I have a database with multiple languages, so i transferred the database between WooCommerce to Magento. It's transferred only English language without other's. How can i solve it?
You can use the litextension service to migrate woo-commerce to Magento.
Below is the litextension migration extension of magento2:
https://marketplace.magento.com/litextension-woocommerce-to-magento-migration.html
You should look for a tool that transfers multiple languages across platforms. There's a bunch of solutions on the market that offer such services, but I'd suggest you try Cart2Cart module. I've used it on a couple of my stores and it worked perfectly . Most importantly, there's no risk of damaging your store, since you'll just have to configure the migration and the system will migrate the data automatedly
Related
We have a Vbulletin 4 forum as well as a gaming CMS (not Vbulletin CMS). We want to connect the database of these systems, integration with CMS.
My question is that: Is it better to make separate database for each one and then integrate two system together or put both in one database? Which one is better and lighter?
I would not recommend to use only one DB.
Each CMS (I assume vb forum IS a CMS) should have its dedicated database (but the DBs can be hosted on the same serv).
Each CMS uses plugins and has a very special way to work with the database, so basicaly they would not be able to share information directly via database.
Many CMS on the same DB = risk of conflict.
(depending what do you need to integrate) You need to use a bridge, that's safer.
I am new to ipad development. I have to develop an app for a client whose employees use ipads.I am to develop this app that would take the data that they have and store it to the main sql server on their server. On researching i came across that people do that once they have their data on ipad and later sync it with their server. I have used sqlite for android before. But that was like a school project. CRUD operations basically. So since i have little knowledge of sqlite i want to pursue this app in this way. My question is can i write an app that will sync temporary sqlite data with server once they sync ? I have more questions..
Thanks.
It is certainly possible to synchronize data between multiple databases.
Generally speaking, you have to record all changes made since the last synchronization (usually done with serial numbers or timestamps), and apply those changes to the other database.
If the same data has been modified by multiple users, you have to resolve this conflict somehow.
If multiple users can add data, you have to prevent duplicates of primary keys.
See these Wikipedia articles for explanations of some related concepts:
Data synchronization
Replication
Change data capture
this Guy may solve the problem, but it only supports Xamarin(iOS or Android).
http://forums.xamarin.com/discussion/5719/sync-sqlite-with-sql-server-merge-replication
I'm working on a site managed by Umbraco. I need to store data about images and clients. I don't think there is any way I can store that data in the existing tables.
Is there any reason I shouldn't add the tables I'll need to the Umbraco database, rather than creating a separate DB? I like Umbraco so far but the documentation is a little thin and I haven't found any suggestions one way or the other.
TIA
I have built a site using Umbraco, with a separate application with a database of vehicles. I used the same database as Umbraco is using, and prefixed all my custom app tables with a few letters to distinguish them easily (eg: vehicles_xxx)
I have had no problems with this arrangement, and don't believe there's much risk involved. Of course you'll need to take care when upgrading Umbraco (never upgrade in the live environment before fully testing, and preferably do it locally anyway), however its unlikely an upgrade script will ever alter or delete any tables that it does not know about.
There's heaps of doco available for umbraco now - much more than when i started.. however a question like this is always best for the forums. :)
all the best
greg
You might use the Umbraco API to store and retrieve your data and enjoy the ease of not having to worry bout tables and much more. Or you create your own tables. Do as Gregorius says - using umbraco db is fine.
Your choice depends on:
do you have a lot of data?
do you have a large relation model?
If not - then go with Umbraco API
The rest of the answers you'll find on http://our.umbraco.org
/Jesper Ordrup
I'm hoping you can help.
I'm looking for a zero config multi-user datbase that my winforms application can easily upload to a webserver folder (together with 1 or 2 classic asp pages) and am looking for some suggestions/recommendations.
The idea is that the database will be used to collect feedback entered by people filling in the asp pages. The pages will write to the database using javascript.
The database will subsequently be downloaded again for processing once the responses are in.
In Summary:
It will mostly run in MS Windows environments.
I have a modest budget for this and do not mind paying for such a database.
No runtime licensing costs.
Should be xcopy - Once uploaded to a website folder it should be operational.
It should not have a dotnet CLR dependency.
It should support a resonable level of concurrent access. Average respondent count would be around 20-30 but one never knows.
Should be a reasonable size so that uploads/downloads to and from the site will be reasonably fast.
Would appreciate your suggestions/comments
Many thanks
Abz
To clarify - this is a desktop commercial application for feedback management in a vertical market. It uses SQL Server as the backing store.
The application currently provides feedback management from email and paper feedback. I now want to add web feedback capability. Getting users to to make their SQL servers accessible to a website is not at option at this time as I am want to make getting up and running as painless as possible.
I intend to release a web based implementation of the software in the near future but for now am looking at the above as a pragmatic way to provide web based feedback collection.
SQLite comes to mind. It meets all of your stated requirements, is open source, and has a liberal license (public domain).
http://sqlite.org/
I would use 'normal' database (say MySql, Postgresql, Firebird, etc.) on server. Instead of copying files to server your winforms application would create custom tables (or even custom databases). After collecting data you could just get it back to your application using plain old SQL.
why reinvent the wheel ? If you want to collect feedback and stuffs from users of your app and if they are connected to internet, it might be a better idea - and in the long term cheaper - to use a service like wufoo. We recently switched from homegrown setup to wufoo and are very pleased. Check it out.
Otherwise you might want to take a look at sqlite orfirebird. Both of them are very robust, and have ADO.NET providers. Firebird scales from a single user to full blown client server system and has no .NET dependency.
If you really don't want a DB/SQL Solution, you could try simple text files and ftp/xcopy files down and parse them into the back-office server as needed. ASP/VBScript or ASP.NET can create the files to store the basic feedback comments. Need to consider security of course!
We have a new django powered project which have a potential heavy-traffic characteristic(means a heavy db interaction). So we need to consider the database scalability in advance. With some researches, the following questions are still not clear to us:
coarse-grained: how to specify one db table(a django model) to a specific db(maybe in another server)?
fine-grained: how to specify a group of table rows to a specific db(so-called sharding, also can in another db server)?
how to specify write and read to different db?(which will be helpful for future mysql master/slave replication)
We are finding the solution with:
be transparent to application program(means we don't need to have additional codes in views.py)
should be in ORM level(means only needs to specify in models.py)
compatible with the current(or future) django release(to keep a minimal change for future's upgrading of django)
I'm still doing the research. And will share in this thread later if I've got some fruits.
Hope anyone with the experience can answer. Thanks.
Don't forget about caching either. Using memcached to relieve your DB of load is key to building a high performance site.
As alex said, django-core doesn't support your specific requests for those features, though they are definitely on the todo list.
If you don't do this in the application layer, you're basically asking for performance trouble. There aren't any really good open source automation layers for this sort of task, since it tends to break SQL axioms. If you're really concerned about it, you should be coding the entire application for it, not simply hoping that your ORM will take care of it.
There is the GSoC project by Alex Gaynor that in future will allow to use multiple databases in one Django project. But now there is no cross-RDBMS working solution.
There is no solution right now too.
And again - there is no cross-RDBMS solution. But if you are using MySQL you can try excellent third-party Django application called - mysql_replicated. It allows to setup master-slave replication scenario easily.
here for some reason we r using django with sqlalchemy. maybe combination of django and sqlalchemy also works for your needs.