I am looking for a way to only add groups(hide the add rule button) on base level with only OR operator selected(AND would be disabled here). Whenever the said group is added the operator allowed will only be OR (hiding AND operator). Now, nested groups are allowed but only to one level i.e. hide the Add Groups button whenever a group is added on base level.
I am using React 16.8.0 with react-querybuilder: "^3.1.2"
For ex. as shown below i want to hide the marked buttons. Would it be possible?
import QueryBuilder, { formatQuery } from "react-querybuilder";
....
<QueryBuilder
fields={
data
}
controlClassnames={{
combinators: "form-control-sm",
addRule: "btn btn-primary btn-sm ml-2 mb-1",
addGroup: "btn btn-secondary btn-sm ml-2 mb-1",
ruleGroup: "ruleGroup",
removeGroup: "ml-2",
rule: "rule",
fields: "mr-2 form-control-sm",
operators: "mr-2 form-control-sm",
value: "mr-2 form-control-sm"
}}
onQueryChange={query => setQueryOutput(formatQuery(query, "sql"))}
/>
<div className="mt-5">
<h5>Query Output:</h5>
{queryOutput}
</div>
Thanks for the support
===UPDATE===
To ensure that the base group's operator is always OR combinator and all the subsequent sub-groups will be AND operator. I have tried(as below) using control elements but I am not able to set the props.
addGroupAction: props => {
let customRule = props.rules.map(x => {
x.combinator = "or";
return x;
});
let customProps = { ...props, rules: customRule };
return (
<button
className={props.className}
title={props.title}
onClick={e => {
setCombinatorOptions(["AND"]);
return customProps.handleOnClick(e);
}}
>
{props.label}
</button>
);
}
Replicated the same at https://stackblitz.com/edit/react-6g5ygt
I think you can do it with css easily:
.queryBuilder .ruleGroup .ruleGroup .ruleGroup-addGroup {
display : none
}
I have applied the same css on below link and it's working as you expected :
https://sapientglobalmarkets.github.io/react-querybuilder/
I see this has already been marked as answered using CSS, but I wanted to show a way to do it with custom components that may be a little more flexible. This version also meets the requirement of limiting the outermost group's combinator to "or", which I don't think the CSS version does.
See the code below, or this codesandbox for a working example.
import { useEffect, useState } from "react";
import QueryBuilder, {
ActionElement,
ActionWithRulesProps,
CombinatorSelectorProps,
formatQuery,
RuleGroupType,
ValueSelector
} from "react-querybuilder";
import "react-querybuilder/dist/query-builder.css";
const fields = [
{ name: "first_name", label: "First Name" },
{ name: "email", label: "Email" },
{ name: "last_name", label: "Last Name" }
];
const defaultQuery: RuleGroupType = {
id: "root",
combinator: "and",
rules: [
{
id: "ruleGroup",
combinator: "and",
rules: []
}
]
};
const addRuleAction = (props: ActionWithRulesProps) => {
if (props.level === 0) {
return null;
}
return <ActionElement {...props} />;
};
const addGroupAction = (props: ActionWithRulesProps) => {
if (props.level > 0) {
return null;
}
return <ActionElement {...props} />;
};
const CombinatorSelector = (props: CombinatorSelectorProps) => {
const { level, value, handleOnChange, options } = props;
useEffect(() => {
if (level === 0 && value !== "or") {
handleOnChange("or");
}
}, [level, value, handleOnChange]);
return (
<ValueSelector
{...{
...props,
options: level === 0 ? options.filter((c) => c.name === "or") : options,
value: level === 0 ? "or" : value
}}
/>
);
};
export default function App() {
const [query, setQuery] = useState<RuleGroupType>(defaultQuery);
return (
<>
<QueryBuilder
fields={fields}
onQueryChange={setQuery}
query={query}
controlElements={{
addRuleAction,
addGroupAction,
combinatorSelector: CombinatorSelector
}}
/>
<h3>Output:</h3>
<code>{formatQuery(query, "sql")}</code>
</>
);
}
And the result:
Related
I am having a onChange function i was trying to update the array options by index wise and i had passed the index to the function.
Suppose if i am updating the options array index 0 value so only that value should be update rest should remain as it is.
