I have Live Chart that I am trying to perform a fresh of the values on Button_Click event but the Chart is not refreshing.
I have two TextBoxes where the user can select the start and end date they would like to review and use the butn_ExecuteQuery_Click to display the data.
public HBDBreakdown()
{
InitializeComponent();
ChartValues();
}
private void ChartValues()
{
try
{
// Defines the variable for differnt lines.
List<double> SmallCommercialIndustValues = new List<double>();
List<double> ResidentialValues = new List<double>();
List<string> AnalystName = new List<string>();
SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection("Data Source=WINDOWS-B1AT5HC\\MSSQLSERVER2;Initial Catalog=CustomerRelations;user id=sa; password=Westside2$; Integrated Security=False;");
string selectQuery = ("SELECT Users.TX_EMPLOYEE, SUM(CASE WHEN d .REV_CLS <> 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS Residential, SUM(CASE WHEN d .REV_CLS = 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS SmallCommercialIndust FROM hb_Disputes AS d INNER JOIN Users ON d.ASSGNTO = Users.KY_USER_ID WHERE(d.OPENED >=#OPENED) AND(d.OPENED < #CLOSED) GROUP BY Users.TX_EMPLOYEE; ");
connection.Open();
SqlCommand command = new SqlCommand(selectQuery, connection);
command.Parameters.Add("#OPENED", SqlDbType.DateTime).Value = dtepicker_Open.Text;
command.Parameters.Add("#CLOSED", SqlDbType.DateTime).Value = dtepicker_DateResolved.Text;
SqlDataReader sqlReader = command.ExecuteReader();
while (sqlReader.Read())
{
// Check for DBNull and then assign the variable
if (sqlReader["SmallCommercialIndust"] != DBNull.Value)
SmallCommercialIndustValues.Add(Convert.ToInt32(sqlReader["SmallCommercialIndust"]));
// Check for DBNull and then assign the variable
if (sqlReader["Residential"] != DBNull.Value)
ResidentialValues.Add(Convert.ToInt32(sqlReader["Residential"]));
// Check for DBNull and then assign the variable
AnalystName.Add(Convert.ToString(sqlReader["TX_EMPLOYEE"]));
}
SeriesCollection = new SeriesCollection
{
new StackedColumnSeries
{
Title = "Residential",
Values = new ChartValues<double>(ResidentialValues),
StackMode = StackMode.Values, // this is not necessary, values is the default stack mode
DataLabels = true
},
new StackedColumnSeries
{
Title = "Small Commercial Indust",
Values = new ChartValues<double>(SmallCommercialIndustValues),
StackMode = StackMode.Values,
DataLabels = true
}
};
Labels = AnalystName.ToArray();
//Formatter = value => value + " Disputes";
DataContext = this;
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
MessageBox.Show(ex.Message);
}
}
public SeriesCollection SeriesCollection { get; set; }
public string[] Labels { get; set; }
public Func<double, string> Formatter { get; set; }
private void butn_ExecuteQuery_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
// Refresh Chart
ChartValues();
}
Set DataContext = null; before you call ChartValues() or implement INotifyPropertyChanged and raise the PropertyChanged event from the setters of the source properties.
Better never reset the DataContext only to update the data binding of certain properties. This results in very bad performance as the complete view will be forced to render again. The DataContext is also inherited down the element tree.
Better write cleaner code and handle dynamic data more gracefully and as intended by the framework (see Data Binding Overview).
Inside a control (or on a DependencyObject in general) you should always implement all properties that are involved in data binding as DependencyProperty.
They will automatically refresh the target and depending on the Binding.Mode also the source of the specific Binding.
Since you are reassigning SeriesCollection and Labels, both properties should be a DependencyProperty.
In your case, you can go without implementing dependency properties, because you are only updating collections. So simply avoid reassigning a new collection on each refresh and instead use IList.Clear and IList.Add on collections that implement INotifyCollectionChanged.
