I have a server that accepts connection from client and forks creating two processes: one reads from client using recv() and the other writes to client using send(). Both functions use the same file descriptor returned by accept().
The client works similarly. It connect()'s to server and forks creating two processes: one reads from server using recv() and the other writes to server using send(). Both use the same file descriptor returned by socket().
The socket domain is AF_INET and the type is SOCK_STREAM. I want the client to receive data from server and vice versa.
Can I receive what I send? For example: Can the server send a message and receive it so the client will never see it?
Related
Well, i have to do a udp server in C on linux.
This is my issue, for example:
I have that each thread will manage a client. But recvfrom will accept packets from any source, so, how can do that each thread will receive the right client's packet and not others?
I hope I explained my issue well.
Thank you!
(I mean that my server will make a new thread for each client that want to be served. So with TCP i can use accept to have a "dedicated" socket for each thread-client connection, but with UDP i can't do the same.)
You can't have multiple threads reading from the same socket at the same time.
What you should do instead is either:
have a dedicated thread that receives all inbound packets, looks at the source IP/Port, and routes the data to the appropriate processing thread as needed.
give each processing thread its own socket that is bind()'ed to the same local IP/Port and connect()'ed to the particular source IP/Port it is interested in, then each thread can call recvfrom() independently and it will only return packets that match the source that the thread is expecting.
UDP is a message based connection-less protocol. Here, there is no definite connection / setup done between the client and server prior sending the data. It does not maintain any states for communication at either client or server. UDP uses datagram socket(SOCK_DGRAM) . This ensures each packet sent or received in any order but with preserved message boundaries.
TCP is a stream based connection oriented protocol. Here , a definite logical connection is setup between the client and server prior to the exchange of data. TCP states are maintained for communication. TCP uses stream socket(SOCK_STREAM). This provides a connection-oriented, sequenced flow of data with mechanisms for creating/releasing connection and for detecting errors.
In header of TCP and UDP , only port number will be present. It is the responsibility of the IP header to add the necessary destination IP address for routing. However the source ip address shall be obtained from the source host.
In both TCP server and UDP server, once the socket is created using the particular socket type, it is bound to the port using bind system call. This is done so that the client can address to this port of the server. The procedure of binding is not necessary in either the TCP client or UDP client, because it does not matter in whatever port the client communicates. Till this point, it is same for both TCP server and UDP server.
In the case of TCP server, the listen system call will be invoked to listen for connections on the particular socket. The listen indicates the limit on the number of connections that can be queued up and that the server process is ready to accept any new incoming connections on the socket.
The server calls the accept system call which is a blocking call that waits for incoming connections.
Once a new connection comes, a new socket descriptor is created and the connection gets established between the server and client. However, as server, it has to keep listening for new connections.
This is where the multiprocessing begins to get into picture. Since connections can be triggered by any client at any time by using connect system call, we need to have the accept call(blocking call)for the new connections. Further, to have these new connections processed in parallel, one option is to fork and create a child process which will in-turn take care of further processing of the new connections while the parent process waits for new connections on accept call. This is how individual client connections are identified and processed/handled in the server. In simple terms, in concurrent server architecture, there will be one listening socket and multiple connected socket end points at the server at any time.
Note : The connect system call from client triggers the TCP SYN from client for starting the 3 way handshake procedure. At this point of time, the client socket state is SYN_SENT and once the SYN reaches the server, the server socket state is SYN_RCVD. Then the server responds with SYN_ACK to client for which client will respond with ACK and this establishes the connection between client and server.
In the case of UDP server, there is no need for this initial connection establishment as it is a message based connection-less protocol using datagram socket(SOCK_DGRAM). So, UDP client will not need the connect call for connection establishment which turn strips off the need for listen and accept calls in the UDP server. So, the UDP client server architecture shall be a iterative architecture where every client request/response shall be sequentially processed as iterative server architecture are applicable for services like UDP(light-weight) that consume less processing time. Also note that since the time consumed for processing is less, iterative servers will be state less.
In the case of requirement of multiple threads listening on same socket, you can also go for select or epoll system call based software architecture, where every thread will be waiting on select call but in this scenario, it may not be of great help. An alternate design that can meet your requirement can be a combination of separate thread for receive,parse & dispatch that will direct multiple processing threads.
That's why you have a port number.
If your server is listening on say, port 8080, no other process will be allowed to bind a socket to that port.
All clients that want to connect to this server will need send their data to port 8080 on the server's IP.
The UDP datagram has a source IP and port - you know where it came from, so you can route it appropriately.
You may well need a dedicated thread to send to the port, maintain state and later match up replies with requests so that the originating thread can be signaled that it's own reply is available. This could be done by providing a callback in the request struct that the rx thread signals when the matching reply arrives. The callback could signal a synchro object that the originating thread is waiting on.
if I want ONLY to receive data from a client, and not send data out, is it necessary have a connect() in the code of my server?
