I have a project which is on react but files are not .js instead they are .tsx and I am trying to use stripe library but keep getting error.
I have tried few different libraries which help setting up stripe but I am keep getting stuck on this errr.
Please help or direct me to correct library which help me setup stripe.
my codes are
import ReactDOM from "react-dom";
import StripeCheckout from 'react-stripe-checkout';
import axios from "axios";
function handleToken(token, addresses) {
console.log(token, addresses);
}
export default function Webinar() {
return (
<div className="container">
<StripeCheckout stripeKey = "mykey"
token={handleToken}
name="Tesla Roadster"
billingAddress
shippingAddress
/>
</div>
);
}
The problem is saying that your Typescript repo is now strict mode enabled which forces you specify the typing. If you wish to keep it silent, you can simply switch it to false in tsconfig.json:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"strict": false,
// ...
}
}
Change your function handleToken to be a variable with has the same type of your component prop as following:
const handleToken: StripeCheckout['props']['token'] = (token) => {
// You can receive hint from token type here
}
Related
I try Qwik framework which looks a lot like Reactjs and uses jsx. And suddenly, I wonder if Reactjs libraries such as MUI can work with Qwik framework.
I tried this code:
import { component$ } from "#builder.io/qwik";
import Add from "#mui/icons-material/Add";
import IconButton from "#mui/material/IconButton";
const AddToCartButton = component$(() => {
return (
<IconButton>
<Add />
</IconButton>
);
});
export default AddToCartButton;
But I got this this error:
QWIK ERROR Code(25): Invalid JSXNode type. It must be either a function or a string. Found: {
'$$typeof': Symbol(react.memo),
type: {
'$$typeof': Symbol(react.forward_ref),
render: [Function: Component] { displayName: 'AddIcon', muiName: 'SvgIcon' }
},
compare: null
} Error: Code(25): Invalid JSXNode type. It must be either a function or a string. Found:
at logError (E:\qwik\flower\node_modules\#builder.io\qwik\core.cjs:4515:58)
at logErrorAndStop (E:\qwik\flower\node_modules\#builder.io\qwik\core.cjs:4521:21)
at qError (E:\qwik\flower\node_modules\#builder.io\qwik\core.cjs:4585:16)
at Proxy.jsx (E:\qwik\flower\node_modules\#builder.io\qwik\core.cjs:605:23)
at AddToCartButton_component_4S0nJgnxzBU (/src/addtocartbutton_component_4s0njgnxzbu.js:11:55)
at useInvoke (E:\qwik\flower\node_modules\#builder.io\qwik\core.cjs:149:30)
at E:\qwik\flower\node_modules\#builder.io\qwik\core.cjs:4676:32
at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:96:5)
at async renderSSR (E:\qwik\flower\node_modules\#builder.io\qwik\core.cjs:5280:9)
at async Proxy.renderToStream (E:\qwik\flower\node_modules\#builder.io\qwik\server.cjs:582:3)
at async file:///E:/qwik/flower/node_modules/#builder.io/qwik/optimizer.mjs:1776:30
QWIK ERROR Code(25): Invalid JSXNode type. It must be either a function or a string. Found: Error: Code(25): Invalid JSXNode type. It must be either a function or a string. Found:
at logError (E:\qwik\flower\node_modules\#builder.io\qwik\core.cjs:4515:58)
at logErrorAndStop (E:\qwik\flower\node_modules\#builder.io\qwik\core.cjs:4521:21)
at qError (E:\qwik\flower\node_modules\#builder.io\qwik\core.cjs:4585:16)
at Proxy.jsx (E:\qwik\flower\node_modules\#builder.io\qwik\core.cjs:605:23)
at AddToCartButton_component_4S0nJgnxzBU (/src/addtocartbutton_component_4s0njgnxzbu.js:11:55)
at useInvoke (E:\qwik\flower\node_modules\#builder.io\qwik\core.cjs:149:30)
at E:\qwik\flower\node_modules\#builder.io\qwik\core.cjs:4676:32
at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:96:5)
at async renderSSR (E:\qwik\flower\node_modules\#builder.io\qwik\core.cjs:5280:9)
at async Proxy.renderToStream (E:\qwik\flower\node_modules\#builder.io\qwik\server.cjs:582:3)
at async file:///E:/qwik/flower/node_modules/#builder.io/qwik/optimizer.mjs:1776:30
not rendered
JSX in this case is the templating language of Qwik but the underlyings are different. It is made similar so you have an easier transition from react as stated in their docs.
