I'm looking if there is any changes recently on FaceID Module, we are getting the error bellow on authentication:
CFURLRequestSetHTTPCookieStorageAcceptPolicy_block_invoke: no longer implemented and should not be called
2021-08-30 14:42:58.196592+0100 MyAPP[42960:9700283] [connection] nw_endpoint_handler_set_adaptive_read_handler [C2.1.1 41.137.251.15:443 ready channel-flow (satisfied (Path is satisfied), viable, interface: en0, ipv4, dns)] unregister notification for read_timeout failed
2021-08-30 14:42:58.196694+0100 MyAPP[42960:9700283] [connection] nw_endpoint_handler_set_adaptive_write_handler [C2.1.1 41.137.251.15:443 ready channel-flow (satisfied (Path is satisfied), viable, interface: en0, ipv4, dns)] unregister notification for write_timeout failed
Related
The story behind it: I'm trying to command an Android box (with a proprietary launcher) that also manages TV channels. To enter the channel section it is not sufficient to type a number, but a specific key must be pressed. I want to find a way to replicate that key, and then use this command on Home Assistant. I could try with a bluetooth sniffer, but it will be after the failure of my actual attempt.
I ran this adb command after pressing the specific key for TV channels:
adb.exe shell dumpsys activity broadcasts history
And the last broadcast in history is this (timvision is the name of the box):
Historical Broadcast foreground #0:
BroadcastRecord{560a0f4 u0 android.intent.action.GLOBAL_BUTTON} to user 0
Intent { act=android.intent.action.GLOBAL_BUTTON flg=0x10000010 (has extras) }
targetComp: {timvision.launcher/timvision.launcher.TimVisionKeyReceiver}
extras: Bundle[{android.intent.extra.KEY_EVENT=KeyEvent { action=ACTION_UP, keyCode=KEYCODE_LAST_CHANNEL, scanCode=377, metaState=0, flags=0x8, repeatCount=0, eventTime=10092564, downTime=10092515, deviceId=27, source=0x301, displayId=-1 }}]
caller=android 3514:system/1000 pid=3514 uid=1000
enqueueClockTime=2022-04-16 14:43:54.577 dispatchClockTime=2022-04-16 14:43:54.578
dispatchTime=-3s691ms (+1ms since enq) finishTime=-3s502ms (+189ms since disp)
resultTo=null resultCode=0 resultData=null
nextReceiver=1 receiver=null
Deliver +189ms #0: (manifest)
priority=0 preferredOrder=0 match=0x0 specificIndex=-1 isDefault=false
ActivityInfo:
name=timvision.launcher.TimVisionKeyReceiver
packageName=timvision.launcher
enabled=true exported=true directBootAware=false
resizeMode=RESIZE_MODE_RESIZEABLE
Is possible to replicate this broadcast ? I tried this (with extra_key values too) but seems is not allowed:
adb.exe shell am broadcast -a android.intent.action.GLOBAL_BUTTON -n timvision.launcher/timvision.launcher.TimVisionKeyReceiver
Error:
java.lang.SecurityException: Permission Denial: not allowed to send broadcast android.intent.action.GLOBAL_BUTTON from pid=32487, uid=2000
Alternatives or ideas are welcome.
Thanks
It is not the solution to the question but it is the solution to my problem. So I post it.
The key to enter in the TV channels section is listed on the official Android documentation and is KEYCODE_LAST_CHANNEL with code 229.
On Home Assistant the service to launch is this:
service: androidtv.adb_command
data:
command: input keyevent 229
target:
entity_id: media_player.your_android_tv_entity
I'm testing pubsub "pull" subscriber on Cloud Run using just listener part of this sample java code (SubscribeAsyncExample...reworked slightly to fit in my SpringBoot app):
https://cloud.google.com/pubsub/docs/quickstart-client-libraries#java_1
It fails to startup during deploy...but while it's trying to start, it does pull items from the pubsub queue. Originally, I had an HTTP "push" receiver (a #RestController) on a different pubsub topic and that worked fine. Any suggestions? I'm new to Cloud Run. Thanks.
Deploying...
