I have a menu. I want the menu items to open different components all with the same style and props.
So I need sth. like this in JSX:
<VARIABLE_HERE style={...} otherProp={'otherProp'}>
where VARIABLE_HERE is a variable i can set (e.g. FileView, SummaryView, ...).
import component1 from '/component1';
import component2 from '/component2';
const availableComponents = {
component1,
component2
};
const MyComponent = (props) => {
const chosenOne = 'component1';
const DisplayedComponent = availableComponents[chosenOne];
return <DisplayedComponent {...props} />;
};
set your choseOne in a condition.
You can create FactoryComponent and inside of the factory component, you can send the VARIABLE_NAME as a prop then you can do what you need. You can check the below example.
FactoryComponent.jsx
const DynamicComponents = {
fileView: FileView,
summaryView: SummaryView
};
const FactoryComponent = (props) => {
const Component = DynamicComponents[props.componentName] || null;
return <Component { ...props }/>
}
Then, you will add the your FactoryComponent to the place that you need. Hypothetically, I am going to use it in Main.jsx.
Main.jsx
const Main = () => {
return <FactoryComponent componentName={VARIABLE_HERE} />
}
Related
I am building this project to try and improve my understanding of react :), so I am a n00b and therefore still learning the ropes of extracting components, states, props etc =)
I have a child Component DescriptionDiv, its parent component is PlusContent and finally the parent component is PlusContentHolder. The user types some input into the DescriptionDiv which then, using a props/callback passes the user input to the PlusContent.
My question/problem is: after setting useState() in the PlusContent component, I am after a button click in the PlusContentHolder component, returned with an undefined in the console.log.
How come I cannot read the useState() in the next parent component, the PlusContentHolder?
I know that useState() is async so you cannot straight up call the value of the state in the PlusContent component, but shouldn't the state value be available in the PlusContentHolder component?
below is my code for the DescriptionDiv
import './DescriptionDiv.css';
const DescriptionDiv = props => {
const onDescriptionChangeHandler = (event) => {
props.descriptionPointer(event.target.value);
}
return (
<div className='description'>
<label>
<p>Description:</p>
<input onChange={onDescriptionChangeHandler} type='text'></input>
</label>
</div>);
}
export default DescriptionDiv;
Next the code for the PlusContent comp
import React, { useState } from "react";
import DescriptionDiv from "./div/DescriptionDiv";
import ImgDiv from "./div/ImgDiv";
import "./PlusContent.css";
import OrientationDiv from "./div/OrientationDiv";
const PlusContent = (props) => {
const [classes, setClasses] = useState("half");
const [content, setContent] = useState();
const [plusContent, setPlusContent] = useState({
orientation: "left",
img: "",
description: "",
});
const onOrientationChangeHandler = (orientationContent) => {
if (orientationContent == "left") {
setClasses("half left");
}
if (orientationContent == "right") {
setClasses("half right");
}
if (orientationContent == "center") {
setClasses("half center");
}
props.orientationInfo(orientationContent);
};
const onDescriptionContentHandler = (descriptionContent) => {
props.descriptionInfo(setPlusContent(descriptionContent));
console.log(descriptionContent)
};
const onImageChangeHandler = (imageContent) => {
props.imageInfo(imageContent);
setContent(
<>
<OrientationDiv
orientationPointer={onOrientationChangeHandler}
orientationName={props.orientationName}
/> {/*
<AltDiv altPointer={onAltDivContentHandler} />
<TitleDiv titlePointer={onTitleDivContentHandler} /> */}
<DescriptionDiv descriptionPointer={onDescriptionContentHandler} />
</>
);
};
return (
<div className={classes}>
<ImgDiv imageChangeExecutor={onImageChangeHandler} />
{content}
</div>
);
};
export default PlusContent;
and lastly the PlusContentHolder
import PlusContent from "../PlusContent";
import React, { useState } from "react";
const PlusContentHolder = (props) => {
const onClickHandler = (t) => {
t.preventDefault();
descriptionInfoHandler();
};
const descriptionInfoHandler = (x) => {
console.log(x) // this console.log(x) returns and undefined
};
return (
<div>
{props.contentAmountPointer.map((content) => (
<PlusContent
orientationInfo={orientationInfoHandler}
imageInfo={imageInfoHandler}
descriptionInfo={descriptionInfoHandler}
key={content}
orientationName={content}
/>
))}
<button onClick={onClickHandler}>Generate Plus Content</button>
</div>
);
};
export default PlusContentHolder;
The reason why the descriptionInfoHandler() function call prints undefined in its console.log() statement when you click the button, is because you never provide an argument to it when you call it from the onClickHandler function.