SeriesCollection already implements INotifyCollectionChanged, so you only need to change the type of the Labels property from string[] to ObservableCollection<string>. This way IList.Clear and IList.Add operations will be automatically reflected by the binding target (the chart control):
public SeriesCollection SeriesCollection { get; set; }
public ObservableCollection<string> Labels { get; set; }
public HBDBreakdown()
{
InitializeComponent();
// Set the `DataContext` once in the constructor
this.DataContext = this;
// Initialize the collection to prepare them for dynamic clear/add
this.SeriesCollection = new SeriesCollection();
this.Labels = new ObservableCollection<string>();
}
private void ChartValues()
{
try
{
...
this.SeriesCollection.Clear();
this.SeriesCollection.Add(
new StackedColumnSeries
{
Title = "Residential",
Values = new ChartValues<double>(ResidentialValues),
StackMode = StackMode.Values, // this is not necessary, values is the default stack mode
DataLabels = true
});
this.SeriesCollection.Add(
new StackedColumnSeries
{
Title = "Small Commercial Indust",
Values = new ChartValues<double>(SmallCommercialIndustValues),
StackMode = StackMode.Values,
DataLabels = true
});
this.Labels.Clear();
AnalystName.ForEach(this.Labels.Add);
}
// Code smell: never catch 'Exception'.
// Only catch explicitly those exception you can handle.
// A user can't handle exceptions, so in a real business application you wouldn't show the exception message to the user.
catch (Exception ex)
{
// Bad practice
MessageBox.Show(ex.Message);
}
}
Please also read: Exceptions and Exception Handling, especially Exceptions Overview and Design Guidelines for Exceptions.
Related
I cannot get updated item in ListView after modifying existing database item. Though, once I reload the application one can see updated item in ListView.
I have binded to an ObservableCollection for the ListView
This is my interface
public interface IService
{
IEnumerable<Employee> GetDetails();
IEnumerable<Employee> GetDetailsById(int MatchID);
}
I have implemented IService IEmployeeServiceData class.
public class IEmployeeServiceData:IService
{
private EmployeeContext Context
{
get;
set;
}
public IEmployeeServiceData()
{
Context = new EmployeeContext();
}
public IEnumerable<Model.Employee> GetDetails()
{
return Context.Employees;
}
public IEnumerable<Model.Employee> GetDetailsById(int MatchID)
{
var q = from f in Context.Employees
where f.EMPLOYEE_ID == MatchID
select f;
return q.AsEnumerable();
}
}
This is my VM
public void RefereshData()
{
var e = EmployeeService.GetDetails();
if (SelectedIndexValue == 1)
{
var Data = from e1 in e
where e1.LOCATION == "Pune"
select e1;
EmployeeMasterData = new ObservableCollection<Model.Employee>(Data);
}
else if(SelectedIndexValue==2)
{
var Data = from e1 in e
where e1.LOCATION == "Bangalore"
select e1;
EmployeeMasterData = new ObservableCollection<Model.Employee>(Data);
}
else
{
EmployeeMasterData = new ObservableCollection<Model.Employee>(e);
}
}
Updating Exiting Item:
public void UpdateEmployee()
{
try
{
Context = new EmployeeContext();
Employee Emp = Context.Employees.First(i => i.EMPLOYEE_ID == FindId1);
Emp.FIRST_NAME = this.FIRSTNAME;
Emp.FAMILY_NAME = this.FAMILY_NAME;
Emp.EXTERNAL_ID = this.EXTERNALID;
Emp.DB_SPONSOR = this.DBSPONSOR;
Emp.LEGAL_ENTITY = this.LEGAL_ENTITY;
Emp.COST_CENTER = this.COST_CENTER1;
Emp.STATUS = this.StatusCategory;
Emp.ENTRY_DATE = this.ENTRYDATE;
Emp.LOCATION = this.LocationCategory1;
Context.SaveChanges();
Clear();
AlertMessage1 = "Employee Record is Updated Sucessfulyy !!!";
IsVisible1 = true;
timer.Start();
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
Console.WriteLine(ex.InnerException);
}
}
Existing Item
Updated Item
Changes done to an entity in Entity Framework will not be reflected on screen because the two instances are not related in your example. Yes the have the same values, but they are two different distinct reference locations in memory. **For the ObservableCollection is a copy of the list and not the actual list being manipulated in your example.
