I am working on testing a component using react-testing-library. The component has an alert which accepts a prop that comes from context to determine whether the alert is open or not.
const PersonRecord = () => {
const {
personSuccessAlert,
setPersonSuccessAlert,
updatePersonSuccessAlert,
setUpdatePersonSuccessAlert,
} = useContext(PeopleContext);
return (
{personSuccessAlert && (
<div className="person-alert-container">
<Alert
ariaLabel="person-create-success-alert"
icon="success"
open={personSuccessAlert}
/>
</div>
)}
)
}
So the above code uses context to pull the value of personSuccessAlert from PeopleContext. If personSuccessAlert is true the alert will display. My context file is set up as follows:
import React, { createContext, useState } from 'react';
export const PeopleContext = createContext();
const PeopleContextProvider = ({ children }) => {
const [personSuccessAlert, setPersonSuccessAlert] = useState(false);
const [updatePersonSuccessAlert, setUpdatePersonSuccessAlert] = useState(
false,
);
return (
<PeopleContext.Provider
value={{
personSuccessAlert,
updatePersonSuccessAlert,
setPersonSuccessAlert,
setUpdatePersonSuccessAlert,
}}>
{children}
</PeopleContext.Provider>
);
};
export default PeopleContextProvider;
Now I am trying to develop a test which passes personSuccessAlert = true to the PersonRecord component.
Here is what I have been trying:
export function renderWithEmptyPerson(
ui,
{
providerProps,
path = '/',
route = '/',
history = createMemoryHistory({ initialEntries: [route] }),
},
) {
return {
...render(
<MockedProvider mocks={getEmptyPerson} addTypename={false}>
<PeopleContextProvider {...providerProps}>
<Router history={history}>
<Route path={path} component={ui} />
</Router>
</PeopleContextProvider>
</MockedProvider>,
),
};
}
describe('empty person record rendering', () => {
afterEach(cleanup);
test('empty person', async () => {
const providerProps = { value: true };
const { getByText, queryByText, queryByLabelText } = renderWithEmptyPerson(
PersonRecord,
{
providerProps,
route: 'people/6d6ed1f4-8294-44de-9855-2999bdf9e3a7',
path: 'people/:slug',
},
);
expect(getByText('Loading...')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
});
I have tried different variations of const providerProps = { value: true };. Replacing value with personSuccessAlert did not work.
Any advice or help is appreciated.
You are passing providerProps to the PeopleContextProvider, but the PeopleContextProvider is not doing anything with the props. You'll need to actually use those props, for example to set the initial state. You could try something like:
const PeopleContextProvider = ({ children, initialPersonSuccessAlert = false }) => {
const [personSuccessAlert, setPersonSuccessAlert] = useState(initialPersonSuccessAlert);
const [updatePersonSuccessAlert, setUpdatePersonSuccessAlert] = useState(
false,
);
return (
<PeopleContext.Provider
value={{
personSuccessAlert,
updatePersonSuccessAlert,
setPersonSuccessAlert,
setUpdatePersonSuccessAlert,
}}>
{children}
</PeopleContext.Provider>
);
};
This would allow you to set the initial state of personSuccessAlert by passing in a initialPersonSuccessAlert prop. You could update your test like so:
const providerProps = { initialPersonSuccessAlert: true };
Alternatively, if you only wanted to make changes in your test file, you could consider updating the renderWithEmptyPerson function to use PeopleContext.Provider directly instead of the PeopleContextProvider component. That will allow you to set the context value however you like.
