I am having trouble with D's package.d feature. I have my package.d file:
module dew;
public
import dew.util;
I then have util.d:
module dew.util;
struct Size
{
int width;
int height;
}
When I try to use it in another project, it gives me this error:
I know that this should work, because projects on GitHub use it, specifically bindbc-sdl.
Your code is correct. By the error message I'm assuming your project layout with DUB probably looks something like this:
dew/
dub.sdl/dub.json
source/
package.d
util.d
However this would be incorrect. By default DUB only uses import folders instead of specifying all input source files, so the compiler attempts to discover the files from the import paths in the filesystem. The compiler dumped the import paths it searches in in your error screenshot.
The rough compiler equivalent to what it's doing right now is (see dub -v)
dmd source/app.d -Isource -I../dew/source
You need to imagine that the path whatever is written in there is invisible to the compiler, so the dew/source/ path is just some opaque string the compiler doesn't interpret. Now all that the compiler sees is a package.d and util.d in its search paths. However for imports from folders to function, they need to correspond to the filesystem layout, i.e. you need to have a folder named dew where your files are stored in.
So a module named dew.util would correspond to dew/util.d
And your package dew would correspond to dew/package.d
So for your dub project that means essentially that you need to move all your source files into
dew/
dub.sdl/dub.json
source/
dew/
package.d
util.d
Alternatively it would be possible to manually specify all files one-by-one where the compiler can look them up because of the module declarations at the top of the file, however you lose the convenience of module names being mapped to filesystem paths, which might be something other community-made D source tools and IDEs are expecting. On the command line that would be equivalent to
dmd source/app.d ../dew/source/dew/package.d ../dew/source/dew/util.d
Related
I am currently learning the C programming language and I'm having some issues with importing modules I created.
I created a small module to read with fgets and flush the buffer from stdin perfectly and I don't want to keep writing the code every single time. I just want to import this small module like I used to do in Python. I didn't knew how because I'm not using an IDE. I'm just compiling with gcc in terminal and using a text editor. I tried to search with Google,but in vain.
You should create a header for your module that declares the functions in the module – and any other information that a consumer of the module needs. You might call that header weekly.h, a pun on your name, but you can choose any name you like within reason.
You should create a library (shared or static — that's up to you) that contains the functions (and any global variables, if you're so gauche as to have any) defined by your module. You might call it libweekly.so or libweekly.a — or using the extensions appropriate to your machine (.dylib and .a on macOS, for example). The source files might or might not be weekly.c — if there's more than one function, you'll probably have multiple source files, so they won't all be weekly.c. You should put this code (the header and the source files and their makefile) into a separate source directory.
You should install the header(s) and the library in a well-known location (e.g. $HOME/include for headers and $HOME/lib for the library — or maybe in the corresponding directories under /usr/local), and then ensure that the right options are used when compiling (-I$HOME/include for the headers) or linking (-L$HOME/lib and -lweekly).
Your source code using the module would contain:
#include "weekly.h"
and your code would be available. With shared libraries in $HOME/lib, you would have to ensure that the runtime system knows where to find the library. If you install it in /usr/local, that is done for you already. If you install it in $HOME/lib, you have to investigate things like /etc/ld.so.conf or the LD_LIBRARY_PATH or DYLIB_LIBRARY_PATH environment variables, etc.
You need to create a header file (.h) with your function declarations types and extern variables. Then in the program where you want to use those functions include this .h file and and add the compiled .o file (with your functions) to the object file list. And you are done.
ECB, cscope, xcscope. All working. Is cedet necessary?
MSVS, eclipse, code::blocks, xcode. All of them allow easy click on an included source file and take you to it.
Now, with the above setup, emacs does too.
Except emacs doesn't take you to the std:: libraries, doesn't assume their location in /src/linux or some such. Emacs is a little blind and needs you to manually set it up.
But I can't find anything that explains how to set up ff-find-other-file to search for any other directories, let alone standard major libraries, outside of a project's directory.
So, how do I do it?
Edit; Most important is to be able to request on either a file name (.h, .c, .cpp, .anything) or a library (iostream) and open the file in which the code resides.
Additional directories for ff-find-other-file to look into are in ff-search-directories variable which by default uses the value of cc-search-directories, so you should be able to customize any of the two to specify additional search paths.
As for the second question about requesting a file name and finding corresponding file, something like that will do:
(defun ff-query-find-file (file-name)
(interactive "sFilename: ")
;; dirs expansion is borrowed from `ff-find-the-other-file` function
(setq dirs
(if (symbolp ff-search-directories)
(ff-list-replace-env-vars (symbol-value ff-search-directories))
(ff-list-replace-env-vars ff-search-directories)))
(ff-get-file dirs file-name))
Call it with M-x ff-query-find-file or bind it to a key to your liking.
