I came across the following solution but it does not work on Sybase
SELECT CONVERT(varchar, CAST(987654321 AS money), 1)
I have read the Convert Sybase information but still i receive the same number without the commas.
Have you tried giving a varchar (20) for example instead ? something like :
SELECT CONVERT(varchar(20), CAST(987654321 AS money), 1)
In SqlAnywhere money datatype is a domain, implemented as NUMERIC(19,4).
in CAST function , If you do not indicate a length for character string types, the database server chooses an appropriate length. If neither precision nor scale is specified for a DECIMAL conversion, the database server selects appropriate values.
So maybe this is what's causing the issue, what do you get as output ? do you get 987654321.00 , or just 987654321 ?
Update:
My last suggestion would be using insertstr() function and loop through the char value of your number to insert comma every 3 digits .. this is not the cleanest/easiest way but apparently SQLAnywhere deal with money datatype as normal NUMERIC datatype ...
insertstr() documentation is here.
I would give you a code sample but I don't have SQLAnywhere installed to test it ...
Here is the SP i created based on F Karam suggestion.
CREATE FUNCTION "DBA"."formattednumber"( in #number numeric)
returns char(60)
begin
declare #returnnumber char(60);
declare #workingnumber char(60);
declare #n_ind char(1);
declare #decimalnumber char(10);
declare #tempnumber char(60);
declare #decimalpos integer;
if isnull(#number,'') = '' then
return null
end if;
if #number < 0 then set #n_ind = 'Y'
else set #n_ind = 'N'
end if;
set #workingnumber = convert(char(60),ABS(#number));
set #decimalpos = patindex('%.%',#workingnumber);
if #decimalpos > 0 then
set #decimalnumber = substr(#workingnumber,#decimalpos);
set #decimalnumber = "left"(#decimalnumber,3+1);
set #workingnumber = "left"(#workingnumber,#decimalpos-1)
end if end if;
set #returnnumber = '';
while length(#workingnumber) > 3 loop
set #tempnumber = "right"(#workingnumber,3);
set #returnnumber = insertstr(0,#returnnumber,#tempnumber);
set #workingnumber = "left"(#workingnumber,length(#workingnumber)-3);
if length(#workingnumber) > 0 then
set #returnnumber = insertstr(0,#returnnumber,',')
end if
end loop;
if length(#workingnumber) > 0 then
set #returnnumber = insertstr(0,#returnnumber,#workingnumber)
end if;
if length(#decimalnumber) > 0 then
set #returnnumber = #returnnumber+#decimalnumber
end if;
if #n_ind = 'Y' then set #returnnumber = '-' || #returnnumber
end if;
return(#returnnumber)
end;
You need to distinguish between server-side and client-side formatting. When you use the 'isql' client for example (the TDS client), then the result will be this:
1> select convert(money, 9876543210)
2> go
9876543210
------------------------
9,876,543,210.00
(1 row affected)
But this is purely because the client application happens to format 'money' values this way. Also, this is actually not specific for SQLA, since isql is originally the client tool for ASE (a different Sybase database).
When you run the same conversion at the SQLA server (i.e. as part of an expression in a SQL statement), those commas will not be there since SQLA doesn't have such a built-in formatting style.
If you want this, you should write a SQL function that formats the number as you desire.
I am trying to parse a string using SQL but am too and still learning. I have text in a control or field 685 that is variable, but always the same format.
field 685 input
arr[hg19] 2q33.3q34(200,900,700-209,000,000)x2 xxx
Desired output
2:200900700-209000000
Basically, the # after the [hg19] but before the q (could also be a p) and the #'s in the () without the commas.
My attempt (though I'm not confident in it at all)
Thank you very much :).