I think that it will print the description when you type it, however. And I believe the problem is that you need to save the state in the PlusContentHolder module as well.
I would probably add a const [content, setContent] = useState() in the PlusContentHolder component, and make sure to call setContent(x) in the descriptionInfoHandler function in PlusContentHolder.
Otherwise, the state will not be present in the PlusContentHolder component when you click the button.
You need to only maintain a single state in the PlusContentHolder for orientation.
Here's a sample implementation of your use case
import React, { useState } from 'react';
const PlusContentHolder = () => {
const [orientatation, setOrientation] = useState('');
const orientationInfoHandler = (x) => {
setOrientation(x);
};
const generateOrientation = () => {
console.log('orientatation', orientatation);
};
return (
<>
<PlusContent orientationInfo={orientationInfoHandler} />
<button onClick={generateOrientation}>generate</button>
</>
);
};
const PlusContent = ({ orientationInfo }) => {
const onDescriptionContentHandler = (value) => {
// your custom implementation here,
orientationInfo(value);
};
return <DescriptionDiv descriptionPointer={onDescriptionContentHandler} />;
};
const DescriptionDiv = ({ descriptionPointer }) => {
const handleChange = (e) => {
descriptionPointer(e.target.value);
};
return <input type="text" onChange={handleChange} />;
};
I would suggest to maintain the orientation in redux so that its easier to update from the application.
SetState functions do not return anything. In the code below, you're passing undefined to props.descriptionInfo
const onDescriptionContentHandler = (descriptionContent) => {
props.descriptionInfo(setPlusContent(descriptionContent));
};
This shows a misunderstanding of the use of state. Make sure you're reading about "lifting state" in the docs.
You're also declaring needless functions, e.g. onDescriptionContentHandler in your PlusContent. The PlusContent component could just pass the descriptionInfoHandler from PlusContentHolder prop directly down to DescriptionDiv, since onDescriptionContentHandler doesn't do anything except invoke descriptionInfoHandler.
You may want to consider restructuring your app so plusContent state is maintained in PlusContentHolder, and pass that state down as props. That state would get updated when DescriptionDiv invokes descriptionInfoHandler. It'd subsequently pass the updated state down as props to PlusContent.
See my suggested flowchart.
I'm trying to use the React-NBA-Logos package(npm link) in a small project and faced a question. According to the documentation here is an example of this package use
import React from 'react';
import * as NBAIcons from 'react-nba-logos';
const Example = () => {
return <NBAIcons.TOR />; // Loads the Toronto Raptors logo
};
export default Example;
The question is it possible to paste a variable with a dynamic string value(with some correct tripcode) here? Something like this
const Example = () => {
const NEW_VAR = 'NYK';
return <NBAIcons.NEW_VAR />;
};
You can get around this by creating an alias for the component.
const Example = () => {
const NEW_VAR = 'NYK';
const Component = NBAIcons[NEW_VAR];
return <Component />;
};
A functional approach would work well here:
function NBAIcon (name, props = {}) {
const Icon = NBAIcons[name];
return <Icon {...props} />;
}
function Example () {
return (
<ul>
<li>{NBAIcon('TOR')}</li>
<li>{NBAIcon('ATL', {size: '64px'})}</li>
</ul>
);
}
My goal is very simple. I am just looking to set my react context from within a reusable function-only (stateless?) react component.
When this reusable function gets called it will set the context (state inside) to values i provide. The problem is of course you can't import react inside a function-only component and hence I cannot set the context throughout my app.
There's nothing really to show its a simple problem.
But just in case:
<button onCLick={() => PlaySong()}></button>
export function PlaySong() {
const {currentSong, setCurrentSong} = useContext(StoreContext) //cannot call useContext in this component
}
If i use a regular react component, i cannot call this function onClick:
export default function PlaySong() {
const {currentSong, setCurrentSong} = useContext(StoreContext) //fine
}
But:
<button onCLick={() => <PlaySong />}></button> //not an executable function
One solution: I know i can easily solve this problem by simply creating a Playbtn component and place that in every song so it plays the song. The problem with this approach is that i am using a react-player library so i cannot place a Playbtn component in there...
