I'm writing a program that will simulate a randomized race between runners who are climbing up a mountain where dwarf orcs (dorcs) are coming down the mountain to attack the runners. It begins with two runners named harold and timmy at the bottom of the mountain. The runners make their way up the mountain in randomized moves where they may make progress forward up the mountain, or they may slide back down the mountain. Dorcs are randomly generated, and they inflict damage on a runner if they collide. The simulation ends when one of the runners reaches the top of the mountain, or when both runners are dead.
I'm struggling with a part where I have to implement the actual race loop. Once the race is initialized, the race loop will iterate until the race is over. This happens when either a winner has been declared, or when all runners are dead.
Every iteration of the race loop will do the following:
with 30% probability, dynamically allocate a new dorc as an EntityType structure, and initialize it as follows:
(a) a dorc’s avatar is always “d”
(b) each dorc begins the race at the top of the mountain, which is at row 2
(c) with equal probability, the dorc may be placed either in the same column as timmy, or in the same column as the harold, or in the column exactly half-way between the two
(d) add the new dorc to the race’s array of dorcs
(e) using the pthread_create() function, create a thread for the new dorc, and save the thread pointer in the dorc’s entity structure; the function that each dorc thread will execute is the void* goDorc(void*) function that you will implement in a later step; the parameter to the goDorc() function will be the EntityType pointer that corresponds to that dorc
I guess I'm confused with the logic of how to approach this. I decided to make a function called isOver() to indicate if the race is over, and then a separate function called addDorc() to initialize the Dorc elements and do all the requirements above.
In isOver(), I attempt to add a dorc object to the dorcs array by doing addDorc(race); with every iteration of the race loop/if the race hasn't ended or no one died. But I keep getting the error:
control.c:82:3: error: too few arguments to function ‘addDorc’
addDorc(race);
The problem is I don't think I can manually declare all the parameters in addDorc() because some elements like the "path" argument are based on probability. As mentioned above, with equal probability, the dorc may be placed either in the same column as timmy, or in the same column as the harold, or in the column exactly half-way between the two. The issue is I don't know how to factor this random value when calling addDorc() and would appreciate some help. I also don't know if I'm doing the "with 30% probability, dynamically allocate a new dorc as an EntityType structure" correctly and would be grateful for some input on that as well.
defs.h
typedef struct {
pthread_t thr;
char avatar[MAX_STR];
int currPos;
int path;
} EntityType;
typedef struct {
EntityType ent;
char name[MAX_STR];
int health;
int dead;
} RunnerType;
typedef struct {
int numRunners;
RunnerType *runners[MAX_RUNNERS];
int numDorcs;
EntityType *dorcs[MAX_DORCS];
char winner[MAX_STR];
int statusRow;
sem_t mutex;
} RaceInfoType;
void launch();
int addDorc(RaceInfoType*, char*, int, int);
int isOver(RaceInfoType*);
void initRunners(RaceInfoType*);
int addRunner(RaceInfoType*, char*, char*, int, int, int, int);
int randm(int);
void *goRunner(void*);
void *goDorc(void*);
RaceInfoType *race;
