I'm working with Next.js and I need to implement i18n. It requires me to add some global provider that should wrap the whole app. Also, it must receive updates from some state management (eg. Redux) to properly re-render the whole app when the active Language changes.
In the standard React app we have App.js that we put into index.js and keep all logic/providers here.
But in the case of Next, I'm not sure where to put this logic. I double-checked their documentation but I didn't find any mention about it.
Only about _app.js and _document.js but actually both don't have a possibility to be connected to Redux, etc. Actually they weren't designed for this.
I'm just curious if Next provides some official way to do it or should I just manually create some HOC as App just and wrap the whole app by myself?
Btw. I barely understand the difference between _app and _document. So I'll appreciate any clarification as well!
Please read the documentation more carefully then, you can find Keeping state when navigating pages on the second point here.
That's what redux used for.
I'm able to connect my entire app to redux and i18n from _app.js file. In my previous project, my teammates even use _document.js file to connect i18n.
As you can see from their doc, the purpose of this _app.js is to override and control the page initialization. So, you can receive updates from redux and put the changes on IntlProvider right before rendering your page.
Other solution is like what you have said, by creating some HOC to wrap your app.
The choice is yours.
You can use next-connect-redux package.
Github page
Example repo
Related
We will be doing our first project using React.
It will not be a Single Page App, but a Multiple Page App.
What I'm trying to figure out at the moment is : what's the difference between a component and an app.
If I only use components, can I still use Redux to have some state management on the current page ? Or do I need an app for this ?
Thanks for the information you can bring !
THoma
There is no special object called "React App". React Components build an "React App" by coming together.
But React Components are formed like tree structure. That means each component have a parent component so you can create a React Component that named "App" and can put another components inside it.
You don't need redux for state management in React Components.
I hope the answers have helped.
Your app may contains a single component and still it will be a react App. If you are using multiple components in a page you can still use react-redux. Redux is basically a container for your states and let suppose you need some state from one component to be consumed in another, Redux provide you a mechanism to make the communication efficient and predictable.
You can also look at the React Context APIs as an alternate to Redux.
An app is simply a component that holds the root of the work you are trying to do. For example an App may have the navigation menu, testimonials, adverts, content, login avitar etc.
If you are making a single App per page (For example a testimonial) then you would still have a SPA. For example, adding testimonials, searching, editing.
You should only use Redux if you are using a SPA with lots of different parts with data in common. If you are making a one-app-per-page and there is no cross over in data then you can simply using Reacts State/Props to hold your data.
Redux is good, but it forces you into a complex path your should try to avoid. If you find yourself wanting data from different domains (customers address and a list of testimonials) then you should use Redux.
If this is a new applications (green) then I strongly recommend you build the whole thing within a SPA using React-Router to control components. you can use frameworks like Next.JS to ensure the site remains small in size (dynamically loading script only when required).
I want to migrate my project from plain react to react redux, I am not new to React but new to Redux.
I have a fairly big web app written in React, dozens of React.js files.
most of them containing state's + passing variables between them.
including allot of Post/Get requests functions, implemented into at least half of my files.
I want to slowly move from plain react to react redux.
I wanted to ask if anyone have some article or can give an insight about migrating existing react project to react-redux.
I dont want to stop development for the sole purpose of the change but instead to slowly adapt to it.
is it possible ? is there a tool to help me do it ?
I saw some redux examples where entire render of app.js was surrounded by <Provider> </Provider>, does that mean every component inside <Provider> bracelet can not have it's own state ?
can I simply keep my old components as they are and put new ones into <Provider> </Provider> ?
Thanks in advance!
I saw some redux examples where entire render of app.js was surrounded
by , does that mean every component inside
bracelet can not have it's own state ?
The way react-redux works is by exposing a store prop, provided by the Provider. In order to consume it, or extract data from it you must wrap your component by it (not directly necessarily, but one of the parents must be a provider). In general in most apps you would simply wrap the entire application with a Provider, because for the most part, if you've chosen to introduce redux into your application, it is probably because your entire app needs some store.
Using redux does not mean that components can't have state. There is a big difference between global state - something that should be accessible to every component in your app (if the component chooses to "consume" it), and state that is private to a component - e.g. form changes before being sent to the server.
can I simply keep my old components as they are and put new ones into ?