Demo
Here is what i tried:
import React from "react";
import "./styles.css";
export default function App() {
const x = {
LEVEL: {
Type: "LINEN",
options: [
{
Order: 1,
orderStatus: "INFO",
orderValue: "5"
},
{
Order: 2,
orderStatus: "INPROGRESS",
orderValue: "5"
},
{
Order: 3,
orderStatus: "ACTIVE",
orderValue: "9"
}
],
details: "2020 N/w UA",
OrderType: "Axes"
},
State: "Inprogress"
};
const [postdata, setPostData] = React.useState(x);
const handleOptionInputChange = (event, idx) => {
setPostData({
...postdata,
LEVEL: {
...postdata.LEVEL.options,
[event.target.name]: event.target.value
}
});
};
return (
<div className="App">
{postdata.LEVEL.options.map((item, idx) => {
return (
<input
type="text"
name="orderStatus"
value={postdata.LEVEL.options[idx].orderStatus}
onChange={e => handleOptionInputChange(e, idx)}
/>
);
})}
</div>
);
}
Suppose if i want to add the objects in another useState variable for all the updated options only, will this work?
const posting = {
"optionUpdates": [],
}
const [sentdata , setSentData] = useState(posting);
setSentData({
...sentdata,
optionUpdates: [{
...sentdata.optionUpdates,
displayOrder: event.target.value
}]
})
Basically, you need to spread properly, use callback approach to set state etc.
Change your handler to like this.
Working demo
const handleOptionInputChange = (event, idx) => {
const target = event.target; // with callback approach of state, you can't use event inside callback, so first extract the target from event.
setPostData(prev => ({ // prev state
...prev, // spread prev state
LEVEL: { //update Level object
...prev.LEVEL,
options: prev.LEVEL.options.map((item, id) => { // you need to loop thru options and find the one which you need to update.
if (id === idx) {
return { ...item, [target.name]: target.value }; //spread all values and update only orderStatus
}
return item;
})
}
}));
};
Edit Added some comments to code and providing some explanation.
You were spreading postdata.LEVEL.options for LEVEL which is incorrect. For nested object you need to spread each level.
Apparently, your event.target.name is "orderStatus", so it will add an "orderStatus" key to your postData.
You might want to do something like this:
const handleOptionInputChange = (value, idx) => {
setPostData(oldValue => {
const options = oldValue.LEVEL.options;
options[idx].orderStatus = value;
return {
...oldValue,
LEVEL: {
...oldValue.LEVEL,
options
}
};
});
};
return (
<div className="App">
{postdata.LEVEL.options.map((item, idx) => {
return (
<input
type="text"
name="orderStatus"
value={postdata.LEVEL.options[idx].orderStatus}
onChange={e => handleOptionInputChange(e.target.value, idx)}
/>
);
})}
</div>
);
See this demo
I have a pretty complicated component and now I am trying to implement a search where the user can type and it filters the results.
// query
const GET_ACCOUNTS = gql`
query accounts{
accounts{
id
name
status
company{
id
name
}
}
}
`;
// get query
const { loading } = useQuery(GET_ACCOUNTS, {
fetchPolicy: "no-cache",
skip: userType !== 'OS_ADMIN',
onCompleted: setSearchResults
});
// example of query result (more than 1)
{
"accounts": [
{
"id": "5deed7df947204960f286010",
"name": "Acme Test Account",
"status": "active",
"company": {
"id": "5de84532ce5373afe23a05c8",
"name": "Acme Inc.",
"__typename": "Company"
},
"__typename": "Account"
},
]
}
// states
const [searchTerm, setSearchTerm] = useState('');
const [searchResults, setSearchResults] = useState([]);
// code to render
<FormControl fullWidth>
<InputLabel htmlFor="seach">Search for accounts</InputLabel>
<Input
id="search"
aria-describedby="Search for accounts"
startAdornment={<InputAdornment position="start"><SearchIcon /></InputAdornment>}
value={searchTerm}
onChange={handleChange}
/>
</FormControl>
{searchResults && searchResults.accounts &&
searchResults.accounts.map(c => {
return (
<>
<ListItem
dense
button
className={classnames({ [classes.selectedAccountContext]: c.id === accountContextId })}
key={c.id}
onClick={() => accountClicked(c.id)}
>
<ListItemText
primary={c.name}
secondary={
<>
<span>{c.company.name}</span>
<span className="d-flex align-items-center top-margin-tiny">
<Badge
color={c.status === 'active' ? "success" : "danger"}
style={{ marginBottom: 0 }}
>
{c.status.replace(/^\w/, c => c.toUpperCase())}
</Badge>
<span className='ml-auto'>
<SvgIcon><path d={mdiMapMarkerRadius} /></SvgIcon>
<SMARTCompanyIcon />
</span>
</span>
</>
}
/>
</ListItem>
</>
)
})
}
// useEffect
useEffect(() => {
if (searchTerm) {
const results = searchResults.accounts.filter((c => c.name.toLowerCase().includes(searchTerm)))
setSearchResults(results)
}
}, [searchTerm])
The issue is when I start typing in my search field, I am looking at my searchResults and it gets filtered when I type in one character, but when I type the next one it breaks.