control.c
void launch(){
race = malloc(sizeof(RaceInfoType));
race->numRunners = 0;
initRunners(race);
if (sem_init(&race->mutex, 0, 1) < 0) {
printf("semaphore initialization error\n");
exit(1);
}
strcpy(race->winner, " ");
srand((unsigned)time(NULL));
int i;
for(i = 0; i < race->numRunners; ++i){
pthread_create(&(race->runners[i]->ent.thr), NULL, goRunner, " ");
}
race->numDorcs = 0;
}
int addDorc(RaceInfoType* race, char *avatar, int path, int currPos){
if(race->numDorcs == MAX_DORCS){
printf("Error: Maximum dorcs already reached. \n");
return 0;
}
race->dorcs[race->numDorcs] = malloc(sizeof(EntityType));
int timmysColumn = race->dorcs[race->numDorcs]->currPos;
int haroldsColumn = race->dorcs[race->numDorcs]->currPos;
int halfwayColumn = (timmysColumn+haroldsColumn)/2;
int r = rand()%100;
pthread_t dorc;
if(r <= 30){
strcpy(race->dorcs[race->numDorcs]->avatar, "d");
race->dorcs[race->numDorcs]->currPos = 2;
if(r <= 33){
race->dorcs[race->numDorcs]->path = timmysColumn;
}else if(r <= 66){
race->dorcs[race->numDorcs]->path = haroldsColumn;
}else{
race->dorcs[race->numDorcs]->path = halfwayColumn;
}
pthread_create(&dorc, NULL, goDorc, " ");
}
race->numRunners++;
}
int isOver(RaceInfoType* race){
int i;
for(i = 0; i < race->numRunners; ++i){
if((race->winner != " ") || (race->runners[race->numRunners]->dead = 1)){
return 1;
}
addDorc(race);
return 0;
}
}
void initRunners(RaceInfoType* r){
addRunner(r, "Timmy", "T", 10, 35, 50, 0);
addRunner(r, "Harold", "H", 14, 35, 50, 0);
}
int addRunner(RaceInfoType* race, char *name, char *avatar, int path, int currPos, int health, int dead){
if(race->numRunners == MAX_RUNNERS){
printf("Error: Maximum runners already reached. \n");
return 0;
}
race->runners[race->numRunners] = malloc(sizeof(RunnerType));
strcpy(race->runners[race->numRunners]->name, name);
strcpy(race->runners[race->numRunners]->ent.avatar, avatar);
race->runners[race->numRunners]->ent.path = path;
race->runners[race->numRunners]->ent.currPos = currPos;
race->runners[race->numRunners]->health = health;
race->runners[race->numRunners]->dead = dead;
race->numRunners++;
return 1;
}
Caveat: Because there's so much missing [unwritten] code, this isn't a complete solution.
But, I notice at least two bugs: the isOver bugs in my top comments. And, incrementing race->numRunners in addDorc.
isOver also has the return 0; misplaced [inside the loop]. That should go as the last statement in the function. If you had compiled with -Wall [which you should always do], that should have been flagged by the compiler (e.g. control reaches end of non-void function)
From that, only one "dorc" would get created (for the first eligible runner). That may be what you want, but [AFAICT] you want to try to create more dorcs (one more for each valid runner).
Also, the bug the compiler flagged is because you're calling addDorc(race); but addDorc takes more arguments.
It's very difficult to follow the code when you're doing (e.g.) race->dorcs[race->numDorcs]->whatever everywhere.
Better to do (e.g.):
EntityType *ent = &race->dorcs[race->numDorcs];
ent->whatever = ...;
Further, it's likely that your thread functions would like a pointer to their [respective] control structs (vs. just passing " ").
Anyway, I've refactored your code to incorporate these changes. I've only tried to fix the obvious/glaring bugs from simple code inspection, but I've not tried to recompile or address the correctness of your logic.
So, there's still more work to do, but the simplifications may help a bit.
