Hey guys I need to know how we can disable kerberos authentication on ambari for solr & spark2 web consoles.
I'm getting the Error 401 - Unauthorized access.
I just want to get in the web consoles with no need for authentication.
I don't need Spnego too.
Please let me know if you need more information.
Best Regards,
André Santos
#Bedjase, This is just a hack. You can look (in ambari) at what was changed for each component, and their dependencies, then try to remove those configuration changes created by kerberizing the cluster. You may find its more than just those Solr and Spark. If you just change those two, it could break stuff in the cluster (zookeeper, Ambari-metrics, and more). This kind of change is also going to make the cluster not something that is supportable for future upgrades.
Related
New to the forum :) - first post. I am trying to set up DocuSign in Salesforce for a client and keep running into an issue when trying to create an envelope template. Some context: my client has a DocuSign Business account (not Gen/ Negotiate), I have added the documents, and can add non-merge fields fine. The only issue is when I try to place the merge field, not create it, I receive an error:
Save Error: Some fields might be out of sync. Unable to connect to the service. Failed to connect to the salesforce service.
So far I have tried: adding IP addresses to Salesforce, removed MFA authentication for API, I have tried clearing cache and cookies, in different browsers, and in incognito mode - no success. I think I just have missed a step in set up? OR is this just not a feature of the client's current account and they need to enable the "Gen" feature to use merge fields?
Appreciate the help - I am also new to Salesforce administration and coding - so I am learning as I go and bear with me if I am not picking up all the "lingo" up front.
It sounds like you're using the legacy DocuSign for Salesforce package if you're not using Gen/Negotiate, so there are typically a couple of issues that could cause the error that you're seeing. The first is a caching issue, so you could try in an incognito browser or by clearing cache and cookies for the browser.
The other issue could be that the connection between DocuSign and Salesforce was broken and needs to be connected again. If that's the case, you could follow the steps in this article. If you're still running into problems, I'd advise to reach out to the DocuSign support team so that they can take a look with you (https://support.docusign.com/).
ok guys here what i did i secure the admin/ path with a firewall user/password
So untile here everything good.
But i want to keep the searching public but i'm asking you expert,
if someone can do some injection or attack codes with those links query?q and select?q
or its only for searching and nothing affraid to!!
http://localhost:8983/solr/core/query
http://localhost:8983/solr/core/select
Also is there any other commands used in cores except
query
select
update/
schema
Thanks!
If you are going to expose the query interface to the public I would not recommend exposing the Solr URL, I would rather do it via a client application (as Shadif suggested) that proxies Solr and sanitizes the user input parameters.
There are many ways in which a malicious user can submit values to have Solr do things that you probably don't want to. This GitHub repo has a good list possible attacks that you could see: https://github.com/veracode-research/solr-injection
This may be the wrong way to phrase this, however I'll ask none the less.
Can I code a Firebase database to accept and parse SOAP protocol messages into my database?
I am new to databases in general, aside from sql, and am just trying to make sure I start off on the right footing.
I will be displaying my Firebase database entries to a webpage.
All SDKs and APIs to access the Firebase Database are documented here. At the moment that does not include a SOAP API.
It is unlikely that such an API will be added (definitely not in the near future). You could try searching if somebody has made a bridge, but I don't recall every hearing of one.
I'm building some reporting tool. Ideally I want to avoid going through web server logs myself and use (some of) the power of Piwik.
The stuff I get from the visitor log would be a good start, this is at http://example.com/piwik/index.php?module=CoreHome&action=index&idSite=1&period=day&date=yesterday#/module=Live&action=getVisitorLog&idSite=1&period=day&date=yesterday
Unfortunately I can't find a getVisitorLog action in the HTTP API docs at
http://developer.piwik.org/api-reference/reporting-api#Actions (and it's also not an undocumented feature, method=Actions.getVisitorLog gives me
The method 'getVisitorLog' does not exist or is not available in the module '\Piwik\Plugins\Actions\API'.
Is there another way to get to this? Or should I write a plugin for Piwik?
Apparently it is possible through the Live plugin API:
http://developer.piwik.org/api-reference/reporting-api#Live
This works as desired:
http://example.com/piwik/index.php?module=API&method=Live.getLastVisitsDetails&format=JSON&idSite=1&period=day&date=2015-07-21&expanded=1&token_auth=XXXXX&filter_limit=100
I am using CapeDwarf JBoss AS7 to host classic GAE+GWT application. On server side, I am logging directly to java.util.Logger framework.
The application works fine, the logs print nice to the console and files.
However, all my logs, together with some http request logs, are also stored in the datastore. Yes, every log line becomes one datastore entity. This should not surprise me, because it is stated in the docs (http://www.jboss.org/capedwarf/docs) and it is needed in order to display logs in gae-like admin console of CapeDwarf.
I was looking for a way to disable this useful but expensive feature. I cannot find any docs that would tell me what to do if I do not need/want my logs in the datastore (e.g. right now 98.3% of my datastore are __org.jboss.capedwarf.LogRequest__ and __org.jboss.capedwarf.LogLine__ entities!). Does anyone happen to know how to do it?
Already answered on our forum: https://community.jboss.org/message/810735#810735