I have an SSRS report that has one Tablix, it is grouped based on a field 'venue'
It has a checkbox for 'Page break options' Between each instance of the group.
So each venue has its own page of data however PageName is set to one value under properties.
Is there a way to automate each page/instance of the venue to be more dynamic.
Click the Row Group at the bottom to toggle the "Tablix Member" properties.
Then you can see the PageName in Group section.
On your case, PageName =Fields!venue.value
Pick Expression at the PageName,
=First(Fields!venue.Value, "dataset")
Related
I have a list. In that list Id and name are the key's. In the view I want to show both Id and name values. when select multiple options the values should be id's i.e.., id need to be assigned to ng-model.I tried below code.
Eg:-
ng-options="listRef.id as listRef.name for listRef in list"
(Or)
ng-options="listRef.id as listRef.id for listRef in list"
In above code possible to show any one variable value but I want both id and name.and I tyried ng-repeat also but the problem is only one option selecting.I want multiple option selection.
You could just use string concatenation there
ng-options="(listRef.name + ' ' + listRef.id) as listRef.id for listRef in list"
I am new to SFDC, struggling to retreive parent objects fields through SOQL query on child object.
I have two objects namely Opportunity and Scope where Scope has a lookup to Opportunity.
Here is the query i have written in Controller.
ScopeController.cls:
List<Scope> scopeList=[Select id,Name,ScopeValue__c,Opportunity__c,Opportunity__r.opAmount__c from Scope__c];
System.debug('scopeList : '+scopeList);
Accessing the values of scopeList in below VF Page.
ScopePage:
<apex:repeat value="{!scopeList}" var="s">
<tr>
<td>{!s.Name}</td>
<td>{!s.ScopeValue__c}</td>
<td>{!s.Opportunity__c}</td>
<td>{!s.Opportunity__r.opAmount__c}</td>
</tr>
</apex:repeat>
But in the above VF Page not able to show the value of s.Opportunity__r.opAmount__c, it is empty. I debugged in Controller, the SOQL query itself not retrieving the value of "Opportunity__r.opAmount__c" hence shown empty in VF Page.
One reason could be that your profile does not have access to this field (Opportunity__r.opAmount__c).
Query looks fine to me. Do you see this value on the standard layout. Does your profile have access to this field?
From the management settings for the field’s object, go to the fields area.
Select the field you want to modify.
Click View Field Accessibility.
I have a column named id in my datagrid. I have set visible:false for the field since I don't want to display the field in the grid.
But then how can I get the value in id? any hope?
I am adding column as
columns.push({'sTitle':'id','visible': 'false'},{'sTitle':'name','visible': 'false'});
And I am retrieving the value in selected row as
this.$view.on("click",function(event){
selectedRow = event.target.parentElement;
var name = selectedRow.cells[0].innerHTML;
}
Here in click event I can't get the value of id as html is not generated for the field with visible:false. So I am searching for a method to access my id field.
You should use display:none property
-Edit:
In order to specify a custom css to your angular datagrid you should also specify the columns. Something like:
$("#gridContainer").dxDataGrid({
// ...
columns: ['CompanyName', 'ContactName', 'City', 'Country']
});
Here's the page I referenced to
Edit2:
Since you're trying to retrieve the value of the field I would recommend you to take a look to this answer
I am maintaining a site that allows users to create a profile of sorts that will allow them to broadcast activities to a feed. I implement ng-grid to keep track of all the profiles that are created, and have created two buttons that allow users to create/edit these profiles. My only problem right now is, when users select a row on the grid and attempt to edit that specific row, the drop-down menu is not auto-populated with the data from ngModel.
This is the part of the form I am having trouble with:
<select ng-model="source.canSendTo" ng-options="value.name for value in sourceCanSendTo" data-style="btn" bs-select></select>
And within the controller, I have sourceCanSendTo defined as:
$scope.sourceCanSendTo = [ {"id":"abc", "name": "ABC"}, {"id":bcd", "name": "BCD"} ... ];
On row selection, I simply set source = the selected item, and console.logs show that all the data is there. The other parts of the form are being populated properly (mainly s), and console.log($scope.source.canSendTo) shows that the original data is there, it's just that select is defaulted to being blank...how would I go about trying to pre-select certain elements on the drop-down select I currently have?
For example, if the profile has 'abc', 'bcd' selected, how can I make it so that when I edit that profile, the drop down box shows 'abc,bcd' instead of just "Nothing Selected"?