void
launch(void)
{
race = malloc(sizeof(RaceInfoType));
race->numRunners = 0;
initRunners(race);
if (sem_init(&race->mutex,0,1) < 0) {
printf("semaphore initialization error\n");
exit(1);
}
strcpy(race->winner," ");
srand((unsigned)time(NULL));
int i;
for (i = 0; i < race->numRunners; ++i) {
RunnerType *run = &race->runners[i];
EntityType *ent = &run->ent;
pthread_create(&ent->thr,NULL,goRunner,ent);
}
race->numDorcs = 0;
}
int
addDorc(RaceInfoType* race,char *avatar,int path,int currPos)
{
if (race->numDorcs == MAX_DORCS) {
printf("Error: Maximum dorcs already reached. \n");
return 0;
}
EntityType *ent = malloc(sizeof(*ent));
race->dorcs[race->numDorcs] = ent;
int timmysColumn = ent->currPos;
int haroldsColumn = ent->currPos;
int halfwayColumn = (timmysColumn + haroldsColumn) / 2;
int r = rand()%100;
#if 0
pthread_t dorc;
#endif
if (r <= 30) {
strcpy(ent->avatar,"d");
ent->currPos = 2;
if (r <= 33) {
ent->path = timmysColumn;
} else if (r <= 66) {
ent->path = haroldsColumn;
} else {
ent->path = halfwayColumn;
}
pthread_create(&ent->thr,NULL,goDorc,ent);
}
#if 0
race->numRunners++;
#else
race->numDorcs += 1;
#endif
}
int
isOver(RaceInfoType* race)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < race->numRunners; ++i) {
#if 0
if ((race->winner != " ") ||
(race->runners[race->numRunners]->dead = 1))
return 1;
#else
RunnerType *run = &race->runners[i];
if ((race->winner != " ") || (run->dead == 1))
return 1;
#endif
addDorc(race);
#if 0
return 0;
#endif
}
#if 1
return 0;
#endif
}
void
initRunners(RaceInfoType* r)
{
addRunner(r,"Timmy","T",10,35,50,0);
addRunner(r,"Harold","H",14,35,50,0);
}
int
addRunner(RaceInfoType* race,char *name,char *avatar,int path,int currPos,
int health,int dead)
{
if (race->numRunners == MAX_RUNNERS) {
printf("Error: Maximum runners already reached. \n");
return 0;
}
RunnerType *run = malloc(sizeof(*run));
race->runners[race->numRunners] = run;
strcpy(run->name,name);
EntityType *ent = &run->ent;
strcpy(ent->avatar,avatar);
ent->path = path;
ent->currPos = currPos;
run->health = health;
run->dead = dead;
race->numRunners++;
return 1;
}
UPDATE:
I noticed in addDorc(), you put pthread_t dorc; in an if statement. I don't quite understand what my if statement is actually supposed to be checking though.
I forgot to mention/explain. I wrapped your/old code and my/new code with preprocessor conditionals (e.g.):
#if 0
// old code
#else
// new code
#endif
After the cpp stage, the compiler will only see the // new code stuff. Doing this was an instructional tool to show [where possible] what code you had vs what I replaced it with. This was done to show the changes vs. just rewriting completely.
If we never defined NEVERWAS with a #define NEVERWAS, then the above block would be equivalent to:
#ifdef NEVERWAS
// old code ...
#else
// new code
#endif
Would it still be under the if(r <= 30) part like I did in my original code?
Yes, hopefully now, it is more clear. #if is a cpp directive to include/exclude code (as if you had edited that way). But, a "real" if is an actual executable statement that is evaluated at runtime [as it was before], so no change needed.
My other concern is it doesn't look like dorc is used anywhere in the function because you write pthread_create(&ent->thr,NULL,goDorc,ent); which seems to use ent instead?
That is correct. It is not used/defined and the value goes to ent->thr. As you had it, the pthread_t value set by pthread_create would be lost [when dorc goes out of scope]. So, unless it's saved somewhere semi-permanent (e.g. in ent->thr), there would be no way to do a pthread_join call later.
So I've got a weird problem and can't seem to solve it. I have an ADT called TEAM:
typedef struct Team {
char *name;
int points;
int matches_won;
int goal_difference;
int goals_for;
}TEAM;
I created a function to initialize variables of the TEAM* type with a given name:
TEAM *createTEAM (char *name){
int error_code;
if (name != NULL){
if(strcmp(name, "") != 0){
TEAM *new_team = (TEAM*)malloc(sizeof(TEAM));
new_team->name = (char*)malloc(sizeof(char)*strlen(name));
strcpy(new_team->name, name);
new_team->points = 0;
new_team->matches_won = 0;
new_team->goal_difference = 0;
new_team->goals_for = 0;
return new_team;
}else{
error_code = EMPTY_STRING_CODE;
}
} else {
error_code = NULL_STRING_CODE;
}
printf("Erro ao criar time.\n");
printError(error_code);
return NULL;
}
I also created a function to delete one of these TEAM* variables properly:
void deleteTEAM (TEAM *team_to_remove){
free(team_to_remove->name);
team_to_remove->name = NULL;
free(team_to_remove);
team_to_remove = NULL;
}
But when one or multiple test functions that I created (example below) run, the program sometimes crashes, sometimes doesn't. I've noticed that changing the names I use affects whether it crashes or not, even if they don't affect the test results.