Qwik is familiar for React developers and can be used to build any type of web site or application.
Qwik offers some adapter for react components you need to install and wrap your components in.
npm i -D #builder.io/qwik-react
And then the usage should look like the example in their repo.
/** #jsxImportSource react */
import { qwikify$ } from '#builder.io/qwik-react';
import { Button } from '#mui/material';
export const App = qwikify$(() => {
return (
<>
<Button variant="contained">Hola</Button>
</>
);
});
This thread is a bit older but maybe someone stumbles across it like me.
I had the same issue using a UI-component library and resolved it with the following steps.
adding qwikReact into the vite.config file:
import { defineConfig } from "vite";
import { qwikVite } from "#builder.io/qwik/optimizer";
import { qwikCity } from "#builder.io/qwik-city/vite";
import { qwikReact } from "#builder.io/qwik-react";
import tsconfigPaths from "vite-tsconfig-paths";
export default defineConfig(() => {
return {
plugins: [qwikCity(), qwikVite(), qwikReact(), tsconfigPaths()],
preview: {
headers: {
"Cache-Control": "public, max-age=600",
},
},
};
});
qwikify() must be used in a seperate file only with /** #jsxImportSource react */ as Jonathan pointed out.
Be aware that react components will not be treated the same way in Qwik. As stated in the docs it should be a migration/testing tool for existing projects where react components should be introduced in "Wide islands".
For those of you who are using Qwik Speak for I18N, the proposed solution will not work as is because Qwik-Speak won't be able to handle the JSX. The solution is to individually wrap the MUI component and then use it normally as so:
import { component$ } from "#builder.io/qwik";
import { Link } from "#builder.io/qwik-city";
import { $translate as t, Speak } from "qwik-speak";
import Button from "#mui/material/Button";
import { qwikify$ } from "#builder.io/qwik-react";
export const MUIButton = qwikify$(Button);
export default component$(() => {
return (
<Speak assets={["welcome"]}>
<div>
<h1>{t("welcome.title##Welcome")}</h1>
<MUIButton variant="contained">Do Something</MUIButton>
</div>
</Speak>
);
})
I have a path.json file that contains the path of a component
// path.json
{
"main": "./login/index.js",
"paths": [
{
"name": "login",
"path": "./login/index.js",
"image": ""
}
]
}
I want to load './login/index.js' file dynamically in react native and render this particular file
My current implementation
const MyComponent = createLazyContainer(() => {
const componentPath = PathJson.main; // ./login/index.js
return import(`${componentPath}`); //import error here # line 7
});
export default MyComponent;
I am getting following error :
Invalid call at line 7: import("" + componentPath)
What people have been telling you in the thread is correct but I'd like to add one possible solution. All the imports/require are resolved at compilation time and not at running time which you are trying to do. By the time you are running your app, if you haven't imported the files, you can't use them.
There is a workaround tho, assuming that you know all the files that you might in advance which is to do something like a factory:
const possiblePaths = {
'one': require('path/to/file/1'),
'two': require('path/to/file/2')
}
function(type){
return possiblePaths[type];
}
And then you use it somehow like:
render(){
const MyComponent = function('one');
return <MyComponent/>;
}
This is more or less pseudo code and my not work right away, but hopefully yo get the idea. You need to store a reference to each of the imports you might need and then dont use the import, use the reference that was created for you at compilation time.
Actually, the React Native development concerns are not like development for the Web.
Just for this reason, it is not so important at all to have lazy loading in the production of a react-native project. Just import anything you want and then use them in any files of the project. all of them are in the bundle of production and exactly it is not important at all.
So for this problem, I prefer to have a helper file to collect all selectable libraries and export them:
// helper file
export { default as Index } from './Login';
export { default as OtherComponent } from './OtherComponent';
Then when you wanna use:
import { Index, OtherComponent } from 'helper';
~~~
render() {
const MyComponent = someCondition ? Index : OtherComponent;
return (
<MyComponent />;
);
}
Solution:
const allPaths = {
path1: require('file path1').default,
path2: require('file path2').default
};
render(){
const MyComponent = allPaths["path1"];
return <MyComponent/>
}
In React Native all the files that are being imported are bundled together, only those files can be dynamically imported.