Well, yes. But also - no. As I said earlier, you should probably start from the top and slowly drill down. Wrap your app with a Provider, and start moving your application state from the top-most component to the store. Once you get more comfortable with redux in general, you should start replacing the props you pass down the component tree with props from the state by connecting your inner components.
This way you can do it one component at a time without breaking existing logic.
I've just setup my Redux store in React native app.
I moved to initialize React navigation for my project, i though that, as long as i'm using Redux to manage my app state, then the default option is that redux also is taking care of Navigation, and it should be hooked up to Redux, i opened React navigation docs, it says literally:
"Think twice before you consider doing this, there is an incredibly good chance that you do not need to do t his!"
So, is it a good practice to manage navigation with Redux, or just implement basic navigation the normal way (outside Redux) ?
Thanks in advance.
React Navigation manages its own state internally (using its own redux store I think...). There's no real need to connect react-navigation state to your own app's redux store since they expose API to do everything you might need to even without the navigation prop. Also it looks like they're dropping support for redux integration in the next version so beware of deprecation.
This is one of those cases where people may introduce unnecessary complexity and research into the project just to be happy about how "neat" the code runs even when it doesn't offer any real deliverable.
The plug-in documentation states:
When adding functionality to Griddle, you’ll likely need to response to actions and update the application state. This can easily be done by adding action handling functions to your reducer object.
I am writing a plug-in to replace the default Pagination with bootstrap styled Pagination. This will need access to getNext() getPrevious() and setPage() in actions. I can clearly see how to access these from inside the Griddle package as the local plug-in does.
I am unsure how I would access these functions and state from a plug-in written in my application.
What do I need to import from Griddle? What do I need to call?
Found it. In the Story Book, the custom page size settings story accesses the selectors and actions exports to give a plugin more direct access to the internals. The other stories around it do a fair job of demonstrating how to access Griddle internals from the a plugin.
Note that in addition to directly accessing the exported selectors and actions, both are available through React Context as well, e.g. in LocalPlugin.components.TableBodyContainer. Context should expose the "best" selectors/actions for the current <Griddle /> after plugins have been applied.
Some work was started in https://github.com/GriddleGriddle/Griddle/pull/743 to make selectors more composable, but the PR has gone stale.
guys. When I go through the documentation of redux-router, I just cannot understand why do we need it?
Here is what the documentation is trying to explain:
React Router is a fantastic routing library, but one downside is that
it abstracts away a very crucial piece of application state — the
current route! This abstraction is super useful for route matching and
rendering, but the API for interacting with the router to 1) trigger
transitions and 2) react to state changes within the component
lifecycle leaves something to be desired.
It turns out we already solved these problems with Flux (and Redux):
We use action creators to trigger state changes, and we use
higher-order components to subscribe to state changes.
This library allows you to keep your router state inside your Redux
store. So getting the current pathname, query, and params is as easy
as selecting any other part of your application state.
As far as I can understand, it is trying to say redux router can keep router state inside redux store so that we can get route info more conveniently.
But within react-router, I can also easily do it.
Like path="messages/:id", I can use this.props.params.id to get the params.
Can someone explain in what scenario redux-router bring its benefit?
Redux (and in general, the flux pattern) is all about having the entire application state stored in one central place. This has the benefit of easier debugging and makes it easier to implement certain features.
If you've ever used the redux-devtools in a react app with react-router, you'll notice that its only of limited use, because you can't replay the entire lifecycle of the application. When the user changes routes, that's not recorded in the redux store. Redux Router keeps the route state in the store.
You could use this for debugging, you could serialise the entire store history and log it elsewhere to replay user sessions. You could hook into it to implement full undo, or log analytics events.
redux-simple-router is a library which could help you understand how to use react router in a redux application.
It is a very simple library stores the URL in redux state and keeps it in sync with any react-router changes.
redux-simple-router compared to redux-router is:
Much smaller and simpler. You don't need to learn another library on top of everything else.
Encourages direct access of react-router APIs. Need server-side rendering, or something else advanced? Just read react-router's docs.
Only stores the current URL and state, whereas redux-router stores the entire location object from react-router.
Follow one of the these 2 examples to get up and running:
redux-simple-router-example
redux-frontend-boilerplate