int create_team_01(){
int test_result;
TEAM *Teste = createTEAM("Cruzeiro");
if (strcmp(Teste->name, "Cruzeiro") == 0){
test_result = TRUE;
}else test_result = FALSE;
_assert(test_result); //just a macro function that will check the argument and return 1 if it's false
deleteTEAM(Teste);
return 0;
}
I don't see any problems with memory allocation or freeing. Still, the debugger complains a lot about the first free() (can't find bounds) of the deleteTEAM function. Any ideas? Thanks a lot in advance for any help.
P.S.: I've even tried checking the mallocs' results, but it doesn't seem to be the problem either, so I removed it for the sake of simplicity.
I have been learning how to use Unix functions to program in C so that I can program Semaphore functionality by scratch (without pthreads), but I am currently stuck. The man pages told me to include particular header files to use functions of interest (such as malloc, tsleep, wakeup, etc.), but when I try to run my program with the headers and method calls, I receive the following errors:
/tmp//ccg29960.o: In function `allocate_semaphore':
/tmp//ccg29960.o(.text+0x28d): undefined reference to `simple_lock_init'
/tmp//ccg29960.o: In function `down_semaphore':
/tmp//ccg29960.o(.text+0x2fb): undefined reference to `tsleep'
/tmp//ccg29960.o: In function `up_semaphore':
/tmp//ccg29960.o(.text+0x3b5): undefined reference to `wakeup'
/tmp//ccg29960.o: In function `free_semaphore':
/tmp//ccg29960.o(.text+0x43b): undefined reference to `simple_lock'
/tmp//ccg29960.o(.text+0x4af): undefined reference to `simple_unlock'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
The relevant code is below:
//#include <stdio.h>
//#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/errno.h>
#include <sys/queue.h>
//#include <sys/time.h>
#include <sys/param.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/proc.h>
#include <sys/malloc.h>
#include <sys/lock.h>
struct entry
{
pid_t id;
SIMPLEQ_ENTRY(entry) next;
} *np;
typedef struct
{
const char* name;
pid_t process;
pid_t p_process; //parent process
int count;
SIMPLEQ_HEAD(queuehead,entry) head;
struct simplelock *slock;
} named_semaphore;
named_semaphore* s_list[64];
int num_semaphores = 0;
int main()
{
//lockinit(0, 0, 0,0, 0);
printf("Hello world\n");
return 0;
}
//... irrelevant code elided
int allocate_semaphore( const char* name, int initial_count )
{
int num_elements, i;
named_semaphore *new_s;
//perform initial checks before creating a new semaphore
//make sure the given name is an acceptable length
num_elements = sizeof(name) / sizeof(*name);
if ( num_elements > 32 )
{
return ENAMETOOLONG;
}
//make sure the given name is unique to this process
for (i = 0; i < num_semaphores; i++)
{
if (s_list[i]->process == getpid() && strcmp(s_list[i]->name, name))
{
return EEXIST;
}
}
//make sure there are no more than 64 semaphores active
if (num_semaphores >= 64)
{
return ENOMEM;
}
//create a new semaphore and add it to the collection
new_s = (named_semaphore*) malloc(sizeof(named_semaphore), 0, 0);
new_s->name = name;
new_s->process = getpid();
new_s->p_process = getppid();
new_s->count = initial_count;
s_list[num_semaphores] = new_s;
