I'm trying to play a note through the speaker of my board. Currently, I have an interrupt as follows:
void sampleISR(void) {
static uint32_t phaseAcc = 0;
phaseAcc += a; //this `a` is modified outside
analogWrite(OUTR_PIN, phaseAcc);
}
It is attached in the setup() function as follows:
TIM_TypeDef *Instance = TIM1;
HardwareTimer *sampleTimer = new HardwareTimer(Instance);
sampleTimer->setOverflow(22000, HERTZ_FORMAT);
sampleTimer->attachInterrupt(sampleISR);
sampleTimer->resume();
I am trying to use a DMA to reduce the strain on my CPU and also increase the sampling rate (making the 22000 bigger). I am trying to use this as my board supports it, however, I am conceptually confused as to what the transformation entails. Currently, I have an interrupt which modifies the analogWrite value to pin OUTR_PIN every 22000 samples. My current understanding is that a DMA is a tool that connects memory to peripherals or memory to memory, in such a way that data can be transferred without the need for the CPU to do it. However, I am uncertain as to what that means in the current context. Would I need to create a memory-to-periphery DMA where the source is memory (my phaseAcc variable and the output is a periphery (my OUTR_PIN?). I am not sure how I would go around doing this, or if what I described above is correct. I am trying to directly mimic the functionality described above.
I am using a board from the stm32 family.
To drive a speaker you normally use the DAC (digital to analog converter) with a PWM signal (pulse width modulation) On STM32 the DAC / PWM can be linked with DMA (Direct Memory Access), see i.e. HAL_TIM_PWM_Start_DMA from the HAL library, in https://deepbluembedded.com/stm32-dac-sine-wave-generation-stm32-dac-dma-timer-example/ and https://community.st.com/s/question/0D50X0000AAJMUVSQ5/start-pwm-with-dma-haltimpwmstartdma-results-in-hardfault is example code, however you should not drive a speaker with a pure sine wave
For details see also this Application Note : https://www.st.com/resource/en/application_note/cd00259245-audio-and-waveform-generation-using-the-dac-in-stm32-products-stmicroelectronics.pdf
To generate a desired waveform you have to adapt the waveform lookup table described in https://deepbluembedded.com/stm32-dac-sine-wave-generation-stm32-dac-dma-timer-example/
Related
I'm using an STM32H743. I have an external clock signal coming in on a GPIO pin, and I want to very accurately measure elapsed time between each rising (or falling) edge in the external clock signal. So I set things up so that TIM4 is triggered by the external clock, and TIM5 is triggered by the internal oscillator.
I wrote an IRQ so that whenever TIM4 triggers, an interrupt runs that captures TIM5's value. It seems to work OK, but I'm wondering if I can do it through DMA to avoid all the context switching and free up the CPU. Basically I want to set up a DMA so that each TIM4 event initiates a DMA transfer that copies the TIM5 counter value to a circular buffer somewhere.
I've searched through forums and the DMA documentation but I'm hazy on whether a timer register can be a valid DMA source. I was thinking maybe I could do something like this:
hDma->PAR = (uint32_t) &htim5.Instance->CNT;
hDma->M0AR = (uint32_t) myBufferPtr;
hDma->NDTR = myBufferSize;
hDma->CR |= (uint32_t)DMA_SxCR_EN;
But I'm not sure if this can work.
Short version: Can I use the timer's CNT register as a DMA transfer source? Would it be a peripheral-to-memory transfer? Or a memory-to-memory transfer? Are there other flags I need to make this work? Or is it not possible? Or is there another STM32 feature that would make it easier to count time between pulses?
Disclaimer
I must confess that my long practical experience with STM32 by now stayed with mainstream controller families like STM32F0, STM32F3, STM32F4 and STM32L4.
Therefore I'm answering based on what those controllers would offer you in your situation.
The STM32H7 series is much stronger, let alone it offers several additional DMA technologies like DMA2D, MDMA and lots of other stuff that I'm not sure about.
But I think a simplified answer might also help you for now, so I'm daring to write it.
Can I use the timer's CNT register as a DMA transfer source? Would it be a peripheral-to-memory transfer? Or a memory-to-memory transfer? Are there other flags I need to make this work? Or is it not possible?
I would expect this to work.
I don't see a reason not to read the TIMx_CNT register in a DMA transfer.
The CNT register is definitely a peripheral address so you have to configure it as a peripheral-to-memory transfer.