TypeError: Cannot read property 'filter' of undefined
Also it does not render on the view even when I have typed one letter.
Based on your data, the initial value of searchResults is a dictionary with accounts key. But when you update it in the useEffect part, it changes to a list:
useEffect(() => {
if (searchTerm) {
const results = searchResults.accounts.filter((c => c.name.toLowerCase().includes(searchTerm)))
// This changes the value of searchResults to an array
setSearchResults(results)
}
}, [searchTerm])
When the setSearchResults was called inside the useEffect, the value of searchResults changes from an object to an array:
from this:
searchResults = {
accounts: [
...
]
}
to this:
searchResults = [
...
]
That is why it raises TypeError: Cannot read property 'filter' of undefined after the first search since there is no accounts key anymore.
To fix this, you need to be consistent in the data type of your searchResults, it would be better to make it as a List in the first place. You can do this in the onCompleted part:
const { loading } = useQuery(GET_ACCOUNTS, {
fetchPolicy: "no-cache",
skip: userType !== 'OS_ADMIN',
onCompleted: (data) => setSearchResults(data.accounts || [])
});
Notice that we set searchResults to the accounts value. After that, you also need the way on how you access searchResults
{searchResults &&
searchResults.map(c => {
return (
...renderhere
)
})
}
And your useEffect will be like this:
useEffect(() => {
if (searchTerm) {
const results = searchResults.filter((c => c.name.toLowerCase().includes(searchTerm)))
setSearchResults(results)
}
}, [searchTerm])
TIP:
You may want to rename your searchResults into accounts to make it clearer. Take note also that after the first search, your options will become limited to the previous search result, so you may also want to store all of the accounts in a different variable:
const [allAccounts, setAllAccounts] = useState([])
const [searchedAccounts, setSearchedAccounts] = useState([])
// useQuery
const { loading } = useQuery(GET_ACCOUNTS, {
fetchPolicy: "no-cache",
skip: userType !== 'OS_ADMIN',
onCompleted: (data) => {
setAllAccounts(data.accounts || [])
setSearchedAccounts(data.accounts || [])
}
});
// useEffect
useEffect(() => {
if (searchTerm) {
// Notice we always search from allAccounts
const results = allAccounts.filter((c => c.name.toLowerCase().includes(searchTerm)))
setSearchedAccounts(results)
}
}, [searchTerm])
I have an array of objects. I need to add a function to remove an object from my array without using the "this" keyword.
I tried using updateList(list.slice(list.indexOf(e.target.name, 1))). This removes everything but the last item in the array and I'm not certain why.
const defaultList = [
{ name: "ItemOne" },
{ name: "ItemTwo" },
{ name: "ItemThree" }]
const [list, updateList] = useState(defaultList);
const handleRemoveItem = e => {
updateList(list.slice(list.indexOf(e.target.name, 1)))
}
return (
{list.map(item => {
return (
<>
<span onClick={handleRemoveItem}>x </span>
<span>{item.name}</span>
</>
)}
}
)
Expected behaviour: The clicked item will be removed from the list.
Actual behaviour: The entire list gets removed, minus the last item in the array.