You're so close! You just need to define the callback inside the function component.
export const PlaySongButton = ({...props}) => {
const {setCurrentSong} = useContext(StoreContext);
const playSong = () => {
setCurrentSong("some song");
}
return (
<button
{...props}
onClick={() => playSong()}
/>
)
}
If you want greater re-usability, you can create custom hooks to consume your context. Of course where you use these still has to follow the rules of hooks.
export const useSetCurrentSong = (song) => {
const {setCurrentSong} = useContext(StoreContext);
setCurrentSong(song);
}
It is possible to trigger a hook function by rendering a component, but you cannot call a component like you are trying to do.
const PlaySong = () => {
const {setCurrentSong} = useContext(StoreContext);
useEffect( () => {
setCurrentSong("some song");
}, []
}
return null;
}
const MyComponent = () => {
const [shouldPlay, setShouldPlay] = useState(false);
return (
<>
<button onClick={() => setShouldPlay(true)}>Play</button>
{shouldPlay && <PlaySong />}
</>
)
}
I am using ag-grid-react and ag-grid-community version 22.1.1. My app is written using functional components and hooks. I have a cellrenderer component that is attempting to call a handler within the parent component using the example found here. Is this a bug in ag-grid? I have been working on this application for over a year as I learn React, and this is my last major blocker so any help or a place to go to get that help would be greatly appreciated.
Cell Renderer Component
import React from 'react';
import Button from '../../button/button';
const RowButtonRenderer = props => {
const editClickHandler = (props) => {
let d = props.data;
console.log(d);
props.context.foo({d});
//props.editClicked(props);
}
const deleteClickHandler = (props) => {
props.deleteClicked(props);
}
return (<span>
<Button classname={'rowbuttons'} onClick={() => { editClickHandler(props) }} caption={'Edit'} />
<Button classname={'rowbuttons'} onClick={() => { deleteClickHandler(props) }} caption={'Delete'} />
</span>);
};
export default RowButtonRenderer;
Parent Component
function Checking() {
function foo(props) {
let toggle = displayModal
setNewData(props);
setModalDisplay(!toggle);
}
const context = {componentParent: (props) => foo(props)};
const gridOptions = (params) => {
if (params.node.rowIndex % 2 === 0) {
return { background: "#ACC0C6" };
}
};
const frameworkComponents = {
rowButtonRenderer: RowButtonRenderer,
};
.
.
.
return (
<>
<AgGridReact
getRowStyle={gridOptions}
frameworkComponents={frameworkComponents}
context = {context}
columnDefs={columnDefinitions}
rowData={rowData}
headerHeight="50"
rowClass="gridFont"
></AgGridReact>
</>
);
}
When clicking the edit button on a row, the debugger says that there is a function.
This error is received though:
You are passing the context object in this code section:
const context = {componentParent: (props) => foo(props)};
...
<AgGridReact
context={context}
{...}
></AgGridReact>
And in your cell renderer you call this
props.context.foo({d});
While it should be this
props.context.componentParent({d});
Also you can assign your callback directly since it receives the same parameter and returns the same result (if any)
function foo(props) {
let toggle = displayModal
setNewData(props);
setModalDisplay(!toggle);
}
const context = {componentParent: foo};
You can also use this shorthand syntax from ES6 when assigning object property
function componentParent(props) {
let toggle = displayModal
setNewData(props);
setModalDisplay(!toggle);
}
const context = {componentParent};
Live Demo
I am using the https://www.npmjs.com/package/react-swipeable-routes library to set up some swipeable views in my React app.
I have a custom context that contains a dynamic list of views that need to be rendered as children of the swipeable router, and I have added two buttons for a 'next' and 'previous' view for desktop users.
Now I am stuck on how to get the next and previous item from the array of modules.
I thought to fix it with a custom context and custom hook, but when using that I am getting stuck in an infinite loop.
