I've returned to try and make some datastudio custom javascript.
So I started off with a template type settings and basic js. Manifest is listing correctly - datastudio sees the custom item.
I took a long time for it to be authorised.
However, on adding the custome js, the console is reporting a load of erros.
first : data.0.type is not a valid config
second : data.0.elements.data.0.type is not a valid config.
Json:
{
"data": [
{
"id": "idtestviz",
"label": "Dimension Element Heading",
"type":"DIMENSION"
}
]
,
"style": [
{
"id": "idtestvizstyles",
"label": "Test Styles",
"elements":[
{
"id":"idtestvizfontcolor",
"label":"Font Colour",
"defaultValue":"#FFFF00"
}
]
}
]
}
It did have options in before, same error.
And appears to be the same as in https://developers.google.com/datastudio/visualization/define-config
Also it also is erroring on 'is already used in the config'
and that data.0.elements.style.0.elements.0.type required field that cannot be found
Seems like there are more checks that need to be done.
Is there a validator for json etc. before running, or has something updated on google side that their documentation hasn't been updated yet?
Or the more likely aspect, I'm missing some critical stuff...
Regards
Vince
Re checked my json config with a previous one that works, noted some errors in the objects. Corrected those and the json errors in the console have gone away.
JS errors remain - working on those... closing this question.
{
"data": [
{
"id":"test_viz_data",
"label":"Test Viz Data",
"elements":[
{
"id": "text_viz_dimensions",
"label": "Dimension Element Heading",
"type": "DIMENSION",
"options": {
"min": 1,
"max": 1
}
}
,
{
"id": "test_metrics",
"label": "Metric fields",
"type": "METRIC",
"options": {
"min": 1,
"max": 1
}
}
]
}
]
,
"style": [
{
"id": "idstyles",
"label": "Test Styles",
"elements":[
{
"id":"idfontcolor",
"label":"Font Colour",
"type":"FONT_COLOR",
"defaultValue":"#FFFF00"
}
]
}
]
,
"interactions": [
]
}
Related
I'm trying to write a json validator to check files before runtime but there's a really odd issue happening with using "type".
I know "type" is a reserved word but jsonSchema doesn't have an issue with it if it doesn't have a value pairing as I found in this other question: Key values of 'key' and 'type' in json schema.
The solution to their problem was encasing "type": { "type": "string"} inside "properties" and it does work. However, my implementation requires it to be inside an array. Here's the snippet of my code:
{
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": false,
"properties":{
"method":{
"type": "array",
"items":{
"type": {
"type": "string"
},
"name":{
"type": "string"
},
"provider": {
"type": "array"
}
}
}
}
}
Oddly enough, VScode doesn't have a problem with it in a file when it's isolated, but when it's included in the main code, it doeesn't like it and yields no solution. Regardless, validating it with python yields:
...
raise exceptions.SchemaError.create_from(error)
jsonschema.exceptions.SchemaError: {'type': 'string'} is not valid under any of the given schemas
Failed validating 'anyOf' in metaschema['allOf'][1]['properties']['properties']['additionalProperties']['$dynamicRef']['allOf'][1]['properties']['items']['$dynamicRef']['allOf'][3]['properties']['type']:
{'anyOf': [{'$ref': '#/$defs/simpleTypes'},
{'items': {'$ref': '#/$defs/simpleTypes'},
'minItems': 1,
'type': 'array',
'uniqueItems': True}]}
On schema['properties']['method']['items']['type']:
{'type': 'string'}
What further confuses me is that https://www.jsonschemavalidator.net/ tells me
Expected array or string for 'type', got StartObject. Path 'properties.method.items.type', line 8, position 17. yet JSON Schema Faker is able to generate a fake file without any problems. The generated fake json also returns the same error when validated with python and JSONSchemaValidator.
I'm a beginner and any help or insight will be greatly appreciated, thanks for your time.
Edit: here's the snippet of the input data as requested.
{
...
"method": [
{
"type": "action",
"name": "name of the chaos experiment to use here",
"provider": [
]
}
}
]
}
Arrays don't have properties; arrays have items. The schema as you have included it is not valid; are you sure you don't mean to have this?
{
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": false,
"properties":{
"method":{
"type": "array",
"items":{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"type": {
"type": "string"
},
"name":{
"type": "string"
},
"provider": {
"type": "array"
}
}
}
}
}
}
I'm building a simple Guess Who skill game for Alexa. I have two intents right now: GenderIntent and HairColorIntent.
GenderIntent has a custom slot to handle gender and related synonyms such as mapping "boy" and "man" to "Male". This is working great. It returns a resolution within the slot. Exactly what I need.