First of all, the span element with the click event needs to have a name property otherwise, there will be no name to find within the e.target. With that said, e.target.name is reserved for form elements (input, select, etc). So to actually tap into the name property you'll have to use e.target.getAttribute("name")
Additionally, because you have an array of objects, it would not be effective to use list.indexOf(e.target.name) since that is looking for a string when you are iterating over objects. That's like saying find "dog" within [{}, {}, {}]
Lastly, array.slice() returns a new array starting with the item at the index you passed to it. So if you clicked the last-item, you would only be getting back the last item.
Try something like this instead using .filter(): codesandbox
import React, { useState } from "react";
import ReactDOM from "react-dom";
import "./styles.css";
const App = () => {
const defaultList = [
{ name: "ItemOne" },
{ name: "ItemTwo" },
{ name: "ItemThree" }
];
const [list, updateList] = useState(defaultList);
const handleRemoveItem = (e) => {
const name = e.target.getAttribute("name")
updateList(list.filter(item => item.name !== name));
};
return (
<div>
{list.map(item => {
return (
<>
<span name={item.name} onClick={handleRemoveItem}>
x
</span>
<span>{item.name}</span>
</>
);
})}
</div>
);
};
const rootElement = document.getElementById("root");
ReactDOM.render(<App />, rootElement);
You can use Array.filter to do this in a one-liner:
const handleRemoveItem = name => {
updateList(list.filter(item => item.name !== name))
}
Eta: you'll also need to pass the name of your item in your onClick handler:
{list.map(item => {
return (
<>
<span onClick={() =>handleRemoveItem(item.name)}>x </span>
<span>{item.name}</span>
</>
)}
const defaultList = [
{ name: "ItemOne" },
{ name: "ItemTwo" },
{ name: "ItemThree" }
]
const [list, updateList] = useState(defaultList);
const handleRemoveItem = idx => {
// assigning the list to temp variable
const temp = [...list];
// removing the element using splice
temp.splice(idx, 1);
// updating the list
updateList(temp);
}
return (
{list.map((item, idx) => (
<div key={idx}>
<button onClick={() => handleRemoveItem(idx)}>x </button>
<span>{item.name}</span>
</div>
))}
)
Small improvement in my opinion to the best answer so far
import React, { useState } from "react";
import ReactDOM from "react-dom";
import "./styles.css";
const App = () => {
const defaultList = [
{ name: "ItemOne" },
{ name: "ItemTwo" },
{ name: "ItemThree" }
];
const [list, updateList] = useState(defaultList);
const handleRemoveItem = (item) => {
updateList(list.filter(item => item.name !== name));
};
return (
<div>
{list.map(item => {
return (
<>
<span onClick={()=>{handleRemoveItem(item)}}>
x
</span>
<span>{item.name}</span>
</>
);
})}
</div>
);
};
const rootElement = document.getElementById("root");
ReactDOM.render(<App />, rootElement);
Instead of giving a name attribute we just send it to the handle function
I think this code will do
let targetIndex = list.findIndex((each) => {each.name == e.target.name});
list.splice(targetIndex-1, 1);
We need to check name value inside object so use findIndex instead. then cut the object start from target index to 1 array after target index.
Codepen
From your comment your problem came from another part.
Change this view section
return (
<>
<span onClick={() => handleRemoveItem(item) }>x </span>
<span>{item.name}</span>
</>
)}
change function handleRemoveItem format
const handleRemoveItem = item => {
list.splice(list.indexOf(item)-1, 1)
updateList(list);
}
Redundant one liner - would not recommend as hard to test / type / expand / repeat / reason with
<button onClick={() => setList(list.slice(item.id - 1))}
A version without exports:
const handleDeleteItem = id => {
const remainingItems = list.slice(id - 1)
setList(remainingItems);
}
However I would consider expanding the structure of your logic differently by using helper functions in another file.
With that in mind, I made one example for filter and another for slice. I personally like the slice option in this particular use-case as it makes it easy to reason with. Apparently, it is also slightly more performant on larger lists if scaling (see references).
