What is the limit of Form recognizer to Compose multiple Custom Models under a single Model [closed] - azure-form-recognizer

Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
I am not able to find out the correct reference of how much custom models of Form Recognizer I can compose under a single model?. What is the limit for now.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/formrecognizer/2.1preview2/compose-custom-models-async/compose-custom-models-async
Many thanks.

With Model Compose, you can compose up to 100 models to a single model ID. When you call Analyze with the composed modelID, Form Recognizer will first classify the form you submitted, choose the best matching model, and then return results for that model.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cognitive-services/form-recognizer/label-tool?tabs=v2-1

Related

How to make user to user relation in laravel? [closed]

Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I have a model user. This user can be of type admin, owner, boss, supervisor.
Now boss can belong to many owners.
How I will make the relation with these users?
The model of both types of users is the same just the type is different.
This is multiauth project. I didn't make separate login. i am just differentiating them on the based of type.
Now problem is owner can has many type of user and other type of users can belongs to many owner. and there database table is same
You should implement self reference like this:
class User extends Eloquent {
public function boss()
{
return $this->belongsTo('User', 'parent_id');
}
public function owner()
{
return $this->hasMany('User', 'parent_id');
}
}
EDIT:
After your new edit you can do this by self reference many to many relationship.

How to save the selected value from picker component [closed]

Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I've using autocompleteTF & picker component to select items. When the user select the item somechanges occur.
But if the user exit the app and open it again the selected value were return to its default value. So how to make the app to remember the previous value when opened again?
See this on saving your application state: https://www.codenameone.com/manual/files-storage-networking.html
Since this is one or two values just store it in preferences dynamically. E.g. use:
String value = Prefrences.get("name", null);
value would be null if not set.
Similarly when you have a selection just put a value into preferences under the same name.

How do I get the title of an uploaded image which is to be entered as a value in the image ID column in typescript? [closed]

Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
Click to see the upload optionWhen I choose an image file, it gets chosen but I am unable to extract the title of the chosen image. I need to get this title and push it to a table as a part of a column. Is there any way to do the same? Click to see the table fragment
The code sample here.
I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for but you can extract the title through onChange like this.
<input
type="file"
onChange={x => {
console.log(x.target.files[0].name);
}}
/>
here's the sandbox example

How to return a set of urls with more accuracy that returns relevant result, using web scraping? [closed]

Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I want to extract a bunch of urls from a db (the db contains a large set of urls), when a user searches for a particular keyword, for example "seattle dentist". I understand that the basic approach is to look for the page title, meta description, keywords and body text.
How can I do this with more accuracy that returns relevant result?
For example, I have two websites in question:
seattledentist.com (which is a dentist website and has the title
"seattle dentist")
abcxyz.com/dentist-seattle (a wordpress blog
page that has the word "seattle dentist" in its title)
For me, the first website is relevant and I want to show this site to a user when he searches for "seattle dentist".
The second website is just a blog post that describes the dentistry profession in seattle and is not relevant for the user.
So my question is, what would be a better strategy(algorithm) for filtering out this type of non-relevant urls from a whole bunch of urls?

I don't have "Add" in my database methods [closed]

Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
As I want to add data to my database, I wanted to use "Add" method but there isn't.
Methods to add to database are only "AddObject" and "AddTo". Even if I choose "AddTo", it suggest to me to use "Add" methods which I don't have it.
This is also same for "remove" method
What is the reason that I don't have "Add" in my method collection?
To add my database to VB.NET I use Entity Model Code Generator which makes a file with the name of "Model1.edmx" in Solution Explorer
AddObject is what your looking for. That method allows you to add records to the tables, and they all follow this pattern.
Using db As New model 'or what ever you model is called
Dim obj As tableName = tableName.CreateTableName({params that are not null})
db.tableNames.AddObject(obj)
db.SaveChanges()
End Using

Resources