I wanted to hide the RightMenu if the routes are /jobs and /account.
My problem is that if /jobs and /account have children routes like /jobs/1 or /accounts/2. How would i include it? Is there way to hide this? Is there a better way than my code?
UPDATE
What about if we wanted to show the RightMenu on /jobs/new BUT not on /jobs/1? Something like that.
Pls check my codesandbox here CLICK HERE
const noRightMenusRoutes = ["/jobs", "/account"];
const noRightMenus = () => {
return (
noRightMenusRoutes.findIndex((el) => el.includes(location.pathname)) !==
-1
);
};
The best way is to use a state that will be updated when the path name changes :
import React, { Suspense, lazy, useState, useEffect } from "react";
....
function PagesRoute({ match: { url } }) {
const classes = useStyles();
const location = useLocation();
const [showMenu, setShowMenu] = useState(true);
const [noRightMenusRoutes, setNoRightMenusRoutes] = useState([
"/jobs",
"/account"
]);
useEffect(() => {
console.log(location.pathname);
const noRightMenus = noRightMenusRoutes.findIndex((el) => {
return location.pathname.includes(el);
});
setShowMenu(noRightMenus === -1);
}, [location, noRightMenusRoutes]);
...
<Grid item xl={3} lg={3} md={3}>
{!showMenu ? null : <RightMenu />}
</Grid>
You shouldn't use functions inside the JSX for rendering purposes, the functions could be used as event handlers.
React router's matchPath function is a really handy utility to handle these things
You can do something like this
const noRightMenusRoutes = ["/jobs", "/account"];
const isMatching = noRightMenusRoutes.some(path => {
const match = matchPath(location.pathname, {
path: path,
exact: true
})
return match && match.isExact
})
Using this will also help you with paths with parameters such as /jobs/:jobId
Related
I have created the following context provider. In sort it's a toast generator. It can have multiple toasts visible at the same time.
It all worked great and such until I realized that the <Component/> further down the tree that called the const context = useContext(ToastContext) aka the consumer of this context and the creator of the toast notifications, was also re-rendering when the providerValue was changing.
I tried to prevent that, changing the useMemo to a useState hook for the providerValue, which did stop my re-rendering problem , but now I could only have 1 toast active at a time (because toasts was never updated inside the add function).
Is there a way to have both my scenarios?
export const withToastProvider = (Component) => {
const WithToastProvider = (props) => {
const [toasts, setToasts] = useState([])
const add = (toastSettings) => {
const id = generateUEID()
setToasts([...toasts, { id, toastSettings }])
}
const remove = (id) => setToasts(toasts.filter((t) => t.id !== id))
// const [providerValue] = useState({ add, remove })
const providerValue = React.useMemo(() => {
return { add, remove }
}, [toasts])
const renderToasts = toasts.map((t, index) => (
<ToastNote key={t.id} remove={() => remove(t.id)} {...t.toastSettings} />
))
return (
<ToastContext.Provider value={providerValue}>
<Component {...props} />
<ToastWrapper>{renderToasts}</ToastWrapper>
</ToastContext.Provider>
)
}
return WithToastProvider
}
Thank you #cbdeveloper, I figured it out.
The problem was not on my Context but on the caller. I needed to use a useMemo() there to have memoized the part of the component that didnt need to update.
Hi guys) I have a strange question may be, but I'm at a dead end.
I have my own custom hook.
const useModal = (Content?: ReactNode, options?: ModalOptions) => {
const { isOpen, close: contextClose, open: contextOpen, setContent } = useContext(
ModalContext,
)
const [customOpenContent, setCustomOpenContent] = useState<ReactNode>()
const showModal = useCallback(
(customContent?: ReactNode) => {
if (!isNil(customContent)) {
setCustomOpenContent(customContent)
contextOpen(customContent, options)
} else contextOpen(Content, options)
},
[contextOpen, Content, options],
)
const hideModal = useCallback(() => {
contextClose()
}, [contextClose])
return { isOpen, close: hideModal, open: showModal, setContent }
}
It is quite simple.
Also i have component which uses this hook
const App: React.FC = () => {
const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false)
const { open } = useModal(null, { deps: [loading] })
useEffect(() => {
setTimeout(() => {
setLoading(true)
}, 10000)
})
const buttonCallback = useCallback(() => {
open(<Button disabled={!loading}>Loading: {loading.toString()}</Button>)
}, [loading, open])
return (
<Page title="App">
<Button onClick={buttonCallback}>Open Modal</Button>
</Page>
)
}
Main problem is - Button didn't became enabled because useModal hook doesn't know anything about changes.