Creating Revision... Cloud Run error: Container failed to start. Failed to start and then listen on the port defined
by the PORT environment variable. Logs for this revision might contain more information....failed
Deployment failed
In logs:
2020-08-11 18:43:22.688 INFO 1 --- [ main] o.s.web.context.ContextLoader : Root WebApplicationContext: initialization completed in 4606 ms
2020-08-11T18:43:25.287759Z Listening for messages on projects/ce-cxmo-dev/subscriptions/AndySubscriptionPull:
2020-08-11T18:43:25.351650801Z Container Sandbox: Unsupported syscall setsockopt(0x18,0x29,0x31,0x3eca02dfd974,0x4,0x28). It is very likely that you can safely ignore this message and that this is not the cause of any error you might be troubleshooting. Please, refer to https://gvisor.dev/c/linux/amd64/setsockopt for more information.
2020-08-11T18:43:25.351770555Z Container Sandbox: Unsupported syscall setsockopt(0x18,0x29,0x12,0x3eca02dfd97c,0x4,0x28). It is very likely that you can safely ignore this message and that this is not the cause of any error you might be troubleshooting. Please, refer to https://gvisor.dev/c/linux/amd64/setsockopt for more information.
2020-08-11 18:43:25.680 WARN 1 --- [ault-executor-0] i.g.n.s.i.n.u.internal.MacAddressUtil : Failed to find a usable hardware address from the network interfaces; using random bytes: ae:2c:fb:e7:92:9c:2b:24
2020-08-11T18:45:36.282714Z Id: 1421389098497572
2020-08-11T18:45:36.282763Z Data: We be pub-sub'n in pull mode2!!
Nothing else after this and the app stops running.
#Component
public class AndyTopicPullRecv {
public AndyTopicPullRecv()
{
subscribeAsyncExample("ce-cxmo-dev", "AndySubscriptionPull");
}
public static void subscribeAsyncExample(String projectId, String subscriptionId) {
ProjectSubscriptionName subscriptionName =
ProjectSubscriptionName.of(projectId, subscriptionId);
// Instantiate an asynchronous message receiver.
MessageReceiver receiver =
(PubsubMessage message, AckReplyConsumer consumer) -> {
// Handle incoming message, then ack the received message.
System.out.println("Id: " + message.getMessageId());
System.out.println("Data: " + message.getData().toStringUtf8());
consumer.ack();
};
Subscriber subscriber = null;
try {
subscriber = Subscriber.newBuilder(subscriptionName, receiver).build();
// Start the subscriber.
subscriber.startAsync().awaitRunning();
System.out.printf("Listening for messages on %s:\n", subscriptionName.toString());
// Allow the subscriber to run for 30s unless an unrecoverable error occurs.
// subscriber.awaitTerminated(30, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
subscriber.awaitTerminated();
System.out.printf("Async subscribe terminated on %s:\n", subscriptionName.toString());
// } catch (TimeoutException timeoutException) {
} catch (Exception e) {
// Shut down the subscriber after 30s. Stop receiving messages.
subscriber.stopAsync();
System.out.printf("Async subscriber exception: " + e);
}
}
}
Kolban question is very important!! With the shared code, I would like to say "No". The Cloud Run contract is clear:
Your service must answer to HTTP request. Out of request, you pay nothing and no CPU is dedicated to your instance (the instance is like a daemon when no request is processing)
Your service must be stateless (not your case here, I won't take time on this)
If you want to pull your PubSub subscription, create an endpoint in your code with a Rest controller. While you are processing this request, run your pull mechanism and process messages.
This endpoint can be called by Cloud Scheduler regularly to keep the process up.
Be careful, you have a max request processing timeout at 15 minutes (today, subject to change in a near future). So, you can't run your process more than 15 minutes. Make it resilient to fail and set your scheduler to call your service every 15 minutes
My camel route tries to pick up some files from sftp, transfer them to network, and delete them from sftp. If the sftp is unreachable after 3 attempts, I want the route to send an email warning the admin about the problem.
For this reason my sftp address has the following parameters:
maximumReconnectAttempts=2&throwExceptionOnConnectFailed=true&consumer.bridgeErrorHandler=true
In case the network location is not available, i want the route to notify the admin and not delete the files from sftp.
For this reason i have set .handled(false) in onException.
