char const * const
char const const *
Two rules
If const is between char and *, it will affect the left one.
If const is not between char and *, it will affect the nearest one.
e.g.
char const *. This is a pointer points to a constant char.
char * const. This is a constant pointer points to a char.
I would like to point out that using int const * (or const int *) isn't about a pointer pointing to a const int variable, but that this variable is const for this specific pointer.
For example:
int var = 10;
int const * _p = &var;
The code above compiles perfectly fine. _p points to a const variable, although var itself isn't constant.
I remember from Czech book about C: read the declaration that you start with the variable and go left.
So for
char * const a;
you can read as: "a is variable of type constant pointer to char",
char const * a;
you can read as: "a is a pointer to constant variable of type char. I hope this helps.
Bonus:
const char * const a;
You will read as a is constant pointer to constant variable of type char.

Why can I have a const char pointer point to a mutable char array?

Why is this fine:
char a[2];
a[0]='a';
const char* b;
b=a;
printf("%s\n",b);
a[0]='b';
printf("%s",b);
why can a pointer to a constant string point to a non constant string? Also how do string constants work when assigning them to variables? Why can you do this:
const char* b="hello";
b="test";
or
char* b="hello";
b="test";
but you can only do the first line if it is an array? constant or not?
Why can I have a const char * point to a mutable char array?
The const here with b puts a restriction on its use. It is not allowing some new usage, but potentially less. So no opening of Pandora's Box here.
char a[2];
const char* b = a;
b has read-access to the array. The array a[] may still change via a.
a[0]='y'; // OK
b[0]='z'; // leads to error like "error: assignment of read-only location "
Also how do string constants work when assigning them to variables? constant or not?
"hello" is a string literal of type char [6]. With const char* b1 = "hello" declaration and initialization, b1 is assigned a pointer of type char *. This could have been const char *, yet for historical reasons1 it is char *. Since it is char*, char* b2 = "hello"; is also OK.
const char* b1 = "hello";
char* b2 = "hello";
Also how do string constants work when assigning them to variables?
b="test";
As part of the assignment, the string literal, a char array, is converted to the address and type of its first element, a char *. That pointer is assigned to b.
1 const was not available in early C, so to not break existing code bases, string literals remained without a const.
You can always add const-ness to a type. This is a good thing, because it allows you to write functions that make some guarantees.
//Here we know *str is const, so the function will not change what's being pointed to.
int strlength(const char *str) {
int length = 0;
while (*str++)
++length;
return length;
}
int main(void) {
char a[2] = "a"; //a[0] and a[1] are mutable in main(), but not in strlength().
printf("%d", strlength(a));
}
Note that casting away const-ness leads to undefined behavior:
void capitalize(char *str) {
if (isalpha(*str))
*str = toupper(*str);
}
int main(void) {
const char *b = "hello";
capitalize((char*) b); //undefined behavior. Note: without the cast, this may not compile.
}
As for your second question, your first example is correct because the type of a string literal in C (i.e. any sequence of characters between double quotes) is of type const char*. This is valid:
const char *b = "hello"; //"hello" is of type const char*
b = "text"; //"text" is of type const char*
Because casting away const leads to undefined behavior, this code is invalid:
char *b = "hello"; //undefined behavior; "hello" is const char*
b = "text"; //undefined behavior; "text" is const char*
The case for arrays is a little more involved. When used in expressions, arrays act as pointers, but arrays are a fundamentally different type than pointers:
char a[10];
a = "hello"; //does not compile - "hello" is a const char*; a is a char[10]
However, when used in an initialization statement, the rules state that a const char* can be used to initialize a character array:
char a[10] = "hello"; //initialization - a is a char[10], "hello" is a const char*
//a will contain {'h','e','l','l','o',0,0,0,0,0}
Also, don't forget that you can assign a string literal to an array with strcpy:
char a[10];
strcpy(a, "hello");
assert(strcmp(a, "hello") == 0);
//a will contain {'h','e','l','l','o',0,x,x,x,x}
//here x's mean uninitialized

Why am I able to modify this const char* array? [duplicate]

What's the difference between:
char * const
and
const char *
The difference is that const char * is a pointer to a const char, while char * const is a constant pointer to a char.
The first, the value being pointed to can't be changed but the pointer can be. The second, the value being pointed at can change but the pointer can't (similar to a reference).