May be you have an idea how to update this component while it's props are updated? And how to do it handsomely ))
Context isn't the best solution to this problem. What you want is a Portal instead. Portals are React's solution to rendering outside of the current React component hierarchy. How to use React Portal? is a basic example, but as you can see, just going with the base React.Portal just gives you the location to render.
Here's a library that does a lot of the heavy lifting for you: https://github.com/wellyshen/react-cool-portal. It has typescript definitions and provides an easy API to work with.
Here's your example using react-cool-portal.
import usePortal from "react-cool-portal";
const App = () => {
const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false);
const { Portal, isShow, toggle } = usePortal({ defaultShow: false });
useEffect(() => {
setTimeout(() => {
setLoading(true);
}, 10000);
});
const buttonCallback = useCallback(() => {
toggle();
}, [toggle]);
return (
<div title="App" style={{ backgroundColor: "hotpink" }}>
<button onClick={buttonCallback}>
{isShow ? "Close" : "Open"} Modal
</button>
<Portal>
<button disabled={!loading}>Loading: {loading.toString()}</button>
</Portal>
<div>{loading.toString()}</div>
</div>
);
};
Basic CodeSandbox Example
There are more detailed ones within the react-cool-portal documentation.
For more detail of the issues with the Context solution you were trying, is that React Elements are just a javascript object. React then uses the object, it's location in the tree, and it's key to determine if they are the same element. React doesn't actually care or notice where you create the object, only it's location in the tree when it is rendered.
The disconnect in your solution is that when you pass the element to the open function in buttonCallback, the element is created at that point. It's a javascript object that then is set as the content in your context. At that point, the object is set and won't change until you called open again. If you set up your component to call open every time the relevant state changes, you could get it working that way. But as I mentioned earlier, context wasn't built for rendering components outside of the current component; hence why some really weird workarounds would be required to get it working.
I have a navbar component with that actual info being pulled in from a CMS. Some of the nav links have a dropdown component onclick, while others do not. I'm having a hard time figuring out how to target a specific menus index with React Hooks - currently onClick, it opens ALL the dropdown menus at once instead of the specific one I clicked on.
The prop toggleOpen is being passed down to a styled component based on the handleDropDownClick event handler.
Heres my component.
const NavBar = props => {
const [links, setLinks] = useState(null);
const [notFound, setNotFound] = useState(false);
const [isOpen, setIsOpen] = useState(false);
const fetchLinks = () => {
if (props.prismicCtx) {
// We are using the function to get a document by its uid
const data = props.prismicCtx.api.query([
Prismic.Predicates.at('document.tags', [`${config.source}`]),
Prismic.Predicates.at('document.type', 'navbar'),
]);
data.then(res => {
const navlinks = res.results[0].data.nav;
setLinks(navlinks);
});
}
return null;
};
const checkForLinks = () => {
if (props.prismicCtx) {
fetchLinks(props);
} else {
setNotFound(true);
}
};
useEffect(() => {
checkForLinks();
});
const handleDropdownClick = e => {
e.preventDefault();
setIsOpen(!isOpen);
};
if (links) {
const linkname = links.map(item => {
// Check to see if NavItem contains Dropdown Children
return item.items.length > 1 ? (
<Fragment>
<StyledNavBar.NavLink onClick={handleDropdownClick} href={item.primary.link.url}>
{item.primary.label[0].text}
</StyledNavBar.NavLink>
<Dropdown toggleOpen={isOpen}>
{item.items.map(subitem => {
return (
<StyledNavBar.NavLink href={subitem.sub_nav_link.url}>
<span>{subitem.sub_nav_link_label[0].text}</span>
</StyledNavBar.NavLink>
);
})}
</Dropdown>
</Fragment>
) : (
<StyledNavBar.NavLink href={item.primary.link.url}>
{item.primary.label[0].text}
</StyledNavBar.NavLink>
);
});
// Render
return (
<StyledNavBar>
<StyledNavBar.NavContainer wide>
<StyledNavBar.NavWrapper row center>
<Logo />
{linkname}
</StyledNavBar.NavWrapper>
</StyledNavBar.NavContainer>
</StyledNavBar>
);
}
if (notFound) {
return <NotFound />;
}
return <h2>Loading Nav</h2>;
};
export default NavBar;
Your problem is that your state only handles a boolean (is open or not), but you actually need multiple booleans (one "is open or not" for each menu item). You could try something like this:
const [isOpen, setIsOpen] = useState({});
const handleDropdownClick = e => {
e.preventDefault();
const currentID = e.currentTarget.id;
const newIsOpenState = isOpen[id] = !isOpen[id];
setIsOpen(newIsOpenState);
};
And finally in your HTML:
const linkname = links.map((item, index) => {
// Check to see if NavItem contains Dropdown Children
return item.items.length > 1 ? (
<Fragment>
<StyledNavBar.NavLink id={index} onClick={handleDropdownClick} href={item.primary.link.url}>
{item.primary.label[0].text}
</StyledNavBar.NavLink>
<Dropdown toggleOpen={isOpen[index]}>
// ... rest of your component
Note the new index variable in the .map function, which is used to identify which menu item you are clicking.