I believe that the peripheral/memory separation refers to the bus from which the DMA controller fetches the data (or to which bus one it delivers them) in the bus matrix implemented in every STM32.
Or is there another STM32 feature that would make it easier to count time between pulses?
Yes, there is:
Many of the TIM peripherals (not all are the same) offer you a feature called "Input Capture" that connects the channel (sub-)peripheral of the TIM instance to the input and has the main part of the (same!) TIM peripheral do the internal clocking.
A prerequisite of this is, that the pin you'd like to measure has a TIMx_CHy alternate function, not "only" a TIMx_ETR one.
The TIM peripherals offer a wealthy range of different configuration options - and a complicated mess as long as you haven't got used to it.
As an introduction and a good overview, I recommend two application notes from ST:
AN4013 Application note. "STM32 cross-series timer overview", Rev.8
Which timers you have on your µC, and which features are offered by which one.
AN4776 Application note. "General-purpose timer cookbook for STM32 microcontrollers", Rev.3
How to use the timers you have. Check out section 2.6, input capture is on page 27.
Looking up those two, I found a third one you might want to check out for better precision, related to HRTIM timers:
AN4539 Application note. "HRTIM cookbook", Rev.4
It is easily done using STM32CubeIDE configurator:
configure timer, enable input capture channel, enable DMA (mode
circular, peripheral to memory,data width word/word). Enable
interrupts.
Prepare buffer for storing captured counter values
Start IC in DMA mode before main loop
For high speed operation you may copy data from timerCaptureBuffer
to timerCaptureBufferSafe inside these callbacks. For example, DMA memory to memory transfer to minimize time spent in HAL_TIM_IC_CaptureHalfCpltCallback and HAL_TIM_IC_CaptureCallback interrupts. Process adjacent captured values stored in timerCaptureBufferSafe after DMA memory to memory callback signals data is ready. You may use signaling flags so timerCaptureBufferSafe will not be overwritten.
Here is an example:
#define TIM_BUFFER_SIZE 128
uint32_t timerCaptureBuffer[TIM_BUFFER_SIZE];
uint32_t timerCaptureBufferSafe[TIM_BUFFER_SIZE];
// ...
HAL_DMA_RegisterCallback(&hdma_memtomem_dma2_stream2,
HAL_DMA_XFER_CPLT_CB_ID,
myDMA_Callback22);
// ...
HAL_TIM_IC_Start_DMA(&htim2, TIM_CHANNEL_1, uint32_t*)timerCaptureBuffer,TIM_BUFFER_SIZE);
// ...
void HAL_TIM_IC_CaptureHalfCpltCallback(TIM_HandleTypeDef *htim)
{
HAL_DMA_Start_IT(&hdma_memtomem_dma2_stream2,
(uint32_t)&timerCaptureBuffer[0],
(uint32_t)&timerCaptureBufferSafe[0],
sizeof(timerCaptureBuffer)/2/4);
// ...
}
void HAL_TIM_IC_CaptureCallback(TIM_HandleTypeDef *htim)
{
HAL_DMA_Start_IT(&hdma_memtomem_dma2_stream2,
(uint32_t)&timerCaptureBuffer[TIM_BUFFER_SIZE/2],
(uint32_t)&timerCaptureBufferSafe[TIM_BUFFER_SIZE/2],
sizeof(timerCaptureBuffer)/2/4);
// ...
}
void myDMA_Callback22(DMA_HandleTypeDef *_hdma)
{
//...
}
I'm now doing a project in CCS (Code Composer Studio) with the device CC1310.
I think is good to mention that I'm relatively new to CCS.
I have a hard time finding a simple way to read the analog value form the PINS on the board. (similar to Arduino: int x = analogRead(A1) )
Question: How do I store and read analog values from the Pins on the board?
I thankful for all answers
Kind Regards // Troubled Engineering Student
The ADC header file should be included in an application as follow
#include <ti/drivers/ADC.h>
Operation
The ADC driver operates as a simplified ADC module with only single channel sampling support. It also operates on blocking only mode which means users have to wait the current sampling finished before starting another sampling. The sampling channel needs to be specified in the ADC_open() before calling ADC_convert().
The APIs in this driver serve as an interface to a typical TI-RTOS application. The specific peripheral implementations are responsible to create all the SYS/BIOS specific primitives to allow for thread-safe operation. User can use the ADC driver or the ADCBuf driver that has more features. But both ADC and ADCBuf cannot be used together in an application.