Related
My Context:
type Props = {
children: React.ReactNode;
};
interface Context {
postIsDraft: boolean;
setPostIsDraft: Dispatch<SetStateAction<boolean>>;
}
const initialContext: Context = {
postIsDraft: false,
setPostIsDraft: (): void => {},
};
const EditPostContext = createContext<Context>(initialContext);
const EditPostContextProvider = ({ children }: Props) => {
const [postIsDraft, setPostIsDraft] = useState<boolean>(
initialContext.postIsDraft
);
return (
<EditPostContext.Provider
value={{
postIsDraft,
setPostIsDraft,
}}
>
{children}
</EditPostContext.Provider>
);
};
export { EditPostContext, EditPostContextProvider };
I set postIsDraft in the parent:
export const ParentComponent = () => {
{ setPostIsDraft } = useContext(EditPostContext);
// some code
const updatePostStatus = (postStatus: boolean) => {
setPostIsDraft(postStatus);
}
// some code
return(
<EditPostContextProvider>
<ChildComponent />
</EditPostContextProvider>
)
}
Then I need to read the value in the child component:
const { postIsDraft } = useContext(EditPostContext);
Only just starting use context, just not sure what I've done wrong. When I try and read the value from context in the child component, I'm only getting back the initial value, not the set value in the parent component.
Your ParentComponent should be wrapped inside provider so as to use it's value:
<EditPostContextProvider>
<ParentComponent />
</EditPostContextProvider>
Generally we can put the provider in index.js file, and wrap <app /> in it
This is a simple question but I couldn't reach the final result after a lot of attempts. The problem is that I want to pass an object in context and use it in another file. And then do an iteration and create a specific element for each value.
App.jsx
const [activities, setActivity] = useState([
{
key: Math.random() * Math.random(),
name: 'Hello',
}
]);
const inputValue = useRef(null);
const addActivity = () => {
const activity = {
key: Math.random() * Math.random(),
name: inputValue.current.value,
};
setActivity(activities.concat(activity));
};
const value = {
// I want to pass this parameter - only activities has problem (Activity.jsx <h1>)
// I can't achieve activities.name in Activity.jsx
activities: [...activities],
functions: {
addActivity: addActivity
},
ref: {
inputValue: inputValue
}
};
<Context.Provider
value={value}
>
Context.js
export const Context = createContext();
Activity.jsx
const { activities, functions, ref } = useContext(Context);
return (
<section className="activity-container">
<input type="text" ref={ref.inputValue} />
<button onClick={functions.addActivity}>add!</button>
{
activities.map(activity => (
<h1>activity.name</h1>
))
}
</section>
);
I believe this is what you want:
// Sharing data through context
Context file:
// Context.js
import React, { useState, useRef, createContext } from "react";
export const DataContext = createContext();
const getRandom = () => Math.random() * Math.random();
const defaultValue = {
key: getRandom(),
name: "Hello"
};
const ContextProvider = ({ children }) => {
const [activities, setActivity] = useState([defaultValue]);
const inputValue = useRef(null);
const addActivity = () => {
const activity = {
key: getRandom(),
name: inputValue.current.value
};
setActivity([...activities, activity]);
};
const value = {
activities: [...activities],
functions: { addActivity },
ref: { inputValue }
};
return <DataContext.Provider value={value}>{children}</DataContext.Provider>;
};
export default ContextProvider;
Hook to read from context:
// useDataContext
import { useContext } from "react";
import { DataContext } from "./Context";
const useDataContext = () => {
const contextValue = useContext(DataContext);
return contextValue;
};
export default useDataContext;
Child Element where you want to receive the value from context:
// Child.js
import React from "react";
import useDataContext from "./useDataContext";
const Child = () => {
const data = useDataContext();
return (
<>
{data.activities.map((val, idx) => (
<div key={idx}>Name is {val.name}</div>
))}
</>
);
};
export default Child;
And the App container:
// App.js
import Child from "./Child";
import ContextProvider from "./Context";
export default function App() {
return (
<div className="App">
<ContextProvider>
<Child />
</ContextProvider>
</div>
);
}
I've created a sandbox for you to test.
You should make sure that the Activity.jsx component is wrapped with context provider, to get the proper value from the context.
I tried in this codesandbox, and it's working properly. You can refer to this and check what you are missing.
I have been struggling to test a React Context update for a while. I can predefine the value of the Context.Provider however, the solution is not ideal because an update to the context which is supposed to happen within component utilising the context is not actually happening.
When I test this manually the text 'Account name: abc' changes to 'Account name: New account name' but not in the test. The context value remains the same.
