I am trying to reconcile the IDs in a temp table (top) from another DB table (bottom). Since I only have one ID that's common between the two, I am only getting the top result for all the rows (ReconGlobalRemunerationGrantID) in my temp table. I am aiming to get each of the unique ID and update my temp table as such.
Right now, my update query is simple and I update using the ID common between the 2 tables. Is there a function or another command statement I can use to get the result intended?
update tgrg set ReconGlobalRemunerationGrantID = grg.GlobalRemunerationGrantID from #GlobalRemunerationGrant tgrg
join #GlobalRemuneration tgr on tgr.GlobalRemunerationID = tgrg.GlobalRemunerationID
join DataCore..GlobalRemuneration gr on gr.CompanyID = #CompanyID and gr.FiscalYearID = tgr.FiscalYearID and gr.DirectorDetailID = tgr.DirectorDetailID and tgr.GlobalRoleIDCODE = gr.GlobalRoleID
join DataCore..GlobalRemunerationGrant grg on gr.GlobalRemunerationID = grg.GlobalRemunerationID
Thank you.
Based on the comment - you have 2 values to match on, not just one? e.g., both GlobalRemunerationID and GlobalRemunerationGrantID?
Here's an example using tables 'temptable' and 't1'
UPDATE temptable
SET ReconGlobalRemunerationGrantID = t1.GlobalRemunerationGrantID
FROM temptable
INNER JOIN t1 ON temptable.GlobalRemunerationID = t1.GlobalRemunerationID
AND temptable.GlobalRemunerationGrantID = t1.GlobalRemunerationGrantID
Update below
The below version takes the two data sets
Partitions them by GlobalRemunerationID and orders them by ReconGlobalRemunerationGrantID to get the 'row numbers' (rn)
Joins them on GlobalRemunerationID and rn to get them in order
Key code is below (with slightly different tables than your full set sorry - matches the data set you gave though).
; WITH tgrg AS
(SELECT GlobalRemunerationID, ReconGlobalRemunerationGrantID,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY GlobalRemunerationID ORDER BY GlobalRemunerationGrantID) AS rn
FROM #GlobalRemunerationGrant
)
UPDATE tgrg
SET ReconGlobalRemunerationGrantID = tgr.GlobalRemunerationGrantID
FROM tgrg
INNER JOIN
(SELECT GlobalRemunerationID, GlobalRemunerationGrantID,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY GlobalRemunerationID ORDER BY GlobalRemunerationGrantID) AS rn
FROM GlobalRemuneration
) AS tgr ON tgrg.GlobalRemunerationID = tgr.GlobalRemunerationID AND tgrg.rn = tgr.rn
A db<>fiddle with the full set is there - note that I changed some of the IDs to demonstrate that it wasn;t using them to match.
Related
What would the syntax be to convert this MS Access query to run in SQL Server as it doesn't have a DistinctRow keyword
UPDATE DISTINCTROW [MyTable]
INNER JOIN [AnotherTable] ON ([MyTable].J5BINB = [AnotherTable].GKBINB)
AND ([MyTable].J5BHNB = [AnotherTable].GKBHNB)
AND ([MyTable].J5BDCD = [AnotherTable].GKBDCD)
SET [AnotherTable].TessereCorso = [MyTable].[J5F7NR];
DISTINCTROW [MyTable] removes duplicate MyTable entries from the results. Example:
select distinctrow items
items.item_number, items.name
from items
join orders on orders.item_id = items.id;
In spite of the join getting you the same item_number and name multiple times when there is more than one order for it, DISTINCTROW reduces this to one row per item. So the whole join is merely for assuring that you only select items for which exist at least one order. You don't find DISTINCTROW in any other DBMS as far as I know. Probably because it is not needed. When checking for existence, we use EXISTS of course (or IN for that matter).
You are joining MyTable and AnotherTable and expect for some reason to get the same MyTable record multifold for one AnotherTable record, so you use DISTINCTROW to only get it once. Your query would (hopefully) fail if you got two different MyTable records for one AnotherTable record.
