weird thread return value in C - c

I think the print result should be 500, but the result was weird - it said 32728, which is meaningless.
#include<stdio.h>
#include<pthread.h>
void* testFunction(void*);
int main(void)
{
void* result;
pthread_t tid;
pthread_create(&tid, NULL, testFunction, NULL);
pthread_join(tid, &result);
printf("%d\n", *((int*)result));
}
void* testFunction(void* args)
{
int time;
time = 500;
pthread_exit((void*)&time);
}
In this code, this is the flow of what I thought
(void*)result has time's address.
(int*)result has time's address. Because of (int*), the program should know result variable is referring to int-type variable.
*((int*)result) means the value of what result variable refers to, so it would be time's value, which is 500.
Can you let me know what I thought wrong?

The problem is that time no longer exists by the time you come to check it. One way around that is to play with the casting. Instead of
pthread_exit((void*)&time);
use
pthread_exit((void*)time);
Then, when you are extracting the result, use
*((int) result)
Another minimal fix is to make time a static. That way, it is not stored in the stack and always exists.

What's wrong is that time is going out of scope when the thread function exits, meaning that dereferencing its address is undefined behaviour. And you are dereferencing after that, since it happens after the pthread_join() call.
There's a chance that something else will be using that memory (probably on the stack but no mandated, since a stack isn't itself mandated), which would explain the strange value.
But, regardless of what's actually happening, it's not something you're allowed to do in C. Or, more correctly, you can do it, just don't expect sane results.

As others already pointed out, the problem is that the pointer received by pthread_join() points nowhere the moment the function returned. As the memory allocate for int time has already been deallocated, as the function has already ended.
There are two possibilities to have pthread_join() return a pointer to valid memory:
Have the thread function allocate it dynamically.
#include <stdlib.h> /* For malloc() and free(). */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <pthread.h>
void* testFunction(void* pv_unused)
{
int * ptime = malloc(sizeof *ptime);
/* Add error checking/handling here! */
*ptime = 500;
pthread_exit(ptime);
}
int main(void)
{
...
pthread_join(tid, &result);
printf("%d\n", *((int*)result));
free(result); /* Free the memory that has been allocated by the thread-function. */
}
Pass a pointer to valid memory to the thread-function.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <pthread.h>
void* testFunction(void* pv_time)
{
int * ptime = pv_time;
*ptime = 500;
pthread_exit(ptime);
}
int main(void)
{
pthread_t tid;
int time;
pthread_create(&tid, NULL, testFunction, &time);
{
void * pv;
pthread_join(tid, &pv);
if (pv != &time)
{
/* Something went wrong! */
}
}
printf("%d\n", time);
}

Related

Dereferencing void * just as (int) -- standard practice?

I was trying to print a thread's return value and discovered that I'm still quite confused by the notion of double void-pointers.
My understanding was that a void* is a pointer to any datatype that can be dereferenced with an appropriate cast, but otherwise the "levels" of referencing are preserved like with regular typed pointers (i.e. you can't expect to get the same value that you put into **(int **)depth2 by dereferencing it only once like *depth2. ).
In the code (below) that I have scraped together for my thread-return-print, however, it seems that I'm not dereferencing a void pointer at all when I'm just casting it to (int). Is this a case of an address being used as value? If so, is this the normal way of returning from threads? Otherwise, what am I missing??
(I am aware that the safer way to manipulate data inside the thread might be caller-level storage, but I'm quite interested in this case and what it is that I don't understand about the void pointer.)
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <pthread.h>
void *myThread(void *arg)
{
return (void *)42;
}
int main()
{
pthread_t tid;
void *res; // res is itself a void *
pthread_create(&tid, NULL, myThread, NULL);
pthread_join(tid, &res); // i pass its address, so void** now
printf(" %d \n", (int)res); // how come am i able to just use it as plain int?
return 0;
}
First of all, the purpose of pthread_join() is to update the void *
given through its second argument in order to obtain the result of the
thread function (a void *).
When you need to update an int as in scanf("%d", &my_var); the argument
is the address of the int to be updated: an int *.
With the same reasoning, you update a void * by providing a void **.
In the specific situation of your example, we don't use the returned
void * in a normal way: this is a trick!
Since a pointer can be thought about as a big integer counting the bytes in
a very long row, the trick is to assume that this pointer can simply store
an integer value which does no refer to any memory location.
In your example, returning (void *)42, is equivalent to saying
"you will find something interesting at address 42".
But nothing has ever been placed at this address!
Is this a problem? No, as long as nobody tries to dereference this
pointer in order to retrieve something at address 42.
Once pthread_join() has been executed, the variable res has
been updated and contains the returned void *: 42 in this case.
We perform here the reverse-trick by assuming that the information memorised
in this pointer does not refer to a memory location but is a simple integer.
It works but this is very ugly!
The main advantage is that you avoid the expensive cost of malloc()/free()
void *myThread(void *arg)
{
int *result=malloc(sizeof(int));
*result=42;
return result;
}
...
int *res;
pthread_join(tid, &res);
int result=*res; // obtain 42
free(res);
A better solution to avoid this cost would be to use the parameter
of the thread function.
void *myThread(void *arg)
{
int *result=arg;
*result=42;
return NULL;
}
...
int expected_result;
pthread_create(&tid, NULL, myThread, &expected_result);
pthread_join(tid, NULL);
// here expected_result has the value 42