The reason I predefine the value is because the component relies on a fetch response from a parent and I am unit testing <ImportAccounts /> only.
In a test I am rendering a component with predefined value
test('accountName value is updated on click', () => {
const { getByText, getByLabelText, getByRole } = render(
<ImportAccountsContext.Provider value={{ accountName: { value: 'abc', setValue: jest.fn() }}}>
<ImportAccounts />
</ImportAccountsContext.Provider>,
);
expect(getByText('Account name: abc')).toBeInTheDocument();
const input = getByLabelText('Account name');
fireEvent.change(input, { target: { value: 'New account name' } });
fireEvent.click(getByRole('button', { name: 'Update' }));
expect(getByText('Account name: New account name')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
Here's my context
import React, { createContext, useContext, useState, useCallback, Dispatch, SetStateAction } from 'react';
export interface StateVariable<T> {
value: T;
setValue: Dispatch<SetStateAction<T>>;
}
export interface ImportAccountsState {
accountName: StateVariable<string>;
}
export const ImportAccountsContext = createContext<ImportAccountsState>(
{} as ImportAccountsState,
);
export const ImportAccountsProvider = ({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) => {
const [accountName, setAccountName] = useState('');
const initialState: ImportAccountsState = {
accountName: {
value: accountName,
setValue: setAccountName,
},
};
return (
<ImportAccountsContext.Provider value={initialState}>
{children}
</ImportAccountsContext.Provider>
);
};
export const useImportAccountsContext = () => {
return useContext<ImportAccountsState>(ImportAccountsContext);
};
Import Accounts is as simple as
export const ImportAccounts = () => {
const { accountName } = useImportAccountsContext();
const [newAccountName, setNewAccountName] = useState(accountName.value);
const handleAccountNameChange = () => {
accountName.setValue(newAccountName);
};
return (
<>
<h1>Account name: {accountName.value}</h1>
<label htmlFor="accountName">Account name</label>
<input
value={newAccountName}
onChange={e => setNewAccountName(e.target.value)}
id="accountName"
/>
<button
type="button"
onClick={handleAccountNameChange}>
Update
</button>
</>
);
}
How can I test that accountName has actually updated?
If we don't need the default value for the ImportAccounts provider then we make the test pass easily. ImportAccountsProvider manages the state of the accountName within itself. In that provider, we are passing the accountName state of type ImportAccountsState to all our children through the context provider.
Now coming to your problem,
const { getByText, getByLabelText, getByRole } = render(
<ImportAccountsContext.Provider value={{ accountName: { value: 'abc', setValue: jest.fn() }}}>
<ImportAccounts />
</ImportAccountsContext.Provider>,
);
Here, the value: 'abc' is not a state value, it's simply a string constant 'abc' which will never be going to change. This is something that we should note. We must pass the state value to the context provider if we want to share the value with the children which is not going to be constant in the entire react lifecycle.
import { render, screen } from '#testing-library/react';
import userEvent from '#testing-library/user-event';
test('should update the context with existing provider', () => {
render(
<ImportAccountsProvider>
<ImportAccounts />
</ImportAccountsProvider>
);
// some constant hoisted to make it clean code
const accountInput = screen.getByRole('textbox', { name: /account name/i });
const accountInputValue = 'subrato patnaik';
expect(accountInput).toHaveAttribute('value', '');
// do some changes
userEvent.type(accountInput, accountInputValue);
//validate "changes"
expect(screen.getByDisplayValue(accountInputValue)).toBeTruthy();
expect(accountInput).toHaveAttribute('value', accountInputValue);
// update context
userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /update/i }));
// validate update
expect(screen.getByRole('heading')).toHaveTextContent(/subrato/i);
screen.debug();
});
Inside the ImportAccountsProvider we can do the fetch call and set the accountName state to the response of the fetch call.
export const ImportAccountsProvider = ({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) => {
const [accountName, setAccountName] = useState('');
useEffect(() => {
// do the fetch call here and update the accountName state accordingly
});
const initialState: ImportAccountsState = {
accountName: {
value: accountName,
setValue: setAccountName,
},
};
return (
<ImportAccountsContext.Provider value={initialState}>
{children}
</ImportAccountsContext.Provider>
);
};
export const useImportAccountsContext = () => {
return useContext<ImportAccountsState>(ImportAccountsContext);
};
I have a parentA and childB component
I want it click a button in parentA
then execute function to get data from api
then show on B component. that seems simple.
parent:
let profileData = {
avatar: '',
first_name: 'hey',
...
