Google APP Engine - spawns new instance for every connection or has zero instances - google-app-engine

I am noticing something a little odd with Google App Engine. If my app has not been used and I go open it I notice that it takes some time to load, I also see in the GAE logs console that it is starting up a server during this time so that accounts for the wait (why not always have an instance running?)
After I open and close the app a couple of times I then notice in the versions tab of GAE that I have 7 running instances (all in the same version).
Im a little confused how GAE works, does it roll down your instances to 0 when there is no requests for a while and then on the flip side, does it spin up a new instance for every new client connecting ?
my app.yaml is looking like this:
runtime: nodejs10
env: standard
instance_class: F2
handlers:
- url: /.*
secure: always
redirect_http_response_code: 301
script: auto

You need to fine tune your App Engine scaling strategy, for example please check this app.yaml file
runtime: nodejs10
env: standard
instance_class: F2
handlers:
- url: /.*
secure: always
redirect_http_response_code: 301
script: auto
automatic_scaling:
min_instances: 1
max_instances: 4
min_idle_instances: 1
max_concurrent_requests: 25
target_throughput_utilization: 0.8
inbound_services:
- warmup
min_instances & min_idle_instances are set to 1 in order to have almost 1 instance ready for incoming requests and avoid cold start.
To avoid spin up new instances too fast, you can set max_concurrent_requests & target_throughput_utilization, in this example a new instance will be spin up until an instance reaches 20 concurrent requests (25 X 0.8)
As is mentioned in this document, it is necessary create a warmup endpoint in your application and add inbound_services in your app.yaml file, for example:
app.get('/_ah/warmup', (req, res) => {
// Handle your warmup logic. Initiate db connection, etc.
});
warmup calls carry the benefit of prepare your instances before an incoming request and reduce the latency of first request.

As you did not specify any scaling setting in your app.yaml, App Engine is using automatic scaling.
That means that the application has 0 minimum instances so when your app is not receiving any request at all it will scale down to 0. With that option you will sabve the costs that imply having an instance running all the time, but also cold starts will happen. A cold start happens each time a request reaches your application but there are no instances ready to serve it and a new one has to be created.
Regarding your application scaling up to 7 instances when the traffic load increases, it depends again on the workload that is receiving. You can control this behaviour as well by using the max_instances setting, although using a low value could affect your application's performance if more instances are needed.
App Engine will be spinning up new instances if the threshold value on target_cpu_utilization, target_throughput_utilization , max_concurrent_requests, max_pending_latency or min_pending_latency is reached. You can read about all of them here.

Related

How does app engine load balancer route to idle instances?

I am in the process of migrating an existing Spring Boot app to GAE. The app is automatically scaled having a minimum of 0 instances. During my test runs I have noticed that initially the first instance is loaded and starts to handle requests. As auto-scaling kicks in, a second instance is launched. The traffic after the second instance is up and running, are all being sent to that second instance. Meantime, the first instance remains idle after having run the first handful of the request that prompted the auto scale.
I'm fairly new at tuning, I'm probably missing something.
app.yaml:
runtime: java17
instance_class: F2
automatic_scaling:
target_cpu_utilization: 0.8
min_instances: 0
max_instances: 4
min_pending_latency: 8s
max_pending_latency: 10s
max_concurrent_requests: 25
env_variables:
SPRING_PROFILES_ACTIVE: "prod"
This is the image of both instances after handling 100 requests in 5 minutes. the majority of the requests are being routed to the second instance that was autoscaled.
I have tried changing some of the autoscale values. I am expecting the GAE load balancer to distribute the load among all available instances. But I don't see an even distribution of traffic. Why is that?

Why are idle instances not being shut down when there is no traffic?