Hence they are not related.
To show a change you have these options:
Change the actual object's property(ies) held by the observable collection to mirror the change done in to the other EF entity. Also the EF entity must adhere to INotifyPropertyChange or also the data property change won't be seen on the screen.
Or delete the screen entity and add the changed entity into the list.
Or delete the whole observable list and re-add it with the latest version from EF. (You mention that you do this and that is an option as well).
I hope this doesn't get marked as duplicate since my problem is kinda complex, so none of the other answers helped. I have a class called 'ControlChoiceModule' that generates a System.Windows.Controls object based on the type of property it deals with (String - TextBox, Boolean - CheckBox, DateTime - DatePicker, etc..).
It has two dictionaries:
public static class ControlChoiceModule
{
private static readonly Dictionary<Type, object> TypeToControl = new Dictionary<Type, object>
{
{typeof(bool), new CheckBox() },
{typeof(DateTime), new DatePicker() }
};
private static readonly Dictionary<Type, DependencyProperty> ControlToProperty = new Dictionary<Type, DependencyProperty>
{
{typeof(TextBox), TextBox.TextProperty },
{typeof(CheckBox), CheckBox.IsCheckedProperty },
{typeof(DatePicker), DatePicker.SelectedDateProperty }
};
The purpose of the other one is just for binding. And here are the two methods:
public static object GenerateControl(Type theType, Binding B)
{
object O;
if (TypeToControl.ContainsKey(theType))
{
O = TypeToControl[theType];
}
else
{
O = new TextBox();
}
SetBinding(O, B);
return O;
}
private static void SetBinding(object O, Binding B)
{
BindingOperations.SetBinding(O as DependencyObject, ControlToProperty[O.GetType()], B);
}
Now the purpose of all this is to generate an insertion window for a certain class, generically. So the windows loops through all of the class's properties and, based on the type, generates an appropriate field for it.
private void GenerateInsertionOrUpdatePage(string windowText)
{
var w2 = new InsertionWindow();
w2.DataContext = this.DataContext;
w2.Title = windowText;
w2.Show();
foreach (var P in ReturnPropertyList())
{
if (P.Name != "SearchableString" && P.Name != "Id" )
{
Label L = new Label();
L.Content = P.Name + ":";
w2.InsertionStackPanel.Children.Add(L);
Binding B = new Binding();
B.Path = new PropertyPath("NewT." + P.Name);
B.UpdateSourceTrigger = UpdateSourceTrigger.PropertyChanged;
B.Mode = BindingMode.TwoWay;
**w2.InsertionStackPanel.Children.Add(ControlChoiceModule.GenerateControl(P.PropertyType, B) as UIElement);**
}
}
}
The method above gets called on a click of a button. The first time I click it, it works just fine. But when I click it again, I get the error from the title (on the line marked with **).
Any idea why this happens?
Thanks
im exploring WPF world, i find a great example on the web about how to use binding on xml
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/37854/How-to-Perform-WPF-Data-Binding-Using-LINQ-to-XML
Now im trying to extends this example: i want to create a "class in the middle" between the XElement and the UI and bind all togheder in a chain so, if i have a modification into the xml, then i have the property in the middle class updated then the UI updated too.