++num_semaphores;
//initialize the waiting queue
SIMPLEQ_INIT( &(new_s->head) );
//initialize its lock
simple_lock_init( new_s->slock );
//need to handle negative initial_count somehow
return (0);
}
int down_semaphore( const char* name )
{
named_semaphore* s;
s = getSemaphore( name );
if (s == NULL)
{
return (ENOENT);
}
s->count = (s->count) - 1;
if (s->count < 0)
{
//put process to sleep
tsleep(getpid(), getpriority(), 0, 0);
//add process to waiting queue
np = (struct entry *) malloc(sizeof(struct entry ));
np->id = getpid();
SIMPLEQ_INSERT_TAIL( &(s->head), np, next );
}
return 0;
}
int up_semaphore ( const char* name )
{
named_semaphore* s;
s = getSemaphore( name );
if ( s == NULL )
{
return (ENOENT);
}
s->count = (s->count) + 1;
if (s->count <= 0)
{
//wakeup longest waiting process
wakeup( (SIMPLEQ_FIRST( &(s->head) ))->id );
//remove process from waiting queue
SIMPLEQ_REMOVE_HEAD( &(s->head), np, next );
free( np );
}
return 0;
}
int free_semaphore( const char* name )
{
named_semaphore* s;
s = getSemaphore( name );
if ( s == NULL )
{
return (ENOENT);
}
simple_lock( s->slock );
while ( (np = SIMPLEQ_FIRST( &(s->head) ) ) != NULL )
{
//wakeup the process and return ECONNABORTED
//wakeup( getSemaphore( np->id ) );
SIMPLEQ_REMOVE_HEAD( &(s->head), np, next );
free( np );
}
free( s );
simple_unlock( s->slock );
}
I am not done modifying/fixing the logic of my overall program (for example, the lock()ing only happens in 1/3 of the intended methods), but it would be wonderful to understand why I am getting my current error so that I know how to fix similar ones in the future.
To me it seems like the methods do not recognize their header files or that I am missing a required piece of information so that the two can communicate.
To fix the errors, I've tried rearranging and commenting out the listed header files and also renaming the method calls in uppercase letters like they were presented in the header file documentation.
Any help or insight is appreciated, and thank you in advance!
The man pages you read... those were section 9, weren't they? Section 9 is for kernel programming. You can't call those functions unless your code is in the kernel.
I'm just entered multithreaded programming and as part of an exercise trying to implement a simple thread pool using pthreads.
I have tried to use conditional variable to signal working threads that there are jobs waiting within the queue. But for a reason I can't figure out the mechanism is not working.
Bellow are the relevant code snippets:
typedef struct thread_pool_task
{
void (*computeFunc)(void *);
void *param;
} ThreadPoolTask;
typedef enum thread_pool_state
{
RUNNING = 0,
SOFT_SHUTDOWN = 1,
HARD_SHUTDOWN = 2
} ThreadPoolState;
typedef struct thread_pool
{
ThreadPoolState poolState;
unsigned int poolSize;
unsigned int queueSize;
OSQueue* poolQueue;
pthread_t* threads;
pthread_mutex_t q_mtx;
pthread_cond_t q_cnd;
} ThreadPool;
static void* threadPoolThread(void* threadPool){
ThreadPool* pool = (ThreadPool*)(threadPool);
for(;;)
{
/* Lock must be taken to wait on conditional variable */
pthread_mutex_lock(&(pool->q_mtx));
/* Wait on condition variable, check for spurious wakeups.