Opening the driver
ADC_Handle adc;
ADC_Params params;
ADC_Params_init(¶ms);
adc = ADC_open(Board_ADCCHANNEL_A1, ¶ms);
if (adc == NULL) {
// ADC_open() failed
while (1);
}
Converting
An ADC conversion with a ADC peripheral is started by calling ADC_convert(). The result value is returned by ADC_convert() once the conversion is finished
int_fast16_t res;
uint_fast16_t adcValue;
res = ADC_convert(adc, &adcValue);
if (res == ADC_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
//use adcValue
}
If you're asking about digital I/O (on or off) then the term you should research in the MCU's Datasheet and Technical Reference Manual is "GPIO". If you have a development kit (such as a LaunchPad) then study the GPIO example that is provided with the development kit's SDK. The SDK probably includes a peripheral driver library that provides a higher level interface to the GPIO peripheral. If so then you could link your application with the library and use the library API to set/get the GPIO data values. Or if you want to do it at the lowest level then you'll need to study the memory-mapped interface to the GPIO registers, which is described in the Technical Reference Manual. For example, the DIN31_0 register is used to read the GPIO input values.
You can find links to everything I mentioned at http://www.ti.com/product/CC1310
I read that the driver for "Software PWM" is running somehow on the PWM-HW and acessing all GPIOs without using the CPU. Can someone explain how that works? Is there a second processor in the Raspberry Pi used for PWM and PCM module(is there a diagram for the blocks)?
The question is related to this excellent driver which I used a lot in my robots.
Here is the explanation, which I unfortunately don't understand...
The driver works by setting up a linked list of DMA control blocks with the
last one linked back to the first, so once initialised the DMA controller
cycles round continuously and the driver does not need to get involved except
when a pulse width needs to be changed. For a given period there are two DMA
control blocks; the first transfers a single word to the GPIO 'clear output'
register, while the second transfers some number of words to the PWM FIFO to
generate the required pulse width time. In addition, interspersed with these
control blocks is one for each configured servo which is used to set an output.
While the driver does use the PWM peripheral, it only uses it to pace the DMA
transfers, so as to generate accurate delays."
Is the following understanding right:
The DMA controller is like a second processor. You can run code on it. So it is used here to control all the Raspberry GPIO pins high/low states together with the PWM block. DMA Controller does this continously. There are probably more than one DMA controller in the Raspberry, so the speed of the OS Linux is not influenced much due to one missing DMA controller.
I don't understand how exactly DMA and PWM work together.
I recommend reading RPIO source code together with ServoBlaster's, as it's slightly simplified and can help understanding. Also very important: Broadcom's BCM2835 manual which contains all the tiny details.
is there a diagram for the blocks
The manual contains all the functionalities offered by the chip (not in a block diagram though, as far as I’ve seen).
Is the following understanding right:
The DMA controller is part of the main chip (Broadcom, although I think the same happens on desktop CPUs). It can't exactly run code, but it can copy memory across peripherals by itself, without consuming the main processor’s time. The DMA controller has different channels which can copy memory independently and runs independently of the CPU.
It is configurable via "control blocks" (BCM manual page 40, 4.2.1.1): you can tell the DMA controller to first copy memory from A to B, then from C to D and so on.
don't understand how exactly DMA and PWM work together
DMA is used to send data to the PWM controller ("Pulse Width Modulator", BCM manual page 138, chap. 9), which consumes the data and this creates a very precise delay. Interestingly, the PWM controller is... not used to generate any PWM pulse, but just to wait.
Can someone explain how that works?
Ultimately, you configure the value of the GPIO pins (or the settings of the PWM or PCM generator), by setting memory at a special address; the memory in that region represents the peripheral configuration (BCM manual page 89, chapter 6).
So the idea is: copy 1 onto the memory that controls the GPIO pin value, using the DMA controller; wait the pulse width; copy 0 onto the GPIO pin value; wait the remaining part of the period; loop. Since the DMA controller does it, it doesn't consume CPU cycles.
The key point here is being able to make the DMA controller "wait" an exact amount of time, and for this, RPIO and ServoBlaster use the PWM controller in FIFO mode (the PCM generator also has such functionality, but let's stick to PWM). This means that the PWM controller will "send" the data it reads from its so-called FIFO queue, and then stop. It doesn't matter how it's "sent" (BCM manual page 139, 9.4 MSENi=0), the key point is that it requires a fixed amount of time. As a matter of fact, it doesn't even matter which data is sent: the DMA controller is configured to write into the FIFO queue and then wait until the PWM controller has finished sending data, and this creates a very precise delay.