Some weeks ago my app on App Engine just started to increase the number of idle instances to an unreasonable high amount, even when there is close to zero traffic. This of course impacts my bill which is skyrocketing.
My app is simple Node.js application serving a GraphQL API that connects to my CloudSQL database.
Why are all these idle instances being started?
My app.yaml:
runtime: nodejs12
service: default
handlers:
- url: /.*
script: auto
secure: always
redirect_http_response_code: 301
automatic_scaling:
max_idle_instances: 1
Screenshot of monitoring:
This is very strange behavior, as per the documentation it should only temporarily exceed the max_idle_instances.
Note: When settling back to normal levels after a load spike, the
number of idle instances can temporarily exceed your specified
maximum. However, you will not be charged for more instances than the
maximum number you've specified.
Some possible solutions:
Confirm in the console that the actual app.yaml configuration is the same as in the app engine console.
Set min_idle_instances to 1 and max_idle_instances to 2 (temporarily) and redeploy the application. It could be that there is just something wrong on the scaling side, and redeploying the application could solve this.
Check your logging (filter app engine) if there is any problem in shutting down the idle instances.
Finally, you could tweak settings like max_pending_latency. I have seen people build applications that take 2-3 seconds to start up, while the default is 30ms before another instance is being spun up.
This post suggests setting the following, which you could try:
instance_class: F1
automatic_scaling:
max_idle_instances: 1 # default value
min_pending_latency: automatic # default value
max_pending_latency: 30ms
Switch to basic_scaling, let Google determine the best scaling algorithm (last resort option). This would look something like this:
basic_scaling:
max_instances: 5
idle_timeout: 15m
The solution could of course also be a combination of 2 and 4.
Update after 24 hours:
I followed #Nebulastic suggestions, number 2 and 4, but it did not make any difference. So in frustration I disabled the entire Google App Engine (App Engine > Settings > Disable application) and left it off for 10 minutes and confirmed in the monitoring dashboard that everything was dead (sorry, users!).
After 10 minutes I enabled App Engine again and it booted only 1 instance. I've been monitoring it closely since and it seems (finally) to be good now. And now after the restart it also adheres to the "min" and "max" idle instances configuration - the suggestion from #Nebulastic. Thanks!
Screenshots:
Have you checked to make sure you dont have a bunch of old versions still running? https://console.cloud.google.com/appengine/versions
check for each service in the services dropdown

App running in Google App Engine fails, tries ah_start for minutes, then restarts

I have a message processor task that runs in the app engine. There are many times that it appears to die, then go into a long (several minutes) log trying to do ah_start, then finally restarts.
This task responds to messages from the message queue, then writes data from these messages to a mySql database.
Looking at the log histogram, it appears that this task is in a 15 minute cycle, where it works for a bit, then does this ah_start loop for a bit, then goes back to working.
When I start sending a heavy load of messages to process, it looses messages which is not an optimal situation for a production environment.
I really don't know even where to check to find out what is going on.
I am sorry but search as I can I really can not find good information on how to use the _ah/start process. A good link to to an explanation and example would to worth a lot.
My process is very simple,
start up
wait for message
store data in data base
ack message
go back to wait for next message
Here is a copy of my app.yaml file:
manual_scaling:
instances: 1
resources:
cpu: 1
memory_gb: 0.5
disk_size_gb: 10
service: message-processor
runtime: nodejs10
env_variables:
BUCKET_NAME: "stans_temp"
handlers:
- url: /stylesheets
static_dir: stylesheets
- url: /.*
secure: always
redirect_http_response_code: 301
script: auto
Thanks for any help.
I would start with correcting syntax errors in app.yaml.
As I can see: runtime: nodejs10 and there is no env: flex settings this seems to be App Engine Standard environment. (app.yaml for standard reference)
However I can see that you have resources setting with is only for App Engine Flexible. (app.yaml for flexible reference)
App Engine Flex and App Engine Standard are practically two different products, so you need to decide which one you want to use. The article about it you may find here. This might be reason, I am even surprised that this was deployed successfully.

How solve High latency in app engine caused by "This request caused a new process to be started for your application..."?

