I'd like to test the selection logic of my Select component.
https://codesandbox.io/s/eager-violet-kkw0x?file=/src/App.js
I found this snippet to test a simulation.
test("simulates selection", () => {
const { getByTestId, getAllByTestId } = render(<Select />);
fireEvent.change(getAllByTestId("select"), { target: { value: 2 } });
let options = getAllByTestId("select-option");
expect(options[0].selected).toBeFalsy();
expect(options[1].selected).toBeTruthy();
expect(options[2].selected).toBeFalsy();
});
However, it fails with TypeError: Cannot read property 'map' of undefined. What's going on? Thank you.
Short answer: you need to make sure you do a conditional check to skip whenever your values are undefined. You can do so by sticking in values && just before values.map(...
Secondly, I really don't see the value of using a two dimensional array just for having an index. You can store a list of fruits in an array and iterate through with a simple map, passing in the value both as a value and as an key. If you want to go fancy with the key, you can even assign the number increment that is generated by the .map()'s index along with the value, here is the fancy version:
{values && values.map((index, value) => (
<option key={`${index}-${value}`} value={value} data-testid="select">
{value}
</option>
))}
The above would generate a key like fruit-1, anotherfruit-2, etc, however you can just go with the fruit name, whatever you do, make sure you don't just go with the index number as that is not a good practice. This is all when you have a simple array, as I said, you don't need a two dimensional one.
Moving forward, there are a lot of issues in your test and some problems in the code, so it won't work unless reimagining the whole code and test, however I give my best to try and explain some of the problems and point you to the right direction:
First line with the issue is:
fireEvent.change(getAllByTestId("select"), { target: { value: 2 } });
You want to select one element, that is the <select /> so you need to use getByTestId instead of getAllByTestId, you also got the id wrong, it is select-option.
The correct format looks like this:
fireEvent.change(getByTestId("select-option"), { target: { value: 2 } });
Just a quick note, while the above works, there are other, better ways of doing this, I recommend looking into the user-event library instead of fireEvent, but most importantly, use a getByRole instead of getByTestId, read why
Next problem is that you haven't passed in your props to your select component, therefore there are no <option> elements when rendered. You couldn't do this mistake with something like TypeScript as it would warn you, but JavaScript doesn't, so.. need to pass in the props:
const props = {
callback: jest.fn(),
values: [
"grapefruit", "coconut", "lime", "mango"
],
selected: 'lime'
}
const { getByTestId, getAllByTestId } = render(<Select {...props} />);
Moving forward, when collecting options, you used the wrong ID again (I think you mixed up the two) and I would also recommend using queryAll rather than getAll, this is because queryAll would return an empty array while getAll would throw an error.
const options = queryAllByTestId("select");
Finally your assertions are all wrong as well. Your option won't have a selected attribute what then you can boolean evaluate. Your option has two attributes data-testid and value.
I tried to give you the best answer to understand what is going on, but as the code stands, it's impossible to fix it without rethinking the whole app and test, like I mentioned above so here is my advice:
In the components:
Change to two dimensional array and use the value as the index.
You are not doing anything with the selected value, just console logging out, if you pass it back to your parent component, save it into the parent state and do whatever you want with it, Probably display somewhere - this is actually important for the test.
selected prop has a string, that will probably need to have the value that you pass back and save it to the state in the parent.
In the test:
React testing library is great because your tests resemble to how the users would use the app, therefore you should assert if the selected component appears where you want, instead of trying to inspect attributes, that would work the following way:
Make sure you render the component that will have both the select component and the component you will render the selected value to as text.
Make sure you pass in all props to the component you rendering with rtl
Simulate action (recommend the user-event library, but fireEvent will also work)
use the getByText to see if the value rendered and exists on the page. That would be something like: expect(getByText('fruitName')).toBeInTheDocument();
Finally, I recommend looking into the selector precedence (use getByRole where you can) and the difference between getBy and queryBy.
Related
I need to test that a react component is called with opened={true} prop after an button click is fired. I am using testing-library ( testing-library/react + testing-library/jest-dom).
I mocked the Component using something like
import Component from "./path-to-file/component-name"
...
jest.mock("./path-to-file/component-name", () => {
return jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => {
return null
})
})
I first tried with:
expect(Component).toBeCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({"opened": true}))
expect(Component).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({"opened": true}))
expect(Component).toHaveBeenLastCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({"opened": true}))
but I got Error: expect(jest.fn()).toBeCalledWith(...expected).
Same went for expect.objectContaining({"opened": expect.anything()})
And even for expect(Component).toBeCalledWith(expect.anything())
And the difference is empty array:
I also tried with expect(ChartMenu.mock).toBeCalledWith(expect.anything()). I got a different error but still not working (this time the error was Error: expect(received).toBeCalledWith(...expected) + Matcher error: received value must be a mock or spy function)
Thank you in advice!
