I am looking to get the list of users who have access to modify the configuration of PostgreSQL database. This is in order to make sure that only restricted user are authorized to modify Database configuration.
Related
I have created 2 azure security groups (Read-SQL and the second is Write-SQL) in order for them to login into multiple Azure SQL servers via SSMS using their Azure AD identity based on their group membership in order to access multiple databases on those services.
First of all I have configured an admin group on the SQL Server in our Azure tenant.
I have connected to the SQL via SSMS using my credentials and so far so good.
After that I opened a query and typed in master database
CREATE USER [SQL-READ] FROM external provider
ALTER ROLE db_datareader ADD MEMBER [SQL-READ];
(Did the same thing for Write-SQL)
only the user is created and no permission given with an error saying the user does not exist or I don't have permission.
I have Azure global administrator permission in Azure and I don't know why I get this error.
In the bottom line I would like that Read-SQL and Write-SQL will be able to login in to the SQL Server and have access to all databases within it as well as giving Read-SQL reading permissions and to Write-SQL writing permission.
I read a few Microsoft articles but I got even more confused since I don't know if I need to create a login or create a user or a contained user.
Please help
Thank you
Here are few screenshots for better understanding
enter image description here
enter image description here
Read the following articles but only partial success.
https://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/6751/azure-ad-authentication-azure-sql-databases/
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-sql/database/authentication-aad-configure?view=azuresql&tabs=azure-powershell#create-contained-users-mapped-to-azure-ad-identities
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-sql/database/authentication-aad-overview?view=azuresql
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/security/contained-database-users-making-your-database-portable?view=sql-server-ver16
Whether you should create a login, user or contained user will depend on your access and security requirements. However, in Azure SQL Database, users are created per database. So, you can create the login in the master database and then you need to create the associated user in each database on that SQL Server.
This documentation gives more information on creating logins, users and contained users for Azure SQL Database.
I have a SQL Server 2017 database instance that was created before I was given administration of the database and I have a Login at DB server level named "atSupervisor" which is a user in database "StaffMonitoring". I wish to clone the login and user "atSupervisor" as login and user "bcSupervisor" in database "StaffMonitoring" to have all permissions, table access, grants etc.
I have tried a few suggestions on google such as this example - https://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/3589/how-to-clone-a-sql-server-login-part-1-of-3/
This seems to creates the login and user and I can then assign the database "StaffMonitoring" in User Mapping in the login's properties and login with the user. However, none of the tables are present.
Is there a way to do this please that clones everything to include grant access to tables that mirrors the original login\user?
I have been searching for articles and SQL script examples that would demonstrate how to securely and conveniently solve one of the most common scenarios - connecting from a .Net Core Entity Framework based web application to an SQL database.
But somehow I could not find any coherent step-by-step guide from a reputable source.
Let's assume the following:
I cannot use integrated Windows auth in the connection string and must use username and password based auth (because hosting on a Linux server and the DB is on a different Windows server)
the web service will need your usual minimum set of permissions - connect to the database, read data, write data, delete data, execute stored procedures
While reading many tutorials, I find there are multiple ways to manage the connection permissions. To avoid this question being too broad, I'll list my current choices as I understand them (please correct me if I'm missing something).
Users and logins:
create a login and a user for the database
create a database-only user without a login (not sure if this is applicable to a web app and connection string, but still it's a feature that I've seen being used)
Assigning permissions:
assign the user to some fixed SQL role (db_datareader, db_datawriter AND also will have to grant EXECUTE permission)
grant all fixed permissions
create a custom role (let's say, db_web_apps) with required permissions
Which choices are better (more secure and easier to manage in general) and recommended by SQL DBAs?
I think every database administrator should have a template script handy for quickly adding a new user with minimum required permissions every time when developers ask for a new connection for their shiny new web app.
If you know a good, reliable tutorial or GitHub / Gist example that explains what and why is being done that way or a script that you yourself have used for years without any issues in production environments, I'll really appreciate if you could share it.
Create a role in the database and assign the required privileges to the role. Don't use the fixed database roles. Instead grant permissions directly to objects, schemas, or the entire database if necessary. Like this:
create role trusted_app_role
grant select, insert, update, delete, execute
on schema::dbo to trusted_app_role
That will grant the role full DML permissions on all the objects in the default dbo schema. So if you have any tables or procedures you don't want the app to have access to, just create them in a different schema, say, admin. This way you never have to fiddle with permissions as you add objects. The fixed database roles predate schema-based permissions, and aren't really needed any more.
For your application's identity, add Active Directory or Azure Active Directory (Azure SQL) identities to this role, or, if you can't, add SQL Users to the role.
If you are on Azure SQL, you should normally use a database user without a login. On SQL Server you can only add "contained database users" if you enable Partial Database Containment. Which you can do, but is incompatible with Change Tracking and Change Data Capture, so it's a tradeoff.
So normally for SQL Server you still create a login and map the user to the login. EG:
create login web_service_user with password = '5X+jeuAB6kmhw85R/AxAg'
create user web_service_user for login web_service_user
And then add that user to your role
alter role trusted_app_role add member web_service_user
Problem
We have a server with multiple databases and we would like a way of allowing a single group of users the ability to access or execute a restricted set of objects in each database on a single server.
Context
This used to be managed via AD groups however we are trying to move away from AD groups to using a mix of server and DB roles. However, I don't want to have to add or remove a user from a db_role in each database or have to try to keep them all in sync. Is there a way to tie database permissions to a server role so I only need to maintain the users in the server role?
I created a new SQL server with a database in Azure and after logging in with the admin account I added a new user that I wanted to only have access to one database.
In SSMS I right clicked on mynewdatabase database and selected New Query.
I executed
CREATE USER mynewuser WITH PASSWORD ='good password here';
ALTER ROLE db_owner ADD MEMBER mynewuser ;
Now after logging in as mynewuser I can still see the master database.
The question is how do I restrict mynewuser to only access mynewdatabase?
I'm sure this is something basic.
In SQL Server, including Azure SQL DB, all users can can see all system databases in sys.databases. This is not the same as being able to connect to them or run queries in them. This does not disclose any sensitive information as these are system databases and whether you saw them listed or not you would know they were there. See https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178534.aspx#Anchor_0.
Based on the steps you describe, you have created a contained user that should not be able to connect to the master database or run queries in Azure SQL DB.