When returning from pthread_cond_wait(), we own the lock. */
while( (pool->queueSize == 0) && (pool->poolState == RUNNING) )
{
pthread_cond_wait(&(pool->q_cnd), &(pool->q_mtx));
}
printf("Queue size: %d\n", pool->queueSize);
/* --- */
if (pool->poolState != RUNNING){
break;
}
/* Grab our task */
ThreadPoolTask* task = osDequeue(pool->poolQueue);
pool->queueSize--;
/* Unlock */
pthread_mutex_unlock(&(pool->q_mtx));
/* Get to work */
(*(task->computeFunc))(task->param);
free(task);
}
pthread_mutex_unlock(&(pool->q_mtx));
pthread_exit(NULL);
return(NULL);
}
ThreadPool* tpCreate(int numOfThreads)
{
ThreadPool* threadPool = malloc(sizeof(ThreadPool));
if(threadPool == NULL) return NULL;
/* Initialize */
threadPool->poolState = RUNNING;
threadPool->poolSize = numOfThreads;
threadPool->queueSize = 0;
/* Allocate OSQueue and threads */
threadPool->poolQueue = osCreateQueue();
if (threadPool->poolQueue == NULL)
{
}
threadPool->threads = malloc(sizeof(pthread_t) * numOfThreads);
if (threadPool->threads == NULL)
{
}
/* Initialize mutex and conditional variable */
pthread_mutex_init(&(threadPool->q_mtx), NULL);
pthread_cond_init(&(threadPool->q_cnd), NULL);
/* Start worker threads */
for(int i = 0; i < threadPool->poolSize; i++)
{
pthread_create(&(threadPool->threads[i]), NULL, threadPoolThread, threadPool);
}
return threadPool;
}
int tpInsertTask(ThreadPool* threadPool, void (*computeFunc) (void *), void* param)
{
if(threadPool == NULL || computeFunc == NULL) {
return -1;
}
/* Check state and create ThreadPoolTask */
if (threadPool->poolState != RUNNING) return -1;
ThreadPoolTask* newTask = malloc(sizeof(ThreadPoolTask));
if (newTask == NULL) return -1;
newTask->computeFunc = computeFunc;
newTask->param = param;
/* Add task to queue */
pthread_mutex_lock(&(threadPool->q_mtx));
osEnqueue(threadPool->poolQueue, newTask);
threadPool->queueSize++;
pthread_cond_signal(&(threadPool->q_cnd));
pthread_mutex_unlock(&threadPool->q_mtx);
return 0;
}
The problem is that when I create a pool with 1 thread and add a lot of jobs to it, it does not executes all the jobs.
[EDIT:]
I have tried running the following code to test basic functionality:
void hello (void* a)
{
int i = *((int*)a);
printf("hello: %d\n", i);
}
void test_thread_pool_sanity()
{
int i;
ThreadPool* tp = tpCreate(1);
for(i=0; i<10; ++i)
{
tpInsertTask(tp,hello,(void*)(&i));
}
}
I expected to have input in like the following:
hello: 0
hello: 1
hello: 2
hello: 3
hello: 4
hello: 5
hello: 6
hello: 7
hello: 8
hello: 9
Instead, sometime i get the following output:
Queue size: 9 //printf added for debugging within threadPoolThread
hello: 9
Queue size: 9 //printf added for debugging within threadPoolThread
hello: 0
And sometimes I don't get any output at all.
What is the thing I'm missing?
When you call tpInsertTask(tp,hello,(void*)(&i)); you are passing the address of i which is on the stack. There are multiple problems with this:
Every thread is getting the same address. I am guessing the hello function takes that address and prints out *param which all point to the same location on the stack.
Since i is on the stack once test_thread_pool_sanity returns the last value is lost and will be overwritten by other code so the value is undefined.
Depending on then the worker thread works through the tasks versus when your main test thread schedules the tasks you will get different results.
You need the parameter passed to be saved as part of the task in order to guarantee it is unique per task.
EDIT: You should also check the return code of pthread_create to see if it is failing.
I have some functions that should allow me to manage a structure which was allocated dynamically. The allocation of the memory and the input of data in those is no real problem, though my program stops when it reaches a certain line of code: (No warning or problems detected)
if(codeV == p_vendite[ctrl_j].p_venditore[ctrl_i].codVenditore)
This line is in the function called VenditeProdotto(Vendite *p_vendite).