If using slice, always use slice not splice unless you have good reason not to do so as it adheres to a functional style (pure functions with no side effects)
// use slice instead of splice (slice creates a shallow copy, i.e., 'mutates' )
export const excludeItemFromArray = (idx, array) => array.slice(idx-1)
// alternatively, you could use filter (also a shallow copy)
export const filterItemFromArray = (idx, array) => array.filter(item => item.idx !== idx)
Example (with both options filter and slice options as imports)
import {excludeItemFromArray, filterItemFromArray} from 'utils/arrayHelpers.js'
const exampleList = [
{ id: 1, name: "ItemOne" },
{ id: 2, name: "ItemTwo" },
{ id: 3, name: "ItemThree" }
]
const [list, setList] = useState(exampleList);
const handleDeleteItem = id => {
//excluding the item (returning mutated list with excluded item)
const remainingItems = excludeItemFromArray(id, list)
//alternatively, filter item (returning mutated list with filtered out item)
const remainingItems = filterItemFromArray(id, list)
// updating the list state
setList(remainingItems);
}
return (
{list.map((item) => (
<div key={item.id}>
<button onClick={() => handleDeleteItem(item.id)}>x</button>
<span>{item.name}</span>
</div>
))}
)
References:
Don't use index keys in maps: https://robinpokorny.com/blog/index-as-a-key-is-an-anti-pattern/
Performance of slice vs filter: https://medium.com/#justintulk/javascript-performance-array-slice-vs-array-filter-4573d726aacb
Slice documentation: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/slice
Functional programming style: https://blog.logrocket.com/fundamentals-functional-programming-react/#:~:text=Functional%20programming%20codes%20are%20meant,computations%20are%20called%20side%20effects.
Using this pattern, the array does not jump, but we take the previous data and create new data and return it.
const [list, updateList] = useState([
{ name: "ItemOne" },
{ name: "ItemTwo" },
{ name: "ItemThree" }
]);
updateList((prev) => {
return [
...prev.filter((item, i) => item.name !== 'ItemTwo')
]
})
This is because both slice and splice return an array containing the removed elements.
You need to apply a splice to the array, and then update the state using the method provided by the hook
const handleRemoveItem = e => {
const newArr = [...list];
newArr.splice(newArr.findIndex(item => item.name === e.target.name), 1)
updateList(newArr)
}
Here is the original example of group checkbox of antd that I need and its fine:
const plainOptions = ['Apple', 'Pear', 'Orange'];
const defaultCheckedList = ['Apple', 'Orange'];
class App extends React.Component {
state = {
checkedList: defaultCheckedList,
indeterminate: true,
checkAll: false,
};
onChange = checkedList => {
this.setState({
checkedList,
indeterminate: !!checkedList.length && checkedList.length < plainOptions.length,
checkAll: checkedList.length === plainOptions.length,
});
};
onCheckAllChange = e => {
this.setState({
checkedList: e.target.checked ? plainOptions : [],
indeterminate: false,
checkAll: e.target.checked,
});
};
render() {
return (
<div>
<div style={{ borderBottom: '1px solid #E9E9E9' }}>
<Checkbox
indeterminate={this.state.indeterminate}
onChange={this.onCheckAllChange}
checked={this.state.checkAll}
>
Check all
</Checkbox>
</div>
<br />
<CheckboxGroup
options={plainOptions}
value={this.state.checkedList}
onChange={this.onChange}
/>
</div>
);
}
}
My question is how can I replace the plainOptions and defaultCheckedList by object array instead of simple array and using attribute name for this check boxes?
For example this object:
const plainOptions = [
{name:'alex', id:1},
{name:'milo', id:2},
{name:'saimon', id:3}
];
const defaultCheckedList = [
{name:'alex', id:1},
{name:'milo', id:2}
];
I want to use attribute name as the key in this example.
Problem solved. I should use "Use with grid" type of group checkbox. It accepts object array. The only think I could do was creating a function that inject "label" and "value" to my object. It makes some duplicates but no problem.
function groupeCheckboxify(obj, labelFrom) {
for (var i = 0; i < obj.length; i++) {
if (obj[i][labelFrom]) {
obj[i]['label'] = obj[i][labelFrom];
obj[i]['value'] = obj[i][labelFrom];
}
if (i == obj.length - 1) {
return obj;
}
}
}
// for calling it:
groupeCheckboxify( myObject , 'name');
I'd this same problem and couldn't find any answer on the entire web. But I tried to find a good way to handle it manually.