What the update does is:
update anothertable
set tesserecorso = (select top 1 j5f7nr from mytable where mytable.j5binb = anothertable.gkbinb and ...)
where exists (select * from mytable where mytable.j5binb = anothertable.gkbinb and ...)
But this uses about the same subquery twice. So we'd want to update from a query instead.
The easiest way to get one result record per <some columns> in a standard SQL query is to aggregate data:
select *
from anothertable a
join
(
select j5binb, j5bhnb, j5bdcd, max(j5f7nr) as j5f7nr
from mytable
group by j5binb, j5bhnb, j5bdcd
) m on m.j5binb = a.gkbinb and m.j5bhnb = a.gkbhnb and m.j5bdcd = a.gkbdcd;
How to write an updateble query is different from one DBMS to another. Here is the final update statement for SQL-Server:
update a
set a.tesserecorso = m.j5f7nr
from anothertable a
join
(
select j5binb, j5bhnb, j5bdcd, max(j5f7nr) as j5f7nr
from mytable
group by j5binb, j5bhnb, j5bdcd
) m on m.j5binb = a.gkbinb and m.j5bhnb = a.gkbhnb and m.j5bdcd = a.gkbdcd;
The DISTINCTROW predicate in MS Access SQL removes duplicates across all fields of a table in join statements and not just the selected fields of query (which DISTINCT in practically all SQL dialects do). So consider selecting all fields in a derived table with DISTINCT predicate:
UPDATE [AnotherTable]
SET [AnotherTable].TessereCorso = main.[J5F7NR]
FROM
(SELECT DISTINCT m.* FROM [MyTable] m) As main
INNER JOIN [AnotherTable]
ON (main.J5BINB = [AnotherTable].GKBINB)
AND (main.J5BHNB = [AnotherTable].GKBHNB)
AND (main.J5BDCD = [AnotherTable].GKBDCD)
Another variant of the query.. (Too lazy to get the original tables).
But like the query above updates 35 rows =, so does this one
UPDATE [Albi-Anagrafe-Associati]
SET
[Albi-Anagrafe-Associati].CRegDitte = [055- Registri ditte].[CRegDitte],
[Albi-Anagrafe-Associati].NIscrTribunale = [055- Registri ditte].[NIscrTribunale],
[Albi-Anagrafe-Associati].NRegImprese = [055- Registri ditte].[NRegImprese]
FROM [055- Registri ditte]
WHERE EXISTS(
SELECT *
FROM [055- Registri ditte]-- [Albi-Anagrafe-Associati]
WHERE ([055- Registri ditte].GIBINB = [Albi-Anagrafe-Associati].GKBINB)
AND ([055- Registri ditte].GIBHNB = [Albi-Anagrafe-Associati].GKBHNB)
AND ([055- Registri ditte].GIBDCD = [Albi-Anagrafe-Associati].GKBDCD))
Update [AnotherTable]
Set [AnotherTable].TessereCorso = MyTable.[J5F7NR]
From [AnotherTable]
Inner Join
(
Select Distinct [J5BINB],[5BHNB],[J5BDCD]
,(Select Top 1 [J5F7NR] From MyTable) as [J5F7NR]
,[J5BHNB]
From MyTable
)as MyTable
On (MyTable.J5BINB = [AnotherTable].GKBINB)
AND (MyTable.J5BHNB = [AnotherTable].GKBHNB)
AND (MyTable.J5BDCD = [AnotherTable].GKBDCD)
I have two tables called PassengerPaymentDetails and RoomInfo. Following is the query that I used to extract some values from existing PassengerPaymentDetails table.
SELECT
COUNT(*) AS Count, RequestReference, RoomTypeID, RoomCategory
FROM
[UL_SLHEV].[dbo].[PassengerPaymentDetails]
WHERE
Status != 0
GROUP BY
RoomTypeID, RoomCategory, RequestReference
As you can see I have RoomTypeID, RoomCategory and Count in the above mentioned table.