EDIT: here is a simplified version of the component I want to test:
const Component = () => {
const [chartMenuOpened, setChartMenuOpened] = useState(false)
return (
<Flex>
<EllipseIcon onClick={() => setChartMenuOpened(true)}>
+
</EllipseIcon>
<ChartMenu
opened={chartMenuOpened}
close={() => setChartMenuOpened(false)}
/>
</Flex>
)
}
Basically I want to make sure that when the + icon is clicked the menu will be opened (or called with open value). The issue is that I cannot render ChartMenu because it needs multiple props and redux state.
I was able in the end to mock useState in order to check that the setState was properly called from the icon component (in order to make sure there won't be future changes on the component that will break this using this post).
But I would still really appreciate an answer to the question: if there is any way to create a spy or something similar on a react component and check the props it was called with? Mostly because this was a rather simple example and I only have one state. But this might not always be the case. Or any good idea on how to properly test this kind if interaction would be really appeciated.
I think you are on the right track to test if the component has been called with that prop, it's probably the syntax issue in your code
I learn this trick from colleague and you can try to see if this helps fix your issue.
expect(Component).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({
opened: true,
}),
expect.anything()
);
While the question on how to is answered, I did some extra research on this and it seems like in React components there is a second parameter refOrContext (so basically most of the time it's an empty object, but it can also be a ref or a context)
Despite pointing out the reason for the behavior, I also wanted to highlight that it is safer to use expect.anything() as the second argument (rather than just {} which would work only in most of the cases ):
More information about React second argument here
I'm trying to create a stepper form
I store my steps in an array of json with a proprety component ({typeOfComponent, component, key})
It works wells, but:
Everytime i slice my array, like when i move up/down a step or add a new step between two steps.
I lose the states inside my component.
I tried to use memo, i don't understand why it's only when an item position my composent is recreate. Is it possible like a pointer in C to store only his "adress"
the code sandbox exemple =>
https://codesandbox.io/s/infallible-maxwell-zkwbm?file=/src/App.js
In my real projet, the button ADD is a button for chosing the new step type
Is there any solution for manipulates my steps without losing the user data inside ?
Thanks for your help
React is re-mounting the components inside of this every re-render probably due to a variety of reasons. I couldn't get it to work as is, but by lifting the state up from your components, it will work.
You'd likely need to lift the state up anyway because the data isn't where you need it to be to make any use of your form when the user is done with it.
In order to lift the state up, I added the current value to the steps array:
function addNext(step, index) {
componentKey++;
setSteps(prevState => {
let newState = [...prevState];
step = 1;
newState.splice(index + 1, 0, {
stepNumber: step,
component: getStepContent(step, componentKey),
value: getDefaultValue(step),
key: componentKey
});
return newState;
});
}
I also made sure your getStepContent just returned the component rather than a node so you can render it like this:
<step.component
value={step.value}
onChange={handleChange}
data-index={i}
/>
There are definitely a lot of ways to optimize this if you start running into performance issues, of course.
https://codesandbox.io/s/beautiful-river-2jltr?file=/src/App.js
I have created the following demo to help me describe my question: https://codesandbox.io/s/dazzling-https-6ztj2
I have a form where I submit information and store it in a database. On another page, I retrieve this data, and set the checked property for the checkbox accordingly. This part works, in the demo this is represented by the dataFromAPI variable.
Now, the problem is that when I'd like to update the checkboxes, I get all sorts of errors and I don't know how to solve this. The ultimate goal is that I modify the form (either uncheck a checked box or vice versa) and send it off to the database - essentially this is an UPDATE operation, but again that's not visible in the demo.
Any suggestions?
Also note that I have simplified the demo, in the real app I'm working on I have multiple form elements and multiple values in the state.
I recommend you to work with an array of all the id's or whatever you want it to be your list's keys and "map" on the array like here https://reactjs.org/docs/lists-and-keys.html.
It also helps you to control each checkbox element as an item.
Neither your add or delete will work as it is.
Array.push returns the length of the new array, not the new array.
Array.splice returns a new array of the deleted items. And it mutates the original which you shouldn't do. We'll use filter instead.
Change your state setter to this:
// Since we are using the updater form of setState now, we need to persist the event.
e.persist();
setQuestion(prev => ({
...prev,
[e.target.name]: prev.topics.includes(e.target.value)
// Return false to remove the part of the array we don't want anymore
? prev.topics.filter((value) => value != e.target.value)
// Create a new array instead of mutating state
: [...prev.topics, e.target.value]
}));
As regard your example in the codesandbox you can get the expected result using the following snippet
//the idea here is if it exists then remove it otherwise add it to the array.
const handleChange = e => {
let x = data.topics.includes(e.target.value) ? data.topics.filter(item => item !== e.target.value): [...data.topics, e.target.value]
setQuestion({topics:x})
};
So you can get the idea and implement it in your actual application.