UPDATE:
One point that I was missing was the initialization, as mention in the other answer by #MattYao. Inside your load data, do this:
data.then(res => {
const navlinks = res.results[0].data.nav;
setLinks(navlinks);
setIsOpen(navlinks.map((link, index) => {index: false}));
});
Not related to your question, but you may want to consider skipping effects and including a key to your .map
I can see the first two useState hooks are working as expected. The problem is your 3rd useState() hook.
The issue is pretty obvious that you are referring the same state variable isOpen by a list of elements so they all have the same state. To fix the problems, I suggest the following way:
Instead of having one value of isOpen, you will need to initialise the state with an array or Map so you can refer each individual one:
const initialOpenState = [] // or using ES6 Map - new Map([]);
In your fetchLink function callback, initialise your isOpen state array values to be false. So you can put it here:
data.then(res => {
const navlinks = res.results[0].data.nav;
setLinks(navlinks);
// init your isOpen state here
navlinks.forEach(link => isOpen.push({ linkId: link.id, value: false })) //I suppose you can get an id or similar identifers
});
In your handleClick function, you have to target the link object and set it to true, instead of setting everything to true. You might need to use .find() to locate the link you are clicking:
handleClick = e => {
const currentOpenState = state;
const clickedLink = e.target.value // use your own identifier
currentOpenState[clickedLink].value = !currentOpenState[clickedLink].value;
setIsOpen(currentOpenState);
}
Update your component so the correct isOpen state is used:
<Dropdown toggleOpen={isOpen[item].value}> // replace this value
{item.items.map(subitem => {
return (
<StyledNavBar.NavLink href={subitem.sub_nav_link.url}>
<span>{subitem.sub_nav_link_label[0].text}</span>
</StyledNavBar.NavLink>
);
})}
</Dropdown>
The above code may not work for you if you just copy & paste. But it should give you an idea how things should work together.
I have a React.SFC / react stateless / functional component which is unfortunately rendering a little too frequent due to some excess data coming in from redux in a parent component. Nothing I can do about that for now, so I'm just accepting the extra rerenders, and using useEffect to make sure data is only fetched whenever a certain property changes. In this case its called "urls" and it is an array of URL's (TypeScript URL Type).
Here's some example code illustrating the issue:
import React from "react";
import { useState, useEffect, useMemo } from "react";
import { render } from "react-dom";
import "./styles.css";
const useCustomHook = urls => {
const [onlyChangeWhenUrlsChange, setOnlyChangeWhenUrlsChange] = useState(
null
);
useEffect(
() => {
setOnlyChangeWhenUrlsChange(Math.random());
},
[urls]
);
return onlyChangeWhenUrlsChange;
};
const dynamicUrls = (pageRouteParamId, someDynamicUrlParam) => {
return [
{
pageRouteParamId: 1337,
urls: [new URL(`https://someurl.com/api?id=${someDynamicUrlParam}`)]
}
];
};
const SomePage: React.SFC<any> = ({
simulateFrequentUpdatingData,
pageRouteParamId
}) => {
const someOtherId = 1;
// As suggested in SO answer, using useMemo seems to work, but will that not create a memory leak?
// Is there any good alternative?