Edit: I previously responded to a comment inquiring about bs-select, saying that it simply controlled some CSS elements of the drop down box - seems like this is completely incorrect after a quick google search when everything else led to dead ends. Does anyone have any idea how to properly initialize the model with data so that when I preload my form, the 'can send to' drop down select actually has the selected options selected, as opposed to saying "Nothing Selected"? Thanks in advance for all help!
As you are binding source.canSendTo to the name (value.name) of sourceCanSendTo then you just need to initially have an structure binding the names which had been saved, something like this:
source.canSendTo = ['abc', 'bcd']; //And all the selected values
So you need to construct your source.canSendTo property to this structure.
PS: If you show how you bring your data from the server, I can help you to construct the source.canSendTo property.
$scope.canSendTo must be initialized with a reference to the selected option.
var initialSelection = 0;
$scope.source = { canSendTo : [ {"id":"abc", "name": "ABC"}, {"id":bcd", "name": "BCD"} ... ] };
$scope.canSendTo = $scope.source.canSendTo[initialSelection];
Finally found out what was wrong with my code - seems like the data being stored in the model wasn't the same as what was in ngOptions, played around a bit with ngOptions and managed to get something that works. Working snippet of code:
<select ng-model="sendTo.name" ng-option="value.name as value.name for value in sourceCanSendTo" data-style="btn" multiple bs-select>
(Realized that the variable being used for ngModel was a fairly ambiguous in terms of naming convention, changed it)
I'm trying to have a dropdown menu for the user to select the database table. I have defined few tables in db.py and I want the user the to select a particular table from a dropdown menu and insert entries. Right now I use SQLFORM:
def index():
form=SQLFORM(db.selectedtable) #want to change the table name#
if form.process().accepted:
response.flash = 'form accepted'
elif form.errors:
response.flash = 'form has errors'
else:
response.flash = 'please fill out the form'
return dict(form=form)
I need the user to select 'selectedtable' value from a dropdown list that shows all the available tables in the DB. I do not necessarily want to retrieve the table values from DB. I am OK with defining a list with the available tables and the dropdown menu can pull the table names from that list.
So far I only found IS_IN_DB to automatically create a dropdown and PluginDropdown() but that does not serve my purpose. If soemebody can direct me to the proper way of handling this task I'd be really thankful.
Regards.
Update:
After Anthony's suggession I tried the following with , as I'm not that familiar with JS.
{{extend 'layout.html'}}
{{select='NONE'}}
<form>
<select>
{{for item in TOOLS:}}
<option value="{{select=item}}">{{=item}}</option>{{pass}}
</select>
<input type="submit" value="Go!"/>
</form>
<h2>Input form</h2>
{{=form}}
<h2>{{=select}}</h2>
As you might see this doesn't work properly. What I tried to do is to get the user chose value to 'select' variable. But it doesn't work. It always gets the last element in ITEMS (this list is defined in db.py). My next option would be to be call another controller function, passing the user selected value as an argument. Then it can prepare the form with the passed value and send to a view to display
<h2>Input form</h2>
{{=form}}
But I'm not sure how I can assign the user chosen value to an argument and then call another controller function with that arugument value.
If you have any suggestion how I can modify this to get the user chosen value thats very much appreciated. Thank you.
You could create a <select> element listing all the tables, and then load the form associated with the selected table as a web2py component via Ajax. In the view of the main page (e.g., /views/default/index.html):
<script>
jQuery(function() {
jQuery('#table').change(function() {
web2py_component("{{=URL('default', 'form.load')}}" + "/" +
jQuery(this).val(), target='form')
})
})
</script>
{{=SELECT('Select a table', *db.tables, _id='table')}}
<div id="form"></div>
And in a controller (e.g., default.py):
def form():
if request.args(0) in db.tables:
response.generic_patterns = ['load']
return dict(form=SQLFORM(db[request.args(0)]).process())
else:
raise HTTP(404)
Note, db.tables is a list of all the tables defined on the db connection object -- it is used in the SELECT() helper in the view to generate a <select> list of all the tables. The script in the view registers a jQuery event handler that fires whenever a different table is selected from the dropdown. The handler calls the web2py_component() function (which is in /static/js/web2py.js), which loads the form component via Ajax into the div with id="form". It appends the value of the selected table to the URL.
In the controller, the form() function checks for the db table name in request.args(0). It then sets response.generic_patterns so the "generic.load" view will be allowed (by default, generic views are only enabled for local requests). Alternatively, you could define your own "form.load" view, or even use a different extension (e.g., "form.html").
Because the form is loaded as a web2py Ajax component, the form submission will be trapped and submitted via Ajax as well, so it will not result in a full page reload.