I have a device (esp32s2) which is IoT enabled and communicating with AWS server.
The device is connecting to the internet via router. I want to check from the device, if the router is connected to the internet or not. If not connected, I need to disconnect mqtt broker instantly.
I know there is aws_iot_yield happening, but it is taking too much of time to change the client state (~5-10 mins) after disconnection. So, is there is any other way in which I can come to know if the device is connected to the mqtt broker or not using AWS sdk?
I want to avoid using pinging to some address/server as it will increase the usage of resources.
Thanks in advance!
Since the connectivity to the AWS server trough internet depends on the network elements, the only reliable way to know if you are connected to internet is to send a package to a know address and receive the response. Simplest way to do this is to use ICMP (ping) protocol. Usually the most reliable destination to ping is the Google DNS server 8.8.8.8 or 8.8.4.4 which is a cluster service and it's always replying on the ping.
You can control the pause between two pings and how many pings you will send in one session in order to preserve the resources.
Alternative approach is to use a router that can send messages to a monitoring device that the link state was changed (by example SNMP trap). But this is not fully reliable method since the router can not detect all scenarios where the connectivity to your AWS server is lost.
Related
How can I determine if a particular AWS IoT device is currently online? I could send an MQTT message and make the device answer it. But is there some implicit way on seeing if a device is online/connected?
You can also use Fleet Indexing with enabled Connectivity Indexing
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/iot/latest/developerguide/managing-index.html and do search for your deviceId. In results you can check connectivity. Also you can search for all connected devices by using search with query connectivity.connected:true
Ok, there is a dedicated internal MQTT topic for it. Subscribe to $aws/events/presence/# to get presence events for all your devices.
i see latency issue - when i send a timelineitem from my glassware app, it takes a long time to appear on glass device.
I see the item in developer playground (https://developers.google.com/glass/playground)
Is it isolated issue on my WiFi (unlikely)? or some optimization done at Mirror server which queues timelineitems and sending in a specific interval to glass device?
Thanks
After doing some more investigation (In my case, i have setup private network inside enterprise network), i found out that some of the ports are blocked by firewall settings for incoming traffic from outside network, so glass device was not getting notifications from the Mirror Server.
It is possible either Channel API or XMPP is used in receiving notification messages from Mirror server to Glass. Those ports might have blocked by my firewall settings. I ran wireshark, still it is not clear which protocol or port is used in receiving notifications.
Also it is possible that glass device could get (HTTP GET) newly available cards from the mirror server by polling on specific time interval or other cases(changing WIFI network, etc).
I called Glass help, i could not get any feedback.
I would really appreciate if someone (from Google) could shed some light (port and protocol details) on how Glass gets notification from mirror server when new timeline card is available.
This is a known issue:
https://code.google.com/p/google-glass-api/issues/detail?id=185
Issue has been fixed by updating to XE10.
My question is, how to connect to socket on romote mechine?
I can only connect sockets on same network..
I wrote a simple code (in c), that simulate a server (open socket and listen for client). in Mac.
I'm trying to connect this socket as a client from iPhone (with simple objectiv-c code).
If my internet on both, server and client, is on the same network (WiFi) and in client I trying to connect to 192.168.1.x, it's working.
But when, in client, I'm trying to connect via external IP (with the same port) connection is failed.
I never did this bofore. Maybe I miss somthing.. I've tried to turn my FireWall off. It did not help.
Thanks.
Edit: If it's not clear.. my Mac is connected by router.
In a setting like this, the "external IP" would typically be the IP of the router. In all likelihood you'll need to configure the router to forward the relevant port to the internal IP address.
It could also be the case that for the port forwarding to work, the request has to come in on the external (WAN) interface. This depends on how the router is configured. If that's the case, you'll need to make sure that you're accessing the external IP via the cellular network and not the Wi-Fi connection on your iPhone.
If you're connecting to your server via a local IP address (i.e., you're connecting to another machine on the same local router via a delegated DHCP address), then your issue is on the network, not the IP-stack of the local machine.
You'll need to look into your router settings ... many routers will block a number of services, especially those on custom ports, in order to prevent malicious attacks from sources external to the local network.
We have a makeshift SOAP client written in C# connecting to a CXF service on a desktop from a windows mobile device. When this device is connected via ActiveSync, it creates a virtual adapter for the RNDIS connection. This virtual adapter assigns a gateway IP to the host, 169.254.2.2.
When we attempt to go through the connection with the hostname or the host's IP set as the address in the C# client, everything works perfectly. When we however set the IP to be the RNDIS gateway (169.254.2.2), the connection is periodically lost on the server side. The CXF service keeps trying to connect, and eventually succeeds, but this results in a massive slowdown of the connection. There are no errors reported in our logs on the mobile C# side, only on the CXF server.
Does anyone have any clues as to why this is happening? We need to assert that 169.254.2.2 cannot possibly be used as a valid endpoint before we rule it out.
Oh, and in case it helps, the C# client is granted the IP 169.254.2.1 through DHCP after the ActiveSync connection.
The first issue that comes to my head, especially once I saw that you are using DCHP, is that the lease time on the IP from the DHCP server is expiring and the CXF server is having to wait for the DCHP server to issue a new lease.
Try lengthening the DCHP lease if you know that the IP won't be changing and use a static IP if you are able. That will at least remove that point of failure.
I found out the cause of this, but I feel bad for answering because I doubt there was any way someone else could have guessed that this was the problem:
On our CXF server, we have a call to InetAddress.getHostName() which basically does a reverse DNS lookup on the request sent from the C# client.
When using the ActiveSync IP address, there was no entry in the DNS for 169.254.2.1 (of course), so the java class would hang until the method timed out (which took about 20 seconds before it would write a response to the C# client). At 20 seconds per request, this resulted in the massive slowdown and lost connection errors.
We fixed this by moving the call to an executor thread that force-finished after half a second. Because it was in another thread, the slowdown became nonexistent. Glad to have that over with!
I need one server to receive ip requests from clients(there are not in the same intranet), and I can
route all the response packets to a special gateway server, and then I send the response packages to
clients after some processing. it is like VPN, but I want to do some development based one
opensource project, so i can control it myself.
any suggestion? thanks!
There is OpenVPN which is as the name already suggests open source.
You could set up the server on the local one as a kind of proxy (or reverse-proxy depending on your viewpoint) and have the clients connect to it.
It depends what protocol you're using, maybe it has explicit proxy capability or you can get an existing proxy program, or just proxy it using a simple socket forwarder program.