Following screenshot has the RoomInfo table:
I want to update the RoomInfo table data from the extracted Passengerpaymentdetails table. I can map these two tables with the RequestReference.
Need to update the count value in RoomInfo table according to the Passengerpaymentdetails table count value. Can anybody please help?
UPDATE:
Following is the code that I have tried so far. It is correctly return join table. I don't know how to set the value to the RoomInfo table with the getting table. And also here I am using left join for some purpose. I want to insert the value as well if the left table contains new row with the new roomtypeId. otherwise if the right table contains the same roomtypeID update the roomInfo with the updated value from passangerpaymentdetails table.
SELECT
t1.RequestReference as RoomInfoReq,
t1.Count as RoomInfoCount,
t1.RoomTypeID as RoomInfoID,
t1.RoomCategory as RoomInfoRoomCat,
l.RequestReference as PassangerReq,
l.Count as PassangerCount,
l.RoomTypeID as PassangerRoomTypeID,
l.RoomCategory as PassangerRoomCategory
FROM (
select
count(*) as Count,
RequestReference,
RoomTypeID,
RoomCategory
FROM
[UL_SLHEV].[dbo].[PassengerPaymentDetails]
where
Status!=0 group by RoomTypeID, RoomCategory, RequestReference)
as t1
Left JOIN RoomInfo as l on
t1.RequestReference = l.RequestReference and
t1.RoomTypeID = l.RoomTypeID and
t1.RoomCategory = l.RoomCategory and
l.Status!=0)
Something like that. It would be good if you provide DDL and DML instructions to test that, however you can see the logic how to do that:
UPDATE ri
SET [COUNT] = rd.[COUNT]
FROM RoomInfo ri
JOIN (SELECT
COUNT(*) AS [Count], RequestReference, RoomTypeID, RoomCategory
FROM
[UL_SLHEV].[dbo].[PassengerPaymentDetails]
WHERE
Status != 0
GROUP BY
RoomTypeID, RoomCategory, RequestReference) rd ON rd.RoomTypeID = ri.RoomTypeID
AND rd.RoomCategory = ri.RoomCategory
AND rd.RequestReference = ri.RequestReference
I have two tables one is the lookup table and the other is the data table. The lookup table has columns named cycleid, cycle. The data table has SID, cycleid, cycle. Below is the structure of the tables.
If you check the data table, the SID may have all the cycles and may not have all the cycles. I want to output the SID completed as well as missed cycles.
I right joined the lookup table and retrieved the missing as well as completed cycles. Below is the query I used.
SELECT TOP 1000 [SID]
,s4.[CYCLE]
,s4.[CYCLEID]
FROM [dbo].[data] s3 RIGHT JOIN
[dbo].[lookup_data] s4 ON s3.CYCLEID = s4.CYCLEID
The query is not displaying me the missed values when I query for all the SID's. When I specifically query for a SID with the below query i am getting the correct result including the missed ones.
SELECT TOP 1000 [SID]
,s4.[CYCLE]
,s4.[CYCLEID]
FROM [dbo].[data] s3 RIGHT JOIN [dbo].[lookup_data] s4
ON s3.CYCLEID = s4.CYCLEID
AND s3.SID = 101002
ORDER BY [SID], s4.[CYCLEID]
As I am supplying this query into tableau I cannot provide the sid value in the query. I want to return all the sid's and from tableau I will be do the rest of the things.
The expected output that i need is as shown below.