SELECT PARSENAME(REPLACE('[685]', ' ', '.'), 2, 3, 4)
This works for me. The code should explain itself: solve using your knowledge of the input along with repeated use of CHARINDEX and SUBSTRING. You could combine this into one very long line of unreadable code, or use as is:
declare #s as varchar(100)
set #s = 'arr[hg19] 23q33.3q34(200,900,700-209,000,000)x2 xxx'
declare #ixBrace as integer; set #ixBrace = CHARINDEX(']',#s,0)
declare #ixP as integer; set #ixP = CHARINDEX('p',#s,#ixBRace)
declare #ixQ as integer; set #ixQ = CHARINDEX('q',#s,#ixBRace)
declare #ixPQ as integer; set #ixPQ = case when #ixP = 0 then #ixQ when #ixQ = 0 then #ixP when #ixP < #ixQ then #ixP else #ixQ end
declare #ixLParen as integer; set #ixLParen = CHARINDEX('(',#s,#ixPQ)
declare #ixMinus as integer; set #ixMinus = CHARINDEX('-',#s,#ixLParen)
declare #ixRParen as integer; set #ixRParen = CHARINDEX(')',#s,#ixMinus)
select SUBSTRING(#s,#ixBrace+1,#ixPQ-#ixBrace-1) + ':' +
REPLACE(SUBSTRING(#s,#ixLParen+1,#ixMinus-#ixLParen-1),',','') + '-' +
REPLACE(SUBSTRING(#s,#ixMinus+1,#ixRParen-#ixMinus-1),',','')
I'm not sure where the '2:' comes from so I guessed it came from the 'x2'
DECLARE #input VARCHAR(100) = 'arr[hg19] 2q33.3q34(200,900,700-209,000,000)x2 xxx'
SELECT SUBSTRING(#input,PATINDEX('%x[0-9]%',#input) + 1,CHARINDEX(' xxx',#input) - PATINDEX('%x[0-9]%',#input) - 1) + ':' +
REPLACE(SUBSTRING(#input,CHARINDEX('(',#input) + 1,CHARINDEX(')',#input) - CHARINDEX('(',#input) - 1),',','')
I have user table in SQL Server 2008 r2. Nothing there is encrypted yet but I would like to at the least encrypt the passwords until the app is ready that will handle this better. Can i do this and how? to manually make the passwords encrypted.
You can encrypt columns using SQL Server, ( see: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms179331.aspx for a walk-through).
You can also use a key given out from the server itself.
The risk of using this is if you had to do data recovery and move the DB to a different server it would be impossible to decrypt the column (reset passwords would be required).
Note: password hashing is not meant for 2-way encryption (where a rogue dba can decrypt it). It is meant for hashing it in a way that allows validation without trivially showing the password to anyone. A low or even moderate level of collisions is in some ways desirable so that it allows the password through (and unfortunately other variants) but with collisions you can never tell what the real password actually was.
A simple implementation would be to run HashBytes over the password. You compare the (hash of) password provided to the hash stored. Unless someone has a rainbow table ready, they will not be able to find the original password.
INSERT INTO <tbl> (..., passwd) values (...., HashBytes('SHA1', #password))
When validating passwords, you take the hash of the password
SELECT HashBytes('SHA1', #password);
And compare it against the input.
You actually don't want to encrypt it, but rather use a hash function on it. Unless there is an strong requirement to gain access to the unencrypted password.