Here some code:
This is the class that wrap the XElement
public class XElementDataProvider : ObjectDataProvider
{
public XElementDataProvider()
{
ObjectInstance = XElement.Load(#"C:\MyFile.xml");
}
private static XElementDataProvider instance;
public static XElementDataProvider Instance
{
get
{
if (instance == null)
{
instance = new XElementDataProvider();
}
return instance;
}
}
}
This is the MiddleClass
public class MiddleClass : DependencyObject
{
XElementDataProvider xElementDataProvider;
XElement myxml;
public MiddleClass()
{
//here i get my dataprovider
xElementDataProvider = XElementDataProvider.Instance;
myxml = xElementDataProvider.Data as XElement;
//i bind my internal collection to the Elements...
Binding binding = new Binding("Elements[book]")
{
Source = myxml,
Mode = BindingMode.Default//here i cant use TwoWay, give me //back an exeption
};
BindingOperations.SetBinding(this, XBookListProperty, binding);
//just to have confirmation of the adding
myxml.Changed += new EventHandler<XObjectChangeEventArgs (myxml_Changed);
}
void myxml_Changed(object sender, XObjectChangeEventArgs e)
{
}
//i use a DependencyProperty to have also a change callback
public static readonly DependencyProperty XBookListProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("XBookList", typeof(IEnumerable),
typeof(MiddleClass),
new PropertyMetadata(XBookPropertyChanged)
);
//here i have a notification only at start but no when i add a new book
private static void XBookPropertyChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
MiddleClass middleClass = d as MiddleClass;
middleClass.XBookPropertyChanged((IEnumerable)e.OldValue, (IEnumerable)e.NewValue);
}
private void XBookPropertyChanged(IEnumerable old, IEnumerable newValue)
{
}
//this is the propery i finally want to expose to the UI but im not able //to keep updated
public List<Book> bookList;
public List<Book> BookList
{
get
{
return bookList;
}
set
{
bookList = value;
}
}
//this is my internal list binded to the xml
private IEnumerable XBookList
{
get
{
return (IEnumerable)GetValue(XBookListProperty);
}
set
{
SetValue(XBookListProperty, value);
}
}
//here i try to add a book addind direcly to the xml//i expect a //notification of propery changed...but nothing
public bool AddBook(string name)
{
XElement newWorkSheet = new XElement("Book",
new XAttribute("Name", name)
);
myxml.Add(newWorkSheet);
return true;
}
Book is a class thar repersents a book, let say it has only a name propery for now.
The UI class misses but it should bind on public List<Book> BookList and show books names to the user in a ListBox
Enyone knows why i dont recive any notification...or what i have to do to keep the public List<Book> BookList synchronized with private IEnumerable<XBookList>?
OK, after many attempts, the only solution I found is this one:
to have notifications when something changes in the IEnumerable<XBookList> you need to clear it ad rebind after you modify it.
In this way you have a first, not used notification, about the clear and then another notification about the new set.
Then in the handler you can synchronize the new list with the old one.
public bool AddBook(string name)
{
XElement newWorkSheet = new XElement("Book",
new XAttribute("Name", name)
);
myxml.Add(newWorkSheet);
ClearValue(XBookListProperty);
Binding binding = new Binding("Elements[book]")
{
Source = myxml,
Mode = BindingMode.Default
};
BindingOperations.SetBinding(this, XBookListProperty, binding);
return true;
}
I'm trying to bind a List<T> to a DataGridView control, and I'm not having any luck creating custom bindings.
I have tried:
gvProgramCode.DataBindings.Add(new Binding("Opcode",code,"Opcode"));
It throws an exception, saying that nothing was found by that property name.
The name of the column in question is "Opcode". The name of the property in the List<T> is Opcode.
ANSWER EDIT: the problem was that I did not have the bindable fields in my class as properties, just public fields...Apparently it doesn't reflect on fields, just properties.
Is the property on the grid you are binding to Opcode as well?.. if you want to bind directly to List you would just DataSource = list. The databindings allows custom binding. are you trying to do something other than the datasource?