I wrote a cross join query like below to acheive my expected output
SELECT DISTINCT
tab.CYCLEID
,tab.SID
,d.CYCLE
FROM ( SELECT d.SID
,d.[CYCLE]
,e.CYCLEID
FROM ( SELECT e.sid
,e.CYCLE
FROM [db_temp].[dbo].[Sheet3$] e
) d
CROSS JOIN [db_temp].[dbo].[Sheet4$] e
) tab
LEFT OUTER JOIN [db_temp].[dbo].[Sheet3$] d
ON d.CYCLEID = tab.CYCLEID
AND d.SID = tab.SID
ORDER BY tab.SID
,tab.CYCLEID;
However I am not able to use this query for more scenarios as my data set have nearly 20 to 40 columns and i am having issues when i use the above one.
Is there any way to do this in a simpler manner with only left or right join itself? I want the query to return all the missing values and the completed values for the all the SID's instead of supplying a single sid in the query.
You can create a master table first (combine all SID and CYCLE ID), then right join with the data table
;with ctxMaster as (
select distinct d.SID, l.CYCLE, l.CYCLEID
from lookup_data l
cross join data d
)
select d.SID, m.CYCLE, m.CYCLEID
from ctxMaster m
left join data d on m.SID = d.SID and m.CYCLEID = d.CYCLEID
order by m.SID, m.CYCLEID
Fiddle
Or if you don't want to use common table expression, subquery version:
select d.SID, m.CYCLE, m.CYCLEID
from (select distinct d.SID, l.CYCLE, l.CYCLEID
from lookup_data l
cross join data d) m
left join data d on m.SID = d.SID and m.CYCLEID = d.CYCLEID
order by m.SID, m.CYCLEID
I have a "temp' table populated from an enrollment transportable in java. What I am doing is comparing the "temp" table with values I am populating in a CTE with a select query. What I need to do next is update two different tables. Here is my query for the comparison of the "temp" table and CTE:
WITH CTE AS
(
SELECT S.SYS_USER_NAME, PG.PAX_ID
FROM component.SYS_USER S
INNER JOIN component.PAX_GROUP PG
ON S.PAX_ID = PG.PAX_ID
WHERE (ROLE_CODE = 'AC' and THRU_DATE is null) or
(ROLE_CODE = 'DLRP' and THRU_DATE is null)
)
SELECT * FROM CTE
INNER JOIN component.TEMP_CONTROL_NUM
ON TEMP_CONTROL_NUM.CONTROL_NUM = CTE.SYS_USER_NAME
What I want to do next is update two different tables. One I need to set a status column as inactive and the other I need to set a thru date.
The issue I am having is writing an UPDATE with a SELECT. I have something like:
UPDATE component.SYS_USER SET STATUS = 'I'
WHERE SYS_USER_NAME =
(SELECT * FROM CTE INNER JOIN component.TEMP_CONTROL_NUM ON
TEMP_CONTROL_NUM = CTE.SYS_USER_NAME)
Would this be correct? I realize I am only attempting to update one table but I figure if I have one table updating, I can figure out the other. It doesn't seem to be.
Thank you in advance.
;WITH CTE as
(
...
)
UPDATE u SET
STATUS = 'I'
FROM component.SYS_USER u
INNER JOIN CTE c on c.SYS_USER_NAME = u.SYS_USER_NAME
INNER JOIN component.TEMP_CONTROL_NUM t ON t.TEMP_CONTROL_NUM = c.SYS_USER_NAME
I am trying to avoid a co-related sub query which in turn made me to update from three different tables and I am not quite sure how to do updates from three tables using netezza.
update stemp
set maxi = a.marks
from stemp
left join
sd696 sd
where st.id = sd.id
left join
(select id,MAX(marks) marks from sm696 group by ID) a
where a.id = sd.id;
Please help me
When you require joins in UPDATEs, the joins are specified implicitly in a comma separated FROM clause (without specifying the UPDATEd table again), with the JOIN criteria being specified in the WHERE clause.
Your UPDATE would look something like this:
UPDATE stemp
SET maxi = a.marks
FROM sd696 sd,
(
SELECT id,
MAX(marks) marks
FROM sm696
GROUP BY ID
)
a
WHERE stemp.id = sd.id
AND a.id = sd.id;