We can Create some simple sql function to encrypt and decrypt the Password column in your web page:
Code:Encryption
`CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[ENCRYPT]
(
#DB_ROLE_PASSWORD VARCHAR(MAX)
)
RETURNS VARCHAR(MAX)
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE
#STR_LEN NUMERIC(10),
#ENCRYPTED_PASSWORD VARCHAR(100),
#TRIAL_CHARACTER VARCHAR(1),
#TRIAL_NUMBER NUMERIC(4)
SET #ENCRYPTED_PASSWORD = NULL
SET #STR_LEN =LEN(#DB_ROLE_PASSWORD)
DECLARE
#I INT
SET #I = 1
DECLARE
#LOOP$BOUND INT
SET #LOOP$BOUND = #STR_LEN
WHILE #I <= #LOOP$BOUND
BEGIN
/* * SSMA WARNING MESSAGES: * O2SS0273: ORACLE SUBSTR FUNCTION AND SQL SERVER SUBSTRING FUNCTION MAY GIVE DIFFERENT RESULTS. */
SET #TRIAL_CHARACTER = SUBSTRING(#DB_ROLE_PASSWORD, #I, 1)
SET #TRIAL_NUMBER = ASCII(#TRIAL_CHARACTER)
IF (#TRIAL_NUMBER % 2) = 0
SET #TRIAL_NUMBER = #TRIAL_NUMBER - 6
ELSE
SET #TRIAL_NUMBER = #TRIAL_NUMBER - 8
SET #TRIAL_CHARACTER = CHAR(CAST(#TRIAL_NUMBER + #I AS INT))
SET #ENCRYPTED_PASSWORD = ISNULL(#ENCRYPTED_PASSWORD, '') + ISNULL(#TRIAL_CHARACTER, '')
SET #I = #I + 1
END
RETURN #ENCRYPTED_PASSWORD
END`
Code:Decryption
`CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[DECRYPT]
(
#DB_ROLE_PASSWORD VARCHAR(MAX)
)
RETURNS VARCHAR(MAX)
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE
#STR_LEN NUMERIC(10),
#DECRYPTED_PASSWORD VARCHAR(100),
#TRIAL_CHARACTER VARCHAR(1),
#TRIAL_NUMBER NUMERIC(4),
#CHECK_CHARACTER VARCHAR(1),
#V_DB_ROLE_PASSWORD VARCHAR(100)
SET #V_DB_ROLE_PASSWORD = #DB_ROLE_PASSWORD
SET #DECRYPTED_PASSWORD = NULL
SET #STR_LEN = LEN(#V_DB_ROLE_PASSWORD)
DECLARE
#I INT
SET #I = 1
DECLARE
#LOOP$BOUND INT
SET #LOOP$BOUND = #STR_LEN
WHILE #I <= #LOOP$BOUND
BEGIN
/*
* SSMA WARNING MESSAGES:
* O2SS0273: ORACLE SUBSTR FUNCTION AND SQL SERVER SUBSTRING FUNCTION MAY GIVE DIFFERENT RESULTS.
*/
SET #TRIAL_CHARACTER = SUBSTRING(#V_DB_ROLE_PASSWORD, #I, 1)
SET #TRIAL_NUMBER = ASCII(#TRIAL_CHARACTER) - #I
IF (#TRIAL_NUMBER % 2) = 0
SET #TRIAL_NUMBER = #TRIAL_NUMBER + 6
/*-IE EVEN*/
ELSE
SET #TRIAL_NUMBER = #TRIAL_NUMBER + 8
/*-IE ODD*/
SET #DECRYPTED_PASSWORD = ISNULL(#DECRYPTED_PASSWORD,'') + ISNULL(CHAR(CAST(#TRIAL_NUMBER AS INT)), '')
SET #I = #I + 1
END
RETURN #DECRYPTED_PASSWORD
END`
Encryption & Decryption examples can be found here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms179331.aspx
Hashing example can be found here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms174415.aspx
You should not encrypt passwords if your only task is to verify that the password the user entered is correct. You should hash them instead. You could use any algorithm to hash them, but I recommend using MD5 because it is very secure.1 :)
for example:
public string EncodePassword(string originalPassword)
{
//Declarations
Byte[] originalBytes;
Byte[] encodedBytes;
MD5 md5;
//Instantiate MD5CryptoServiceProvider, get bytes for original password and compute hash (encoded password)
md5 = new MD5CryptoServiceProvider();
originalBytes = ASCIIEncoding.Default.GetBytes(originalPassword);
encodedBytes = md5.ComputeHash(originalBytes);
//Convert encoded bytes back to a 'readable' string
return BitConverter.ToString(encodedBytes);
}
1 Edit (not original answer author): MD5 for passwords is considered insecure and more robust algorithms should be used. You should do research into the contemporary algorithms at the point of reading this. This post might be a good starting point.
We have a large database on which we have DB side pagination. This is quick, returning a page of 50 rows from millions of records in a small fraction of a second.
Users can define their own sort, basically choosing what column to sort by. Columns are dynamic - some have numeric values, some dates and some text.
While most sort as expected text sorts in a dumb way. Well, I say dumb, it makes sense to computers, but frustrates users.
