How to change TDengine database default parameter - tdengine

After searching TDengine online documentation: https://www.taosdata.com/en/documentation/, I found the the command to change the default database parameter "keep", which indicates how long data will be preserved in databases. However after I have typed in that command from shell, "show variables" command still shows the old value. How would I know if changing this parameter is taking effect?
taos> alter database test keep 50;
Query OK, 0 of 0 row(s) in database (0.019087s)
taos> show variables;
name | value |
============================================================
version | 2.1.5.0 |
buildinfo | Built at 2021-08-05 23:49:17 |
walLevel | 1 |
comp | 2 |
precision | 0 |
maxRows | 4096 |
minRows | 100 |
keep | 3650 |

the alter command is effective at the DataBase level, and show varibles is show the global parameters.
you can use show databases; to check the database's parameter.
if you want change the show variables;'s show, you should modify the config file /etc/taos.cfg
and there are only serval parameters can modify by alter command.

Related

What controls the maximum value for DATA_RETENTION_TIME_IN_DAYS

I am trying the set DATA_RETENTION_TIME_IN_DAYS for a table to a specific value (5) but it fails due invalid value error. Setting it to value 1 works. Setting it to 5 on another database works on another database on the same account.
Are there any other parameters affecting the maximum value other than the Snowflake Edition type, which shouldn't matter since we are using the Enterprise Edition?
ALTER TABLE MY_TABLE SET DATA_RETENTION_TIME_IN_DAYS = 5;
SQL State : 22023
Error Code : 1008
Message : SQL compilation error:
invalid value [5] for parameter 'DATA_RETENTION_TIME_IN_DAYS'
Location : some-file.sql
Line : 4
Statement : ALTER TABLE MY_TABLE SET DATA_RETENTION_TIME_IN_DAYS = 5
According to docs the max value for Snowflake Enterprise Edition which we are using is 90.
Are there any other parameters affecting the maximum value?
The Time-Travel capability depends on type of the table. The value range 0-90 for Enterprise Edition is for pernament tables.
Comparison of Table Types:
+-------------------------------------------+-----+-------------------------------------+
| Type | ... | Time Travel Retention Period (Days) |
+-------------------------------------------+-----+-------------------------------------+
| Temporary | | 0 or 1 (default is 1) |
| Transient | | 0 or 1 (default is 1) |
| Permanent (Standard Edition) | | 0 or 1 (default is 1) |
| Permanent (Enterprise Edition and higher) | | 0 to 90 (default is configurable) |
+-------------------------------------------+-----+-------------------------------------+
TRANSIENT databases have maximum value of 1 for DATA_RETENTION_TIME_IN_DAYS also in Enterprise Edition. My database that was causing this is TRANSIENT.
https://docs.snowflake.com/en/sql-reference/sql/create-database.html

403 error running data unload with snowsql GET

I'm having issues testing a data unload flow from Snowflake using the GET command to store the files on my local machine.
Following the documentation here, it should be as simple as creating a stage, copying the data I want to that stage, and then running a snowsql command locally to retrieve the files.
I'm on Windows 10, running the following snowsql command to try and unload the data, against a database populated with the test TCP-H data that snowflake provides:
snowsql -a <account id> -u <username> -q "
USE DATABASE TESTDB;
CREATE OR REPLACE STAGE TESTSNOWFLAKESTAGE;
copy into #TESTSNOWFLAKESTAGE/supplier from SUPPLIER;
GET #TESTSNOWFLAKESTAGE file://C:/Users/<local user>/Downloads/unload;"
All commands run successfully, except for the final GET:
SnowSQL * v1.2.14
Type SQL statements or !help
+----------------------------------+
| status |
|----------------------------------|
| Statement executed successfully. |
+----------------------------------+
1 Row(s) produced. Time Elapsed: 0.121s
+-------------------------------------------------+
| status |
|-------------------------------------------------|
| Stage area TESTSNOWFLAKESTAGE successfully created. |
+-------------------------------------------------+
1 Row(s) produced. Time Elapsed: 0.293s
+---------------+-------------+--------------+
| rows_unloaded | input_bytes | output_bytes |
|---------------+-------------+--------------|
| 100000 | 14137839 | 5636225 |
+---------------+-------------+--------------+
1 Row(s) produced. Time Elapsed: 7.548s
+-----------------------+------+--------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| file | size | status | message |
|-----------------------+------+--------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| supplier_0_0_0.csv.gz | -1 | ERROR | An error occurred (403) when calling the HeadObject operation: Forbidden, file=supplier_0_0_0.csv.gz |
+-----------------------+------+--------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
1 Row(s) produced. Time Elapsed: 1.434s
This 403 looks like it's coming from the S3 instance backing my Snowflake account, but that's part of the abstracted service layer provided by Snowflake, so I'm not sure where I would have to go to flip auth switches.
Any guidance is much appreciated.
You need to use Windows-based slashes in your local file path. So, assuming that to #NickW's point, you are filling your local user correctly, the format should be like the following:
file://C:\Users\<local user>\Downloads
There are some examples in the documentation for this here:
https://docs.snowflake.com/en/sql-reference/sql/get.html#required-parameters