There is also a
const char * const
which is a constant pointer to a constant char (so nothing about it can be changed).
Note:
The following two forms are equivalent:
const char *
and
char const *
The exact reason for this is described in the C++ standard, but it's important to note and avoid the confusion. I know several coding standards that prefer:
char const
over
const char
(with or without pointer) so that the placement of the const element is the same as with a pointer const.
To avoid confusion, always append the const qualifier.
int * mutable_pointer_to_mutable_int;
int const * mutable_pointer_to_constant_int;
int *const constant_pointer_to_mutable_int;
int const *const constant_pointer_to_constant_int;
const always modifies the thing that comes before it (to the left of it), EXCEPT when it's the first thing in a type declaration, where it modifies the thing that comes after it (to the right of it).
So these two are the same:
int const *i1;
const int *i2;
they define pointers to a const int. You can change where i1 and i2 points, but you can't change the value they point at.
This:
int *const i3 = (int*) 0x12345678;
defines a const pointer to an integer and initializes it to point at memory location 12345678. You can change the int value at address 12345678, but you can't change the address that i3 points to.
const char* is a pointer to a constant character
char* const is a constant pointer to a character
const char* const is a constant pointer to a constant character
const * char is invalid C code and is meaningless. Perhaps you meant to ask the difference between a const char * and a char const *, or possibly the difference between a const char * and a char * const?
See also:
What are const pointers (as opposed to pointers to const objects)?
Const in C
Difference between const declarations in C++
C++ const question
Why can I change the values of a const char* variable?
Rule of thumb: read the definition from right to left!
const int *foo;
Means "foo points (*) to an int that cannot change (const)".
To the programmer this means "I will not change the value of what foo points to".
*foo = 123; or foo[0] = 123; would be invalid.
foo = &bar; is allowed.
int *const foo;
Means "foo cannot change (const) and points (*) to an int".
To the programmer this means "I will not change the memory address that foo refers to".
*foo = 123; or foo[0] = 123; is allowed.
foo = &bar; would be invalid.
const int *const foo;
Means "foo cannot change (const) and points (*) to an int that cannot change (const)".
To the programmer this means "I will not change the value of what foo points to, nor will I change the address that foo refers to".
*foo = 123; or foo[0] = 123; would be invalid.
foo = &bar; would be invalid.
const char* x Here X is basically a character pointer which is pointing to a constant value
char* const x is refer to character pointer which is constant, but the location it is pointing can be change.
const char* const x is combination to 1 and 2, means it is a constant character pointer which is pointing to constant value.
const *char x will cause a compiler error. it can not be declared.
char const * x is equal to point 1.
the rule of thumb is if const is with var name then the pointer will be constant but the pointing location can be changed , else pointer will point to a constant location and pointer can point to another location but the pointing location content can not be change.
Another thumb rule is to check where const is:
before * => value stored is constant
after * => pointer itself is constant
First one is a syntax error. Maybe you meant the difference between
const char * mychar
and
char * const mychar
In that case, the first one is a pointer to data that can't change, and the second one is a pointer that will always point to the same address.
Lots of answer provide specific techniques, rule of thumbs etc to understand this particular instance of variable declaration. But there is a generic technique of understand any declaration:
Clockwise/Spiral Rule
A)
const char *a;
As per the clockwise/spiral rule a is pointer to character that is constant. Which means character is constant but the pointer can change. i.e. a = "other string"; is fine but a[2] = 'c'; will fail to compile
B)
char * const a;
As per the rule, a is const pointer to a character. i.e. You can do a[2] = 'c'; but you cannot do a = "other string";
Here is a detailed explanation with code
/*const char * p;
char * const p;
const char * const p;*/ // these are the three conditions,
// const char *p;const char * const p; pointer value cannot be changed
// char * const p; pointer address cannot be changed
// const char * const p; both cannot be changed.
#include<stdio.h>
/*int main()
{
const char * p; // value cannot be changed
char z;
//*p = 'c'; // this will not work
p = &z;
printf(" %c\n",*p);
return 0;
}*/
/*int main()
{
char * const p; // address cannot be changed
char z;
*p = 'c';
//p = &z; // this will not work
printf(" %c\n",*p);
return 0;
}*/
/*int main()
{
const char * const p; // both address and value cannot be changed
char z;
*p = 'c'; // this will not work
p = &z; // this will not work
printf(" %c\n",*p);
return 0;
}*/
char * const and const char *?