For instance, sorting by a string record id gives something like:
rec1
rec10
rec14
rec2
rec20
rec3
rec4
...and so on.
I want this to take account of the number, so:
rec1
rec2
rec3
rec4
rec10
rec14
rec20
I can't control the input (otherwise I'd just format in leading 000s) and I can't rely on a single format - some are things like "{alpha code}-{dept code}-{rec id}".
I know a few ways to do this in C#, but can't pull down all the records to sort them, as that would be to slow.
Does anyone know a way to quickly apply a natural sort in Sql server?
We're using:
ROW_NUMBER() over (order by {field name} asc)
And then we're paging by that.
We can add triggers, although we wouldn't. All their input is parametrised and the like, but I can't change the format - if they put in "rec2" and "rec10" they expect them to be returned just like that, and in natural order.
We have valid user input that follows different formats for different clients.
One might go rec1, rec2, rec3, ... rec100, rec101
While another might go: grp1rec1, grp1rec2, ... grp20rec300, grp20rec301
When I say we can't control the input I mean that we can't force users to change these standards - they have a value like grp1rec1 and I can't reformat it as grp01rec001, as that would be changing something used for lookups and linking to external systems.
These formats vary a lot, but are often mixtures of letters and numbers.
Sorting these in C# is easy - just break it up into { "grp", 20, "rec", 301 } and then compare sequence values in turn.
However there may be millions of records and the data is paged, I need the sort to be done on the SQL server.
SQL server sorts by value, not comparison - in C# I can split the values out to compare, but in SQL I need some logic that (very quickly) gets a single value that consistently sorts.
#moebius - your answer might work, but it does feel like an ugly compromise to add a sort-key for all these text values.
order by LEN(value), value
Not perfect, but works well in a lot of cases.
Most of the SQL-based solutions I have seen break when the data gets complex enough (e.g. more than one or two numbers in it). Initially I tried implementing a NaturalSort function in T-SQL that met my requirements (among other things, handles an arbitrary number of numbers within the string), but the performance was way too slow.
Ultimately, I wrote a scalar CLR function in C# to allow for a natural sort, and even with unoptimized code the performance calling it from SQL Server is blindingly fast. It has the following characteristics:
will sort the first 1,000 characters or so correctly (easily modified in code or made into a parameter)
properly sorts decimals, so 123.333 comes before 123.45
because of above, will likely NOT sort things like IP addresses correctly; if you wish different behaviour, modify the code
supports sorting a string with an arbitrary number of numbers within it
will correctly sort numbers up to 25 digits long (easily modified in code or made into a parameter)
The code is here:
using System;
using System.Data.SqlTypes;
using System.Text;
using Microsoft.SqlServer.Server;
public class UDF
{
[SqlFunction(DataAccess = DataAccessKind.None, IsDeterministic=true)]
public static SqlString Naturalize(string val)
{
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(val))
return val;
while(val.Contains(" "))
val = val.Replace(" ", " ");
const int maxLength = 1000;
const int padLength = 25;
bool inNumber = false;
bool isDecimal = false;
int numStart = 0;
int numLength = 0;
int length = val.Length < maxLength ? val.Length : maxLength;
//TODO: optimize this so that we exit for loop once sb.ToString() >= maxLength
var sb = new StringBuilder();
for (var i = 0; i < length; i++)
{
int charCode = (int)val[i];
if (charCode >= 48 && charCode <= 57)
{
if (!inNumber)
{
numStart = i;
numLength = 1;
inNumber = true;
continue;
}
numLength++;
continue;
}
if (inNumber)
{
sb.Append(PadNumber(val.Substring(numStart, numLength), isDecimal, padLength));
inNumber = false;
}
isDecimal = (charCode == 46);
sb.Append(val[i]);
}
if (inNumber)
sb.Append(PadNumber(val.Substring(numStart, numLength), isDecimal, padLength));
var ret = sb.ToString();
if (ret.Length > maxLength)
return ret.Substring(0, maxLength);
return ret;
}
static string PadNumber(string num, bool isDecimal, int padLength)
{
return isDecimal ? num.PadRight(padLength, '0') : num.PadLeft(padLength, '0');
}
}
To register this so that you can call it from SQL Server, run the following commands in Query Analyzer:
CREATE ASSEMBLY SqlServerClr FROM 'SqlServerClr.dll' --put the full path to DLL here
go
CREATE FUNCTION Naturalize(#val as nvarchar(max)) RETURNS nvarchar(1000)
EXTERNAL NAME SqlServerClr.UDF.Naturalize
go
Then, you can use it like so:
select *
from MyTable
order by dbo.Naturalize(MyTextField)
Note: If you get an error in SQL Server along the lines of Execution of user code in the .NET Framework is disabled. Enable "clr enabled" configuration option., follow the instructions here to enable it. Make sure you consider the security implications before doing so. If you are not the db admin, make sure you discuss this with your admin before making any changes to the server configuration.