MemSQL database not available for reads while leaf node is in replicating mode

I have a CentOS server running a local memsql cluster (aggregator and leaf on the same machine). I have a databse named offers. For some reason, I cannot execute any queries against tables in my database.
Everything was working fine until I tried to add another machine to the cluster. I had the IT team at my place replicate the server I was working on (completely). I went over to the replicated server, deleted the database in question and then registered the server using the memsql-toolbox-config register-node command. Then the database showed it was under the transition state. I restarted memsql using memsql-ops and got to this situation.
Running a simple query yields:
memsql> select * from table;
ERROR 2261 (HY000): Query `select * from table` couldn't be executed because of an in progress failover operation. Check the status of the leaf nodes in the cluster (error 1049:'Leaf Error (172.26.32.20:3307): Unknown database 'offers_5'')
The output for the the cluster status command is:
memsql> show cluster status;
+---------+--------------+------+----------+-------------+-------------+----------+--------------+-------------+-------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+---------------+-------------------------------------------------+
| Node ID | Host | Port | Database | Role | State | Position | Master Host | Master Port | Metadata Master Node ID | Metadata Master Host | Metadata Master Port | Metadata Role | Details |
+---------+--------------+------+----------+-------------+-------------+----------+--------------+-------------+-------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+---------------+-------------------------------------------------+
| 1 | 172.26.32.20 | 3306 | cluster | master | online | 0:181 | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | Reference | |
| 1 | 172.26.32.20 | 3306 | offers | master | online | 0:156505 | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | Reference | |
| 2 | 172.26.32.20 | 3307 | cluster | async slave | replicating | 0:180 | 172.26.32.20 | 3306 | 1 | 172.26.32.20 | 3306 | Reference | stage: packet wait, state: x_streaming, err: no |
| 2 | 172.26.32.20 | 3307 | offers | sync slave | replicating | 0:156505 | 172.26.32.20 | 3306 | 1 | 172.26.32.20 | 3306 | Reference | |
+---------+--------------+------+----------+-------------+-------------+----------+--------------+-------------+-------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+---------------+-------------------------------------------------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
So it seems that the the second node is replicating. Also note the details column saying:
stage: packet wait, state: x_streaming, err: no
Running the replication status command gives:
memsql> show replication status;
+--------+----------+------------+--------------+------------------+--------------------+------------------+----------------+----------------+-----------+---------------------------+-------------+-----------------+-------------------+-----------------+---------------+---------------+
| Role | Database | Master_URI | Master_State | Master_CommitLSN | Master_HardenedLSN | Master_ReplayLSN | Master_TailLSN | Master_Commits | Connected | Slave_URI | Slave_State | Slave_CommitLSN | Slave_HardenedLSN | Slave_ReplayLSN | Slave_TailLSN | Slave_Commits |
+--------+----------+------------+--------------+------------------+--------------------+------------------+----------------+----------------+-----------+---------------------------+-------------+-----------------+-------------------+-----------------+---------------+---------------+
| master | cluster | NULL | online | 0:181 | 0:181 | 0:177 | 0:181 | 86 | yes | 172.26.32.20:3307/cluster | replicating | 0:180 | 0:181 | 0:180 | 0:181 | 84 |
| master | offers | NULL | online | 0:156505 | 0:156505 | 0:156505 | 0:156505 | 183 | yes | 172.26.32.20:3307/offers | replicating | 0:156505 | 0:156505 | 0:156505 | 0:156505 | 183 |
+--------+----------+------------+--------------+------------------+--------------------+------------------+----------------+----------------+-----------+---------------------------+-------------+-----------------+-------------------+-----------------+---------------+---------------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
I never initiated any fail over or replication. Anyone knows why this is happening? How could I solve this?
EDIT:
Using memsql-ops I get:
[me#memsql ~]$ memsql-ops memsql-list
ID Agent Id Process State Cluster State Role Host Port Version
33829AF Af13af7 RUNNING CONNECTED MASTER 172.26.32.20 3306 6.5.18
BBA1B61 Af13af7 RUNNING CONNECTED LEAF 172.26.32.20 3307 6.5.18
But with memsql-admin, with the new memsql tools:
[me#memsql ~]$ memsql-admin list-nodes
✘ Failed to list nodes on all hosts: failed to list nodes on 1 host:
172.26.32.20
No nodes found