Pointing to a constant value
const char * p; // value cannot be changed
Constant pointer to a value
char * const p; // address cannot be changed
Constant pointer to a constant value
const char * const p; // both cannot be changed.
I presume you mean const char * and char * const .
The first, const char *, is a pointer to a constant character. The pointer itself is mutable.
The second, char * const is a constant pointer to a character. The pointer cannot change, the character it points to can.
And then there is const char * const where the pointer and character cannot change.
// Some more complex constant variable/pointer declaration.
// Observing cases when we get error and warning would help
// understanding it better.
int main(void)
{
char ca1[10]= "aaaa"; // char array 1
char ca2[10]= "bbbb"; // char array 2
char *pca1= ca1;
char *pca2= ca2;
char const *ccs= pca1;
char * const csc= pca2;
ccs[1]='m'; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only location ‘*(ccs + 1u)’
ccs= csc; // Good
csc[1]='n'; // Good
csc= ccs; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only variable ‘csc’
char const **ccss= &ccs; // Good
char const **ccss1= &csc; // Bad - warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
char * const *cscs= &csc; // Good
char * const *cscs1= &ccs; // Bad - warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
char ** const cssc= &pca1; // Good
char ** const cssc1= &ccs; // Bad - warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
char ** const cssc2= &csc; // Bad - warning: initialization discards ‘const’
// qualifier from pointer target type
*ccss[1]= 'x'; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only location ‘**(ccss + 8u)’
*ccss= ccs; // Good
*ccss= csc; // Good
ccss= ccss1; // Good
ccss= cscs; // Bad - warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type
*cscs[1]= 'y'; // Good
*cscs= ccs; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only location ‘*cscs’
*cscs= csc; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only location ‘*cscs’
cscs= cscs1; // Good
cscs= cssc; // Good
*cssc[1]= 'z'; // Good
*cssc= ccs; // Bad - warning: assignment discards ‘const’
// qualifier from pointer target type
*cssc= csc; // Good
*cssc= pca2; // Good
cssc= ccss; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only variable ‘cssc’
cssc= cscs; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only variable ‘cssc’
cssc= cssc1; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only variable ‘cssc’
}
Constant pointer: A constant pointer can point only to a single variable of the respective data type during the entire program.we can change the value of the variable pointed by the pointer. Initialization should be done during the time of declaration itself.
Syntax:
datatype *const var;
char *const comes under this case.
/*program to illustrate the behaviour of constant pointer */
#include<stdio.h>
int main(){
int a=10;
int *const ptr=&a;
*ptr=100;/* we can change the value of object but we cannot point it to another variable.suppose another variable int b=20; and ptr=&b; gives you error*/
printf("%d",*ptr);
return 0;
}
Pointer to a const value: In this a pointer can point any number of variables of the respective type but we cannot change the value of the object pointed by the pointer at that specific time.
Syntax:
const datatype *varor datatype const *var
const char* comes under this case.
/* program to illustrate the behavior of pointer to a constant*/
#include<stdio.h>
int main(){
int a=10,b=20;
int const *ptr=&a;
printf("%d\n",*ptr);
/* *ptr=100 is not possible i.e we cannot change the value of the object pointed by the pointer*/
ptr=&b;
printf("%d",*ptr);
/*we can point it to another object*/
return 0;
}
The const modifier is applied to the term immediately to its left. The only exception to this is when there is nothing to its left, then it applies to what is immediately on its right.
These are all equivalent ways of saying "constant pointer to a constant char":
const char * const
const char const *
char const * const
char const const *
Two rules
If const is between char and *, it will affect the left one.
If const is not between char and *, it will affect the nearest one.
e.g.
char const *. This is a pointer points to a constant char.
char * const. This is a constant pointer points to a char.
I would like to point out that using int const * (or const int *) isn't about a pointer pointing to a const int variable, but that this variable is const for this specific pointer.
For example:
int var = 10;
int const * _p = &var;
The code above compiles perfectly fine. _p points to a const variable, although var itself isn't constant.
I remember from Czech book about C: read the declaration that you start with the variable and go left.
So for
char * const a;
you can read as: "a is variable of type constant pointer to char",
char const * a;
you can read as: "a is a pointer to constant variable of type char. I hope this helps.