You can use this code:
import { Checkbox, Dropdown } from 'antd';
const CheckboxGroup = Checkbox.Group;
function CheckboxSelect({
title,
items,
initSelectedItems,
hasCheckAllAction,
}) {
const [checkedList, setCheckedList] = useState(initSelectedItems || []);
const [indeterminate, setIndeterminate] = useState(true);
const [checkAll, setCheckAll] = useState(false);
const onCheckAllChange = (e) => {
setCheckedList(e.target.checked ? items : []);
setIndeterminate(false);
setCheckAll(e.target.checked);
};
const onChangeGroup = (list) => {
if (hasCheckAllAction) {
setIndeterminate(!!list.length && list.length < items.length);
setCheckAll(list.length === items.length);
}
};
const updateItems = (el) => {
let newList = [];
if (el.target.checked) {
newList = [...checkedList, el.target.value];
} else {
newList = checkedList.filter(
(listItem) => listItem.id !== el.target.value.id,
);
}
setCheckedList(newList);
};
useEffect(() => {
setCheckedList(initSelectedItems);
}, []);
const renderItems = () => {
return (
<div classname="items-wrapper">
{hasCheckAllAction ? (
<Checkbox
indeterminate={indeterminate}
onChange={onCheckAllChange}
checked={checkAll}
>
All
</Checkbox>
) : null}
<CheckboxGroup onChange={onChangeGroup} value={checkedList}>
<>
{items.map((item) => (
<Checkbox
key={item.id}
value={item}
onChange={($event) => updateItems($event)}
>
{item.name}
</Checkbox>
))}
</>
</CheckboxGroup>
</div>
);
};
return (
<Dropdown overlay={renderItems()} trigger={['click']}>
<div>
<span className="icon icon-arrow-down" />
<span className="title">{title}</span>
</div>
</Dropdown>
);
}
It looks like the only difference you are talking about making is using an array of objects instead of strings? If that's the case, when looping through the array to create the checkboxes, you access the object attributes using dot notation. It should look something like this if I understand the problem correctly.
From CheckboxGroup component:
this.props.options.forEach(el => {
let name = el.name;
let id = el.id;
//rest of code to create checkboxes
or to show an example in creating components
let checkboxMarkup = [];
checkboxMarkup.push(
<input type="checkbox" id={el.id} name={el.name} key={`${el.id} - ${el.name}`}/>
);
}
'el' in this case refers to each individual object when looping through the array. It's not necessary to assign it to a variable, I just used that to show an example of how to access the properties.
I am trying to find the best table to use with my react apps, and for now, the react-table offers everything I need (pagination, server-side control, filtering, sorting, footer row).
This being said, I can't seem to be able to select a row. There are no examples that show this.
Some things, that I have tried include trying to set a className on click of the row. But I can't seem to find the calling element in e nor t. Also, I don't like this approach, because it is not how a react app should do things.
<ReactTable
...
getTrProps={(state, rowInfo, column, instance) => {
return {
onClick: (e, t) => {
t.srcElement.classList.add('active')
},
style: {
}
}
}}
/>
Some possible workaround would be to render checkboxes as a first column, but this is not optimal as it limits the area to click to 'activate' the row. Also, the visual feedback will be less expressive.
Am I missing the elephant in the room? And if not, do you know another library that supports the things that I've described earlier?
Thank you!
EDIT:
Another option, this being open source, is to suggest an edit. And maybe this is the proper thing to do.
EDIT 2
Another thing, suggested by Davorin RuĆĄevljan in the comments, but I couldn't make it work was:
onRowClick(e, t, rowInfo) {
this.setState((oldState) => {
let data = oldState.data.slice();
let copy = Object.assign({}, data[rowInfo.index]);
copy.selected = true;
copy.FirstName = "selected";
data[rowInfo.index] = copy;
return {
data: data,
}
})
}
....
getTrProps={(state, rowInfo, column) => {
return {
onClick: (e, t) => { this.onRowClick(e, t, rowInfo) },
style: {
background: rowInfo && rowInfo.row.selected ? 'green' : 'red'
}
}
}}
This sets the 'FirstName' column to 'selected', but does not set the class to 'green'
I found the solution after a few tries, I hope this can help you. Add the following to your <ReactTable> component:
getTrProps={(state, rowInfo) => {
if (rowInfo && rowInfo.row) {
return {
onClick: (e) => {
this.setState({
selected: rowInfo.index
})
},
style: {
background: rowInfo.index === this.state.selected ? '#00afec' : 'white',
color: rowInfo.index === this.state.selected ? 'white' : 'black'
}
}
}else{
return {}
}
}
In your state don't forget to add a null selected value, like:
state = { selected: null }
There is a HOC included for React-Table that allows for selection, even when filtering and paginating the table, the setup is slightly more advanced than the basic table so read through the info in the link below first.