Can someone tell me the error as pthread_join is not working

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <pthread.h>
struct Array
{
//
};
void* evensum(void* param)
{
//calculated the sum of even elements and returned it
}
void* oddsum(void* param)
{
//did the same thing but for odd elements
}
int main()
{
struct Array* obj=malloc(sizeof(struct Array));
//did all the inputs
int evensum,oddsum;
pthread_t thread1,thread2;
pthread_create(&thread1,0,&evensum,(void*)obj);
int evensum,oddsum;
pthread_join(&thread,(void**)evensum);
pthread_create(&thread2,0,&oddsum,(void*)obj);
pthread_join(&thread2,(void**)oddsum);
//try to print it using %i but I get or %d
// I get the sum as zero
}
So I created two separate threads and these threads were meant to work asynchronously. I followed the advice mentioned here but the join still doesn't work as once the thread1 finishes execution, the other thread is never created despite me following the correct syntax. Any idea how to fix this?
Also, the value printed is zero, despite showing the correct value if I print it in the function.
Here is what I wrote in the return statement of each function:
return (void*)sum;//variable that stores sum
Also, I want to add that I don't want to use semaphores or any other synchronization tool to do this.
The second parameter to pthread_join is a void **, i.e. it expects a pointer to a void * which it dereferences to store the value in. Because you're not passing the address of a variable, this function will attempted to use whatever value you passed in as an address (which would likely be invalid) and dereference it. This invokes undefined behavior.
Also, the first parameter is of type pthread_t but you're passing a pointer to a pthread_t.
You're also declaring local variables with the same names as the functions you're calling. As a result, when you call pthread_create(&thread2,0,&oddsum,(void*)obj); you're actually passing the local int variable called oddsum and not the function called oddsum. That's why it hangs.
Changing the name of the variables to hold the results, changing the pthread_join calls to pass the addresses of these variables and passing the thread IDs directly should work:
int evenresult;
pthread_join(thread,(void**)&evenresult);
...
int oddresult;
pthread_join(thread2,(void**)&oddresult);
The proper way to do retrieve the result however would be to pass the addresses of actual void * variables and converting them:
int evenresult, oddresult;
void *result;
pthread_join(thread, &result);
evensum = (intptr_t)result;
...
pthread_join(thread2, &result);
oddsum = (intptr_t)result;
Create all the thread and then join them like below:-
pthread_create(&thread1,0,&evensum,(void*)obj);
pthread_create(&thread2,0,&oddsum,(void*)obj);
pthread_join(&thread1,(void**)evensum);
pthread_join(&thread2,(void**)oddsum);

Avoiding race condition using int to void * casting [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Pass integer value through pthread_create
(4 answers)
Closed 5 years ago.
I am trying to understand following code. This code has no race conditions, but I cannot understand.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <pthread.h>
void *foo(void *vargp) {
int id;
id = (int)vargp;
printf("Thread %d\n", id);
}
int main() {
pthread_t tid[2];
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
pthread_create(&tid[i], NULL, foo, (void *)i);
pthread_join(tid[0], NULL);
pthread_join(tid[1], NULL);
return 0;
}
How does the typecasting from int to void* work?
The race condition that is avoided is illustrated by this code, which is very similar to the original code, but subtly different, and the difference makes it incorrect:
/* Incorrect code! */
#include <pthread.h>
#include <stdio.h>
static void *foo(void *vargp)
{
int id = *(int *)vargp;
printf("Thread %d\n", id);
return 0;
}
int main(void)
{
pthread_t tid[2];
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
pthread_create(&tid[i], NULL, foo, &i); // Bad idea!
pthread_join(tid[0], NULL);
pthread_join(tid[1], NULL);
return 0;
}
Since the function foo takes a void * argument, it seems logical to pass the address of the int to it. However, this has a major problem:
There is no guarantee which order the threads will execute, nor when, so there's no way to know which values the threads will see.
Indeed, when I ran this code the first time, both threads reported 2.
The way around this is to not pass the address of i but to pass i by value. However, the argument is still supposed to be a void *, so the code casts i to a void * before calling pthread_create(), and the thread function undoes the cast to retrieve the value.
When I'm doing this, I also use <stdint.h> to make the uintptr_t type available, and I use:
int id = (uintptr_t)vargp;
and
pthread_create(&tid[i], NULL, foo, (void *)(uintptr_t)i);
That looks excessive and/or obsessive, but the uintptr_t cast ensures the integer is the same size as a pointer to avoid the 'cast to pointer from integer of different size' compiler warning (which, since I tell the compiler to treat all warnings as errors, is necessary for me to get the code to compile at all).
If you do pass a pointer-to-data to the thread function (foo in this discussion), you must ensure that each thread you create gets its own copy of the data unless that data is meant to be identical in each thread.
You can see this technique at work in POSIX threads — unique execution.