Bonus:
const char * const a;
You will read as a is constant pointer to constant variable of type char.

constness and pointers to pointers

I'm very much confused about the const keyword. I have a function accepting an array of strings as input parameter and a function accepting a variable number of arguments.
void dtree_joinpaths(char* output_buffer, int count, ...);
void dtree_joinpaths_a(char* output_buffer, int count, const char** paths);
dtree_joinpaths internally invokes dtree_joinpaths_a after it has built an array of strings from the argument list.
void dtree_joinpaths(char* output_buffer, int count, ...) {
int i;
va_list arg_list;
va_start(arg_list, count);
char** paths = malloc(sizeof(char*) * count);
for (i=0; i < count; i++) {
paths[i] = va_arg(arg_list, char*);
}
va_end(arg_list);
dtree_joinpaths_a(output_buffer, count, paths);
}
But the gcc compiler gives me the following error message:
src/dtree_path.c: In function 'dtree_joinpaths':
src/dtree_path.c:65: warning: passing argument 3 of 'dtree_joinpaths_a' from incompatible pointer type
When I change char** paths = malloc(count); to const char** paths = malloc(count);, this error is not showing up anymore. What I don't understand is, that
I thought a pointer to an address can always be casted to a const pointer, but not the other way round (which is what is happening here imo).
This example works: http://codepad.org/mcPCMk3f
What am I doing wrong, or where is my missunderstanding?
Edit
My intent is to make the memory of the input data immutable for the function. (in this case the paths parameter).
The reason char ** -> const char** is a "dangerous" conversion is the following code:
const char immutable[] = "don't modify this";
void get_immutable_str(const char **p) {
*p = immutable;
return;
}
int main() {
char *ptr;
get_immutable_str(&ptr); // <--- here is the dangerous conversion
ptr[0] = 0;
}
The above code attempts to modify a non-modifiable object (the global array of const char), which is undefined behavior. There is no other candidate in this code for something to define as "bad", so const-safety dictates that the pointer conversion is bad.
C does not forbid the conversion, but gcc warns you that it's bad. FYI, C++ does forbid the conversion, it has stricter const-safety than C.
I would have used a string literal for the example, except that string literals in C are "dangerous" to begin with -- you're not allowed to modify them but they have type array-of-char rather than array-of-const char. This is for historical reasons.
I thought a pointer to an address can always be casted to a const pointer
A pointer-to-non-const-T can be converted to a pointer-to-const-T. char ** -> const char** isn't an example of that pattern, because if T is char * then const T is char * const, not const char * (at this point it's probably worthwhile not writing the const on the left any more: write char const * and you won't expect it to be the same as T const where T is char *).
You can safely convert char ** to char * const *, and (for reasons that require a little more than just the simple rule) you can safely convert char ** to char const * const *.
The key is that not the pointer is const. To declare a const pointer, use char *const ptr; or to declare a const pointer to a const pointer, char *const *const ptr;. const char **ptr is a pointer to pointer to const char.
Actually if there is a function that accepts a const char** and you pass a char** , this can lead to a problematic situation and viceversa.
In your specific case you expect that the memory is immutable, but it's not immutable and may change at any time. In a multithreading environment you would expect this memory to be thread safe, and as long as it's living in the stack or heap, you wouldn't need a mutex to access to it.
All this is oriented to avoiding errors, but if you are sure that this wouldn't lead to an error you can simply cast the pointer to const char** .
You cannot pass char ** into const char ** because the compiler cannot guarantee const correctness.
Suppose you had the following code (and it compiled):
void foo(const char **ppc, const char* pc)
{
*ppc = pc; // Assign const char* to const char*
}
void bar()
{
const char c = 'x';
char* pc;
foo(&pc, &c); // Illegal; converting const char* to const char**. Will set p == &c
*pc = 'X'; // Ooops! That changed c.
}
See here for the same example without the function calls.

What is the difference between char * const and const char *?

What's the difference between:
char * const
and
const char *
The difference is that const char * is a pointer to a const char, while char * const is a constant pointer to a char.
The first, the value being pointed to can't be changed but the pointer can be. The second, the value being pointed at can change but the pointer can't (similar to a reference).
There is also a
const char * const
which is a constant pointer to a constant char (so nothing about it can be changed).