However, when connecting to sftp fails, aggregation also fails and no emails are coming. I have made a minimalist example below:
/configure
onException(Throwable.class)
.retryAttemptedLogLevel(LoggingLevel.WARN)
.redeliveryDelay(1000)
.handled(false)
.log(LoggingLevel.ERROR, LOG, "XXX - Error moving files")
.to(AGGREGATEROUTE)
.end();
from(downloadFrom)
.to(to)
.log(LoggingLevel.INFO, LOG, "XXX - Moving file OK")
.to(AGGREGATEROUTE);
from(AGGREGATEROUTE)
.log(LoggingLevel.INFO, LOG, "XXX - Starting aggregation.")
.aggregate(constant(true), new GroupedExchangeAggregationStrategy())
.completionFromBatchConsumer()
.completionTimeout(10000)
.log(LoggingLevel.INFO, LOG, "XXX - Aggregation completed, sending mail.");
In the logs i see:
16:02| ERROR | CamelLogger.java 156 | XXX - Error moving files
Then the logs for the Exception occurring during connection.
And then this:
16:02| ERROR | FatalFallbackErrorHandler.java 174 | Exception occurred while trying to handle previously thrown exception on exchangeId: ID-LP0641-1552662095664-0-2 using: [Pipeline[[Channel[Log(proefjes.camel_cursus.routebuilders.MoveWithPickupExceptions)[XXX - Error moving files]], Channel[sendTo(direct://aggregate)]]]].
16:02| ERROR | FatalFallbackErrorHandler.java 172 | \--> New exception on exchangeId: ID-LP0641-1552662095664-0-2
org.apache.camel.component.file.GenericFileOperationFailedException: Cannot connect to sftp://user#mycompany.nl:22
at org.apache.camel.component.file.remote.SftpOperations.connect(SftpOperations.java:149)
I do not see "XXX - Starting aggregation." which i would expect to see in the log. Does some kind of error occur befor aggregation? The breakpoint on aggregate(*, *) is never reached.
First, I just want to clarify something. You write "In case the network location is not available, i want the route to notify the admin and not delete the files from sftp", but shouldn't that be obvious anyhow? I mean, if the network location is not available, wouldn't deleting the files from sftp be impossible?
It's a little confusing that your exception handler is also routing .to(AGGREGATEROUTE). Given that you want to email an admin, shouldn't that be in the exception handler, not in the happy path? Why would you and how would you "aggregate" a connection failure?
Finally, and here I think is a real problem with your implementation, you may have misunderstood what handled(false) does. Setting this to false means routing should stop and propagate the exception returned to the caller. I'm not sure what having to the .to(AGGREGATEROUTE) would do in this case, but I'm not surprised it's not being called.
I suggest trying a few things. I don't have your code so I'm not sure which will work best. These are all related and any might work:
Change handled(false) to handled(true).
Replace handled with continued(true).
Use a Dead Letter Channel.
Reference:
Handle and Continue Exceptions
Dead Letter Channel
Since errorhandling is different depending on which endpoint causes the error, i have solved this by having two different versions of onException:
//configure exception on sft end
onException(Throwable.class)
.maximumRedeliveries(2)
.retryAttemptedLogLevel(LoggingLevel.WARN)
.redeliveryDelay(1000)
.onWhen(new hasSFTPErrorPredicate())
// .continued(true) // tries to connect once, mails and continues to aggregation with empty exchange
//.handled(false) // tries to connect twice but does not reach mail
.handled(true) // tries to connect once, does reach mail
// handled not defined: tries to connect twice but does not reach mail
.log(LoggingLevel.INFO, LOG, "XXX - SFTP exception")
.to(MAIL_ROUTE)
.end();
// exception anywhere else
onException(Throwable.class)
.maximumRedeliveries(2)
.retryAttemptedLogLevel(LoggingLevel.WARN)
.redeliveryDelay(1000)
.log(LoggingLevel.ERROR, LOG, "XXX - Error moving file ${file:name}: ${exception}")
.to(AGGREGATEROUTE)
.handled(false)
.end();
Exceptions occuring at the sftp end are handled in the first onException, because there the hasSFTPErrorPredicate returns 'true'. All this predicate does is check if any exception or their cause has "Cannot connect to sftp:" in the message.