I noticed the problem with your code was that you changed the nature of question stored in state which makes it difficult to get the attribute topics when next react re-renders Also you were directly mutating the state. its best to alway use functional array manipulating methods are free from side effects like map, filter and reduce where possible.
I am beginning to use React (hooks only), and facing a strange issue. I am trying to reproduce the problem in a small test code, but can't get it to happen, except in my full blown app. This leads me to wonder if I'm doing something really wrong.
I have an array of objects, declared as a state. I map this array to display its content. Except that nothing gets displayed (the array is filled, but nothing gets displayed). Now if I declare an un-related state, make it a boolean which flips each time my array gets updated, then my array gets displayed properly. As if, in the render phase itself, React did not detect the array's changes.
A few things:
the array gets updated by a socketIO connection, I simulate it here with a timer
I update my array OUTSIDE of my component function, BUT providing the setter function to the update function
I also create part of the render fields outside my component function (this has no effect, just for readability in my full app)
I essence, this is what I am doing:
const updateArray = (setTestArray, setTestTag, addArray) => {
setTestArray(prevTestArray => {
let newTestArray = prevTestArray.map((data, index) => (data + addArray[index]))
return newTestArray
})
setTestTag(prevTag => {
return (!prevTag)
})
}
const renderArray = (currentTestArray) => {
return currentTestArray.map((data, index) => (
<div>
testArray[{index}]={data}
</div>
))
}
function TestPage(props) {
const [testArray, setTestArray] = useState([])
const [testTag, setTestTag] = useState(false)
useEffect(() => {
let samples = 3
let initArray= []
for (let i=0; i<samples;i++) initArray[i] = Math.random()
setTestArray(initArray)
// In real code: setup socket here...
setInterval(() => {
let addArray= []
for (let i=0; i<samples;i++) addArray[i] = Math.random()
updateArray(setTestArray, setTestTag, addArray)
}, 1000)
return (() => {
// In real code, disconnect socket here...
})
}, []);
return (
<Paper>
Array content:
{renderArray(testArray)}
<br/>
Tag: {(testTag)? 'true' : 'false'}
</Paper>
)
}
This works just fine. But, in my full app, if I comment out everything concerning "testTag", then my array content never displays. testArray's content is as expected, updates just fine, but placing a debugger inside the map section show that array as empty.
Thus my questions:
is my updateArray function a bad idea? From what I read, my prevTestArray input will always reflect the latest state value, and setTestArray is never supposed to change... This is the only way I see to handle the async calls my socket connection generate, without placing "testArray" in my useEffect dependencies (thus avoiding continuously connecting/disconnecting the socket?)
rendering outside the component, in renderArray, doesn't affect my tests (same result if I move the code inside my component), but is there a problem with this?
As a side note, my array's content is actually more complex is the real app (array of objects), I have tried placing this in this test code, it works just fine too...
Thank you!
Edit: Note that moving updateArray inside the useEffect seems to be the recommended pattern. I did that in my full app. The hook linter does not complain about any missing dependency, yet this still doesn't work in my full app.
But the question is still whether what I am doing here is wrong or not: I know it goes against the guidelines as it prevents the linter from doing its job, but it looks to me like this will still work, the previous state being accessible by default in the setter functions.
Edit #2: Shame on me... silly mistake in my real app code, the equivalent of updateArray had a shallow array copy at some place instead of a deep copy.
Why adding the flipping tag made it work is beyond me (knowing the data was then indeed properly displayed and updated), but getting rid of this mistake solved it all.
I will leave this question on, as the question still stand: is placing the state update, and part of the rendering outside the component a functional problem, or just something which might mater on hide dependencies (preventing the react hooks linter from doing its job) and thus simply bad practice?
The fact is that things work just fine now with both functions outside the component function, which makes sense based on what I understand from hooks at this point.
I am trying to understand how React works with the new Hooks implementation. In this example, I want the browsers to render selected items as I click on the rendered options. But as you can see, it doesn't work.
Here is the example: https://codesandbox.io/s/pjorxzyrx7
Do I have to use the useEffect in this case? Also, as I understand, useEffect couldn't render anything and only return functions. So, what am I missing here?
Thank you!
You're currently mutating the contents of the selected array instead of replacing it. React can't detect a state change when you do this.
Try something like the following:
const handleSelected = item => {
console.log(item);
console.log(selected);
setSelected([...selected, item]);
};
When updating arrays or objects as a part of a state, always make a new copy to assign so that React can properly know when to re-render.
Also, include relevant parts of your code directly in the question in the future, instead of hiding it behind a link (although including a runnable example is great!)