App working with standard environment app engine, python 3.7 and cloud sql (Mysql)
Checking the logs there are some with very high latencies (more than 4 seconds), when the expected are 800ms. All these logs are accompanied by this message:
"This request caused a new process to be started for your application,
and thus caused your application code to be loaded for the first time.
This request may thus take longer and use more CPU than a typical
request for your application."
I understand that when it refers to a new process it refers to the deployment of a new instance (since I use automatic scaling) however the strange thing is that when comparing these logs with the deployment of instances in some cases it matches but in others it does not.
My question is, how can these latencies be reduced?
The app engine config is:
runtime: python37
env: standard
instance_class: F1
handlers:
- url: /static/(.*)
static_files: static/\1
require_matching_file: false
upload: static/.*
- url: /.*
script: auto
secure: always
- url: .*
script: auto
automatic_scaling:
min_idle_instances: automatic
max_idle_instances: automatic
min_pending_latency: automatic
max_pending_latency: automatic
network: {}
As you note, these slower requests happen whenever app engine needs to start a new instance for your application, as the initial load is slow (these are called "loading requests").
However, App Engine does provide a way to use "warmup" requests -- basically, dummy requests to your application to start instances in advance of when they are actually needed. This can reduce, but not eliminate the user-affecting loading requests.
This can slightly increase your costs, but it should reduce the loading request latency as these dummy requests will be the ones that eat the cost of starting a new instance.
In the python 3.7 runtime, you can add a "warmup" element to the inbound_services directive in app.yaml:
inbound_services:
- warmup
This will send a request to /_ah/warmup where, if you want, you can do any other initialization the instance needs (e.g. starting a DB connection pool).
There are more strategies that may help you decrease your latencies in your application.
You can modify your automatic_scaling options in order to use something that may suit better for your app.
You can manage better your bandwidth by setting the appropriate Cache-Control header on your responses and set reasonable expiration times for static files.
Using public Cache-Control headers in this way will allow proxy servers and your clients' browser to cache responses for the designated period of time.
You can use bigger instance class like F2 in order to avoid horizontal scaling happening so often. As I understood from this issue, your latencies increase mostly while new instances are deployed.
You can, also enable concurrent requests and write your code as asynchronously as you can.

Running min 1 instance of Google-App-Engine in standard environment

Looking at the Google-App-Engine's two environments, standard and flex, most of the features offered by standard seem more appropriate for my use case.
According to https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/the-appengine-environments, both standard and flex environment support automatic scaling while standard can scale to 0 instances and flex can scale to 1 instance.
According to https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/standard/nodejs/config/appref, an option for automatic scaling is specifying the min/max number of instances running at any given moment. I would have thought that this would 'override' standard environment's ability to scale to zero, but after my service had seen no traffic in 15 hours, it still closed the last remaining instance.
I have the following config-settings in my app.yaml file.
runtime: nodejs10
automatic_scaling:
min_instances: 1
max_instances: 1 # Increase in production
target_cpu_utilization: 0.95
I was trying to force GAE to have 1 running instance at any time while in testing. I realize that having a static number of instances running is not the point of automatic scaling, but I plan to increase the maximum number of instances when moving to production. I have also tried adding min_idle_instances: 1 to the settings without any difference.
Can standard environment be forced to have a minimum of 1 running instance at any time?
A way to ensure that your instance is ready to serve is to configure warm up request.
Bear in mind that even with Warm up request, you might encounter loading request. If your app has no traffic, the first request will always be a loading request and not a warm up. Thus, in my opinion the best way to approach a situation like this is to set 2 min_instances.
Example of an express.js handler:
js
const express = require('express');
const app = express();
app.get('/_ah/warmup', (req, res) => {
// Handle your warmup logic. Initiate db connection, etc.
});
// Rest of your application handlers.
app.get('/', handler);
app.listen(8080);
Example of app.yaml addition:
inbound_services:
- warmup
A workaround it could be to use cron job that triggers every minute, so your instance it will be available to serve you. However, even with this approach 2 min_instance is a better solution.

Resources