Note2: This code does not properly support internationalization (e.g., assumes the decimal marker is ".", is not optimized for speed, etc. Suggestions on improving it are welcome!
Edit: Renamed the function to Naturalize instead of NaturalSort, since it does not do any actual sorting.
I know this is an old question but I just came across it and since it's not got an accepted answer.
I have always used ways similar to this:
SELECT [Column] FROM [Table]
ORDER BY RIGHT(REPLICATE('0', 1000) + LTRIM(RTRIM(CAST([Column] AS VARCHAR(MAX)))), 1000)
The only common times that this has issues is if your column won't cast to a VARCHAR(MAX), or if LEN([Column]) > 1000 (but you can change that 1000 to something else if you want), but you can use this rough idea for what you need.
Also this is much worse performance than normal ORDER BY [Column], but it does give you the result asked for in the OP.
Edit: Just to further clarify, this the above will not work if you have decimal values such as having 1, 1.15 and 1.5, (they will sort as {1, 1.5, 1.15}) as that is not what is asked for in the OP, but that can easily be done by:
SELECT [Column] FROM [Table]
ORDER BY REPLACE(RIGHT(REPLICATE('0', 1000) + LTRIM(RTRIM(CAST([Column] AS VARCHAR(MAX)))) + REPLICATE('0', 100 - CHARINDEX('.', REVERSE(LTRIM(RTRIM(CAST([Column] AS VARCHAR(MAX))))), 1)), 1000), '.', '0')
Result: {1, 1.15, 1.5}
And still all entirely within SQL. This will not sort IP addresses because you're now getting into very specific number combinations as opposed to simple text + number.
RedFilter's answer is great for reasonably sized datasets where indexing is not critical, however if you want an index, several tweaks are required.
First, mark the function as not doing any data access and being deterministic and precise:
[SqlFunction(DataAccess = DataAccessKind.None,
SystemDataAccess = SystemDataAccessKind.None,
IsDeterministic = true, IsPrecise = true)]
Next, MSSQL has a 900 byte limit on the index key size, so if the naturalized value is the only value in the index, it must be at most 450 characters long. If the index includes multiple columns, the return value must be even smaller. Two changes:
CREATE FUNCTION Naturalize(#str AS nvarchar(max)) RETURNS nvarchar(450)
EXTERNAL NAME ClrExtensions.Util.Naturalize
and in the C# code:
const int maxLength = 450;
Finally, you will need to add a computed column to your table, and it must be persisted (because MSSQL cannot prove that Naturalize is deterministic and precise), which means the naturalized value is actually stored in the table but is still maintained automatically:
ALTER TABLE YourTable ADD nameNaturalized AS dbo.Naturalize(name) PERSISTED
You can now create the index!