Making my question a bit clearer - How can I get my server to respond to queries again? And after I do, How should I act to add another host? Should I clean the replicated server completely of any memsql data?
2nd EDIT:
I managed to solve this problem by delete my database and cluster data, and setting up a new one using the new MemSQL tools, throwing away MemsqlOps. Read my answer.
It looks like there are a couple things that might be causing problems. Generally speaking, cloning a memsql server is not something that is supported nor the best way to go about adding nodes. It also looks like you may be using both the older Ops management tool and the newer MemSQL tools. I would recommend not installing or using Ops and sticking to just the new MemSQL tools instead.
A good place to start would be to try recreating the nodes after cloning; a cloned memsql node won't correctly become part of the cluster. You should also verify that you don't have more than one master aggregator in the cluster. If you can start with that and see if it resolves your issues I'm happy to help with any other problems that you run into.
I managed to set up a working cluster.
As micahbhakti mentioned in his answer, I tried using only the newer MemSQL tools, instead of the deprecated MemSQL Ops. It required deleting the MemSQL agent existing on both servers and then following the tutorial in the MemSQL documentation. Here are the steps I took for anyone struggling with this issue which is better described as: My MemSQL-Ops-managed-MemSQL-cluster is not responding. How can I upgrade it to a working MemSQL-tools-managed-cluster?
1. Save what data you can
The following step is to delete all memsql data, so it would be best if you could save your data. The table data could be stored in CSV files easily with a simple
SELECT * FROM important_data_containing_table INTO OUTFILE '/home/yourfolder/yourcsvfile.csv';
Do this for all tables containing important data. You could also save the scheme itself. You can do that by viewing and copying to another file all the create queries you used to create the table originally, to re-execute them later. Use this
SHOW CREATE TABLE your_table_name
The documentation for mysql is described here. It might not be similar to the syntax used in mem, but the above base command works. For exact information, read about MySQL Features Unsupported in MemSQL.
2. Delete anything to do with Memsql-Ops
As it is said here about the uninstall command:
Stops the local MemSQL Ops agent and deletes all its data.
If MemSQL nodes are already installed in the local host, this command will prompt users to delete those nodes first before proceeding with the uninstall.
And indeed, if there is a node runnning (in my case there were), you will be prompted to run another command to delete those nodes: memsql-ops memsql-delete --all. This WILL delete all data in your database as said in it's documentation:
Deletes all data for a MemSQL node. This operation is not reversible and may lead to data loss. Users who want to perform this operation are prompted to explicitly type ‘DELETE’ to be sure of their decision.
That's why I asked you to save what ever you need :)
This should be done for each host you want to include in your new shiny cluster.
3. Follow the instructions to create the new cluster using MemSQL tools
After you cleaned your servers from the deprecated MemSQL ops agent and data, you can follow the instructions here. I chose to set up a multiple host comprehensive set up. The process will ask you to register your hosts, and then set up the nodes roles (master aggregator, aggreators and leafs), ip addresses, passwords, ports and etc.
After that, you can try to test the cluster, making changes in one machine and view them in another. Also the output for memsql-admin list-nodes on the deploying machine for my cluster was:
+------------+------------+--------------+------+---------------+--------------+---------+----------------+--------------------+
| MemSQL ID | Role | Host | Port | Process State | Connectable? | Version | Recovery State | Availability Group |
+------------+------------+--------------+------+---------------+--------------+---------+----------------+--------------------+
| AAAAAAAAAA | Master | 172.26.32.20 | 3306 | Running | True | 6.7.16 | Online | |
| BBBBBBBBBB | Aggregator | 172.26.32.22 | 3306 | Running | True | 6.7.16 | Online | |
| CCCCCCCCCC | Leaf | 172.26.32.20 | 3307 | Running | True | 6.7.16 | Online | 1 |
| DDDDDDDDDD | Leaf | 172.26.32.22 | 3307 | Running | True | 6.7.16 | Online | 1 |
+------------+------------+--------------+------+---------------+--------------+---------+----------------+--------------------+
4. Restore the data
Re-execute all the create table queries you saved in step 1, and import all data exported to a csv using this syntax:
LOAD DATA INFILE '/home/yourfolder/yourcsvfile.csv' INTO TABLE your_table;
And that's it! Now you can manage your cluster using the new MemSQL studio that run on the default http://your_deployment_machine:8080.
Enjoy :)