// const urls = useMemo(() => dynamicUrls(pageRouteParamId, someOtherId).find(url => url.pageRouteParamId === pageRouteParamId).urls, [pageRouteParamId, someOtherId]);
const urls = dynamicUrls(pageRouteParamId, 1).find(
url => url.pageRouteParamId === 1337
).urls;
return (
<div>
<p>parent</p>
<p>{simulateFrequentUpdatingData}</p>
<p>
Page route param id (in real app this would come from react-router route
param): {pageRouteParamId}
</p>
{urls && urls.length && <MyStateLessFunctionalComponent {...{ urls }} />}
<p>
Page route param id (in real app this would come from react-router route
param): {pageRouteParamId}
</p>
{urls && urls.length && (
<MyStateLessFunctionalComponentWithHook {...{ urls }} />
)}
</div>
);
};
const MyStateLessFunctionalComponent: React.SFC<any> = ({ urls }) => {
const [onlyChangeWhenUrlsChange, setOnlyChangeWhenUrlsChange] = useState(
null
);
useEffect(
() => {
setOnlyChangeWhenUrlsChange(Math.random());
},
[urls]
);
return (
<div>
<p>MyStateLessFunctionalComponent</p>
<p>{JSON.stringify(urls)}</p>
<p>This should only change when urls change {onlyChangeWhenUrlsChange}</p>
</div>
);
};
const MyStateLessFunctionalComponentWithHook: React.SFC<any> = ({ urls }) => {
const onlyChangeWhenUrlsChange = useCustomHook(urls);
return (
<div>
<p>MyStateLessFunctionalComponentWithHook</p>
<p>{JSON.stringify(urls)}</p>
<p>This should only change when urls change {onlyChangeWhenUrlsChange}</p>
</div>
);
};
function App() {
const [
simulateFrequentUpdatingData,
setSimulateFrequentUpdatingData
] = useState(null);
const [pageRouteParamId, setPageRouteParamId] = useState(1337);
useEffect(() => {
setInterval(() => setSimulateFrequentUpdatingData(Math.random()), 1000);
}, []);
return (
<div className="App">
<SomePage {...{ simulateFrequentUpdatingData, pageRouteParamId }} />
</div>
);
}
const rootElement = document.getElementById("root");
render(<App />, rootElement);
Edit:
I had to change the title and question, since while reproducing it with the example code I realized the problem was not about "Skipping Effects inside a custom hook". Before I though I saw a difference when using useEffect directly vs inside a custom hook, and as the comments rightfully mentioned, there should not be any difference - and I came to the same conclusion while reproducing my issue with this sample code:
You can check out a live example here.
As it was suggested in the answer below, it seems like useMemo solves the issue (see line 36)
My guess is that urls is being declared inside a render higher up the tree, and thus getting a new identity every time. You can either useMemo on the place where it is being declared, JSON.stringify the urls in the deps-array, or a useRef which works as an additional guard against re-runs.
Edit: This is being discussed by smarter people than me: https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/14476#issuecomment-471199055.
If urls is an array of strings you can pass that as the second argument to useEffect
useEffect(() => {
loadData();
}, urls);
that way it will check the string values instead of the array reference.
I am using the https://www.npmjs.com/package/react-swipeable-routes library to set up some swipeable views in my React app.
I have a custom context that contains a dynamic list of views that need to be rendered as children of the swipeable router, and I have added two buttons for a 'next' and 'previous' view for desktop users.
Now I am stuck on how to get the next and previous item from the array of modules.
I thought to fix it with a custom context and custom hook, but when using that I am getting stuck in an infinite loop.