CREATE INDEX idx_YourTable_n ON YourTable (nameNaturalized)
I've also made a couple of changes to RedFilter's code: using chars for clarity, incorporating duplicate space removal into the main loop, exiting once the result is longer than the limit, setting maximum length without substring etc. Here's the result:
using System.Data.SqlTypes;
using System.Text;
using Microsoft.SqlServer.Server;
public static class Util
{
[SqlFunction(DataAccess = DataAccessKind.None, SystemDataAccess = SystemDataAccessKind.None, IsDeterministic = true, IsPrecise = true)]
public static SqlString Naturalize(string str)
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(str))
return str;
const int maxLength = 450;
const int padLength = 15;
bool isDecimal = false;
bool wasSpace = false;
int numStart = 0;
int numLength = 0;
var sb = new StringBuilder();
for (var i = 0; i < str.Length; i++)
{
char c = str[i];
if (c >= '0' && c <= '9')
{
if (numLength == 0)
numStart = i;
numLength++;
}
else
{
if (numLength > 0)
{
sb.Append(pad(str.Substring(numStart, numLength), isDecimal, padLength));
numLength = 0;
}
if (c != ' ' || !wasSpace)
sb.Append(c);
isDecimal = c == '.';
if (sb.Length > maxLength)
break;
}
wasSpace = c == ' ';
}
if (numLength > 0)
sb.Append(pad(str.Substring(numStart, numLength), isDecimal, padLength));
if (sb.Length > maxLength)
sb.Length = maxLength;
return sb.ToString();
}
private static string pad(string num, bool isDecimal, int padLength)
{
return isDecimal ? num.PadRight(padLength, '0') : num.PadLeft(padLength, '0');
}
}
Here's a solution written for SQL 2000. It can probably be improved for newer SQL versions.
/**
* Returns a string formatted for natural sorting. This function is very useful when having to sort alpha-numeric strings.
*
* #author Alexandre Potvin Latreille (plalx)
* #param {nvarchar(4000)} string The formatted string.
* #param {int} numberLength The length each number should have (including padding). This should be the length of the longest number. Defaults to 10.
* #param {char(50)} sameOrderChars A list of characters that should have the same order. Ex: '.-/'. Defaults to empty string.
*
* #return {nvarchar(4000)} A string for natural sorting.
* Example of use:
*
* SELECT Name FROM TableA ORDER BY Name
* TableA (unordered) TableA (ordered)
* ------------ ------------
* ID Name ID Name
* 1. A1. 1. A1-1.
* 2. A1-1. 2. A1.
* 3. R1 --> 3. R1
* 4. R11 4. R11
* 5. R2 5. R2
*
*
* As we can see, humans would expect A1., A1-1., R1, R2, R11 but that's not how SQL is sorting it.
* We can use this function to fix this.
*
* SELECT Name FROM TableA ORDER BY dbo.udf_NaturalSortFormat(Name, default, '.-')
* TableA (unordered) TableA (ordered)
* ------------ ------------
* ID Name ID Name
* 1. A1. 1. A1.
* 2. A1-1. 2. A1-1.
* 3. R1 --> 3. R1
* 4. R11 4. R2
* 5. R2 5. R11
*/
ALTER FUNCTION [dbo].[udf_NaturalSortFormat](
#string nvarchar(4000),
#numberLength int = 10,
#sameOrderChars char(50) = ''
)
RETURNS varchar(4000)
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #sortString varchar(4000),
#numStartIndex int,
#numEndIndex int,
#padLength int,
#totalPadLength int,
#i int,
#sameOrderCharsLen int;
SELECT
#totalPadLength = 0,
#string = RTRIM(LTRIM(#string)),
#sortString = #string,
#numStartIndex = PATINDEX('%[0-9]%', #string),
#numEndIndex = 0,
#i = 1,
#sameOrderCharsLen = LEN(#sameOrderChars);
-- Replace all char that have the same order by a space.
WHILE (#i <= #sameOrderCharsLen)
BEGIN
SET #sortString = REPLACE(#sortString, SUBSTRING(#sameOrderChars, #i, 1), ' ');
SET #i = #i + 1;
END
-- Pad numbers with zeros.