No rollback is required in this case because nothing has happened yet.
Any other exception is handled by the second onException.
I'm using Camel within a Spring boot application and integrate with RabbitMQ but am encountering strange behaviour.
My app has Restful endpointswhich convert the http request to a RabbitMQ message and publish this to a predefined exchange. There is a separate consumer app which listens to a queue and processes the messages.
I have deliberately entered an incorrect rabbitmq exchange name (invalidxchangename)to check that the application will fail if the exchange does not exist however the camel context starts without error and when I send in a first request is does not report any error. This message gets lost as there is no matching RabbitMQ exchange. When I submit a second request I receive the following exception which I would have expected on route startup.
com.rabbitmq.client.AlreadyClosedException: channel is already closed due to channel error; protocol method: #method<channel.close>(reply-code=404, reply-text=NOT_FOUND - no exchange 'invalidxchangename' in vhost
EDIT:
I've tried a more simple example to show the issue in Camel.
I've created a simple route as follows:
from("file:in?fileName=in.txt").log(LoggingLevel.DEBUG, "in here!").to("rabbitmq://localhost:5762/invalidexchange?declare=false");
where there is an existing RabbitMQ exchange called validexchange (so I have deliberately made a typo in the RabbitMQ uri). I would expect the camel route to fail at startup since the exchange doesn't exist, or even the first time it tries to process a new in.txt file.
What I am actually seeing in the logs is that on start up it reports no error and only on the 2nd invocation of the route does it report an error.
2015-03-11 16:17:04.356 INFO 9756 : ID-SBMELW7W-06220-59960-1426051020468-0-2 >>> (route2) from(file://in?fileName=in.txt) --> log[in here!] <<< Pattern:InOnly, Headers:...
2015-03-11 16:17:04.360 INFO 9756 : ID-SBMELW7W-06220-59960-1426051020468-0-2 >>> (route2) log[in here!] --> rabbitmq://localhost:5762/customerchannel.exchang?declare=false <<< Pattern:InOnly, Headers:...
2015-03-11 16:17:45.073 INFO 9756 : ID-SBMELW7W-06220-59960-1426051020468-0-4 >>> (route2) from(file://in?fileName=in.txt) --> log[in here!] <<< Pattern:InOnly, Headers: ...
2015-03-11 16:17:45.079 INFO 9756 : ID-SBMELW7W-06220-59960-1426051020468-0-4 >>> (route2) log[in here!] --> rabbitmq://localhost:5762/customerchannel.exchang?declare=false <<< Pattern:InOnly, Headers:...
2015-03-11 16:17:45.092 ERROR 9756 : Failed delivery for (MessageId: ID-SBMELW7W-06220-59960-1426051020468-0-3 on ExchangeId: ID-SBMELW7W-06220-59960-1426051020468-0-4). Exhausted after delivery attempt: 1 caught: com.rabbitmq.client.AlreadyClosedException: channel is already closed due to channel error; protocol method: #method<channel.close>(reply-code=404, reply-text=NOT_FOUND - no exchange 'customerchannel.exchang' in vhost '/', class-id=60, method-id=40)
It looks like the first request is causing an error which closes the connection and logs the reason, and when you try to use the channel the second time it's returning an AlreadyClosedException with the message that caused the channel to close in the first call.
You can test this by trying to publish the second message to a different exchange name in the same channel and checking which exchange is in the error. E.g. publish the second message to invalidxchangename2 and you should still see invalidxchangename as the exchange in the error.
To fix, you should handle the publish result when you publish and re-establish the connection if there's an error.
If you want to be sure that a message got delivered to a RabbitMQ queue, then you have to use publisher confirms: https://www.rabbitmq.com/confirms.html
That you are able to publish a message it doesn't mean that the message will reach a queue. You could go to a mailbox and leave a letter inside, but between the time you left the letter there and a postman picked up, many things could have happened, for example, the mailbox catching fire and so on.
So well, I am trying to get a MQXAQueueConnectionFactory to work, I have created a extended class from the JmsComponent to handle username and password when sending data to the queue.