Or is it sufficient to have the following?
socket();
bind();
listen();
accept();
This describes the basic principle of server-client interaction. As you can see, the client must connect to the server before any interaction.
Once you've built a socket descriptor with the socket() call, you can connect that socket to a remote server using the well-named connect() system call.
Also the sequence you mentioned is in the server. If you want to only receive data from server, just do the read in client and write in server. But connect is neccessary.
You need to use socket and connect for the client.
The TCP protocol does send data to the server and recieves data back from the server (even if you are not transferring data) in the form of ACKs
Please read up on the TCP/IP protocol.
if I want ONLY to receive data from a client, and not send data out, is it necessary have a connect() in the code of my server?
It is never necessary to have connect() in the code of a server.
Clients call connect(). Servers call accept(). By definition.
I need to realize a little TCP server on linux which works like a proxy between a variable number of clients (max 50) and a remote server. This process must open a permanent connection to the remote server, read from it and route data to connected clients and viceversa.
I'am trying to use poll() function on both accepted client socket and the socket client connection to remote server to avoid blocking on recv waiting for data from the server.
It doesn't work. I can manage accepted client socket correctly but when I add the client connection to the pollfd array poll() dont wait for ready socket it returns immediately but calling recv it blocks indefinitely.
Can I mix accepted socket from clients and client socket (just one) in pollfd array?
Thanks.
Please help me clear this concept. Say we have A socket port server implemented using threads. The socket server listens on a socket port and, when a message arrives, create a thread to service the request.
The client code sends a given number of messages to the server. This client code could also be run from different machines by multiple users. I understand that the client code codes are run as seperate processes.Ihat is seperate processes issue requests to the server which is then processed by a server thread.
So, does a client processes stack, user address space, process control block etc pass on to the server thread that processes its request.
Similarly, if it is a file server and a file open request is implemeted by a server thread, then is the fd a part of server file descriptor table or the calling processes.
Would be graatefull to get any link to materials I can read up.
Thanks
No, the client and the server are different processes, possibly even running on different machines.
Clients will ask the operating system (through the libraries) to send network messages to servers, whose operating system will unpack them and direct them (through the libraries) into the server process.
Now "client handling threads" are a different thing, they are subcomponents of the server process, and in your setup, one of those threads (the one handling the client on the other side of the network) will receive the data and do whatever is needed (possibly including a reply, if necessary).
In the file server situation, the file descriptor provided by the operating system never "leaves" the file server. The file server clients create whatever they need to mirror the contents of the remote machine. Such mirroring might include file descriptors, but they are definitely not the same file descriptors as those that reside on the server. The client file descriptors are bound to code which takes the requested operation and turns it into a network call, while the server file descriptors (likely) access the blocks on disk directly.
'The socket server listens on a socket port and, when a message arrives, create a thread to service the request.' Nearly. In this type of server design, a new client-server thread is created, (or depooled), when a connection from a client is accepted by the server listening thread. This client-server thread is passed the client-server socket instance that is allocated by the listener thread accept() call. The client-server thread then usually reads from the client-server socket to get messages, HTTP GET/POST, whatever.
'The client code sends a given number of messages to the server. This client code could also be run from different machines by multiple users. I understand that the client code codes are run as seperate processes.Ihat is seperate processes issue requests to the server which is then processed by a server thread.' Yes-ish. There is the possibility that one client on one box may have multiple connections from multiple threads, but you are 99.99% right.
So, does a client processes stack, user address space, process control block etc pass on to the server thread that processes its request.' No! That would be an absolute nightmare!
Similarly, if it is a file server and a file open request is implemeted by a server thread, then is the fd a part of server file descriptor table or the calling processes.
The file/whatever is opened by the client-server thread. All resources/handles allocated by the client-server thread belong to the server.
Rgds,
Martin
Can a process open/maintain 2 TCP connections in parallel? [for sending and receiving].
I tried the following scenario :
1) Client connects to server on one port, say 13101.
2) Once it sends, it will wait on another port 13102 to get the ACK.
3) Here Server can handle multiple connections [using select() on same port number].
Now, I am facing 2 problems:
1) Server on receiving data from Client1, it is processing data and for sending the ACK back [to client1], I am preparing a new TCP connection [with port 13102] and trying to send data. It fails with "Connection Refused".
2) In order to verify the above problem, I wrote another client2 program that just sends data to port 13102 [to client1, when it is in listening mode]. Still client2 is getting "Connection refused" error.
Yes, you can open lots of sockets! However, you shouldn't need separate sockets for sending and receiving, a TCP socket is bi-directional once it's opened.
As for your error, if you're using two machines, there could be a firewall preventing the server from connecting to your client. You might try using telnet to try to connect to the same port.
The error is probably because the client is not listening for an incoming connection. As stated above you can use a single socket for both send and receive.