My custom hook:
import { useContext } from 'react';
import { RootContext } from '../context/root-context';
const useShow = () => {
const [state, setState] = useContext(RootContext);
const setModules = (modules) => {
setState((currentState) => ({
...currentState,
modules,
}));
};
const setActiveModule = (currentModule) => {
// here is the magic. we get the currentModule, so we know which module is visible on the screen
// with this info, we can determine what the previous and next modules are
const index = state.modules.findIndex((module) => module.id === currentModule.id);
// if we are on first item, then there is no previous
let previous = index - 1;
if (previous < 0) {
previous = 0;
}
// if we are on last item, then there is no next
let next = index + 1;
if (next > state.modules.length - 1) {
next = state.modules.length - 1;
}
// update the state. this will trigger every component listening to the previous and next values
setState((currentState) => ({
...currentState,
previous: state.modules[previous].id,
next: state.modules[next].id,
}));
};
return {
modules: state.modules,
setActiveModule,
setModules,
previous: state.previous,
next: state.next,
};
};
export default useShow;
My custom context:
import React, { useState } from 'react';
export const RootContext = React.createContext([{}, () => {}]);
export default (props) => {
const [state, setState] = useState({});
return (
<RootContext.Provider value={[state, setState]}>
{props.children}
</RootContext.Provider>
);
};
and here the part where it goes wrong, in my Content.js
import React, { useEffect } from 'react';
import { Route } from 'react-router-dom';
import SwipeableRoutes from 'react-swipeable-routes';
import useShow from '../../hooks/useShow';
import NavButton from '../NavButton';
// for this demo we just have one single module component
// when we have real data, there will be a VoteModule and CommentModule at least
// there are 2 important object given to the props; module and match
// module comes from us, match comes from swipeable views library
const ModuleComponent = ({ module, match }) => {
// we need this function from the custom hook
const { setActiveModule } = useShow();
// if this view is active (match.type === 'full') then we tell the show hook that
useEffect(() => {
if (match.type === 'full') {
setActiveModule(module);
}
},[match]);
return (
<div style={{ height: 300, backgroundColor: module.title }}>{module.title}</div>
);
};
const Content = () => {
const { modules, previousModule, nextModule } = useShow();
// this is a safety measure, to make sure we don't start rendering stuff when there are no modules yet
if (!modules) {
return <div>Loading...</div>;
}
// this determines which component needs to be rendered for each module
// when we have real data we will switch on module.type or something similar
const getComponentForModule = (module) => {
// this is needed to get both the module and match objects inside the component
// the module object is provided by us and the match object comes from swipeable routes
const ModuleComponentWithProps = (props) => (
<ModuleComponent module={module} {...props} />
);
return ModuleComponentWithProps;
};
// this renders all the modules
// because we return early if there are no modules, we can be sure that here the modules array is always existing
const renderModules = () => (
modules.map((module) => (
<Route
path={`/${module.id}`}
key={module.id}
component={getComponentForModule(module)}
defaultParams={module}
/>
))
);
return (
<div className="content">
<div>
<SwipeableRoutes>
{renderModules()}
</SwipeableRoutes>
<NavButton type="previous" to={previousModule} />
<NavButton type="next" to={nextModule} />
</div>
</div>
);
};
export default Content;
For sake of completion, also my NavButton.js :
import React from 'react';
import { NavLink } from 'react-router-dom';
const NavButton = ({ type, to }) => {
const iconClassName = ['fa'];
if (type === 'next') {
iconClassName.push('fa-arrow-right');
} else {
iconClassName.push('fa-arrow-left');
}
return (
<div className="">
<NavLink className="nav-link-button" to={`/${to}`}>
<i className={iconClassName.join(' ')} />
</NavLink>
</div>
);
};
export default NavButton;
In Content.js there is this part:
// if this view is active (match.type === 'full') then we tell the show hook that
useEffect(() => {
if (match.type === 'full') {
setActiveModule(module);
}
},[match]);
which is causing the infinite loop. If I comment out the setActiveModule call, then the infinite loop is gone, but of course then I also won't have the desired outcome.
I am sure I am doing something wrong in either the usage of useEffect and/or the custom hook I have created, but I just can't figure out what it is.
Any help is much appreciated
I think it's the problem with the way you are using the component in the Route.
Try using:
<Route
path={`/${module.id}`}
key={module.id}
component={() => getComponentForModule(module)}
defaultParams={module}
/>
EDIT:
I have a feeling that it's because of your HOC.
Can you try
component={ModuleComponent}
defaultParams={module}
And get the module from the match object.
const ModuleComponent = ({ match }) => {
const {type, module} = match;
const { setActiveModule } = useShow();
useEffect(() => {
if (type === 'full') {
setActiveModule(module);
}
},[module, setActiveModule]);
match is an object and evaluated in the useEffect will always cause the code to be executed. Track match.type instead. Also you need to track the module there. If that's an object, you'll need to wrap it in a deep compare hook: https://github.com/kentcdodds/use-deep-compare-effect
useEffect(() => {
if (match.type === 'full') {
setActiveModule(module);
}
},[match.type, module]);