Update Access database (multiple rows)

I am totally newbie to Access, I used to use Excel to handle my needs for a while.
But by now Excel has become too slow to handle such a big set of data, so I decided to migrate to Access.
Here is my problem
My columns are:
Number | Link | Name | Status
1899 | htto://example.com/code1 | code1 | Done
2 | htto://example.com/code23455 | code23455 | Done
3 | htto://example.com/code2343 | code2343 | Done
13500 | htto://example.com/code234cv | code234cv | Deleted
220 | htto://example.com/code234cv | code234cv | Null
400 | htto://example.com/code234cv | code234cv | Null
So I want a way to update Status of my rows according to numbers list.
For example I want to update Status column for multiple numbers to become Done
Simply I want to update "Null status" to become "Done" according to this number list
13544
17
13546
12
13548
13549
16000
13551
13552
13553
13554
13555
12500
13557
13558
13559
13560
30
13562
13563
Something like this
I tried "update query" but I don't know how to use criteria to solve this problem
In Excel I did that by "conditional formatting duplicates" -with my number list which I wanted to update-
Then "sort by highlighted color" then "fill copy" the status with the value
I know that Access is different but I hope that there is a way to do this task as Excel did.
Thanks in advance
From my understanding, You can try
Update TblA
Set TblA.Status="Done"
where Number in (13544,17,13546,....)
Or alternatively easy method is to pull these numbers in IN clause into its own table and use it like this
Update TblA
Set TblA.Status="Done" where Number in (select NumCol from NumTable )
or this solution may help you Here

How to change default language for SQL Server?

Now when I query
SELECT ##language
it gets 'us_english'. But I need russian.
I can't use SET LANGUAGE russian for every query.
I need to set it by default (for all new sessions).
Using SQL Server Management Studio
To configure the default language option
In Object Explorer, right-click a server and select Properties.
Click the Misc server settings node.
In the Default language for users box, choose the language in which Microsoft SQL Server should display system messages.
The default language is English.
Using Transact-SQL
To configure the default language option
Connect to the Database Engine.
From the Standard bar, click New Query.
Copy and paste the following example into the query window and click Execute.
This example shows how to use sp_configure to configure the default language option to French
USE AdventureWorks2012 ;
GO
EXEC sp_configure 'default language', 2 ;
GO
RECONFIGURE ;
GO
Configure the default language Server Configuration Option
The 33 languages of SQL Server
| LANGID | ALIAS |
|--------|---------------------|
| 0 | English |
| 1 | German |
| 2 | French |
| 3 | Japanese |
| 4 | Danish |
| 5 | Spanish |
| 6 | Italian |
| 7 | Dutch |
| 8 | Norwegian |
| 9 | Portuguese |
| 10 | Finnish |
| 11 | Swedish |
| 12 | Czech |
| 13 | Hungarian |
| 14 | Polish |
| 15 | Romanian |
| 16 | Croatian |
| 17 | Slovak |
| 18 | Slovenian |
| 19 | Greek |
| 20 | Bulgarian |
| 21 | Russian |
| 22 | Turkish |
| 23 | British English |
| 24 | Estonian |
| 25 | Latvian |
| 26 | Lithuanian |
| 27 | Brazilian |
| 28 | Traditional Chinese |
| 29 | Korean |
| 30 | Simplified Chinese |
| 31 | Arabic |
| 32 | Thai |
| 33 | Bokmål |
John Woo's accepted answer has some caveats which you should be aware of:
Default language setting of a T-SQL session in SQL Server Management Studio(SSMS) is inherited/overriden from/by Default language setting of the user login used to initiate the session instead. A new tab in SSMS creates a new T-SQL session. SQL Server instance level setting does not control the Default language setting of T-SQL session directly.
Changing Default language setting at SQL Server instance level has no effect on the Default language setting of the already existing SQL Server logins. It is meant to be inherited only by the new user logins that we create after changing the instance level setting. So don't be surprised if you changed the Default language setting at SQL Server instance level but it didn't take effect for your user account. It is as per design.
So, there is an intermediate configuration level between SQL Server instance level and the T-SQL session level. It is called user login level. You can use this intermediate level configuration to control the Default language setting for T-SQL session without disrupting the SQL Server instance level settings.
SQL Server Instance level setting
|
V
User login level setting
|
V
T-SQL Query Session level setting
This intermediate level setting is very helpful in case you want to set Default language setting to some value for all new T-SQL sessions(tabs in SSMS) belonging to some specific user.
We can change the Default language setting of the target user login as per this link. You can also achieve it from SSMS console e.g. we can change the Default language setting from the properties window of sa user in SQL Server via SSMS (Refer screenshot):
Note: Also, please remember that changing the setting at user login level will not have any effect on the Default language setting of already active T-SQL sessions (tabs in SSMS) created with that user login. It will affect only the new sessions which will be created after changing the setting.
Please try below:
DECLARE #Today DATETIME;
SET #Today = '12/5/2007';
SET LANGUAGE Italian;
SELECT DATENAME(month, #Today) AS 'Month Name';
SET LANGUAGE us_english;
SELECT DATENAME(month, #Today) AS 'Month Name' ;
GO
Reference:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/statements/set-language-transact-sql
If you want to change MSSQL server language, you can use the following QUERY:
EXEC sp_configure 'default language', 'British English';

Resources