After importing the HOC you can then use it like this with the necessary methods:
/**
* Toggle a single checkbox for select table
*/
toggleSelection(key: number, shift: string, row: string) {
// start off with the existing state
let selection = [...this.state.selection];
const keyIndex = selection.indexOf(key);
// check to see if the key exists
if (keyIndex >= 0) {
// it does exist so we will remove it using destructing
selection = [
...selection.slice(0, keyIndex),
...selection.slice(keyIndex + 1)
];
} else {
// it does not exist so add it
selection.push(key);
}
// update the state
this.setState({ selection });
}
/**
* Toggle all checkboxes for select table
*/
toggleAll() {
const selectAll = !this.state.selectAll;
const selection = [];
if (selectAll) {
// we need to get at the internals of ReactTable
const wrappedInstance = this.checkboxTable.getWrappedInstance();
// the 'sortedData' property contains the currently accessible records based on the filter and sort
const currentRecords = wrappedInstance.getResolvedState().sortedData;
// we just push all the IDs onto the selection array
currentRecords.forEach(item => {
selection.push(item._original._id);
});
}
this.setState({ selectAll, selection });
}
/**
* Whether or not a row is selected for select table
*/
isSelected(key: number) {
return this.state.selection.includes(key);
}
<CheckboxTable
ref={r => (this.checkboxTable = r)}
toggleSelection={this.toggleSelection}
selectAll={this.state.selectAll}
toggleAll={this.toggleAll}
selectType="checkbox"
isSelected={this.isSelected}
data={data}
columns={columns}
/>
See here for more information:
https://github.com/tannerlinsley/react-table/tree/v6#selecttable
Here is a working example:
https://codesandbox.io/s/react-table-select-j9jvw
I am not familiar with, react-table, so I do not know it has direct support for selecting and deselecting (it would be nice if it had).
If it does not, with the piece of code you already have you can install the onCLick handler. Now instead of trying to attach style directly to row, you can modify state, by for instance adding selected: true to row data. That would trigger rerender. Now you only have to override how are rows with selected === true rendered. Something along lines of:
// Any Tr element will be green if its (row.age > 20)
<ReactTable
getTrProps={(state, rowInfo, column) => {
return {
style: {
background: rowInfo.row.selected ? 'green' : 'red'
}
}
}}
/>
if u want to have multiple selection on select row..