};
const handleClickProfileOpen = () => {
setIsProfileOpen(true);
getProfileData();
};
const getProfileData = async() => {
let res;
try {
res = await....;
if (res.code === 200) {
profileData = res.data.data;
...
} else {
...
}
} catch...
};
return (
<>
<UserInfo openProfilePage={ handleClickProfileOpen } />
<Profile profileData={profileData} />
</>
)
child(profile)
export default function Profile({profileData}) {
return (
<>
<p>{profileData.first_name}</p>
</>
)}
and I run it, the profileData is not re-render when called API, the last_name is always 'hey',
I tried setState in getProfileData code === 200, but cause error
Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component.
I'm a new react programer, if you answer, I appreciate it.
Assuming you are using functional component, you can use useState from react, refer to https://reactjs.org/docs/hooks-state.html
E.g.,
function ParentComponent() {
const [profileData, setProfileData] = useState({
// default value if you needed, otherwise use `null`
avatar: '',
first_name: 'hey',
...
})
const handleClickProfileOpen = () => {
setIsProfileOpen(true);
getProfileData();
};
const getProfileData = async() => {
let res;
try {
res = await....;
if (res.code === 200) {
setProfileData(res.data.data);
...
} else {
...
}
} catch...
};
return (
<>
<UserInfo openProfilePage={ handleClickProfileOpen } />
<Profile profileData={profileData} />
</>
)
}
Above is the easiest way to handle simple react state, you can find other state management libraries when you state become more complicated.
I'm trying to pass a value down using useContext as below
This is Context.js
export const selectedContext = React.createContext();
export const SelectProvider = () => {
return (
<selectedContext.Provider value={"Team One"}>
<Cards />
<Pies />
</selectedContext.Provider>
);
};
I'm calling the context in one of the components like so
This is in Card.js (a child in the provider)
const value = React.useContext(selectedContext);
console.log(value);
When I initialize the value from React.createContext, the value is passed down to my component but when I try using the provider it doesn't work.
What am I doing wrong?
When you are using React.useContext like this it's not wire into the <Context.Provider>
Please see the docs on who to use React.useContext here.
It's seems that the React.useContext will not work with in the Provider direct component children, so you need to make one more component in between. (like in the docs example)
const selectedContext = React.createContext();
const SelectProvider = () => {
return (
<selectedContext.Provider value={"Team One"}>
<Cards />
</selectedContext.Provider>
);
};
const Cards = () => {
const value = React.useContext(selectedContext);
console.log(value); // will not work
return (
<Card />
);
};
const Card = () => {
const value = React.useContext(selectedContext);
console.log(value); // will work
return (
<div>My Card</div>
);
};
If you need it to work on the first layer of component you can use <Context.Consumer> and it will work within.
const selectedContext = React.createContext();
const SelectProvider = () => {
return (
<selectedContext.Provider value={"Team One"}>
<Cards />
</selectedContext.Provider>
);
};
const Cards = () => {
const value = React.useContext(selectedContext);
console.log(value); // will not work
return (
<div>
<selectedContext.Consumer>
{({value}) => (
<h1>{value}</h1> // will work
)}
</selectedContext.Consumer>
</div>
);
};
Your code is fine, but you should "call the context" in the child component of the provider, as the value is available in Provider's children:
export const SelectedContext = React.createContext();
export const SelectProvider = ({ children }) => {
return (
<SelectedContext.Provider value={'Team One'}>
{children}
</SelectedContext.Provider>
);
};
const ProviderChecker = () => {
const value = React.useContext(SelectedContext);
return <div>{value}</div>;
};
const App = () => {
return (
<SelectProvider>
<ProviderChecker />
</SelectProvider>
);
};