Testing SQL queries with large datasets against Azure SQL server may be costly, so it is better for me to test my code against a local server. I would like to create a new local server with "SQL Server authentication" rather than "Windows authentication", and I would like to keep my default local server that uses Windows authentication.
In lack of better phrasing:... is it "common" to have multiple SQL servers with different authentication methods on the same Windows-10 pc ?
If it is "straight-forward" to do this, then please share "how-to", or share better jargon for web searches. I did not find much information on this when googling "create new local server with sql server authentication"
As you may easily catch from the text: I'm not an IT expert...
Yes, you can use at an instance and solely your will to provide the accesses.
where you can use Windows Authentication mode and mixed mode.
More information about Windows Authentication may be found at: Connecting Using Windows Authentication.
We may utilize SQL Server Authentication to solve your problem by passing the user name and password.
Related
When trying to connect to a SQL Server database, there is an option to connect via SQL Server authentication, but the only option I have with Analysis Services is connecting via Azure Active Directory or Windows Authentication (which I don't think I have).
However, every time I enter in my Microsoft user/password it just keeps prompting for it again and again, going in an infinite loop:
How do I actually connect to SSAS from SSMS?
Note:
Authentication type, Active Directory - Universal with MFA support, is recommended.
Follow the offical document(Manage Analysis Services), it works for me.
I wanted to read AWS Postgresql from within SQL Server, so
I created a system ODBC connection to Postgresql on the SQL Server machine, tested it, fine.
I then created a Linked Server to connect to postgresql.
In the Security tab (For a login not defined in the list above, connections will), I selected "Be made using the login's current security context".
When using this linked server while connected to SQL Server through windows authentication, it works fine.
If I connect to SQL Server using a SQL Server authenticated account, trying to access postgresql data through that same Linked Server fails authentication.
I fixed that by switching my security setting to "Be made using this security context" and giving the POSTGRESQL login/password (same that I gave at the ODBC level).
Question:
Without repeating the postgresql details at the Linked Server stage, why is it working with Window sauthentication account and not for SQL Server authenticated accounts?
Neither are relevant to Postgresql?...
I made it work but still confused...
I will have to guess a bit to help you, but I hope to give you enough context to understand what is happening so you can debug further.
When you connect to SQL Server using integrated authentication, the domain controller gives out a token to talk to SQL and this is used to authenticate your connection from your client to SQL Server's process. Underneath the covers, Windows can use either NTLM or Kerberos to do this handshake. You can read more about this here in this blog post:
NTLM vs. Kerberos Blog. This protocol choice matters when trying to use linked servers since it has to then authenticate to something else over the network.
At this point, it matters what credentials are used to run SQL Server (usually as a service in the services window to see). If you are running SQL as Local System or Network Service or something else defined by windows (instead of as a specific user on the network), it may or may not have permissions to talk out to your target remote server (whether it be postgres or something else). When you use Kerberos and enable delegation (which the domain admin needs to do), you can have the original integrated auth credentials "flow" over the linked server link to the next connection. NTLM does not do this. Therefore, the usual scenario is to create a map in the local SQL Server of what credentials to use when talking out to a remote linked server.
If you are talking to an ODBC driver, then you are likely using the msdasql (OLEDB to ODBC bridge) provider and then also having to go through its authentication stack. It has been too long for my memory as to whether it even supports integrated auth at all, much less delegation in Kerberos. However, you may be able to debug this problem further if you:
consider which account is running SQL
consider which mechanism is used to do integrated auth to sql and whether that would work with delegation
determine which credentials are used to make the outbound connection to your ODBC target. You should be able to debug much of this through the profiler mechanism as there is a distributed query/linked server set of events IIRC.
I can't speak to your postgres provider specifically, but this should give you some more tools to debug. Hope that helps you get one step further.
I am new to SQL Server, I am planning to build a distributed application in Java for SQL Server. I am curious to know that if there is a way to handle the following scenarios:
UserA logs in on MachineA and chooses Windows authentication as credentials in app. My application's 2nd component is on MachineB (components communicate using RESTful web services) and MachineB has SQL Server installed on it. MachineB has the code to connect to SQL Server.
I want to know what are the steps to make this happen, is it possible to use windows authentication here?
UserA logs in on MachineA and uses Windows authentication, code to connect is on MachineB and SQL Server is on MachineC. What are the required steps here to make this happen, connection string and if I need to make any domain etc.
Assuming all machines are on the same DOMAIN, yes it will work. You may need to configure Kerberos (SetSPN) to make sure the service is trusted. You should check Microsoft® Kerberos Configuration Manager for SQL Server® from Microsoft. If Java is used from a Web site, you will also need to configure a SPN for this service as well. When it's all configured, To connect using Java, your ConnectionString should look like this:
jdbc:sqlserver://localhost;databaseName=AdventureWorks;integratedSecurity=true;
Hope it help.
I have a website that is backed by a database. I requested a SQL Server login with read/write/execute privileges to be created in our Production environment, and our DBA indicated that a non-interactive service account would be preferred.
Are there any potential issues with using a service account in this manner over a SQL Server login?
According to Microsoft, it is a "best practice" to use a service account (i.e. Windows account) and use SQL logins only for legacy applications that are not able to use Windows accounts (see Microsoft Recommendation).
So, only if your website is based on a non Microsoft technology or not hosted by IIS an SQL login might be the better choice.
At my current employer's we've been using non interactive Windows accounts to connect from our ASP.NET applications to SQL server all the time without any problems. It also makes managing and deploying connection strings easier because you don't have to care about securing them.
If you have an ASP.NET application it's good to add the account under which the IIS app pool runs (or a domain group it's in) as a login on the SQL Server.
However an SQL login might also have the practical advantage to be easier to test with: E.g. you can connect to the server using this account with SQL Management Studio to check if the permissions are sufficient.
I've been developing a site using ASP.NET MVC, and have decided to use the new SQL Server 2008 FILESTREAM facility to store files 'within' the database rather than as separate entities. While initially working within VS2008 (using a trusted connection to the database), everything was fine and dandy. Issues arose, however, when I shifted the site to IIS7 and changed over to SQL authentication on the database.
It seems that streaming a FILESTREAM doesn't work with SQL authentication, only with Windows authentication. Given this, what is the best practice to follow?
Is there a way to force this sort of thing to work under SQL authentication?
Should I add NETWORK SERVICE as a database user and then use Trusted authentication?
Should I create another user, and run both the IIS site and the database connection under this?
Any other suggestions?
Take a look at this article. I don't know a whole lot about FileStreaming and security, but there are a couple of interesting options in the FileStreaming setup such as allowing remote connections and allow remote clients to access FileStreaming