It does get/put messages on the queue, but in my case I've created a router to test the XA such as
from("wmq:queue:incomingQueue")
.process(new Processor(){
... Thread.sleep(20000)
})
.to("wmq:queue:outgoingQueue")
while being in sleep, I shut down the queuemanager. However when trying to get uncommited messages from the queue
DISPLAY QSTATUS('qChainQueue') i get CURDEPTH(0), while it should be 1 as I understand the XA part.
Am I doing this totally wrong?
How can it be tested?
HelpClass to handle WMQ:
public class WMQComponent extends JmsComponent {
private final String username;
private final String password;
public WMQComponent(String hostname, int port, String username, String password,
String queueManager, String channel) throws JMSException {
super();
this.username = username;
this.password = password;
MQXAQueueConnectionFactory connectionFactory = new MQXAQueueConnectionFactory();
connectionFactory.setTransportType(JMSC.MQJMS_TP_CLIENT_MQ_TCPIP);
connectionFactory.setFailIfQuiesce(1);
connectionFactory.setHostName(hostname);
connectionFactory.setPort(port);
connectionFactory.setQueueManager(queueManager);
connectionFactory.setChannel(channel);
setConnectionFactory(connectionFactory);
}
#Override
public Endpoint createEndpoint(String uri) throws Exception {
if (uri.contains("username") || uri.contains("password")) {
throw new IllegalStateException("Username and password is set by the component");
}
if (uri.contains("?")) {
return super.createEndpoint(uri + "&username=" + username + "&password=" + password);
} else {
return super.createEndpoint(uri + "?username=" + username + "&password=" + password);
}
}
}
With the following errors:
2015-03-25 14:01:12,077 [ #2 - Multicast] INFO dest_chain_ldap - org.springframework.jms.IllegalStateException: JMSWMQ0018: Failed to connect to queue manager 'QMBATCHESB' with connection mode 'Client' and host name 'hostname.com'.; nested exception is com.ibm.msg.client.jms.DetailedIllegalStateException: JMSWMQ0018: Failed to connect to queue manager 'QMBATCHESB' with connection mode 'Client' and host name 'hostname.com'. Check the queue manager is started and if running in client mode, check there is a listener running. Please see the linked exception for more information.; nested exception is com.ibm.mq.MQException: JMSCMQ0001: WebSphere MQ call failed with compcode '2' ('MQCC_FAILED') reason '2059' ('MQRC_Q_MGR_NOT_AVAILABLE').
at org.springframework.jms.support.JmsUtils.convertJmsAccessException(JmsUtils.java:279)
at org.springframework.jms.support.JmsAccessor.convertJmsAccessException(JmsAccessor.java:168)
at org.springframework.jms.core.JmsTemplate.execute(JmsTemplate.java:469)
at org.apache.camel.component.jms.JmsConfiguration$CamelJmsTemplate.send(JmsConfiguration.java:228)
at org.apache.camel.component.jms.JmsProducer.doSend(JmsProducer.java:431)
at org.apache.camel.component.jms.JmsProducer.processInOnly(JmsProducer.java:385)
at org.apache.camel.component.jms.JmsProducer.process(JmsProducer.java:153)
at org.apache.camel.processor.SendProcessor.process(SendProcessor.java:120)
at org.apache.camel.management.InstrumentationProcessor.process(InstrumentationProcessor.java:72)
at org.apache.camel.processor.interceptor.TraceInterceptor.process(TraceInterceptor.java:163)
at org.apache.camel.processor.RedeliveryErrorHandler.process(RedeliveryErrorHandler.java:416)
at org.apache.camel.processor.CamelInternalProcessor.process(CamelInternalProcessor.java:191)
at org.apache.camel.processor.Pipeline.process(Pipeline.java:118)
at org.apache.camel.processor.Pipeline.process(Pipeline.java:80)
at org.apache.camel.processor.CamelInternalProcessor.process(CamelInternalProcessor.java:191)
at org.apache.camel.component.direct.DirectProducer.process(DirectProducer.java:51)
at org.apache.camel.processor.SendProcessor.process(SendProcessor.java:120)
at org.apache.camel.management.InstrumentationProcessor.process(InstrumentationProcessor.java:72)
at org.apache.camel.processor.interceptor.TraceInterceptor.process(TraceInterceptor.java:163)
at org.apache.camel.processor.CamelInternalProcessor.process(CamelInternalProcessor.java:191)
at org.apache.camel.processor.RedeliveryErrorHandler.process(RedeliveryErrorHandler.java:416)
at org.apache.camel.processor.CamelInternalProcessor.process(CamelInternalProcessor.java:191)
at org.apache.camel.util.AsyncProcessorHelper.process(AsyncProcessorHelper.java:105)
at org.apache.camel.processor.MulticastProcessor.doProcessParallel(MulticastProcessor.java:732)
at org.apache.camel.processor.MulticastProcessor.access$200(MulticastProcessor.java:82)
at org.apache.camel.processor.MulticastProcessor$1.call(MulticastProcessor.java:303)
at org.apache.camel.processor.MulticastProcessor$1.call(MulticastProcessor.java:288)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
Caused by: com.ibm.msg.client.jms.DetailedIllegalStateException: JMSWMQ0018: Failed to connect to queue manager 'QMBATCHESB' with connection mode 'Client' and host name 'hostname.com'. Check the queue manager is started and if running in client mode, check there is a listener running. Please see the linked exception for more information.