Note:
The following two forms are equivalent:
const char *
and
char const *
The exact reason for this is described in the C++ standard, but it's important to note and avoid the confusion. I know several coding standards that prefer:
char const
over
const char
(with or without pointer) so that the placement of the const element is the same as with a pointer const.
To avoid confusion, always append the const qualifier.
int * mutable_pointer_to_mutable_int;
int const * mutable_pointer_to_constant_int;
int *const constant_pointer_to_mutable_int;
int const *const constant_pointer_to_constant_int;
const always modifies the thing that comes before it (to the left of it), EXCEPT when it's the first thing in a type declaration, where it modifies the thing that comes after it (to the right of it).
So these two are the same:
int const *i1;
const int *i2;
they define pointers to a const int. You can change where i1 and i2 points, but you can't change the value they point at.
This:
int *const i3 = (int*) 0x12345678;
defines a const pointer to an integer and initializes it to point at memory location 12345678. You can change the int value at address 12345678, but you can't change the address that i3 points to.
const char* is a pointer to a constant character
char* const is a constant pointer to a character
const char* const is a constant pointer to a constant character
const * char is invalid C code and is meaningless. Perhaps you meant to ask the difference between a const char * and a char const *, or possibly the difference between a const char * and a char * const?
See also:
What are const pointers (as opposed to pointers to const objects)?
Const in C
Difference between const declarations in C++
C++ const question
Why can I change the values of a const char* variable?
Rule of thumb: read the definition from right to left!
const int *foo;
Means "foo points (*) to an int that cannot change (const)".
To the programmer this means "I will not change the value of what foo points to".
*foo = 123; or foo[0] = 123; would be invalid.
foo = &bar; is allowed.
int *const foo;
Means "foo cannot change (const) and points (*) to an int".
To the programmer this means "I will not change the memory address that foo refers to".
*foo = 123; or foo[0] = 123; is allowed.
foo = &bar; would be invalid.
const int *const foo;
Means "foo cannot change (const) and points (*) to an int that cannot change (const)".
To the programmer this means "I will not change the value of what foo points to, nor will I change the address that foo refers to".
*foo = 123; or foo[0] = 123; would be invalid.
foo = &bar; would be invalid.
const char* x Here X is basically a character pointer which is pointing to a constant value
char* const x is refer to character pointer which is constant, but the location it is pointing can be change.
const char* const x is combination to 1 and 2, means it is a constant character pointer which is pointing to constant value.
const *char x will cause a compiler error. it can not be declared.
char const * x is equal to point 1.
the rule of thumb is if const is with var name then the pointer will be constant but the pointing location can be changed , else pointer will point to a constant location and pointer can point to another location but the pointing location content can not be change.
Another thumb rule is to check where const is:
before * => value stored is constant
after * => pointer itself is constant
First one is a syntax error. Maybe you meant the difference between
const char * mychar
and
char * const mychar
In that case, the first one is a pointer to data that can't change, and the second one is a pointer that will always point to the same address.
Lots of answer provide specific techniques, rule of thumbs etc to understand this particular instance of variable declaration. But there is a generic technique of understand any declaration:
Clockwise/Spiral Rule
A)
const char *a;
As per the clockwise/spiral rule a is pointer to character that is constant. Which means character is constant but the pointer can change. i.e. a = "other string"; is fine but a[2] = 'c'; will fail to compile
B)
char * const a;
As per the rule, a is const pointer to a character. i.e. You can do a[2] = 'c'; but you cannot do a = "other string";
Here is a detailed explanation with code
/*const char * p;
char * const p;
const char * const p;*/ // these are the three conditions,
// const char *p;const char * const p; pointer value cannot be changed
// char * const p; pointer address cannot be changed
// const char * const p; both cannot be changed.
#include<stdio.h>
/*int main()
{
const char * p; // value cannot be changed
char z;
//*p = 'c'; // this will not work
p = &z;
printf(" %c\n",*p);
return 0;
}*/
/*int main()
{
char * const p; // address cannot be changed
char z;
*p = 'c';
//p = &z; // this will not work
printf(" %c\n",*p);
return 0;
}*/
/*int main()
{
const char * const p; // both address and value cannot be changed
char z;
*p = 'c'; // this will not work
p = &z; // this will not work
printf(" %c\n",*p);
return 0;
}*/
char * const and const char *?