Let's say you have three files index.js, test_1.js and test_2.js and if you have imported only test_1.js in index.js than React Native will only bundle those two files leaving test_2.js.
So to answer your question even if dynamic import works in React Native but because these files are not part of the bundle you are not able to import them.
I've once been in a similar situation where I need to do imports by variable, but that is limited to importing components inside a component and it uses code-splitting (Edit: I'm playing around to look for a solution without relying on code-splitting, I just realized there was a react-native tag in the question, and I don't think code-splitting is a good choice to go with in RN). I'm not sure by how much my method could help you, but here goes.
Side notes:
Importing folder that contains an index.js(jsx|ts|tsx) file should automatically resolve to that index file.
Importing from from './login/index.js' usually throws a 'Module not found' error. Either import from './login/index' or from './login but I prefer the last one as it's the shortest & simplest.
In path.json:
{
"main": "./login", // '.js' is removed
"paths": [
{
"name": "login",
"path": "./login/index.js", // Not sure what this is for, but if necessary, remove the '.js' here as well
"image": ""
}
]
}
In MyComponent.js:
import React, { lazy, Suspense } from 'react'
import PathJson from './path'
// 1. We need a UI to show while component is being loaded
const Loader = () => <div>{'Loading...'}</div>
// 2. We need a fallback UI if component is not found
const DocUnavailable = () => <div>{'We\'re sorry, but this document is unavailable.'}</div>
// 3. Create a resolver function ('resolver' is just a name I give)
function resolveImport(pathToComponent, FallbackComponent) {
let componentFound = false
let RenderComponent = () => <FallbackComponent /> // Assign fallback first
try {
if (require.resolve(pathToComponent)) {
componentFound = true
}
} catch (e) { } // Kinda hacky, if you don't mind, but it works
if (componentFound) {
// If found, replace fallback with the valid component
RenderComponent = lazy(() => import(pathToComponent))
}
return RenderComponent
}
// 4. Finally, implement it in a component
class MyComponent extends React.Component {
render() {
const componentPath = PathJson.main
const RenderComponent = resolveImport(componentPath, DocUnavailable)
return (
<Suspense fallback={<Loader />}>
<RenderComponent />
</Suspense>
)
}
}
export default MyComponent
References:
Implementation for 'resolver' function based on Langutil
Code-splitting with lazy & Suspense based on React Docs
Using typescript to define a test outputs Type assertion using the '<>' syntax is forbidden. Use the 'as' syntax instead. error.
./app.test.ts
import React from 'react';
import ReactDOM from 'react-dom';
import App from './App';
it('renders without crashing', () => {
const div = document.createElement('div');
ReactDOM.render(<App />, div); // here the error is produced
});
How should the component be defined in Typescript?
Example code from CRA Facebook page
edit: Accepted answer by #rzelek pointed in the right direction.
As defined in the JSX handbook the compiler options define the way your JSX is interpreted. In my case used "jsx": "react" so that means the method React.createElement() needs to be used in order to create a component (see table in JSX handbook):
final result: ./app.test.ts
import React from 'react';
import ReactDOM from 'react-dom';
import App from './App';
it('renders without crashing', () => {
const app = React.createElement(App);
const div = document.createElement('div');
ReactDOM.render(app, div);
});
Typescript files that contain JSX should have *.tsx extension instead of .ts.
You can see similar issue here: https://github.com/palantir/tslint-react/issues/141
Additionally, your tsconfig.json should have appropriate config. For my CRA apps, this is:
{
"compilerOptions": {
...
"jsx": "preserve",
...
}
}
https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/jsx.html
The error you can see most probably comes from tslint, not Typescript itself. You can see a rule here: https://palantir.github.io/tslint/rules/no-angle-bracket-type-assertion/. Basic tslint config for CRA should be something similar to this:
{
"extends": ["tslint:latest", "tslint-react"],
"rules": {
// override tslint-react rules here
"jsx-wrap-multiline": false
}
}
As a good starting point, you can try adding "no-angle-bracket-type-assertion": false to tslint.json rules and see if error disappears.