Here's the important part of the code (defining structures)
typedef struct _Venditore {
int codVenditore;
int codProdotto;
int qty;
} Venditore;
typedef struct _Vendite{
int mmGG;
Venditore *p_venditore;
} Vendite;
void AggiungiVendita (Vendite *p_vendite);
void VenditeProdotto(Vendite *p_vendite);
void VenditeVenditore(Vendite *p_vendite);
...
Here's main():
int main() {
int check, i, count, flag, choice;
Vendite *p_Vendite;
...
...
p_Vendite = (Vendite*) calloc(numVenditori,sizeof(Vendite));
...
...
p_Vendite->p_venditore = (Venditore*)calloc(numVenditori,sizeof(Venditore));
/*menu*/
flag = TRUE;
do{
choice = menu();
switch (choice) {
case 1 : AggiungiVendita(p_Vendite); break;
...
case 3 : VenditeProdotto(p_Vendite); break;
case 4 : VenditeVenditore(p_Vendite); break;
...
}
} while (flag == TRUE);
return 0;
}
And here are the functions:
void AggiungiVendita (Vendite *p_vendite) {
int flag, check, answer;
i = 0;
do{
/*input of struct - codVenditore,codProdotto,qty*/
...
check = scanf("%d", &(p_vendite[j].p_venditore[i].codVenditore));
...
/*input*/
check = scanf("%d", &(p_vendite[j].p_venditore[i].codProdotto) );
...
/*controllo sull'input*/
check = scanf("%d", &(p_vendite[j].p_venditore[i].qty) );
...
...
//asking to redo or quit
} while(flag == TRUE && i < numVenditori);
return;
}
int menu() {
//just a standard menu, no problem here
...
return choice;
}
void VenditeProdotto(Vendite *p_vendite) {
int check = 0, codeP = 0, ctrl_i = 0, ctrl_j = 0; //ctrl_i,ctrl_j are increasing variables and I use them to search among the structures
...//input, continues after
Where I find the debug error: (line 3 after this)
for(ctrl_j = 0; ctrl_j < numVendite; ctrl_j++) {
for(ctrl_i = 0; ctrl_i < numVenditori; ctrl_i++) {
if (codeP == p_vendite[ctrl_j].p_venditore[ctrl_i].codProdotto)
printf("\nSeller %d, quantity sold: %d in day %d", p_vendite[ctrl_j].p_venditore[ctrl_i].codVenditore, p_vendite[ctrl_j].p_venditore[ctrl_i].qty, ctrl_j+1);
else
continue;
}
}
return;
}
Basically I don't know if it's really legit to use the first line of code that I've talked about, with . instead of ->, but if I try to change the syntax I get detected errors. Any ideas?
At first I thought about something like (p_vendite+ctrl_j)->(p_venditore+ctrl_i)->codProdotto, since it's a pointer but it doesn't seem working.
There are a couple of obvious bugs:
Allocation of Vendite
You're allocating numVenditori elements for p_Vendite, but later on you are iterating numVendite times over the same pointer:
p_Vendite = (Vendite*) calloc(numVenditori,sizeof(Vendite));
...
for(ctrl_j = 0; ctrl_j < numVendite; ctrl_j++) {
for(ctrl_i = 0; ctrl_i < numVenditori; ctrl_i++) {
if (codeP == p_vendite[ctrl_j].p_venditore[ctrl_i].codProdotto)
The allocation should read:
p_Vendite = (Vendite*) calloc(numVendite,sizeof(Vendite));
or as I would prefer it:
p_Vendite = calloc (numVendite, sizeof *p_Vendite);
Allocation of Venditore
p_Vendite->p_venditore = (Venditore*)calloc(numVenditori,sizeof(Venditore));
You're only allocating the p_venditore element for one of your Vendite structs. You need to allocate all of them in a loop:
for (int j = 0; j < numVendite; j++) {
p_Vendite[j].p_venditore = (Venditore*)calloc(numVenditori,sizeof(Venditore));
// And check for allocation errors
}