Pointing to a constant value
const char * p; // value cannot be changed
Constant pointer to a value
char * const p; // address cannot be changed
Constant pointer to a constant value
const char * const p; // both cannot be changed.
I presume you mean const char * and char * const .
The first, const char *, is a pointer to a constant character. The pointer itself is mutable.
The second, char * const is a constant pointer to a character. The pointer cannot change, the character it points to can.
And then there is const char * const where the pointer and character cannot change.
// Some more complex constant variable/pointer declaration.
// Observing cases when we get error and warning would help
// understanding it better.
int main(void)
{
char ca1[10]= "aaaa"; // char array 1
char ca2[10]= "bbbb"; // char array 2
char *pca1= ca1;
char *pca2= ca2;
char const *ccs= pca1;
char * const csc= pca2;
ccs[1]='m'; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only location ‘*(ccs + 1u)’
ccs= csc; // Good
csc[1]='n'; // Good
csc= ccs; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only variable ‘csc’
char const **ccss= &ccs; // Good
char const **ccss1= &csc; // Bad - warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
char * const *cscs= &csc; // Good
char * const *cscs1= &ccs; // Bad - warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
char ** const cssc= &pca1; // Good
char ** const cssc1= &ccs; // Bad - warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
char ** const cssc2= &csc; // Bad - warning: initialization discards ‘const’
// qualifier from pointer target type
*ccss[1]= 'x'; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only location ‘**(ccss + 8u)’
*ccss= ccs; // Good
*ccss= csc; // Good
ccss= ccss1; // Good
ccss= cscs; // Bad - warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type
*cscs[1]= 'y'; // Good
*cscs= ccs; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only location ‘*cscs’
*cscs= csc; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only location ‘*cscs’
cscs= cscs1; // Good
cscs= cssc; // Good
*cssc[1]= 'z'; // Good
*cssc= ccs; // Bad - warning: assignment discards ‘const’
// qualifier from pointer target type
*cssc= csc; // Good
*cssc= pca2; // Good
cssc= ccss; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only variable ‘cssc’
cssc= cscs; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only variable ‘cssc’
cssc= cssc1; // Bad - error: assignment of read-only variable ‘cssc’
}
Constant pointer: A constant pointer can point only to a single variable of the respective data type during the entire program.we can change the value of the variable pointed by the pointer. Initialization should be done during the time of declaration itself.
Syntax:
datatype *const var;
char *const comes under this case.
/*program to illustrate the behaviour of constant pointer */
#include<stdio.h>
int main(){
int a=10;
int *const ptr=&a;
*ptr=100;/* we can change the value of object but we cannot point it to another variable.suppose another variable int b=20; and ptr=&b; gives you error*/
printf("%d",*ptr);
return 0;
}
Pointer to a const value: In this a pointer can point any number of variables of the respective type but we cannot change the value of the object pointed by the pointer at that specific time.
Syntax:
const datatype *varor datatype const *var
const char* comes under this case.
/* program to illustrate the behavior of pointer to a constant*/
#include<stdio.h>
int main(){
int a=10,b=20;
int const *ptr=&a;
printf("%d\n",*ptr);
/* *ptr=100 is not possible i.e we cannot change the value of the object pointed by the pointer*/
ptr=&b;
printf("%d",*ptr);
/*we can point it to another object*/
return 0;
}
The const modifier is applied to the term immediately to its left. The only exception to this is when there is nothing to its left, then it applies to what is immediately on its right.
These are all equivalent ways of saying "constant pointer to a constant char":
const char * const
const char const *
char const * const
char const const *
Two rules
If const is between char and *, it will affect the left one.
If const is not between char and *, it will affect the nearest one.
e.g.
char const *. This is a pointer points to a constant char.
char * const. This is a constant pointer points to a char.
I would like to point out that using int const * (or const int *) isn't about a pointer pointing to a const int variable, but that this variable is const for this specific pointer.
For example:
int var = 10;
int const * _p = &var;
The code above compiles perfectly fine. _p points to a const variable, although var itself isn't constant.
I remember from Czech book about C: read the declaration that you start with the variable and go left.
So for
char * const a;
you can read as: "a is variable of type constant pointer to char",
char const * a;
you can read as: "a is a pointer to constant variable of type char. I hope this helps.
Bonus:
const char * const a;
You will read as a is constant pointer to constant variable of type char.

Resources