at com.ibm.msg.client.wmq.common.internal.Reason.reasonToException(Reason.java:496)
at com.ibm.msg.client.wmq.common.internal.Reason.createException(Reason.java:236)
at com.ibm.msg.client.wmq.internal.WMQConnection.<init>(WMQConnection.java:430)
at com.ibm.msg.client.wmq.internal.WMQXAConnection.<init>(WMQXAConnection.java:70)
at com.ibm.msg.client.wmq.factories.WMQXAConnectionFactory.createV7ProviderConnection(WMQXAConnectionFactory.java:190)
at com.ibm.msg.client.wmq.factories.WMQConnectionFactory.createProviderConnection(WMQConnectionFactory.java:6210)
at com.ibm.msg.client.jms.admin.JmsConnectionFactoryImpl.createConnection(JmsConnectionFactoryImpl.java:278)
at com.ibm.mq.jms.MQConnectionFactory.createCommonConnection(MQConnectionFactory.java:6155)
at com.ibm.mq.jms.MQQueueConnectionFactory.createQueueConnection(MQQueueConnectionFactory.java:144)
at com.ibm.mq.jms.MQQueueConnectionFactory.createConnection(MQQueueConnectionFactory.java:223)
at org.springframework.jms.connection.UserCredentialsConnectionFactoryAdapter.doCreateConnection(UserCredentialsConnectionFactoryAdapter.java:175)
at org.springframework.jms.connection.UserCredentialsConnectionFactoryAdapter.createConnection(UserCredentialsConnectionFactoryAdapter.java:150)
at org.springframework.jms.support.JmsAccessor.createConnection(JmsAccessor.java:184)
at org.springframework.jms.core.JmsTemplate.execute(JmsTemplate.java:456)
... 29 more
Caused by: com.ibm.mq.MQException: JMSCMQ0001: WebSphere MQ call failed with compcode '2' ('MQCC_FAILED') reason '2059' ('MQRC_Q_MGR_NOT_AVAILABLE').