pthread_create argument in c multi thread programming

pthread_create(&Thread,NULL,ChildThread,(void *)100);
1) Can we pass the 4th argument of pthread_create as shown above? shouldn't it be a pointer variable?
Just an example (not meant to be correct way of doing it; but to serve as example code for anyone who want to play with it):
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <pthread.h>
void *print_number(void *number) {
printf("Thread received parameter with value: %d\n", number);
return (void *)number;
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
pthread_t thread;
void *ret;
int pt_stat;
pt_stat = pthread_create(&thread, NULL, print_number, (void *)100);
if (pt_stat) {
printf("Error creating thread\n");
exit(0);
}
pthread_join(thread, &ret);
printf("Return value: %d\n", ret);
pthread_exit(NULL);
return 0;
}
This will lead to undefined behavior if the pointer value is greater then what an int can hold. See this quote from C99:
Any pointer type may be converted to an integer type. Except as previously specified, the result is implementation-defined. If the result cannot be represented in the integer type, the behavior is undefined. The result need not be in the range of values of any integer type.
What (void *)100 means is take the integer value 100 and treat it as a pointer to some unspecified type of memory (i.e., (void *)). In that case, that means push the integer value 100 on the stack as an argument to pthread_create. Presumably, ChildThread casts the void * passed to it back to an int, then uses it as a number.
Fundamentally pointers are really just memory addresses. A memory address is just a number that describes a location in memory, so casting an int to a pointer of any type is legal. There are a few cases where casting an int to a pointer is absolutely the right thing to do and required, however, they tend to be rare. For example, if you are writing code for an embedded controller, and want write a driver for a memory mapped I/O device, then you might cast the device's base address as a pointer to an int or struct and then do normal C accesses through the pointer to access the device. Another example where casting ints to pointers, would be to implement the low-level virtual memory management routines to parcel out physical memory for an operating system.
The code you present is not uncommon and will work, assuming that the size of a pointer is at least big enough to hold the integer you are trying to pass. Most systems that implement pthread_create would probably have a 32-bit or 64-bit pointer, so your example is pretty likely to work. IMHO, it is a bit of an abuse, because 100 probably does not refer to a memory location in this case, and C does not guarantee that a void * is big enough to hold an int.
Taken from an excellent artice on POSIX Thread Progreamming . Must read for any newbie .
Example Code - Pthread Creation and Termination
#include <pthread.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#define NUM_THREADS 5
void *PrintHello(void *threadid)
{
long tid;
tid = (long)threadid;
printf("Hello World! It's me, thread #%ld!\n", tid);
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
int main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
pthread_t threads[NUM_THREADS];
int rc;
long t;
for(t=0; t<NUM_THREADS; t++){
printf("In main: creating thread %ld\n", t);
rc = pthread_create(&threads[t], NULL, PrintHello, (void *)t);
if (rc){
printf("ERROR; return code from pthread_create() is %d\n", rc);
exit(-1);
}
}
/* Last thing that main() should do */
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
Explanation :
You can pass the 100 as the 4th argument to the pthread_create() . In the function PrintHello you can typecast the void* back into the correct type .

pthread_join() and pthread_exit()

I have a question about C concurrency programming.
In the pthread library, the prototype of pthread_join is
int pthread_join(pthread_t tid, void **ret);
and the prototype of pthread_exit is:
void pthread_exit(void *ret);
So I am confused that, why pthread_join takes the return value of the process as a pointer to a void pointer from reaped thread, but pthread_exit only takes a void pointer from the exited thread? I mean basically they are all return values from a thread, why there is a difference in type?
In pthread_exit, ret is an input parameter. You are simply passing the address of a variable to the function.
In pthread_join, ret is an output parameter. You get back a value from the function. Such value can, for example, be set to NULL.
Long explanation:
In pthread_join, you get back the address passed to pthread_exit by the finished thread. If you pass just a plain pointer, it is passed by value so you can't change where it is pointing to. To be able to change the value of the pointer passed to pthread_join, it must be passed as a pointer itself, that is, a pointer to a pointer.
It because every time
void pthread_exit(void *ret);
will be called from thread function so which ever you want to return simply its pointer pass with pthread_exit().
Now at
int pthread_join(pthread_t tid, void **ret);
will be always called from where thread is created so here to accept that returned pointer you need double pointer ..
i think this code will help you to understand this
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
void* thread_function(void *ignoredInThisExample)
{
char *a = malloc(10);
strcpy(a,"hello world");
pthread_exit((void*)a);
}
int main()
{
pthread_t thread_id;
char *b;
pthread_create (&thread_id, NULL,&thread_function, NULL);
pthread_join(thread_id,(void**)&b); //here we are reciving one pointer
value so to use that we need double pointer
printf("b is %s\n",b);
free(b); // lets free the memory
}
The typical use is
void* ret = NULL;
pthread_t tid = something; /// change it suitably
if (pthread_join (tid, &ret))
handle_error();
// do something with the return value ret

Resources