The resolution of the resulting pulse is given by the duration of the PWM transfer, which depends on the frequency at which the PWM controller is running.
Example
We have a maximum resolution of 1ms (given by the PWM delay), and we want to have a pulse of 25% duty cycle with frequency 125Hz. The period of a pulse is thus 8ms. The DMA operation performed will be
Set pin to 1 (DMA write to GPIO mem)
Wait 1ms (DMA write to PWM FIFO)
Wait 1ms (DMA write to PWM FIFO)
Set the pin to 0 (DMA write to GPIO mem)
Wait 1ms (DMA write to PWM FIFO)
...repeat "Wait 1ms" 4 more times.
Wait 1ms (DMA write to PWM FIFO) and jump back to 1.
This will thus require at least 10 DMA control blocks (8 wait instructions, given by period / delay plus 2 write operations).
Note: in ServoBlaster and RPIO, it will consume exactly 16 DMA control blocks, because (for higher precision), they always perform a "memory copy" operation before a "wait operation". The "memory copy" operation is just a dummy unless it needs to change the pin value.
I am trying to write a small driver program on a Beaglebone Black that needs to send a signal with timings like this:
I need to send 360 bits of information. I'm wondering if I can turn off all interrupts on the board for a duration of 500µs while I send the signal. I have no idea if I can just turn off all the interrupts like that. Searches have been unkind to me so far. Any ideas how I might achieve this? I do have some prototypes in assembly language for the signal, but I'm pretty sure its being broken by interrupts.
So for example, I'm hoping I could have something like this:
disable_irq();
/* asm code to send my bytes */
reenable_irq();
What would the bodies of disable_irq() and reenable_irq() look like?
The calls you would want to use are local_irq_disable() and local_irq_enable() to disable & enable IRQs locally on the current CPU. This also has the effect of disabling all preemption on the CPU.
Now lets talk about your general approach. If I understand you correctly, you'd like to bit bang your protocol over a GPIO with timing accurate to < 1/3 us.
This will be a challenge. Tests show that the Beaglebone black GPIO toggle frequency is going to max out at ~2.78MHz writing directly to the SoC IO registers in kernel mode (~0.18 us minimum pulse width).
So, although this might be achievable by the thinnest of margins by writing atomic code in kernel space, I propose another concept:
Implement your custom serial protocol on the SPI bus.
Why?
The SPI bus can be clocked up to 48MHz on the Beaglebone Black, its buffered and can be used with the DMA engine. Therefore, you don't have to worry about disabling interrupts and monopolizing your CPU for this one interface. With a timing resolution of ~0.021us (# 48MHz), you should be able to achieve your timing needs with an acceptable margin of error.
With the bus configured for Single Channel Continuous Transfer Transmit-Only Master mode and 30-bit word length (2 30-bit words for each bit of your protocol):
To write a '0' with your protocol, you'd write the 2 word sequence - 17 '1's followed by 43 '0's - on SPI (#48MHz).
To write a '1' with your protocol, you'd write the 2 word sequence - 43 '1's followed by 17 '0's - on SPI (#48MHz).
From your signal timmings it's easy to figure out that SPI or other serial peripheral can not reach your demand. In your timmings, encoding is based on the width of the pulse. So let's get to the point:
Q1 Could you turn off all interrupts for a duration of 500µs?
A: 0.5ms is quite a long time in embedded system. ISR is born to enable the concurrency of multi-task and improve the real-time capability. Your should keep in mind that ISR and context-switch(in some chip architecture) are all influenced by global interrupt.
But if your top priority is to perform the timmings, and the real-time window of other tasks are acceptable, of cause you can disable the global interrupt in the duration. Even longer. If not, don't do ATOM operation in such a long time.
Q2 How?
A: For a certain chip, there's asm instruction for open/close global interrupt undoubtedly. Find the instructions or the APIs provided by your OS, do the 3 steps below(pseudocode):
state_t tState = get_interrupt_status( );
disable_interrupt( );
... /*your operation here*/
resume_interrupt( tState );
I knew there is a similar post:
Steps to make a LED blink from a C/C++ program?
But now I am working on a arm-based development board, and it seems to have two serial ports that I could use it to make a LED on or off.
Basically I think the flow is , make one pin in serial "1" or on and the LED will be turned on and "0" to make it off.