HairColorIntent has a predefined Amazon slot, AMAZON.Color. This is not working great as it never returns a resolution regardless of the color supplied.
Here is my model for GenderIntent and HairColorIntent:
{
"name": "GenderIntent",
"samples": [
"are you a {Gender}"
],
"slots": [
{
"name": "Gender",
"type": "GENDER_TYPES",
"samples": []
}
]
},
{
"name": "HairColorIntent",
"samples": [
"is your hair {HairColor}",
"do you have {HairColor} hair"
],
"slots": [
{
"name": "HairColor",
"type": "AMAZON.Color"
}
]
}
GenderIntent returns the following slot WITH resolutions:
{
"Gender": {
"name": "Gender",
"value": "male",
"resolutions": {
"resolutionsPerAuthority": [
{
"authority": "amzn1.er-authority.echo-sdk.amzn1.ask.skill.2ed972f4-1c5a-4cc1-8fd7-3f440f5b8968.GENDER_TYPES",
"status": {
"code": "ER_SUCCESS_MATCH"
},
"values": [
{
"value": {
"name": "Male",
"id": "63889cfb9d3cbe05d1bd2be5cc9953fd"
}
}
]
}
]
},
"confirmationStatus": "NONE",
"source": "USER"
}
}
HairColorIntent returns the following WITHOUT resolutions:
{
"HairColor": {
"name": "HairColor",
"value": "brown",
"confirmationStatus": "NONE",
"source": "USER"
}
}
I'd like HairColorIntent's HairColor slot to return the resolution. What am I doing wrong?
Resolution is only returned if you use synonyms in your slot type.
Not exactly sure how you handle it in your code, for example Node.js would be:
handlerInput.requestEnvelope.request.intent.slots.Gender.resolutions.resolutionPerAuthority[0].values[0].value.name
If you do not use synonyms (for example for the HairColor slot), you can get the value simply by handlerInput.requestEnvelope.request.intent.slots.HairColor.value
Working with predefined slot types this should work well with your code. If you want custom slot types to also return resolution whether you actually use synonyms or not, you can always just simply give the value as a synonym and it should return the full resolution tree.
Hope that answered your question.
I work with Autodesk Forge (node.js, javascript (worked with it a little), React (completely new !)).
I have a rectangle 3D object. At each corner is a point with real world coordinates (lat, lon, z).
These coordinates can be displayed with the property panel in the viewer.
I want to access them from the code, but I cannot find them anywhere.
At first, I thought they would be at :
window.NOP_VIEWER.model.getData().metadata
but nothing !
Here is a picture of what I can see in the viewer. Since I can see them in the property panel, I should be able to access them !
I tried to use this :
window.NOP_VIEWER.model.getBulkProperties('1',
function(properties){console.log(properties);},
function(error){console.log(error);})
It returns an amazingly long list of field names (if think that's it).
When I try to put it in a variable it returns 'undefined'. So I cannot access what is inside anyway.
Also tried getProperties() but I think I did not write it in the right way, it doesn't work either.
I also tried som GET request to find the object properties, but all I got was this :
{
"data": {
"type": "objects",
"objects": [
{
"objectid": 1,
"name": "Model",
"objects": [
{
"objectid": 2691,
"name": "Sols",
"objects": [
{
"objectid": 2692,
"name": "Sol",
"objects": [
{
"objectid": 2693,
"name": "Dalle en béton - 250 mm",
"objects": [
{
"objectid": 2694,
"name": "Sol [236041]"
}
]
}
]
}
]
},
{
"objectid": 2711,
"name": "Modèles génériques",
"objects": [
{
"objectid": 2712,
"name": "Point_Georeferencement",
"objects": [
{
"objectid": 2713,
"name": "Point_Georeferencement",
"objects": [
{
"objectid": 2714,
"name": "Point_Georeferencement [236831]"
},
{
"objectid": 2715,
"name": "Point_Georeferencement [236836]"
},
{
"objectid": 2716,
"name": "Point_Georeferencement [236843]"
},
{
"objectid": 2717,
"name": "Point_Georeferencement [236846]"
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
}
But I cannot find a way to access the points' names or their values !
Can anyone help with this, please ?