My custom hook:
import { useContext } from 'react';
import { RootContext } from '../context/root-context';
const useShow = () => {
const [state, setState] = useContext(RootContext);
const setModules = (modules) => {
setState((currentState) => ({
...currentState,
modules,
}));
};
const setActiveModule = (currentModule) => {
// here is the magic. we get the currentModule, so we know which module is visible on the screen
// with this info, we can determine what the previous and next modules are
const index = state.modules.findIndex((module) => module.id === currentModule.id);
// if we are on first item, then there is no previous
let previous = index - 1;
if (previous < 0) {
previous = 0;
}
// if we are on last item, then there is no next
let next = index + 1;
if (next > state.modules.length - 1) {
next = state.modules.length - 1;
}
// update the state. this will trigger every component listening to the previous and next values
setState((currentState) => ({
...currentState,
previous: state.modules[previous].id,
next: state.modules[next].id,
}));
};
return {
modules: state.modules,
setActiveModule,
setModules,
previous: state.previous,
next: state.next,
};
};
export default useShow;
My custom context:
import React, { useState } from 'react';
export const RootContext = React.createContext([{}, () => {}]);
export default (props) => {
const [state, setState] = useState({});
return (
<RootContext.Provider value={[state, setState]}>
{props.children}
</RootContext.Provider>
);
};
and here the part where it goes wrong, in my Content.js
import React, { useEffect } from 'react';
import { Route } from 'react-router-dom';
import SwipeableRoutes from 'react-swipeable-routes';
import useShow from '../../hooks/useShow';
import NavButton from '../NavButton';
// for this demo we just have one single module component
// when we have real data, there will be a VoteModule and CommentModule at least
// there are 2 important object given to the props; module and match
// module comes from us, match comes from swipeable views library
const ModuleComponent = ({ module, match }) => {
// we need this function from the custom hook
const { setActiveModule } = useShow();
// if this view is active (match.type === 'full') then we tell the show hook that
useEffect(() => {
if (match.type === 'full') {
setActiveModule(module);
}
},[match]);
return (
<div style={{ height: 300, backgroundColor: module.title }}>{module.title}</div>
);
};
const Content = () => {
const { modules, previousModule, nextModule } = useShow();
// this is a safety measure, to make sure we don't start rendering stuff when there are no modules yet
if (!modules) {
return <div>Loading...</div>;
}
// this determines which component needs to be rendered for each module
// when we have real data we will switch on module.type or something similar
const getComponentForModule = (module) => {
// this is needed to get both the module and match objects inside the component
// the module object is provided by us and the match object comes from swipeable routes
const ModuleComponentWithProps = (props) => (
<ModuleComponent module={module} {...props} />
);
return ModuleComponentWithProps;
};
// this renders all the modules
// because we return early if there are no modules, we can be sure that here the modules array is always existing
const renderModules = () => (
modules.map((module) => (
<Route
path={`/${module.id}`}
key={module.id}
component={getComponentForModule(module)}
defaultParams={module}
/>
))
);
return (
<div className="content">
<div>
<SwipeableRoutes>
{renderModules()}
</SwipeableRoutes>
<NavButton type="previous" to={previousModule} />
<NavButton type="next" to={nextModule} />
</div>
</div>
);
};
export default Content;
For sake of completion, also my NavButton.js :
import React from 'react';
import { NavLink } from 'react-router-dom';
const NavButton = ({ type, to }) => {
const iconClassName = ['fa'];
if (type === 'next') {
iconClassName.push('fa-arrow-right');
} else {
iconClassName.push('fa-arrow-left');
}
return (
<div className="">
<NavLink className="nav-link-button" to={`/${to}`}>
<i className={iconClassName.join(' ')} />
</NavLink>
</div>
);
};
export default NavButton;
In Content.js there is this part:
// if this view is active (match.type === 'full') then we tell the show hook that
useEffect(() => {
if (match.type === 'full') {
setActiveModule(module);
}
},[match]);
which is causing the infinite loop. If I comment out the setActiveModule call, then the infinite loop is gone, but of course then I also won't have the desired outcome.
I am sure I am doing something wrong in either the usage of useEffect and/or the custom hook I have created, but I just can't figure out what it is.
Any help is much appreciated
I think it's the problem with the way you are using the component in the Route.
Try using:
<Route
path={`/${module.id}`}
key={module.id}
component={() => getComponentForModule(module)}
defaultParams={module}
/>
EDIT:
I have a feeling that it's because of your HOC.
Can you try
component={ModuleComponent}
defaultParams={module}
And get the module from the match object.
const ModuleComponent = ({ match }) => {
const {type, module} = match;
const { setActiveModule } = useShow();
useEffect(() => {
if (type === 'full') {
setActiveModule(module);
}
},[module, setActiveModule]);
match is an object and evaluated in the useEffect will always cause the code to be executed. Track match.type instead. Also you need to track the module there. If that's an object, you'll need to wrap it in a deep compare hook: https://github.com/kentcdodds/use-deep-compare-effect
useEffect(() => {
if (match.type === 'full') {
setActiveModule(module);
}
},[match.type, module]);