You are getting a bunch of empty rows? do the auto generated columns have names? Have you verified data is in the object (not just string.empty) ?
class MyObject
{
public string Something { get; set; }
public string Text { get; set; }
public string Other { get; set; }
}
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
List<MyObject> myList = new List<MyObject>();
for (int i = 0; i < 200; i++)
{
string num = i.ToString();
myList.Add(new MyObject { Something = "Something " + num , Text = "Some Row " + num , Other = "Other " + num });
}
dataGridView1.DataSource = myList;
}
this should work fine...
I can't really tell what you're trying to do with the example you included, but binding to a generic list of objects is fairly straightforward if you just want to list the objects:
private BindingSource _gridSource;
private BindingSource GridSource
{
get
{
if (_gridSource == null)
_gridSource = new BindingSource();
return _gridSource;
}
}
private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
List<FluffyBunny> list = new List<FluffyBunny>();
list.Add(new FluffyBunny { Color = "White", EarType = "Long", Name = "Stan" });
list.Add(new FluffyBunny { Color = "Brown", EarType = "Medium", Name = "Mike" });
list.Add(new FluffyBunny { Color = "Mottled", EarType = "Short", Name = "Torvald" });
GridSource.DataSource = list;
dataGridView1.Columns["EarType"].Visible = false; //Optionally hide a column
dataGridView1.DataSource = GridSource;
}
If you only want to display specific properties of the List's type you should be able to make the unwanted column(s) invisible.
Technically, you don't really need to create the BindingSource, but I find it's a whole lot easier when I'm doing updates or changes if I have it.
Hope this helps.
Had the same issue... I had a struct with public fields obviously. nothing in the grid. provided public getters, worked.
Another solution I've found is to use the BindingList collection.
private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
BindingList people= new BindingList {
new Person {Name="John",Age=23},
new Person {Name="Lucy",Age=16}
};
dataGridView1.DataSource= people;
}
It works fine for me,
I have an Image control with it's source bound to a property on an object(string url to an image). After making a service call, i update the data object with a new URL. The exception is thrown after it leaves my code, after invoking the PropertyChanged event.
The data structure and the service logic are all done in a core dll that has no knowledge of the UI. How do I sync up with the UI thread when i cant access a Dispatcher?
PS: Accessing Application.Current.RootVisual in order to get at a Dispatcher is not a solution because the root visual is on a different thread(causing the exact exception i need to prevent).
PPS: This only is a problem with the image control, binding to any other ui element, the cross thread issue is handled for you.
System.Windows.Deployment.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() => {...});
Also look here.
Have you tried implementing INotifyPropertyChanged?
The property getter for RootVisual on the Application class has a thread check which causes that exception. I got around this by storing the root visual's dispatcher in my own property in my App.xaml.cs:
public static Dispatcher RootVisualDispatcher { get; set; }
private void Application_Startup(object sender, StartupEventArgs e)
{
this.RootVisual = new Page();
RootVisualDispatcher = RootVisual.Dispatcher;
}
If you then call BeginInvoke on App.RootVisualDispatcher rather than Application.Current.RootVisual.Dispatcher you shouldn't get this exception.
I ran into a similar issue to this, but this was in windows forms:
I have a class that has it's own thread, updating statistics about another process, there is a control in my UI that is databound to this object. I was running into cross-thread call issues, here is how I resolved it:
Form m_MainWindow; //Reference to the main window of my application
protected virtual void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
if(PropertyChanged != null)
if(m_MainWindow.InvokeRequired)
m_MainWindow.Invoke(
PropertyChanged, this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName);
else
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName);
}
This seems to work great, if anyone has suggestions, please let me know.
When ever we want to update UI related items that action should happen in the UI thread else you will get an invalid cross thread access exception
Deployment.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke( () =>
{
UpdateUI(); // DO the actions in the function Update UI
});
public void UpdateUI()
{
//to do :Update UI elements here
}
The INotifyPropertyChanged interface is used to notify clients, typically binding clients, that a property value has changed.