NOP_VIEWER is a global variable to access the current Viewer. From that you can call:
.getProperties(): this requires 1 dbId, an easy way to try it is with:
NOP_VIEWER.addEventListener(Autodesk.Viewing.SELECTION_CHANGED_EVENT, function (e) {
e.dbIdArray.forEach(function (dbId) {
NOP_VIEWER.getProperty(dbId, function (props) {
console.log(props)
})
})
});
.model.getBulkProperties(): this received an array of elements and just return the properties you specify:
NOP_VIEWER.addEventListener(Autodesk.Viewing.SELECTION_CHANGED_EVENT, function (e) {
viewer.model.getBulkProperties(e.dbIdArray, ['RefX', 'RefY'], function (elements) {
elements.forEach(function(element){
console.log(element);
})
})
});
And you may also combine it with .search() (see here) or by enumerating leaf nodes.
I got the error code Error code: InvalidIntentSamplePhraseSlot when I built the model using the new skills console.
The full error message is
Sample utterance "AddBookmarkIntent i am at {pageno} of {mybook}" in intent "AddBookmarkIntent" cannot include both a phrase slot and another intent slot. Error code: InvalidIntentSamplePhraseSlot -
where {pageno} is AMAZON.NUMBER and {mybook} is AMAZON.SearchQuery
What is the error about and how can I solve it?
edit: add the JSON for the intent
{
"name": "AddBookmarkIntent",
"slots": [
{
"name": "mybook",
"type": "AMAZON.SearchQuery"
},
{
"name": "pageno",
"type": "AMAZON.NUMBER"
}
],
"samples": [
"i am at {pageno} of the book {mybook}",
"save page {pageno} to the book {mybook}",
"save page {pageno} to {mybook}",
"i am at {pageno} of {mybook}"
]
}
It's not allowed to have a slot of the type AMAZON.SearchQuery in the same Utterance with another slot, in your case AMAZON.NUMBER.
Mark one of the slots as required and ask for them separately.
A little example:
Create the Intent put in the utterances and slots:
"intents": [
{
"name": "AddBookmarkIntent",
"samples": [
"I am at {pageno}"
],
"slots": [
{
"name": "mybook",
"type": "AMAZON.SearchQuery",
"samples": [
"For {mybook}"
]
},
{
"name": "pageno",
"type": "AMAZON.NUMBER"
}
]
}
Mark the specific slot as required so Alexa will automatically ask for it:
"dialog": {
"intents": [
{
"name": "AddBookmarkIntent",
"confirmationRequired": false,
"prompts": {},
"slots": [
{
"name": "mybook",
"type": "AMAZON.SearchQuery",
"elicitationRequired": true,
"confirmationRequired": false,
"prompts": {
"elicitation": "Elicit.Intent-AddBookmarkIntent.IntentSlot-mybook"
}
}
]
}
]
}
and create the prompts to ask for the slot:
"prompts": [
{
"id": "Elicit.Intent-AddBookmarkIntent.IntentSlot-mybook",
"variations": [
{
"type": "PlainText",
"value": "For which book you like to save the page?"
}
]
}
]
This is probably much easier with the skill builder BETA and not its editor because it will automatically create the JSON in the background.
The error is telling you that you have an Intent name in your Sample Utterance where it should only have Slots and it looks like you do.
"AddBookmarkIntent i am at {pageno} of {mybook}"
"AddBookmarkIntent" shouldn't actually be inside of the utterance. So turn your utterance into:
"i am at {pageno} of {mybook}"
I know that some of the documents show an example of the sample utterances with the Intent Name first, such as here. But that has a big warning near the top:
So you have to be careful about which documents you read and follow based on which way you are building your Alexa Skill.
Follow this if you are using the Skill Builder.
It unfortunately seems like an utterance can only reference 1 "Phrase" slot type.
For your specific case, it does look like there is now a non-phrase slot type AMAZON.Book in public beta; if you use that instead of AMAZON.SearchQuery it might work?
Src: https://developer.amazon.com/en-US/docs/alexa/custom-skills/slot-type-reference.html
In my data, I have two fields that I want to use as an index together. They are sensorid (any string) and timestamp (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss).
So I made an index for these two using the Cloudant index generator. This was created successfully and it appears as a design document.
{
"index": {
"fields": [
{
"name": "sensorid",
"type": "string"
},
{
"name": "timestamp",
"type": "string"
}
]
},
"type": "text"
}
However, when I try to make the following query to find all documents with a timestamp newer than some value, I am told there is no index available for the selector:
{
"selector": {
"timestamp": {
"$gt": "2015-10-13 16:00:00"
}
},
"fields": [
"_id",
"_rev"
],
"sort": [
{
"_id": "asc"
}
]
}
What have I done wrong?
It seems to me like cloudant query only allows sorting on fields that are part of the selector.
Therefore your selector should include the _id field and look like:
"selector":{
"_id":{
"$gt":0
},
"timestamp":{
"$gt":"2015-10-13 16:00:00"
}
}
I hope this works for you!