at com.ibm.msg.client.wmq.common.internal.Reason.createException(Reason.java:223)
... 41 more
Caused by: com.ibm.mq.jmqi.JmqiException: CC=2;RC=2059;AMQ9204: Connection to host 'hostname.com(1514)' rejected. [1=com.ibm.mq.jmqi.JmqiException[CC=2;RC=2059;AMQ9213: A communications error for occurred. [1=java.net.ConnectException[Connection refused: connect],3=hostname.com]],3=hostname.com(1514),5=RemoteTCPConnection.connnectUsingLocalAddress]
at com.ibm.mq.jmqi.remote.internal.RemoteFAP.jmqiConnect(RemoteFAP.java:1831)
at com.ibm.msg.client.wmq.internal.WMQConnection.<init>(WMQConnection.java:345)
... 40 more
Caused by: com.ibm.mq.jmqi.JmqiException: CC=2;RC=2059;AMQ9213: A communications error for occurred. [1=java.net.ConnectException[Connection refused: connect],3=hostname.com]
at com.ibm.mq.jmqi.remote.internal.RemoteTCPConnection.connnectUsingLocalAddress(RemoteTCPConnection.java:612)
at com.ibm.mq.jmqi.remote.internal.RemoteTCPConnection.protocolConnect(RemoteTCPConnection.java:940)
at com.ibm.mq.jmqi.remote.internal.system.RemoteConnection.connect(RemoteConnection.java:1097)
at com.ibm.mq.jmqi.remote.internal.system.RemoteConnectionPool.getConnection(RemoteConnectionPool.java:348)
at com.ibm.mq.jmqi.remote.internal.RemoteFAP.jmqiConnect(RemoteFAP.java:1503)
... 41 more
Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect
at java.net.DualStackPlainSocketImpl.connect0(Native Method)
at java.net.DualStackPlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(DualStackPlainSocketImpl.java:69)
at java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.doConnect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:339)
at java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:200)
at java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:182)
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(PlainSocketImpl.java:157)
at java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(SocksSocketImpl.java:391)
at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:579)
at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:528)
at com.ibm.mq.jmqi.remote.internal.RemoteTCPConnection$2.run(RemoteTCPConnection.java:597)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at com.ibm.mq.jmqi.remote.internal.RemoteTCPConnection.connnectUsingLocalAddress(RemoteTCPConnection.java:588)
... 45 more
The reason code 2059 and various errors stating that the connection was refused suggest either a mechanical issue (i.e. Listener not running) or an auths issue.
If I were attempting to debug this, the first thing I'd do is to enable authorization events, channel events, and any others you would normally enable. If you use MQ Explorer, also install the MS0P Plugin which will allow you to view the event messages in human-readable text.
Next, I would use the MQ sample programs to test. Since I always install the full client rather than grabbing the jar files, I have amqsputc available. However, the Java classes have IVT (initial verification test) programs. These ensure that the listener is running, the channel is configured and available, etc. As of v7.1 this also ensures that the CHLAUTH rules are set to allow the access. As of v8.0, or if you had the Capitalware exit installed, this also lets us test the user ID and password authentication.
The queue manager's error log and the event messages should provide good diagnostics, assuming the connection request makes it to MQ. Be sure to look both in the QMgr-specific error logs and the installation-global error logs.
Once I had confirmed that basic connectivity is in place, I'd reconcile my client-side configuration parameters for host, port, channel and if it is specified [shudder!] the QMgr name. Assuming these are correct and having proven basic connectivity works, it is now possible to test the app with some confidence.
The same method applies. First make sure the app's connection request makes it to the QMgr. If it does and is refused, the event messages and error logs will note this and why. If there is no indication of a failure in these places, the app isn't getting to the QMgr. The 2059 can indicate that the socket was refused, that the listener is up but the QMgr is not, that the channel instances have maxed out, or that after provisionally starting the channel it was closed by the QMgr, often due to a CHLAUTH rule. In any case, the event messages and error logs will have a detailed explanation as to why.
So I had done this a bit wrong, it was not enough to use the MQXAConnectionFactory but I had to create the JmsComponent as transacted.
Have tried to stop the queue manager while running the application and stop the application while handling a message and it seems to do the rollback as expected.
Ended up with
public static JmsComponent mqXAComponentTransacted(String hostname, int port, String username, String password,
String queueManager, String channel) throws JMSException {
MQXAQueueConnectionFactory connectionFactory = new MQXAQueueConnectionFactory();
connectionFactory.setTransportType(JMSC.MQJMS_TP_CLIENT_MQ_TCPIP);
connectionFactory.setFailIfQuiesce(1);
connectionFactory.setHostName(hostname);
connectionFactory.setPort(port);
connectionFactory.setQueueManager(queueManager);
connectionFactory.setChannel(channel);
UserCredentialsConnectionFactoryAdapter connectionFactoryAdapter=new UserCredentialsConnectionFactoryAdapter();
connectionFactoryAdapter.setTargetConnectionFactory(connectionFactory);
connectionFactoryAdapter.setUsername(username);
connectionFactoryAdapter.setPassword(password);
return JmsComponent.jmsComponentTransacted(connectionFactoryAdapter);
}
Also using the UserCredentialsConnectionFactoryAdapter, I didn't want to use Spring components but since the Jms package is already dependent of it, it was easier to use it than my previous solution to handle credentials.