For example, consider a Person object with a property called FirstName. To provide generic property-change notification, the Person type implements the INotifyPropertyChanged interface and raises a PropertyChanged event when FirstName is changed.
For change notification to occur in a binding between a bound client and a data source, your bound type should either:
Implement the INotifyPropertyChanged interface (preferred).
Provide a change event for each property of the bound type.
Do not do both.
Example:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.ComponentModel;
using System.Drawing;
using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;
using System.Windows.Forms;
// Change the namespace to the project name.
namespace TestNotifyPropertyChangedCS
{
// This form demonstrates using a BindingSource to bind
// a list to a DataGridView control. The list does not
// raise change notifications. However the DemoCustomer type
// in the list does.
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
// This button causes the value of a list element to be changed.
private Button changeItemBtn = new Button();
// This DataGridView control displays the contents of the list.
private DataGridView customersDataGridView = new DataGridView();
// This BindingSource binds the list to the DataGridView control.
private BindingSource customersBindingSource = new BindingSource();
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
// Set up the "Change Item" button.
this.changeItemBtn.Text = "Change Item";
this.changeItemBtn.Dock = DockStyle.Bottom;
this.changeItemBtn.Click +=
new EventHandler(changeItemBtn_Click);
this.Controls.Add(this.changeItemBtn);
// Set up the DataGridView.
customersDataGridView.Dock = DockStyle.Top;
this.Controls.Add(customersDataGridView);
this.Size = new Size(400, 200);
}
private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// Create and populate the list of DemoCustomer objects
// which will supply data to the DataGridView.
BindingList<DemoCustomer> customerList = new BindingList<DemoCustomer>();
customerList.Add(DemoCustomer.CreateNewCustomer());
customerList.Add(DemoCustomer.CreateNewCustomer());
customerList.Add(DemoCustomer.CreateNewCustomer());
// Bind the list to the BindingSource.
this.customersBindingSource.DataSource = customerList;
// Attach the BindingSource to the DataGridView.
this.customersDataGridView.DataSource =
this.customersBindingSource;
}
// Change the value of the CompanyName property for the first
// item in the list when the "Change Item" button is clicked.
void changeItemBtn_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// Get a reference to the list from the BindingSource.
BindingList<DemoCustomer> customerList =
this.customersBindingSource.DataSource as BindingList<DemoCustomer>;
// Change the value of the CompanyName property for the
// first item in the list.
customerList[0].CustomerName = "Tailspin Toys";
customerList[0].PhoneNumber = "(708)555-0150";
}
}
// This is a simple customer class that
// implements the IPropertyChange interface.
public class DemoCustomer : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
// These fields hold the values for the public properties.
private Guid idValue = Guid.NewGuid();
private string customerNameValue = String.Empty;
private string phoneNumberValue = String.Empty;
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
// This method is called by the Set accessor of each property.
// The CallerMemberName attribute that is applied to the optional propertyName
// parameter causes the property name of the caller to be substituted as an argument.
private void NotifyPropertyChanged([CallerMemberName] String propertyName = "")
{
if (PropertyChanged != null)
{
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
// The constructor is private to enforce the factory pattern.
private DemoCustomer()
{
customerNameValue = "Customer";
phoneNumberValue = "(312)555-0100";
}
// This is the public factory method.
public static DemoCustomer CreateNewCustomer()
{
return new DemoCustomer();
}
// This property represents an ID, suitable
// for use as a primary key in a database.
public Guid ID
{
get
{
return this.idValue;
}
}
public string CustomerName
{
get
{
return this.customerNameValue;
}
set
{
if (value != this.customerNameValue)
{
this.customerNameValue = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged();
}
}
}
public string PhoneNumber
{
get
{
return this.phoneNumberValue;
}
set
{
if (value != this.phoneNumberValue)
{
this.phoneNumberValue = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged();
}
}
}
}
}