I do have a bunch of OWLDataRanges which look something like this when the toString-method is used:
DataRangeRestriction(xsd:string facetRestriction(pattern "[0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2}[T]{1}[0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}[Z]{1}"^^xsd:string))
What I want is the part in brackets after "facetRestriction". I guess I have to use some visitor pattern, but I don't really understand how they work.
Thanks in advance!
Related
How do I add a custom delimiter to iris templates? I'm using angularjs for the front end and it conflicts with what angularjs is doing. I found some reference here but when I tried, it doesn't work, looks like the author of iris just gave a simple snippet just to describe it.
I'm quite new to Go so even checking the source code of iris, I'm having trouble. Thanks.
Note: I know that I should be using static files for this, but this just really peaked my curiousity
I'm trying to create a content type that allows me to post multiple images from an external database in this sort of style: http://www.newageman.co.uk/14-time-travelling-celebrities
In an ideal world this is what I would like my group of fields to look like in the article creation screen.
http://oi57.tinypic.com/wi0z8i.jpg
Any idea how I would achieve this using best practices? To post articles like this I'm currently using a piece of php code but it's confusing for my contributors, so would like to use fields. I've never made a module or custom field before.
Thank you!
I have done something similar using the Field Group module, you may give it a try.
I'm new here, and although I've searched for something like this, I couldn't find an answer. So here is my question: How Fuseki handles owl:imports?
Details: I've defined a set of ontologies in different owl files. Let's call two of them of subDomainA.owl and subDomainB.owl.
To "join" these ontologies, I've defined a single owl file that imports the others. Let's call it completeDomain.owl, which owl:imports subDomainA.owl and subDomainB.owl. There are a few statements explicitly declared in completeDomain.owl. If it's not clear, It's something like sweetAll.owl in SWEET.
I need to import these owl files (with RDF/XML syntax) into TDB using Fuseki. How these imports will be handled? I mean, should I load the completeDomain.owl to the default graph and subDomainA.owl and subDomainB.owl to their respective graphs and Fuseki would "understand" imports and let me query all of them at once?
Using tdb:unionDefaultGraph is the same thing? What would happen with the statements declared in completeDomain.owl that uses entities declared in the subDomain ontologies? Also, I couldn't see the difference of tdb:unionDefaultGraph and Union Model.
As you can see, I'm a little bit confused and any help will be appreciated!
Following the tips from Joshua bellow(thanks for them, by the way), here is the answer:
To organize owl:imports into Fuseki, there are 3 options:
1) Import all ontologies files to the default graph.
2) Configure the store using tdb:unionDefaultGraph with true value, and import each file to its own named graph. This way, Fuseki will answer a query to the default graph with the union of all named graphs. Also, each graph can be acessed by its named graph and/or SPARQL GRAPH.
3) A Union Model combines in a single graph other graphs. Any app would not be able to query the graphs separatedely.
The original answer to this question is here!
I would like to create a table that looks/behaves like the one to manage fields when editing content types.
How is this one named? Is this form API?
If you're looking for the drag and drop sorting behavior, then you should look at the documentation for drupal_add_tabledrag.
And perhaps this tutorial might help: http://aswapathy.com/d78tu/tabledrag/theme_the_form_doc
I would implement it using Forms API together with a table.
If you are new to forms API, this step by step introduction is really good:
http://drupal.org/node/262422
I've found a public domain latin<->portuguese dictionary in PDF which I'd like to convert to plain text, parse and use as the database of a program. After some testing, however, I got a little skeptical. Take a look at the original file and at the resulting text of gocr. Is there any hope that I might reach 99%+ accuracy in some method? I thought of reCaptcha's database, but I guess it is Google's property, isn't it?
Thanks!
Another route is to use one of the freely available dictionary files, like http://www.brothersoft.com/downloads/dictionary-database.html
Or WordNet.
EDIT: I've just spotted that this is a Latin/Portuguese dictionary, so WordNet clearly is no good.