Is there some reference code in C-language I could refers?
Generally speaking, the board should come with some Board Support Package (BSP) which lets you control the built in I/O. Look for a serial library if you really want to use the Hardware flow control signals.
I'd recommend looking for some GPIO (General Purpose I/O, or digial I/O) on the board, which typically lets you configure it as an input or an output. You should be able to connect the LED via a current limiting resister between a digital I/O line and a ground pin. Make sure you have the LED oriented correctly if you connect it backwards it will block the current instead lighting. And as always make sure you check it out with a digital voltage meter before connecting it.
Even if you don't have a BSP for digital I/O the configuration is usually pretty simple.
Set a bit in a register to enable it, set bit in another register to select input or output they will normally be arranged in 8-bit "ports." Some systems allow you configure individual I/O pins, other will only allow you to configure the whole port for input or output. Then you just write a 1 or 0 to the bit you want to control in an write/output register.
ARM chips typically have a considerable amount of built in peripherals today, so most boards will just be bringing the I/O out to physical connectors on the board and you may need to read the chip vender's documentation to find the register memory map. Better board venders will supply documentation, a library (BSP) and examples. Luminary Micro even supplies chips with built in ethernet MACs and PHYs, just add a connector and Magnetics and you have a 1 chip Webserver.
This will, I'm afraid, be heavily dependent on the specifications of the particular arm-based development board you are using.
You need to find documentation specific to that board.
I used to do this kind of programming before.
You need to study the serial port connection
http://www.lammertbies.nl/comm/cable/RS-232.html
http://www.beyondlogic.org/serial/serial.htm
It has +5v, -5v on the output, I can't remember clearly now. Not every pin is needed.
I never use ARM before, but I use a 8-bit PIC controller to program it. I guess you can find a lot of example online.
The preferred alternative for controlling a GPIO is via a BSP. Because this BSP (board support package) does all the work for you in setting all peripherals to good defaults and and allowing you to call a function. Possibly your BSP of choice will have a function to write a byte to an 8-bit GPIO port; your LED will only have one bit. In this case your C code could look like: (at least: it will work like this on Luminary Micro kits). (Example code; requires a bit of extra work to make it compile especially on your kit).
/* each LED is addressed by an address (byte) and a bit-within-this-byte */
struct {
address, // address of IO register for LED port
bit // bit of LED
} LEDConfigPair;
struct LEDConfigPair LEDConfig[NUMBER_OF_LEDS] = {
{GPIO_PORTB_BASE,0}, // LED_0 is at port B0
{GPIO_PORTB_BASE,1} // LED_1 is at port B1
} ;
/* function LED_init configures the GPIOs where LEDs are connected as output */
led_init(void)
{
U32 i;
for(i=0;i<NUMBER_OF_LEDS;i++)
{
GPIODirModeSet( LEDConfig[i][0], LEDConfig[i][1], GPIO_DIR_MODE_OUT );
}
}
/* my LED function
set_led_state makes use of the BSP of Luminary Micro to access a GPIO function
Implementation: this BSP requires setting 8 port wide IO, so the function will calculate a mask (
*/
set_led_state(U8 led,bool state)
{
U8 andmask;
U8 setmask;
andmask = ~(1 << LEDConfig[led].bit);// a bitmask with all 1's except bit of LED
if (true == state)
{
setmask = (1 << LEDConfig[led].bit); // set bit for LED
} else
{
setmask = 0;
}
GPIOPinWrite(LEDConfig[led].address, andmask, setmask);
}
Of course this is all spelled out; it can be done in a single lines like this:
#DEFINE SETLEDSTATE(led,state) GPIOPinWrite(LEDConfig[led].address, ~(1<<LEDConfig[led].bit),(state<<LEDConfig[led].bit))
this will do the same, but only makes sense when you can dream bit masks, and you only want to toggle some LEDs to debug the real program...
The alternative: bare metal.
In this case you need to set up everything for yourself. For an embedded system, you need to be aware of pin multiplexing and power management (assuming memory controller and cpu clocks are already set up!)
initialization: set pin multiplexing in such a way that the function you want to control is actually mapped on the package.
initialization of pheripheral (in this case either a UART, or a GPIO function on the same pin)
You can't do it using Rx or Tx pins of Serial port. For that you just need to control the RTS or CTS pins of serial port.
Just google for "access COM port in VC++ code" and then control the RTS and CTS status pins to turn ON and OFF any external device.