WHILE (#numStartIndex <> 0)
BEGIN
SET #numStartIndex = #numStartIndex + #numEndIndex;
SET #numEndIndex = #numStartIndex;
WHILE(PATINDEX('[0-9]', SUBSTRING(#string, #numEndIndex, 1)) = 1)
BEGIN
SET #numEndIndex = #numEndIndex + 1;
END
SET #numEndIndex = #numEndIndex - 1;
SET #padLength = #numberLength - (#numEndIndex + 1 - #numStartIndex);
IF #padLength < 0
BEGIN
SET #padLength = 0;
END
SET #sortString = STUFF(
#sortString,
#numStartIndex + #totalPadLength,
0,
REPLICATE('0', #padLength)
);
SET #totalPadLength = #totalPadLength + #padLength;
SET #numStartIndex = PATINDEX('%[0-9]%', RIGHT(#string, LEN(#string) - #numEndIndex));
END
RETURN #sortString;
END
I know this is a bit old at this point, but in my search for a better solution, I came across this question. I'm currently using a function to order by. It works fine for my purpose of sorting records which are named with mixed alpha numeric ('item 1', 'item 10', 'item 2', etc)
CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[fnMixSort]
(
#ColValue NVARCHAR(255)
)
RETURNS NVARCHAR(1000)
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #p1 NVARCHAR(255),
#p2 NVARCHAR(255),
#p3 NVARCHAR(255),
#p4 NVARCHAR(255),
#Index TINYINT
IF #ColValue LIKE '[a-z]%'
SELECT #Index = PATINDEX('%[0-9]%', #ColValue),
#p1 = LEFT(CASE WHEN #Index = 0 THEN #ColValue ELSE LEFT(#ColValue, #Index - 1) END + REPLICATE(' ', 255), 255),
#ColValue = CASE WHEN #Index = 0 THEN '' ELSE SUBSTRING(#ColValue, #Index, 255) END
ELSE
SELECT #p1 = REPLICATE(' ', 255)
SELECT #Index = PATINDEX('%[^0-9]%', #ColValue)
IF #Index = 0
SELECT #p2 = RIGHT(REPLICATE(' ', 255) + #ColValue, 255),
#ColValue = ''
ELSE
SELECT #p2 = RIGHT(REPLICATE(' ', 255) + LEFT(#ColValue, #Index - 1), 255),
#ColValue = SUBSTRING(#ColValue, #Index, 255)
SELECT #Index = PATINDEX('%[0-9,a-z]%', #ColValue)
IF #Index = 0
SELECT #p3 = REPLICATE(' ', 255)
ELSE
SELECT #p3 = LEFT(REPLICATE(' ', 255) + LEFT(#ColValue, #Index - 1), 255),
#ColValue = SUBSTRING(#ColValue, #Index, 255)
IF PATINDEX('%[^0-9]%', #ColValue) = 0
SELECT #p4 = RIGHT(REPLICATE(' ', 255) + #ColValue, 255)
ELSE
SELECT #p4 = LEFT(#ColValue + REPLICATE(' ', 255), 255)
RETURN #p1 + #p2 + #p3 + #p4
END
Then call
select item_name from my_table order by fnMixSort(item_name)
It easily triples the processing time for a simple data read, so it may not be the perfect solution.
Here is an other solution that I like:
http://www.dreamchain.com/sql-and-alpha-numeric-sort-order/
It's not Microsoft SQL, but since I ended up here when I was searching for a solution for Postgres, I thought adding this here would help others.
EDIT: Here is the code, in case the link goes away.
CREATE or REPLACE FUNCTION pad_numbers(text) RETURNS text AS $$
SELECT regexp_replace(regexp_replace(regexp_replace(regexp_replace(($1 collate "C"),
E'(^|\\D)(\\d{1,3}($|\\D))', E'\\1000\\2', 'g'),
E'(^|\\D)(\\d{4,6}($|\\D))', E'\\1000\\2', 'g'),
E'(^|\\D)(\\d{7}($|\\D))', E'\\100\\2', 'g'),
E'(^|\\D)(\\d{8}($|\\D))', E'\\10\\2', 'g');
$$ LANGUAGE SQL;
"C" is the default collation in postgresql; you may specify any collation you desire, or remove the collation statement if you can be certain your table columns will never have a nondeterministic collation assigned.
usage:
SELECT * FROM wtf w
WHERE TRUE
ORDER BY pad_numbers(w.my_alphanumeric_field)
For the following varchar data:
BR1
BR2
External Location
IR1
IR2
IR3
IR4
IR5
IR6
IR7
IR8
IR9
IR10
IR11
IR12
IR13
IR14
IR16
IR17
IR15
VCR
This worked best for me:
ORDER BY substring(fieldName, 1, 1), LEN(fieldName)
If you're having trouble loading the data from the DB to sort in C#, then I'm sure you'll be disappointed with any approach at doing it programmatically in the DB. When the server is going to sort, it's got to calculate the "perceived" order just as you would have -- every time.