PS. tslint usually points you to source of the error, for example:
ERROR: app/components/Root/index.ts[6, 7]: Type assertion using the '<>' syntax is forbidden. Use the 'as' syntax instead.
How's your <App> component defined?
Let's assume these are the component props and state interfaces (I usually define them in the beginning of a file for each component):
interface Props {
//... some props
}
interface State {
//... some state
}
A class component can be defined like this
class MyComponent extends React.Component<Props, State> { ... }
A function component can be defined like this
const MyComponent: React.FC<Props> = ...
You might want to check react-redux-typescript-guide
Also, this question might be related
React + ES6 Babel spits the following error message whenever I try to access undefined (ex. trying person.age where person === undefined.)
This also happens when I mistype an import statement or make a mistake when I destructure a props object. For example, I could make the following mistake:
const { name, age } = this.props.person
// but `this.props.person` only has a `name` property.
Such lack of error messages is a pain. Is there some option that I missed to set? How is everyone coping with this problem?
It is a highly requested feature and probably is going to be implemented in next React version. For now you can use redbox-react. As far as I know react-transform-catch-errors is deprecated.
/* global __DEV__ */
import React from 'react'
import { render } from 'react-dom'
import App from './components/App'
const root = document.getElementById('root')
if (__DEV__) {
const RedBox = require('redbox-react').default
try {
render(<App />, root)
} catch (e) {
render(<RedBox error={e} />, root)
}
} else {
render(<App />, root)
}
Yes, this is annoying. One way that helps, is to wrap the render-method of every React-component with try / catch, so you can see the actual error and not the gibberish provided by React. Add this to your babel.js-config, so it's automatically done: https://github.com/gaearon/react-transform-catch-errors.
I want to use marked in reactjs as described in the reactjs docs.
<div>{marked(mystring)}</div>
I use babel so I import marked like this:
import { marked } from 'marked';
Unfortunately the import statement does not work. marked is not defined.
How do I have to import marked here, so that I can use it?
Here's one way to use marked with React:
Ensure that you've installed marked
Include marked in your project's package.json file:
// package.json
{
dependencies: {
react: "^17.0.0",
marked: "^4.0.0",
},
}
Import marked in your .jsx (or related) file:
import { marked } from "marked";
Use the dangerouslySetInnerHTML approach as shown in the example below:
import React from "react";
import { marked } from "marked";
class MarkdownExample extends React.Component {
getMarkdownText() {
var rawMarkup = marked.parse("This is _Markdown_.");
return { __html: rawMarkup };
}
render() {
return <div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={this.getMarkdownText()} />;
}
}
The dangerouslySetInnerHTML attribute gives you the ability to work with raw (HTML) markup. Make sure to take care when using this attribute, though!
Alternative (Safe)
If you don't want to use dangerouslySetInnerHTML and safely render HTML. Try marked-react, which internally uses marked to render the html elements as react components
npm i marked-react
import Markdown from "marked-react";
const MarkdownComponent = () => {
return <Markdown>{rawmarkdown}</Markdown>;
};
Another alternative is react-markdown
Here is another way of using marked with React Hooks:
Create your MarkedConverter component
import { useState } from 'react'
import marked from 'marked'
export const MarkedConverter = () => {
const [markedVal, setMarkedVal] = useState(
'# Welcome to my React Markdown Previewer!'
)
return <div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={createMarkUp(markedVal)}></div>
}
Create Markup function and pass the value from MarkedConverter Component
export const createMarkUp = (val) => {
return { __html: marked(val) }
}
Finally you can import MarkedConverter Component to any of your Component
With the marked-wrapper react-marked-markdown:
import { MarkdownPreview } from 'react-marked-markdown'
export default ({ post }) => (
<div>
<h1>{ post.title }</h1>
<MarkdownPreview value={ post.content }/>
</div>
)
If you just want to import marked:
import marked from 'marked';
Then call the function in your component:
marked('# Markdown');
Here's an example on how to use marked with react:
Install marked with NPM : npm i marked
import it in your react app (this example is created with create-react-app), and using it
example of a react component using "marked"
result in the browser :
preview