import React from 'react';
import ReactTable from 'react-table';
import 'react-table/react-table.css';
import { ReactTableDefaults } from 'react-table';
import matchSorter from 'match-sorter';
class ThreatReportTable extends React.Component{
constructor(props){
super(props);
this.state = {
selected: [],
row: []
}
}
render(){
const columns = this.props.label;
const data = this.props.data;
Object.assign(ReactTableDefaults, {
defaultPageSize: 10,
pageText: false,
previousText: '<',
nextText: '>',
showPageJump: false,
showPagination: true,
defaultSortMethod: (a, b, desc) => {
return b - a;
},
})
return(
<ReactTable className='threatReportTable'
data= {data}
columns={columns}
getTrProps={(state, rowInfo, column) => {
return {
onClick: (e) => {
var a = this.state.selected.indexOf(rowInfo.index);
if (a == -1) {
// this.setState({selected: array.concat(this.state.selected, [rowInfo.index])});
this.setState({selected: [...this.state.selected, rowInfo.index]});
// Pass props to the React component
}
var array = this.state.selected;
if(a != -1){
array.splice(a, 1);
this.setState({selected: array});
}
},
// #393740 - Lighter, selected row
// #302f36 - Darker, not selected row
style: {background: this.state.selected.indexOf(rowInfo.index) != -1 ? '#393740': '#302f36'},
}
}}
noDataText = "No available threats"
/>
)
}
}
export default ThreatReportTable;
The answer you selected is correct, however if you are using a sorting table it will crash since rowInfo will became undefined as you search, would recommend using this function instead
getTrGroupProps={(state, rowInfo, column, instance) => {
if (rowInfo !== undefined) {
return {
onClick: (e, handleOriginal) => {
console.log('It was in this row:', rowInfo)
this.setState({
firstNameState: rowInfo.row.firstName,
lastNameState: rowInfo.row.lastName,
selectedIndex: rowInfo.original.id
})
},
style: {
cursor: 'pointer',
background: rowInfo.original.id === this.state.selectedIndex ? '#00afec' : 'white',
color: rowInfo.original.id === this.state.selectedIndex ? 'white' : 'black'
}
}
}}
}
If you are using the latest version (7.7 at the time) it is possible to select rows using toggleRoWSelected() see full example;
<tr
{...row.getRowProps()}
className="odd:bg-white even:bg-gray-100"
onClick={() => row.toggleRowSelected()}
>
{row.cells.map((cell) => {
return (
<td {...cell.getCellProps()} className="p-2">
{cell.render("Cell")}
</td>
);
})}
</tr>;
Another mechanism for dynamic styling is to define it in the JSX for your component. For example, the following could be used to selectively style the current step in the React tic-tac-toe tutorial (one of the suggested extra credit enhancements:
return (
<li key={move}>
<button style={{fontWeight:(move === this.state.stepNumber ? 'bold' : '')}} onClick={() => this.jumpTo(move)}>{desc}</button>
</li>
);
Granted, a cleaner approach would be to add/remove a 'selected' CSS class but this direct approach might be helpful in some cases.
Multiple rows with checkboxes and select all using useState() hooks. Requires minor implementation to adjust to own project.
const data;
const [ allToggled, setAllToggled ] = useState(false);
const [ toggled, setToggled ] = useState(Array.from(new Array(data.length), () => false));
const [ selected, setSelected ] = useState([]);
const handleToggleAll = allToggled => {
let selectAll = !allToggled;
setAllToggled(selectAll);
let toggledCopy = [];
let selectedCopy = [];
data.forEach(function (e, index) {
toggledCopy.push(selectAll);
if(selectAll) {
selectedCopy.push(index);
}
});
setToggled(toggledCopy);
setSelected(selectedCopy);
};
const handleToggle = index => {
let toggledCopy = [...toggled];
toggledCopy[index] = !toggledCopy[index];
setToggled(toggledCopy);
if( toggledCopy[index] === false ){
setAllToggled(false);
}
else if (allToggled) {
setAllToggled(false);
}
};
....
Header: state => (
<input
type="checkbox"
checked={allToggled}
onChange={() => handleToggleAll(allToggled)}
/>
),
Cell: row => (
<input
type="checkbox"
checked={toggled[row.index]}
onChange={() => handleToggle(row.index)}
/>
),
....
<ReactTable
...
getTrProps={(state, rowInfo, column, instance) => {
if (rowInfo && rowInfo.row) {
return {
onClick: (e, handleOriginal) => {
let present = selected.indexOf(rowInfo.index);
let selectedCopy = selected;
if (present === -1){
selected.push(rowInfo.index);
setSelected(selected);
}
if (present > -1){
selectedCopy.splice(present, 1);
setSelected(selectedCopy);
}
handleToggle(rowInfo.index);
},
style: {
background: selected.indexOf(rowInfo.index) > -1 ? '#00afec' : 'white',
color: selected.indexOf(rowInfo.index) > -1 ? 'white' : 'black'
},
}
}
else {
return {}
}
}}
/>
# react-table with edit button #
const [rowIndexState, setRowIndexState] = useState(null);
const [rowBackGroundColor, setRowBackGroundColor] = useState('')
{...row.getRowProps({
onClick: (e) => {
if (!e.target.cellIndex) {
setRowIndexState(row.index);
setRowBackGroundColor('#f4f4f4')
}
},
style: {
background: row.index === rowIndexState ? rowBackGroundColor : '',
},
})}