I'd suggest that you add an additional column to store the preprocessed sortable string, using some C# method, when the data is first inserted. You might try to convert the numerics into fixed-width ranges, for example, so "xyz1" would turn into "xyz00000001". Then you could use normal SQL Server sorting.
At the risk of tooting my own horn, I wrote a CodeProject article implementing the problem as posed in the CodingHorror article. Feel free to steal from my code.
Simply you sort by
ORDER BY
cast (substring(name,(PATINDEX('%[0-9]%',name)),len(name))as int)
##
I've just read a article somewhere about such a topic. The key point is: you only need the integer value to sort data, while the 'rec' string belongs to the UI. You could split the information in two fields, say alpha and num, sort by alpha and num (separately) and then showing a string composed by alpha + num. You could use a computed column to compose the string, or a view.
Hope it helps
You can use the following code to resolve the problem:
Select *,
substring(Cote,1,len(Cote) - Len(RIGHT(Cote, LEN(Cote) - PATINDEX('%[0-9]%', Cote)+1)))alpha,
CAST(RIGHT(Cote, LEN(Cote) - PATINDEX('%[0-9]%', Cote)+1) AS INT)intv
FROM Documents
left outer join Sites ON Sites.IDSite = Documents.IDSite
Order BY alpha, intv
regards,
rabihkahaleh#hotmail.com
I'm fashionably late to the party as usual. Nevertheless, here is my attempt at an answer that seems to work well (I would say that). It assumes text with digits at the end, like in the original example data.
First a function that won't end up winning a "pretty SQL" competition anytime soon.
CREATE FUNCTION udfAlphaNumericSortHelper (
#string varchar(max)
)
RETURNS #results TABLE (
txt varchar(max),
num float
)
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #txt varchar(max) = #string
DECLARE #numStr varchar(max) = ''
DECLARE #num float = 0
DECLARE #lastChar varchar(1) = ''
set #lastChar = RIGHT(#txt, 1)
WHILE #lastChar <> '' and #lastChar is not null
BEGIN
IF ISNUMERIC(#lastChar) = 1
BEGIN
set #numStr = #lastChar + #numStr
set #txt = Substring(#txt, 0, len(#txt))
set #lastChar = RIGHT(#txt, 1)
END
ELSE
BEGIN
set #lastChar = null
END
END
SET #num = CAST(#numStr as float)
INSERT INTO #results select #txt, #num
RETURN;
END
Then call it like below:
declare #str nvarchar(250) = 'sox,fox,jen1,Jen0,jen15,jen02,jen0004,fox00,rec1,rec10,jen3,rec14,rec2,rec20,rec3,rec4,zip1,zip1.32,zip1.33,zip1.3,TT0001,TT01,TT002'
SELECT tbl.value --, sorter.txt, sorter.num
FROM STRING_SPLIT(#str, ',') as tbl
CROSS APPLY dbo.udfAlphaNumericSortHelper(value) as sorter
ORDER BY sorter.txt, sorter.num, len(tbl.value)
With results:
fox
fox00
Jen0
jen1
jen02
jen3
jen0004
jen15
rec1
rec2
rec3
rec4
rec10
rec14
rec20
sox
TT01
TT0001
TT002
zip1
zip1.3
zip1.32
zip1.33
I still don't understand (probably because of my poor English).
You could try:
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY dbo.human_sort(field_name) ASC)
But it won't work for millions of records.
That why I suggested to use trigger which fills separate column with human value.
Moreover:
built-in T-SQL functions are really
slow and Microsoft suggest to use
.NET functions instead.
human value is constant so there is no point calculating it each time
when query runs.