What's the simplest way to find the path to the file in which I am "executing" some code? By this, I mean that if I have a file foo.py that contains:
print(here())
I would like to see /some/path/foo.py (I realise that in practice what file is "being executed" is complicated, but I think the above is well defined - a source file that contains some function that, when executed, gives the path to said file).
I have needed this in the past to make tests (that require some external file) self-contained, and I am currently wondering if it would be a useful way to locate some support files needed by a program. But I have never found a good way of doing this. The inspect module sounds like it should work, but you seem to need a class or function that is defined in that module.
In particular, the module instances contain __file__ attributes, but I can't see how to get the "current" module. Objects have a __module__ attribute, but that's the module name, not a module instance.
I guess one way is to throw and catch an exception and inspect the contents, but that seems like hard work. Surely there is a simple, easy way that I have missed?
To get the absolute path of the current file:
import os
os.path.abspath(__file__)
To get content of external file distributed with your package you could use pkg_util.get_data()(stdlib) or pkg_resources.resouce_string() (setuptools) to support execution from zip-archives or standalone executables created by py2exe, PyInstaller or similar, example.
I have a C program built using Autotools. In src/Makefile.am, I define a macro with the path to installed data files:
AM_CPPFLAGS = -DAM_INSTALLDIR='"$(pkgdatadir)"'
The problem is that I need to run make install before I can test the binary (since it needs to be able to find the data files).
I can define another macro with the path of the source tree so the data files can be located without installing:
AM_CPPFLAGS = -DAM_INSTALLDIR='"$(pkgdatadir)"' -DAM_TOPDIR='"$(abs_top_srcdir)"'
Now, I would like the following behavior:
If the binary was installed via make install, use AM_INSTALLDIR to fetch data files.
If the binary was not installed, use AM_TOPDIR to fetch data files.
Is this possible? Is there a better approach to this problem?
What I do (in https://http://rhdunn.github.com/cainteoir/) is:
const char *basedir = getenv("CAINTEOIR_DATADIR");
if (!basedir)
basedir = DATADIR "/" PACKAGE; // e.g. /usr/share/cainteoir-engine
and then run it (in tests/harness.py) as:
CAINTEOIR_DATADIR=`pwd`/data src/apps/metadata/metadata test_file.epub
This then allows the user to change the location of where to get the data if they wish.
Making the program able to use a run-time configuration as proposed by reece is a good solution. If for some reason you do not want it to be configurable at run-time, a common solution is to build a test binary differently than the installed binary (there are other problems associated with this, in particular ensuring that the program you are testing has behavior that is consistent with the program that is installed.) An easy way to do that is something like:
bin_PROGRAMS = foo
check_PROGRAMS = test-foo
test_foo_SOURCES = $(foo_SOURCES)
AM_CPPFLAGS = -DINSTALLDIR='"$(pkgdatadir)"'
test_foo_CPPFLAGS = -DINSTALLDIR='"$(abs_top_srcdir)"'
Rather than using a binary with a different name, you might want to have a dedicated tests directory and build the program using the same name as the original.
Note that I've changed the name from AM_INSTALLDIR to INSTALLDIR. Automake reserves names
beginning with "AM_" for its own use, and by using that name you are stomping on Automake's
namespace.
A bit of additional information first: The data files are under active development, and I have various scripts that need to call binaries using local data files, whereas installed binaries should use stable, installed data files.
My original solution made use of an environment variable, as proposed by reece. But I didn't want to manage setting up environment variables in various places, and I didn't want any risk of the wrong data files being picked up due to a mistake.
So the solution I ended up with was to define macros for both locations at build time, and add a flag (-local) to the binaries to force local data files to be used.
Is there any way to get the absolute path of functions in map files? Map files support following format
0001:000016a0 func 00000001400026a0 f lib:func.o
Is there any way to get the absolute path of "func"
This may not be useful depending on your situation, but some linkers do not support having multiple object files with the same name in different directories. So if you give them some_directory/func.o and some_other_directory/func.o, only one of them will be linked. I know CodeWarrior does this.
In order to avoid this problem, I make sure that all of my object files have unique names. The convention I use is to include an abbreviation of the module name, for example, func_module.o. With that convention it is easy to identify the object file. Or if you need to do so programatically, any file searching technique will suffice.
Some versions of Visual Studio put all object files into a single directory, regardless of the organization of the .c and/or .cpp files, and will automatically append numeric suffixes to avoid conflicts. Figuring out which object file goes to which .c file requires reading the project file.